Third-party payers and breast cancer study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Rodenhuis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Docetaxel is one of the most active drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer. However, its major side-effect, myelosuppression, hampers full-dose combination chemotherapy. We have, therefore, developed an alternating schedule of docetaxel with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, together with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, to ameliorate neutropenia. We studied the feasibility of such a strategy, decreasing the treatment interval from 21 days to 14 days, thus further increasing the dose intensity. As expected, myelosuppression was common, complicated by neutropenic fever, which did not exceed preset criteria. Other side-effects were also as expected: alopecia, malaise, nausea and vomiting. After two alternating courses of chemotherapy, a partial response was documented in 15 of 17 patients. We conclude that this alternating schedule is very active against breast cancer and warrants further phase II studies.
BACKGROUND: Recently the feasibility of combining carboplatin with paclitaxel has been demonstrated in dose-finding studies. Maximum tolerated doses were 550 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 (three hours), respectively. We report now a phase II study in ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one chemo-naïve patients with optimally (n = 6) or suboptimally (n = 15) debulked stage III or IV ovarian cancer were treated every three weeks for six courses with paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) as a three-hour infusion, immediately followed by carboplatin (550 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion. RESULTS: Uncomplicated neutropenia was the principal toxicity, with mild anemia occurring regularly. As observed in the preceding phase I study, a relative lack of thrombocytopenia, generally grade III was found. Other toxicities consisted of mild neurotoxicity, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, myalgia, and bone pain. All suboptimally debulked patients responded to therapy. Overall, 12 patients underwent second-look laparoscopy, which revealed a pathologically confirmed complete remission in six. The median follow-up interval at the time of analysis was 14 months. Twelve patients are currently free of progression, at 8+ to 19 +/- months after the start of therapy. CONCLUSION: The carboplatin/paclitaxel combination appears to be a well-tolerated regimen, yielding high response rates. This combination has now gone forward to be evaluated in prospective randomized trials versus the cisplatin/paclitaxel combination.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A method based on the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was developed that allows the determination of relative mRNA expression levels in fine-needle aspirates from human tumors. The method was developed for the c-erbB-2 gene, using the porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) gene as an internal standard. It was validated for mRNA isolated from cell lines and for material obtained by fine-needle aspiration from human breast cancer. Gene expression levels were determined by measuring the activity of radiolabeled RT-PCR-amplified gene-specific bands with a phosphor imager. At least four points are measured on the log-linear part of the amplification cycle versus signal intensity curves, and subsequently the distance between the curves of the gene of interest and that of an internal standard gene is used to calculate the relative expression levels. The method worked equally well with the BRCA1 gene, illustrating that it can be generalized to other genes. The method is suitable to measure or monitor semiquantitively gene expression levels in accessible human tumors in situ.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the clinical course and the response to chemotherapy of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung depends on the presence or absence of a ras mutation in the tumor. Mutational activation of K-ras is a strong adverse prognostic factor in stage I or II lung cancer and laboratory studies have suggested that ras mutations lead to resistance against ionizing radiation and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung with measurable or assessable disease received chemotherapy with mesna, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (MICE). Archival biopsies, fresh biopsies, or fine-needle aspirations were tested for the presence of ras gene mutations. Associations of ras mutations with clinical characteristics, response to chemotherapy, and survival were studied. RESULTS: The presence or absence of ras gene mutations could be established in 69 of 83 patients (83%). A total of 261 courses of MICE were administered to 62 informative patients, 16 of whom were shown to have a K-ras mutation-positive tumor. The frequency of mutations (26%) and the type of mutations closely matched the pattern we have previously reported in operable disease. Patients with a ras mutation in their tumor were more likely to have a close relative with lung cancer, but other clinical characteristics, such as pattern of metastases, response, and survival, were similar between the ras mutation-positive and ras mutation-negative groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbor a ras mutation may have major responses to chemotherapy and have similar progression-free and overall survival as patients with ras mutation-negative tumors. K-ras mutations may represent one of several ways in which early tumors are enabled to metastasize to distant sites.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 4 weeks and to gain more insight into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this combination in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy-naive patients with suboptimally debulked stage III (tumor masses > 3 cm) and stage IV ovarian cancer were entered onto this phase I trial in which paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion at dosages of 125 to 225 mg/m2 immediately followed by carboplatin over 30 minutes at dosages of 300 to 600 mg/m2. A total of six courses was planned, followed by a second-look laparoscopy/laparotomy. Patients with a response and/or minimal residual disease at second-look laparoscopy received three additional courses. Twenty-six patients participated in the pharmacokinetic part of the study. RESULTS: The most important hematologic toxicity encountered was neutropenia. Neutropenia was more pronounced for the higher dose levels (DLs) and was cumulative. Thrombocytopenia was mild in the first eight DLs, but increased during the treatment courses. Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of vomiting, neuropathy, fatigue, rash, pruritus, myalgia, and arthralgia. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in this trial were neutropenic fever, thrombocytopenia that required platelet transfusions, and cumulative neuropathy. Of 33 patients assessable for response, 26 major responders (78%, 20 complete response [CR] and six partial response [PR]) were documented. The maximal concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were not different from the historical data for paclitaxel as a single agent. Retrospective analysis using a modified Calvert formula showed that the measured carboplatin AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) were 30% +/- 3.4% less than the calculated carboplatin AUC. Neutropenia was more pronounced than could be expected on the basis of the historical times above a threshold concentration greater than 0.1 mumol/L (T > or = 0.1 mumol/L) or 0.05 mumol/L (T > or = 0.05 mumol/L), and thrombocytopenia was less than could be expected from historical sigmoidal Emax models. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2 and carboplatin 550 mg/m2 every 4 weeks is a well-tolerated treatment modality. The paclitaxel-carboplatin combination is highly active in stage III (bulky) and stage IV ovarian cancer. No indications for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between carboplatin and paclitaxel were found.
Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) combined with cisplatin seems the new standard of care for ovarian cancer patients. Since carboplatin lacks the neurotoxicity of cisplatin with an equal antitumor activity against ovarian cancer, it was chosen as the next logical step for combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel. In 46 patients an alternating dose-escalation trial has been performed. The maximum tolerated doses are carboplatin 500 mg (area under the concentration-time curve of 9) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity is thrombocytopenia, which emerges in the later stages of the treatment. A true platelet-sparing effect of the combination seems highly probable. The antitumor activity of the combination equals that reported for the new standard paclitaxel/cisplatin treatment. Further phase III studies are warranted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Carboplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent frequently used in the treatment of various malignancies. An individual dosing strategy has been recommended to yield the most optimal exposure, expressed as the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The formula developed by Calvert et al. (dose = target-AUC x [GFR + 25]) can be used to achieve this. However, due to the inconvenient [51Cr]-ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid ([51Cr]-EDTA)-based measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), its application in the clinic has thus far been limited. Chatelut and co-workers have recently proposed a formula to estimate carboplatin clearance using the serum creatinine concentration. We retrospectively tested the Chatelut equation and the Calvert formula using either the creatinine clearance based on 24-h urine collection or the creatinine clearance based on the formula of Cockcroft and Gault. The latter equations were shown to predict the carboplatin clearance reasonably well, although systematic overprediction and underprediction occurred. However, the formula proposed by Chatelut and co-workers had no significant bias and was precise. It is proposed that this formula be used to calculate the optimal carboplatin dosage after prospective validation has been performed.
BACKGROUND: This trial studied the disease-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy in patients in complete remission of metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women, mean age 42.2 years (range 33-55) with metastatic breast cancer, received high-dose chemotherapy in a phase II study. Patients were eligible if they were < or = 55 years of age, had achieved complete remission within 6 months of the initiation of chemotherapy, and had a WHO performance scale of 0 or 1. The high-dose regimen consisted of melphalan 180 mg/m2 and mitoxantrone 60 mg/m2 both divided over 3 days. On day 7 bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cells were infused. After bone marrow recovery, external beam radiation was administered to sites of previous metastatic disease in 15 patients. RESULTS: Apart from leuko- and thrombocytopenia, mucositis was the major side effect. One patient died during the bone marrow transplant period due to an aspergillus infection. The median follow-up since high-dose chemotherapy is 25 months (range 13 to 56 months). The median disease-free survival since high-dose chemotherapy is 27 months and the disease free survival is still 43% with an overall survival of 53% at 3 years. In two patients tumor relapse occurred only in the brain; in one patient the only relapse sign was a meningeal carcinosis. At the moment 17 patients are disease-free (13(+)-56+) months after high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Until now this high-dose regimen in selected patients with complete remission after induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer has a promising disease free survival.
Topotecan is a novel semisynthetic derivative of the anticancer agent camptothecin and inhibits the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. The lactone structure of topotecan, which is in equilibrium with the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acid, is essential for this activity. We performed a pharmacokinetics study as part of phase II clinical trials in patients with various types of solid tumors, giving topotecan at 1.5 mg/m2 per day by 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days, with courses being repeated every 3 weeks. Previously validated limited-sampling models, using concentration measurements in samples obtained 2 h after infusion, were used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) for both chemical forms. Samples were obtained from a total of 36 patients over 136 treatment days. The mean AUC of the closed-ring form (AUC(closed)) was 8.74 (range 2.3-16.3 microM min per day, and the mean AUC of the ring-opened form (AUC(open)) was 11.5 (range 3.2-46.0) microM min per day (interpatient variability 34-61%). In each patient the AUC values achieved on the 1st day of administration were similar to and, thus, predictive for those achieved during the following days, with a day-to-day variation of 7.39% being recorded for the AUC(closed) and that of 12.6% for the AUC(open). There was no drug accumulation during the 5 consecutive treatment days of each cycle. However, despite the large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, the importance of regular drug monitoring on this schedule can be questioned, as the pharmacodynamic variability was relatively small.
We investigated the pharmacokinetics of etoposide given to a patient suffering from multifocal liver metastases from an unknown primary tumor. The drug was given either by i.v. infusion or by hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters (mean values +/- SD) were similar after i.v. infusion and HAI, viz., 6.4 +/- 0.7 versus 6.5 +/- 0.2 h for the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta), 98.5 +/- 1.3 versus 101.3 +/- 5.9 mg l(-1) h for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), 21.2 +/- 0.3 versus 20.6 +/- 1.2 ml min-1 m-2 for clearance (Cl), 17.7 +/- 1.9 versus 18.1 +/- 2.6 mg/l for the peak concentration, and 11.7 +/- 1.3 versus 11.6 +/- 1.01/m2 for the volume of distribution (Vd), respectively. We therefore conclude that administration of etoposide by HAI does not result in a significantly higher liver extraction. Hepatic extraction of etoposide is determined by the fraction of non-protein-bound (free) drug present. The lack of a difference between the two administration routes suggests that under in vivo conditions the equilibrium between free and bound drug is established before the drug reaches the hepatic arterioles. Consequently, administration by HAI does not lead to an increased exposure of the tumor in the liver to free (active) etoposide. Furthermore, the overall exposure of the liver to total (bound + free) etoposide is increased only from about 100 to 120 mg l-1 h. These results do not favor the use of this more complex route of drug administration in the treatment of (metastatic) cancer located in the liver.
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow and/or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support is increasingly employed in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer. Subsequent radiotherapy has been reported to be associated with morbidity and mortality resulting from pulmonary toxicity. In addition, the course of radiation therapy may be hampered by excess myelosuppression. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution to radiation-induced toxicity of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen (CTC) that incorporates cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin, in patients with high-risk breast cancer. In two randomised single institution studies, 70 consecutive patients received anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (FEC: 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by radiotherapy to achieve maximal local control. Of these patients, 34 received high-dose CTC with autologous PBSC support. All patients tolerated the full radiation dose in the planned time schedule. Radiation pneumonitis was observed in 5 patients (7%), 4 of whom had undergone high-dose chemotherapy (P = 0.38). All 5 responded favourably to prednisone. Fatal toxicities were not observed. Myelosuppression did not require interruption or untimely discontinuation of the radiotherapy, although significant reductions in median nadir platelet counts and haemoglobin levels were observed in patients who had received high-dose chemotherapy (P = 0.0001). The median nadir of WBC counts was mildly but significantly decreased during radiotherapy (P = 0.01). Red blood cell or platelet transfusions were rarely indicated. Adequate radiotherapy for breast cancer can be safely administered after high-dose CTC with autologous PBSC support. Radiation-induced myelotoxicity is clearly enhanced following CTC, but this is of little clinical significance. Radiation pneumonitis after high-dose therapy may occur more often in patients with a history of lung disease or after a relatively high radiation dose to the chest wall. Other high-dose regimens, particularly those incorporating drugs with known pulmonary toxicity (such as BCNU), may predispose patients to radiation pneumonitis.
The aim of this pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study was to define the relationships of the carboplatin exposure with the toxicity in patients treated with high dose carboplatin (400 mg m-2 day-1), cyclophosphamide (1500 mg m-2 day-1) and thiotepa (120 mg m-2 day-1) for four consecutive days, followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation. Exposure to carboplatin was studied in 200 treatment days by measuring the area under the carboplatin plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) concentration vs time curve (AUC). The AUC was obtained by using a previously validated limited sampling model. A total of 31 patients was studied who received one, two or three courses of this high-dose chemotherapy regimen. The unbound, plasma ultrafiltrate carboplatin was almost completely cleared from the body before each next treatment day in a course; the day-to-day AUC variation was 3.3%. The mean cumulative AUC over 4 days was 19.6 (range 14.1-27.2) mg ml-1 min-1. In 97 treatment days the carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). For these courses, the inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics was significantly reduced from 21% to 15% (P = 0.007) in comparison with the schemes where it was given as a fixed dose of 400 mg m-2. There were no relationships found between toxicity and the AUC of carboplatin, which may be due to the influence of overlapping toxicities of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. However, the ototoxicity was strongly related to the cumulative carboplatin AUC. This toxicity was dose limiting for carboplatin in this schedule. It appeared that the carboplatin pharmacokinetics in these regimens were similar to those reported at conventional dosages. To reduce the inter-patient variation, the carboplatin dose can be calculated using the Calvert-formula with the creatinine clearance as the measure for the GFR.
The prognosis of patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma with tumour spread to the apical axillary lymph nodes has hardly improved despite adequate locoregional control and the introduction of systemic adjuvant therapy. A combined modality regimen that includes anthracyclin-based chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support and radiation and hormonal therapy is currently under investigation in this subset of patients. The present study aims to document the efficacy and feasibility of dose-intensive epidoxorubicin in combination with a standard dose of 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide as up-front chemotherapy in this setting. A preoperative chemotherapy regimen consisting of three courses of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m-2, epidoxorubicin 120 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 (FE120C) was administered at 21 day intervals without haematopoietic growth factors to 70 patients with apex node-positive disease. All patients were below 60 years of age and had not had prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Sixty-six patients were evaluable for clinical response and histopathological examination could be performed in 62 of these. Thirteen patients achieved a clinical complete response (20%). Of these patients, microscopic examination of the mastectomy specimen revealed absence of malignant cells in two and exclusively ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in another two patients. In addition, of the 46 patients (70%) with a clinical partial response, at pathological examination one patient had sclerosis only and four had DCIS. This results in a pathological complete response in three (5%) of all patients and absence of invasive carcinoma in 10%. None of the patients progressed during chemotherapy. The major toxicity was moderate bone marrow suppression with a median white blood count (WBC) nadir of 1800 microliters-1 (range 500-4900). Other toxicities were mild. The full planned dose could be given without delays in 66 of 70 patients FE120C is well tolerated and is highly effective as up-front chemotherapy in relatively young patients with high-risk breast cancer, with a 90% (CI 74-98%) clinical objective response rate.