PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Osborne

Publications and source records attributed to S Osborne.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are wound infections that occur after invasive (surgical) procedures. Preoperative bathing or showering with an antiseptic skin wash product is a well-accepted procedure for reducing skin bacteria (microflora). It is less clear whether reducing skin microflora leads to a lower incidence of surgical site infection. OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for preoperative bathing or showering with antiseptics for the prevention of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) surgical site infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2005) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing any antiseptic preparation used for preoperative full-body bathing or showering with non-antiseptic preparations in patients undergoing surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed studies for selection, trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials involving a total of 10,007 participants were included. Three of the included trials had three comparison groups. The antiseptic used in all trials was 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiscrub). Three trials involving 7691 participants compared chlorhexidine with a placebo. Bathing with chlorhexidine compared with a placebo did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SSIs; the relative risk of SSI (RR) was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.04). When only trials of high quality were included in this comparison, the RR of SSI was 0.95 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.10). Three trials of 1443 participants compared bar soap with chlorhexidine; when combined there was no difference in the risk of SSIs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.84). Two trials of 1092 patients compared bathing with chlorhexidine with no washing. No difference was found in the postoperative SSI rate between patients who washed with chlorhexidine and those who did not wash preoperatively (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.58). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence of no benefit for preoperative showering or bathing with chlorhexidine over other wash products, to reduce surgical site infection. Efforts to reduce the incidence of nosocomial surgical site infection should focus on interventions where effect has been demonstrated.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2006

Meta-analysis of preoperative antiseptic bathing in the prevention of surgical site infection.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative bathing with an antiseptic solution is widely used to prevent surgical site infection, but trial results are conflicting. METHODS: Trials were identified by searches of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane controlled trials register. Studies were eligible if they compared an antiseptic solution used in preoperative bathing with a non-antiseptic washing agent or with no bathing and if they reported data on surgical site infection. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 10 007 patients were included; all of them used 4 per cent chlorhexidine gluconate. Three trials with 7691 patients compared chlorhexidine with placebo. Bathing with chlorhexidine did not reduce surgical site infection rate; the relative risk (RR) was 0.91. Including only trials of high quality, the RR was 0.95. Three trials with 1443 patients compared bar soap with chlorhexidine; no differences in the surgical site infection rates were detected, and the RR was 1.02. Two trials of 1092 patients compared bathing with chlorhexidine with no washing. The surgical site wound infection rate in the two groups was similar, and the RR was 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence does not support preoperative bathing with chlorhexidine as a means of reducing surgical site wound infection.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2004

Amisulpride augmentation of clozapine: an open non-randomized study in patients with schizophrenia partially responsive to clozapine.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options are very limited for individuals with schizophrenia resistant to clozapine. We tested the hypothesis that amisulpride augmentation would lead to an improvement in these patients. METHOD: This was an open non-randomized study. Thirty-three patients with sub-optimal response to clozapine were commenced on amisulpride in addition to clozapine. Clinical status was evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months using the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Calgary Depression Scale, Calgary Anxiety Scale and various side effect rating scales. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed 6 months treatment on clozapine and amisulpride. There was a statistically significant improvement in the mean scores for PANSS, SANS and GAS at follow-up and no significant changes in side effect ratings. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of amisulpride, in a group of patients partially or non-responsive to clozapine, may lead to a substantial improvement in positive and negative symptoms, without worsening the side effect burden.

Amisulpride↗
PubMed2002

Investigation of promoter variants of the histamine 1 and 2 receptors in schizophrenia and clozapine response.

We report the identification of four novel histamine 1 (H1-17-C/T, -974-C/A, -1023-A/G and -1536-G/C) and four novel histamine 2 promoter polymorphisms (H2-294-A/G, -592-A/G, -1018-G/A and -1077-G/A) which we have investigated for involvement in susceptibility to schizophrenia, and in clinical response to clozapine treatment. We identified a weak independent association between variants at the H1-1536-G/C locus and schizophrenia, where an excess of the H1-1536-C allele was observed amongst such patients (P = 0.036). However upon correction for multiple testing this relationship was no longer statistically significant. Similar investigation of the H2 receptor polymorphisms revealed association between genotype at the H2-1018-G/A locus and clinical response to clozapine treatment (P = 0.027), though upon correction for multiple testing this difference was no longer significant. We have concluded that the participation of these variants in the disorder is unlikely, particularly in view of their apparent lack of function and unlikely influence on receptor expression. However their nature alludes to the potential presence of other more important alterations further along these regions, where sequences encoding alternate promoters have recently been identified for each receptor that may yet be found to harbour such polymorphisms.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed2002

The use of multidisciplinary assessment and scientific measurement in advanced juvenile idiopathic arthritis can categorise gait deviations to guide treatment.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to identify the range of gait deviations associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) using simple clinical observations. AIMS: To use objective gait analysis to accurately describe biomechanical gait abnormalities in JIA and to search for common patterns, which may subsequently serve as a basis for therapeutic intervention. METHODS: Children with persistent polyarticular arthritis and symmetrical joint involvement were referred to the Gait Analysis Laboratory and independently assessed by a multidisciplinary team. Gait analysis was performed using an in-house Visual Vector System and the Novel PEDAR in-shoe plantar pressure measurement system. Clinical groupings were based on the extent of joint restriction: minimal (group A), and moderate-severe (with supinatory foot deformity (group B), or with pronatory foot deformity (group C)). Gait analysis enabled classification of each subject into one of four gait patterns: either near normal (pattern I) or one of three adaptive patterns defined by the predominant abnormality--lower limb pain (pattern II), lower limb deformity (pattern III), or a combination of pain and deformity of the lower limb (pattern IV). RESULTS: Of the 15 subjects assessed as part of this study, seven were placed into clinical group A, six into group B, and two into group C. All the subjects with gait patterns I and II were found in clinical group A. Both subjects from clinical group C exhibited gait pattern III. All subjects from clinical group B and the remainder from group A exhibited a mixture of gait patterns III and IV. CONCLUSION: Despite the initial clinical observations it was not always possible to predict the resultant gait pattern. Scientific gait analysis allowed a clear distinction to be made between primary and secondary gait deviations, and accurate targeting of physiotherapy and orthotic interventions to suit each individual. Prospective quantitative analysis in a larger sample is under way to support the clinical effectiveness of these findings.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics confirm no accumulation and dose proportionality of the novel promotile drug tegaserod (HTF 919).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) and dose proportionality of the selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist tegaserod (HTF 919) in healthy subjects. METHODS: Eighteen subjects were given 2, 6, or 12-mg doses of tegaserod twice daily (b.i.d.) for 5 days, with PK and safety assessments made during the 12 h or 24 h following first administration, and 12 h after the final dose. RESULTS: Tegaserod was rapidly absorbed [time to reach measured maximum plasma concentration after multiple administrations (tmax,ss) 1 h]. Steady-state PK were consistent with single-dose PK characteristics supporting that there was no accumulation of tegaserod in plasma based on systemic exposure. Mean measured maximum plasma concentration after multiple administrations (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over one dosing interval (tau, 0-12 h after drug administration, AUC tau) were between 0.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml and 5.6 +/- 2.9 ng/ml and 2.4 +/- 1.3 h.ng/ml and 20.4 +/- 14.0 h.ng/ml, respectively, indicating dose-proportional PK of tegaserod in the range 2-12 mg b.i.d. Tegaserod was safe and well tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Tegaserod exhibits no accumulation and dose-proportional PK after multiple doses.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The pharmacokinetics of the novel promotile drug, tegaserod, are similar in healthy subjects-male and female, elderly and young.

BACKGROUND: Tegaserod (HTF 919) is a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist in development for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. AIM: This study aimed to assess the effect of age and gender on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of tegaserod. METHODS: In a parallel-group, open-label study, a single dose of tegaserod (12 mg) was administered to four groups of healthy young male, young female, elderly male and elderly female subjects (n=10 per group). Blood samples were collected from 0 to 24 h postdose. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetics evaluation and statistical analysis (ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed ranks test for tmax) were performed. RESULTS: Tegaserod was well tolerated in all groups. There was no effect of age or gender on tmax and Cmax. Gender did not affect AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tz; there was a statistically significant effect of age on these parameters. AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tz in the elderly were greater than in the young (AUC0-infinity ratio 1.37, P < 0.001; AUC0-tz ratio 1.23, P=0.029). This increase in exposure is judged not to be clinically relevant because it is within the variability in the pharmacokinetics parameters of tegaserod and because the dose-response relationship of tegaserod is relatively shallow. CONCLUSIONS: No dose adjustment for age or gender is recommended in tegaserod therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, accelerates gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin and its type-4 (5-hydroxytryptamine4) receptor play a major role in the physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. The effect of intravenous and/or oral tegaserod, a 5-hydroxytryptamine4 receptor partial agonist, on gastric emptying, small bowel transit and colonic transit has not been studied in detail in humans. AIM: To assess the pharmacodynamic effects of repeated oral and intravenous administration of tegaserod on gastric emptying and small intestine and colonic transit. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-way, crossover study of 6 mg oral and 0.6 mg intravenous tegaserod in 12 healthy male subjects was performed. Each treatment arm of the study involved 3 days of twice-daily administration and 1 day of daily administration of the study drugs. RESULTS: In comparison with placebo, oral and intravenous tegaserod significantly increased the gastric emptying rate (P < 0.01), accelerated colonic filling (P < 0.01) and shortened colonic transit at 48 h (P < 0.05). Tegaserod shortened the small intestine transit time by 30% after oral and by 37% after intravenous administration. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects, tegaserod markedly accelerated gastric emptying and small intestinal transit, and induced a small but significant acceleration of colonic transit. Tegaserod can act as a promotile agent throughout the gastrointestinal tract.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Tegaserod coadministration does not alter the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in healthy subjects.

Tegaserod (HTF 919), a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, is in development for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal motility disorders. Tegaserod has been found to inhibit cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A2, for which theophylline is a prototype substrate. This study was designed to assess the effect of tegaserod on the single-dose pharmacokinetic and safety profile of theophylline. Eighteen subjects were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study. After an overnight fast, subjects were randomized to receive one of two treatments: (1) a single dose of controlled-release formulation of theophylline (Theo-Dur, 600 mg) on day 1 or (2) a single dose of tegaserod (6 mg) on day 1, concomitant administration of tegaserod (6 mg) and theophylline (600 mg) on the morning of day 2, followed by an additional dose of tegaserod (6 mg) 12 hours later. Four to 10 days later, the subjects received the alternative treatment regimen. The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, including AUC, Cmax, and t(1/2lambda z), were similar for both treatment regimens, although the tmax of theophylline was statistically different between the treatments. Except for a decrease in partial metabolic formation clearance from theophylline to 1-methyluric acid, which is unlikely to be clinically relevant, there were no statistically significant differences in renal clearance of theophylline and partial metabolic formation clearances following the combined treatment compared with theophylline alone. The results of the current study indicate that no dose adjustment is required when drugs metabolized via CYP1A2 are coadministered with tegaserod.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

The effects of tegaserod (HTF 919) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin in healthy subjects.

Tegaserod (HTF 919) is a highly specific 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist that exhibits promotile activity throughout the gastrointestinal tract and is under development for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal motility disorders. The present study was designed to assess the effect of multiple doses of tegaserod on the single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin, a commonly prescribed agent for congestive heart failure. The study was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover design of 12 healthy subjects. One treatment included digoxin treatment alone; the other treatment included a combined digoxin and tegaserod treatment. On day 1 of the digoxin treatment period, subjects received a single 1 mg oral dose of digoxin. In the combined tegaserod/digoxin treatment period, subjects received a single oral dose of 1 mg digoxin after 3 days of tegaserod (6 mg bid). After coadministration of tegaserod, systemic exposure to digoxin was decreased; mean AUC decreased by 11.9% (p < 0.05) relative to digoxin alone. Cmax was decreased by about 15% (p < 0.05). The 0.5-hour difference in the median tmax between the two treatments was not statistically significant. Because the steady-state trough concentration of digoxin (C(SS,min)) correlates with pharmacological effects, C(SS,min) for digoxin alone and in combination with tegaserod was simulated based on both parametric compartmental modeling and nonparametric superpositioning approaches. The predicted arithmetic mean C(SS,min) for combination therapy is 86% to 89% of that following digoxin alone. Likewise, the predicted arithmetic mean steady-state peak concentration (C(SS,min)) and AUC at steady state during a dosing interval (AUC(SS,tau)) have a similar decrease. This extent of decrease in systemic exposure of digoxin at steady state is unlikely to be clinically relevant. Administration of tegaserod (6 mg bid) was well tolerated, both alone and in combination with a single dose of digoxin. There were no pharmacodynamic changes in ventricular rate and QT interval following coadministration of tegaserod with digoxin. The 1.5-hour and 2-hour postdose plasma concentrations of tegaserod on days 3 and 4 confirmed adequate exposure. In conclusion, dose adjustment for digoxin is unlikely to be needed when tegaserod is coadministered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Applications of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry: personalisation of treatment.

In spite of the lack of epidemiological information, pharmacogenetic research has produced evidence of the relationship between genes and treatment response. Genetic variants of metabolic enzymes are related to toxic reactions; polymorphisms in genes coding for drug-targeted neurotransmitter receptors influence therapeutic efficacy. Also, recent studies have shown that response to antipsychotic drugs can be predicted by looking at the individual's pharmacogenetic profile. In addition to providing the first evidence that treatment response can be predicted by looking at a core of key genes, these studies illustrate the feasibility of individualisation of psychiatric treatment.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases↗
PubMed2000

Diastereo- and enantioselective total synthesis of stigmatellin A.

Stigmatellin A (1) isolated from the myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca is a powerful inhibitor of electron transport in mitochondria and chloroplasts. The first highly diastereo- and enantioselective total synthesis of this important natural product is described. Key steps in the synthesis are the alkylation of the SAMP-hydrazone (S)-13, a titanium mediated syn-diastereoselective aldol reaction, the anti-diastereoselective triacetoxyborohydride reduction of the aldol adduct (R,R,S)-16, formation of the chromone system via Baker Venkataraman rearrangement and exclusive (E) C=C double bond formation via Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

No influence of adrenergic receptor polymorphisms on schizophrenia and antipsychotic response.

The adrenergic system plays an important role in psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia. Antagonism of the adrenergic receptor subtypes alpha1A and alpha2A has been found to have an antipsychotic effect. Genetic mutations in these receptors could be related to the alterations in the adrenergic system observed in psychiatric patients and to failure to respond to drug antagonism. We have studied one polymorphism in the alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (Arg492Cys) and two polymorphisms in the promoter region of the alpha2A-adrenergic receptor (-1291-C/G and -261-G/A) in a sample of clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients and controls. No clear differences were observed between the different groups suggesting that these polymorphisms did not play an important role in the aetiology of the disorder or in determining antipsychotic response.

Amino Acid Substitution↗
PubMed1999

Androgen receptor polymorphisms: association with prostate cancer risk, relapse and overall survival.

Several reports have suggested that one or both of the trinucleotide repeat polymorphisms in the human androgen receptor (hAR) gene, (CAG)n coding for polyglutamine and (GGC)n coding for polyglycine, may be associated with prostate cancer risk; but no study has investigated their association with disease progression. We present here a study of both hAR trinucleotide repeat polymorphisms not only as they relate to the initial diagnosis but also as they are associated with disease progression after therapy. Lymphocyte DNA samples from 178 British Caucasian prostate cancer patients and 195 control individuals were genotyped by PCR for the (CAG)n and (GGC)n polymorphisms in hAR. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that stage, grade and GGC repeat length were individually significant factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The relative risk (RR) of relapse for men with more than 16 GGC repeats was 1.74 (95% CI 1. 08-2.79) and of dying from any cause, 1.98 (1.13-3.45). Adjusting for stage and grade, GGC effects remained but were not significant (RR(DFS)= 1.60, p = 0.052; RR(OS)= 1.65, p = 0.088). The greatest effects were in stage T1-T2 (RR(DFS)= 3.56, 95% CI 1.13-11.21) and grade 1 (RR(DFS)= 6.47, 95% CI 0.57-72.8) tumours. No differences between patient and control allele distributions were found by odds-ratio analysis, nor were trends with stage or grade evident in the proportion of short CAG alleles. Non-significant trends with stage and grade were found in the proportion of short GGC alleles. The (GGC)n polymorphism in this population is a significant predictor of disease outcome. Since the (GGC)(n) effect is strongest in early-stage tumours, this marker may help forecast aggressive behaviour and could be used to identify those patients meriting more radical treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Predictivity of an in vitro model for acute and chronic skin irritation (SkinEthic) applied to the testing of topical vehicles.

An in vitro human reconstructed epidermis model (SkinEthic) used for screening acute and chronic skin irritation potential was validated against in vivo data from skin tolerability studies. The irritation potential of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), calcipotriol and trans-retinoic acid was investigated. The in vitro epidermis-like model consists of cultures of keratinocytes from human foreskin on a polycarbonate filter. The modulation of cell viability, the release and gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines, interleukins 1alpha and 8, and morphological changes were evaluated during 3 days as endpoints representative for an inflammatory reaction. The cumulative irritation potential of the topical products was evaluated in a human clinical study by visual scoring and biophysical measurement of inflammatory skin reaction after repeated 24 h applications over 3 weeks under Finn chamber patches. All topical products that were nonirritating in the human study were noncytotoxic and did not induce cytokine expression in the in vitro acute model (day 1 exposure). All irritating controls exhibited specific cell viability and cytokine patterns, which were predictive of the in vivo human data. The ranking of mild to moderate skin irritation potential was based on the lack of cytotoxicity and the presence of cytokine patterns including gene expression specific for each irritant, using the chronic in vitro model (up to 3 days exposure). The human reconstructed epidermis model SkinEthic was shown to be a reliable preclinical tool predicting the irritation potential of topical products. Moreover, it is a useful model in a two-step tiered strategy for screening acute and chronic irritation potential for the selection of vehicles for new topical drugs.

Adult↗