Biomedical subjects

S Pampallona

Publications and source records attributed to S Pampallona.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1984

Dietary vitamin A and the risk of invasive cervical cancer.

The relation between dietary vitamin A and the risk of invasive cervical cancer was evaluated using data from a hospital-based case-control study of 191 women with cervical cancer and 191 age-matched controls. There was no association between dietary retinoids and cervical cancer risk. Intake of dietary beta-carotene, on the other hand, was inversely and strongly related to the risk of cervical cancer. Compared to risks for women reporting a monthly intake of 150,000 or more international units (IU) of beta-carotene, the estimated relative risks for those with 100,000 to 149,000 and those with less than 100,000 IU per month were 2.8 and 6.1 respectively. The inverse association was not explained by any of the major identified risk factors for cervical cancer (including indicators of socio-economic status or sexual habits), or by differences in general characteristics and other lifestyle habits between cases and controls. Thus, although the uncertainties of the vitamin A measurements used are substantial, these findings support the hypothesis that dietary beta-carotene-or some related aspect of a vegetable-rich diet-is protective against invasive cervical cancer.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

Age of parents and risk of gestational trophoblastic disease.

The relationship of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) to parental age was evaluated in a case-control study of 132 women with hydatidiform mole (108) or choriocarcinoma (24) and 304 control subjects hospitalized for normal deliveries. Cases and controls were recruited in Lombardy (Northern Italy), and all were white and Italian. Compared to the risk of developing trophoblastic tumors in women 21-35 years old, the risk of developing trophoblastic tumors was elevated both in younger [less than or equal to 20 yr old, relative risk (RR) = 1.4, with 95% confidence interval (Cl) of 0.7-2.8] and in older subjects, RR being 1.2 (95% Cl 0.7-2.8) and 5.2 (95% Cl 2.2-12.3) for women 36-40 years old and over 40, respectively. The risk estimates for the last two categories were reduced to 0.7 (with 95% Cl of 0.3-1.9) and 2.5 (with 95% Cl of 0.7-8.9) when adjustment was made for paternal age by means of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Higher paternal age also was associated with GTD: Women whose husbands were 41-45 years old and over 45 had RR of 1.6 (with 95% Cl = 0.7-3.7) and 4.9 (with 95% Cl = 2.2-11.1), respectively, compared to women married to men less than 40 years old. These risk estimates were practically unchanged when adjustment was made for the woman's age. Examination of the effects of parental and maternal ages suggests that the highest risk estimate was observed when both parents were older. The findings of the present study were consistent with increased risk in the youngest maternal age group and confirm that older maternal age is associated with increased risk of GTD. Furthermore, showing a strong, independent effect of paternal age, they give epidemiologic support to the cytogenetic evidence of an androgenetic role in the origin of GTD.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer.

Prognosis of patients after colorectal cancer resection is predominantly influenced by the extent of local tumour growth and the presence or absence of nodal or distant metastasis. However, many factors have been used to generate numerous classification systems, leading to some debate and confusion. The effects on survival of 7 clinical and pathological parameters were reviewed in 801 consecutive patients operated upon with locally curative intent for colorectal cancer over a ten-year period. Age less than 50 or more than 70 years, poor cellular differentiation, high mucous secretion by tumour cells and Dukes' staging were the parameters significantly correlated to poor overall survival (p<0.001 for each). The Cox's regression analysis identified the same parameters as independent prognostic factors. The value of age as a prognostic factor remains debatable, but the other three parameters must be considered when evaluating prognosis after curative surgery for colorectal cancer and when considering adjuvant therapy.

Adult↗