PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S R Zheng

Publications and source records attributed to S R Zheng.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant.

To compare the contraceptive efficacy, tolerability, and bleeding patterns, 200 healthy female volunteers received, in an open, comparative, randomized, multicenter study in China, either a single-rod (Implanon) or a six-capsule (Norplant) contraceptive implant for 2 years with an optional extension of up to 4 years. Women were exposed to Implanon for 341.6 woman-years and Norplant for 329.1 woman-years. There were no pregnancies during the study. Per 90-day reference period, the median number of bleeding/spotting days with Implanon decreased from 33.5 in the first period to 19.0-21.5 days in the last year. Similarly, with Norplant, the median number of bleeding/spotting days decreased from 34.5 to 18.0-23.0 days, respectively. The number of bleeding/spotting episodes during year 1 was 2.0 per 90-day reference period with Implanon and 3.0 per period with Norplant (p < 0.05 for periods 1-4). For the remaining 90-day periods, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. In general, there was less frequent bleeding with Implanon compared with Norplant, whereas the incidences of amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding were higher with Implanon than with Norplant. The mean overall incidence of prolonged bleeding fell markedly during the study, from 66.0% in reference period 1 to 27.3% in period 16 with Implanon and from 69.0% to 21.7% with Norplant, respectively. The most common adverse events were related to disturbed bleeding patterns, which were also the major reasons for discontinuation (Implanon n = 8; Norplant n = 14). Normal menses returned in almost all subjects within 3 months after removal of the implants. Implanon was inserted in a mean time of 0.61 min and Norplant in 3.90 min (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean time required to remove the implant was significantly shorter for Implanon than for Norplant (2.18 min vs 11.25 min, p < 0.001). The maximum time required for removal of the implant was 10 min for the Implanon group and 60 min for the Norplant group. In both groups, blood pressure and hemoglobin were not affected, whereas body weight tended to increase. It can be concluded that both contraceptive systems demonstrated excellent contraceptive efficacy and were well tolerated. Compared with Norplant, there was less frequent bleeding with Implanon, whereas the incidence of infrequent bleeding and amenorrhea was higher. Implanon was significantly quicker to insert and to remove than was the multiple capsule system.

Adult↗

A long-term study of the efficacy and acceptability of a single-rod hormonal contraceptive implant (Implanon) in healthy women in China.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and acceptability of Implanon, a new single-rod, progestogen-only contraceptive implant. METHODS: In a non-comparative, open, multicenter study, a contraceptive implant containing the progestogen etonogestrel was inserted into 200 healthy women. The study duration was 2 years, with an optional extension up to 4 years. RESULTS: Women were exposed to Implanon for 644.6 woman-years. There were no pregnancies during the study. Per 90-day reference period, the median number of bleeding-spotting days ranged between 18 and 21 and the median number of bleeding-spotting episodes was two. The mean overall incidence of prolonged bleeding fell markedly during the study, from 69% in the first reference period to 26% in the 16th period. The most common adverse events were related to disturbed bleeding pattern and amenorrhea. Heavy or prolonged bleeding caused 18 subjects to withdraw from the study. Only a few subjects discontinued the study early due to irregular bleeding (2%) or amenorrhea (2%). A slight increase in mean body weight was observed. The implant was removed in an average time of 2.9 min. CONCLUSIONS: Implanon demonstrated excellent contraceptive efficacy for 4 years of use and was well tolerated. The incidences of prolonged bleeding and amenorrhea both fell markedly with continued implant use. Because of its single-rod design, Implanon was quickly removed with few complications and proved to be a highly acceptable method of contraception.

Adult↗

RU 486 (mifepristone): clinical trials in China.

Four multicentre clinical trials on interruption of early pregnancy (less than or equal to 49 days of amenorrhea) using RU 486 have been conducted in China, including 2321 subjects. The data from trials 1, 2 and 4 are presented here. RU 486 (600 mg as a single dose) was given to 299 women. A further 422 women were given RU 486 (600 mg) plus a vaginal suppository containing the Chinese domestic prostaglandin PGO5 (1 mg) 36-60 hours later. Complete abortion was achieved in 63.5% of patients receiving RU 486 alone and in 94.1% of patients receiving RU 486 plus PG (p less than 0.001). RU 486 given alone showed decreasing efficacy as the duration of amenorrhea increased. However, RU 486 combined with PG was equally effective at all time points studied (less than or equal to 35 days of amenorrhea: 98.1%, 36-42 days: 92%, 42-49 days: 87.4%). When compared with RU 486 alone Ru 486 + PG also produced a shorter bleeding time and a lower volume of blood loss (n = 21, 52 ml vs n = 13, 117 ml). Two patients from the RU 486+PG group and 4 given RU 486 alone suffered heavy bleeding, necessitating emergency curettage. No transfusions were required. The time elapsed between RU 486 intake and expulsion of the conceptus was significantly shorter in the RU 486+PG group (n = 97, 31 days) than that in the RU 486 alone group (n = 95, 4.4 4.4 days). Main side effects, nausea/vomiting and headache/dizziness, were mainly due to RU 486. PG increased the incidence of diarrhea and uterine cramp.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abortion, Induced↗

Pregnancy interruption with RU 486 in combination with dl-15-methyl-prostaglandin-F2 alpha-methyl ester: the Chinese experience.

In a multicenter study taking place in four centers in Beijing (People's Republic of China), pregnancies up to 49 days of amenorrhea (DA) were interrupted with RU 486 (RU 38486, mifepristone, 600 mg orally once), followed 36-60 hours later by administration of dl-15-methyl-PGF 2 alpha-methyl ester (PG05, 1 mg vaginal suppository). One-hundred-and-sixty women were included in the study, three of whom being excluded from efficacy assessment because of non-compliance to the protocol. Complete pregnancy interruption without additional surgical procedure (success) was obtained in 136 women (86.6%, 95% confidence interval: 81.3-91.9%). The success rate was significantly (P = 0.013) higher for pregnancies below (91.3%), than for pregnancies above 42 days of amenorrhea (DA) (76.6%). The time elapsed between RU 486 intake and complete expulsion was 2.8 +/- 1.5 (sd) days (range: 1-12 days). Expulsion took place at the latest 4 days after RU 486 in 125 women (94.7%), and in 107 of these women, it occurred 3.1 +/- 1.7 (sd) hours after PG05 administration. Uterine bleeding occurred in all women after RU 486 intake whatever the outcome of treatment and lasted 11.5 +/- 4.8 (sd) days (range: 3-36 days). It was judged more or much more abundant than usual periods in 6.15% of the women. It led to a slight but significant decrease in hemoglobin as measured eight and 14 days after RU 486 intake. In five women, hemoglobin decreased by 4 g/dl or more, but no patient required a blood transfusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗