PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Ruchholtz

Publications and source records attributed to S Ruchholtz.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

[The Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as a basis for interclinical quality management. A multicenter study of the German Society of Trauma Surgery].

Based on the "Trauma Registry" of the German Society of Trauma Surgery, an interclinical quality management (QM) system was implemented. The principles of the QM system as well as the differences in the quality of outcome and treatment are presented. The analysis uses the data on 2,069 severely injured (ISS = 22 +/- 14) patients from 20 hospitals collected prospectively and anonymously between 2/93 and 12/97. Outcome quality was analyzed by the TRISS method and Z-statistics. The Z-value of the whole series was -0.24. There were three hospitals with more than 150 patients that had a Ps value calculated by the TRISS method. Clinic A had a good (-2.49), clinic B an average (-0.3) and clinic C (3.62) an adverse Z-value. The assessment of treatment quality was performed by criteria concerning both preclinical and acute clinical phases. Clinic C had a prolonged preclinical treatment time (90 min vs 62 min in clinic A) for severely injured (ISS > 15) patients. At the same time, the preclinical intubation rate for severe thoracic trauma (AIS > 3) was lower (44 %) in clinic C than in A (62 %). With 14 min clinic A had the shortest time until basic radiological and ultrasound diagnostics were completed (X-rays of chest and pelvis and abdominal ultrasound) in cases of severe blunt trauma (ISS > 15), compared to 54 min in clinic B or 31 min in clinic C. Also, cranial computed tomography for severe traumatic brain injury (GCS < 9) was applied significantly faster in clinic A (after 36 min) than in clinic C (after 62 min). Delayed diagnoses were defined as the difference between the ISS at discharge and the ISS at completion of diagnostics in the emergency department; this criterion was met best by clinic A with an ISS difference of two patients compared to five in clinic B and four in clinic C. The hospitals participating in the Trauma Registry receive an annual analysis of their preclinical and acute clinical performance. Thus, every hospital can analyze and improve the quality of treatment based on reliable data that show which parts of the process have to be optimized. Furthermore, the data allow a comparison of the average and optimal results of the whole series.

Efficiency, Organizational↗
PubMed1999

[Quality management of early clinical treatment of severely injured patients].

The early clinical treatment of severely injured patients of today is based on modern technical resources as well as on refined therapeutic strategies involving a multidisciplinary team. In the meantime the requirements for and expectations towards best major trauma care have both increased considerably. In spite of a decline in mortality after major trauma during the last two decades still clinical deviations from actual treatment guidelines with proven influence on negative outcome are to be found. In order to improve the therapeutic process it proved effective to introduce the main principles of quality assurance (QA) and quality management (QM) that were used successfully in industry into major trauma treatment. In QA an analysis of 'process', 'structure' and 'outcome' of the clinical treatment is performed. For these components of QA important tools such as treatment-guidelines (polytrauma-algorithms), guidelines by the German Society of Trauma Surgery for the equipment of a trauma center and score systems for the classification of injury severity were elaborated and implemented in major trauma care. Further optimization of outcome quality may be achieved by integrating the QA- components in a QM-system. QM means introducing relevant feed-back-pathways of procedural data for the improvement of the (treatment-) process and of outcome data for decisions about structural (and organizational) changements. The presented clinical QM-system is based on adequate documentation, analysis and assessment of treatment data within a quality committee. The treatment of severely injured patients was significantly improved by implementation of the QM-system in clinical routine with respect to the effectivity of the treatment process. Furthermore, by transferring the QM-system to another trauma center, we were able to show that the effects of the system in major trauma care are reproducible. Besides the internal efforts for quality optimization an external quality assessment comparing the own treatment results with other trauma centers should take place. For this purpose joining a multicentered trauma registry (i.e. the trauma registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery for the German speaking countries) is recommended.

Germany↗
PubMed1999

Long-term results and quality of life after parasuicidal multiple blunt trauma.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the somatic, socioeconomic, and psychiatric long-term results, as well as the factors for adverse outcome, in a significant subset of patients with severe multiple injuries resulting from attempted suicide. DESIGN: The follow-up study 6.1 +/- 3 (SD) yrs after trauma was based on prospectively documented data of patients with multiple injuries. SETTING: Level I university trauma center in a major German city. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data derived from thorough physical and psychiatric evaluations. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale served to describe psychiatric outcome. PATIENTS: In a series of 539 severely injured patients (Abbreviated Injury Score in two regions > or = 3), 65 (12%) attempted suicides were reported (Injury Severity Score, 40 +/- 15; age, 38 +/- 18 yrs). Twenty-one patients of the study cohort died during the hospital stay, and six subjects died thereafter, none because of suicide. Three patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 35 individuals eligible for examination. None of the latter had reattempted suicide. Seventeen (48%) had good or satisfactory outcomes reflected by absent or ambulatory psychiatric treatment, employment, normal psychiatric findings (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), and good psychosocial ability (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale). For eight patients (24%), the result was indeterminate. The adverse outcomes in ten patients (28%) were mainly influenced by the presence of chronic schizophrenia (n = 4), affective disorder (n = 2), or severe traumatic brain injury (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the parasuicidal origin, the long-term results after severe trauma were good or satisfactory in approximately half the cases and without further suicide attempts in any of the patients. Good recovery of the parasuicidal patients in our study is approximately 20% lower than in an unselected group of patients with multiple injuries and may be attributed mainly to the underlying chronic psychiatric disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Abdominal trauma].

While a great part of the Anglo-American medical literature addresses the topic of penetrating trauma the German speaking countries rather publish on blunt abdominal injury. The presented paper discusses the strategic principles of acute clinical management of abdominal trauma on the combined basis of own research results and a comprehensive review of the literature. Blunt abdominal injuries in most cases from a part in the pattern of multiple trauma. The early, first-hours mortality is most often caused by severe traumatic brain injury or abdominal trauma with massive hemorrhage. The prehospital management of penetrating injuries is characterized rather by the concept of 'load and go', whereas the onscene stabilization of the patient with blunt abdominal injury should precede transport to the adequate hospital. On arrival in the accident and emergency room an immediate blood transfusion is recommended for hemodynamically unstable patients. If then a stabilization is not achieved, an emergency laparotomy should follow. Abdominal stab injuries should be explored by laparoscopy if an intraperitoneal lesion is suspected. If then the possibility of an intestinal lesion is present a laparotomy should be performed directly thereafter. Firearm injuries require open revision in almost all cases. The standard diagnostic technique in blunt abdominal trauma is sonography, assisted by computed tomography and, if indicated, angiography in hemodynamically stable patients. Isolated abdominal injuries without hemodynamic or coagulation disorders allow conservative treatment in the intensive care setting. In severe multiple trauma as well as in manifest shock even the smallest fluid detection should lead to laparotomy. The surgical treatment of splenic rupture is still a matter of discussion. Splenectomy is indicated in patients with severe concomitating injuries or shock whereas in the remainder of cases the total or partial preservation of the spleen should be pursued. Hepatic injuries offer a broad spectrum of operative interventions, ranging from superficial hemostatic measures over compression techniques like 'packing' and 'mesh-wrapping' to atypical and anatomical resections and to liver transplantation in exceptional cases. Lesions of tubular organs and the pancreas pose especially difficult diagnostical problems but regularly allow a rather easy operative treatment.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1998

[Effect of kinetic therapy on the treatment outcome in patients with post-traumatic lung failure].

Intermittent prone positioning (PP) is a promising therapy of patients with severe respiratory failure. Evaluations of patient outcomes can not, to dare, be found in the literature. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of intermittent PP on patients with posttraumatic respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 < 280 mmHg) in comparison with conventional therapy in suspine position. The collected data is part of our prospective polytrauma study. 136 polytraumized patients (mean ISS 23.4) were included and evaluated. 77 patients had a severe chest trauma with an AIS > or = 3. Of these, 47 patients developed a respiratory failure. 19 of these patients were treated conventionally in suspine position, 28 patients were intermittently turned prone. Having similar AIS (3.6 vs. 33), the PP-patients had a significantly severer trauma (ISS 35.8 vs. 24.5). Though the injury severity of the PP-patients was much higher, the time of ventilation (32 vs. 31 d) and the ICU stay (39 vs. 36 d) was similar to the patients treated in suspine position. The mortility of PP-patients was 0%, of suspine positioned patients 26%. After the first PP the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased with an average of 82 mmHg (26-151 mmHg). The FiO2 was reduced from 0.45 (0.35-1.0) to 0.26 (0.21-0.35). Beside the beneficial effect of PP on the oxygenation we have, for the first time evidence that PP improves the outcome of patients with posttraumatic respiratory failure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Improvement in the therapy of multiply injured patients by introduction of clinical management guidelines.

A trauma algorithm representing the guidelines for the management of emergency treatment of severe blunt trauma was implemented at our institution in 1994. By comparison of two prospectively recorded cohorts of multiply injured patients, the clinical efficacy of these guidelines was analysed. The algorithm cohort comprised 74 patients over the period January 1994 to June 1996, and the Control cohort 126 patients over the period April 1988 to December 1993. To evaluate procedural quality of early clinical trauma management, nine criteria were applied. After implementation of the algorithm there was an improvement in all parameters reflected by a significant reduction of missed injuries and important time savings. Mortality rates in the cohorts were calculated after subdivision into three groups (I-III) with moderate (ISS: 18-24), high (ISS: 25-49) and very high (ISS: 50-75) injury severity. All cohort subgroups were comparable with respect to ISS values, age, initial loss of consciousness (GCS) and shock rate. In all subgroups of the algorithm cohort mortality rates were reduced: group I: 0 versus 20 per cent (p < 0.05); group II: 8 versus 24 per cent (p < 0.05); group III: 40 versus 71 per cent. Improvements in both therapeutic process and outcome were observed after implementation of the trauma algorithm.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Percutaneous computed tomographic-controlled ventriculostomy in severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous computed tomographic (CT)-controlled ventriculostomy (PCV) was introduced for the monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who did not require simultaneous decompressive trepanation. METHODS: PCV (n = 14) was compared with conventional burr hole ventriculostomy (n = 13) based on prospectively collected data. RESULTS: PCV proved to be a successful technique in all cases and also when a burr hole ventriculostomy was impossible previously. There were no complications. In burr hole ventriculostomy, there were one unsuccessful insertion and one catheter contamination. The main advantage of PCV over burr hole ventriculostomy was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the time required to perform the procedure. In ventriculostomy directly after the initial evaluation in the emergency department, the operation time was reduced from 45 +/- 11 to 22 +/- 14 minutes. The interval between cranial computed tomography and start of operation was reduced from 78 +/- 38 to 33 +/- 12 minutes, and between initial cranial computed tomography and intensive care unit admittance, from 138 +/- 37 to 73 +/- 28 minutes. For patients requiring ventriculostomy while being treated in the intensive care unit, the duration of the procedure (i.e., absence from the intensive care unit) was able to be reduced from 111 +/- 24 to 81 +/- 21 minutes. CONCLUSION: Distinct time savings are the major advantages of PCV, allowing exact catheter positioning even with very narrow ventricles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

[Effect of kinetic therapy on the course of treatment of patients with post-traumatic lung failure].

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of intermittent prone positioning of patients with post-traumatic respiratory failure (paO2/FiO2 < 280 mm Hg) in comparison with conventional therapy in a supine position. Although the severity of injury of the prone-positioned patients was much higher (ISS 35.8 vs 24.5), the ventilation time (32 vs 31 days) and ICU stay (39 vs 36 days) were similar to patients treated in the supine position. Besides the beneficial effect of prone positioning on oxygenation, for the first time we have evidence that prone positioning improves the outcome of patients with post-traumatic respiratory failure.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Minimal invasive, percutaneous ventriculostomy in therapy of severe craniocerebral trauma].

From May 1996 until April 1997 percutaneous CT-controlled ventriculostomy (PCV) was performed in 19 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and no indication for decompressive craniotomy. There was a significant reduction in the duration of the procedure compared to burr-hole ventriculostomy with no complications. Because of further advantage of PCV CT-controlling is the possibility of puncturing even very narrow ventricles.

Brain Edema↗
PubMed1997

[Treatment of Pipkin fractures].

Because of the controversy that exists about therapy for the Pipkin fracture, the treatment and results of 117 fractures of the femoral head were reviewed and re-evaluated at least 1 year after the trauma had taken place. The cases were taken from eight publications in the literature from 1983 to 1995. The lesions in this collection comprised 35% (n = 41) type I, 40% (n = 47) type II, 10% (n = 12) type III and 15% (n = 17) type IV fractures classified after the Pipkin system. Seventy-four percent of patients (n = 87) were operated on; only type I lesions were treated conservatively in 42%, thus more often than average. There were 57 complications with equally frequent head necroses (14.5%) and severe coxarthritis. Coxarthritis was doubled after conservative treatment versus operation (23% vs. 13%). There was no difference in respect to head necrosis. Postoperatively, 18 (14%) periarticular ossifications were registered. Forty-one (75%) of 55 Pipkin I and II fractures had an at least "good" outcome; the portion of conservative treatment was higher than operative treatment (88% vs 69%). Still these results have to be seen with respect to the use of treating simple lesions primarily conservatively with the minimum of 6 weeks of traction therapy, thus counting the latter patients in this group. According to the literature, we think that if there are no vital contraindications, all Pipkin fractures should be treated operatively (early emergency operation) by reattaching bigger fragments and extracting smaller fragments in Pipkin I and II fractures, trying to save the heads in young, active patients with Pipkin III fractures in contrast to primary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with coxarthrosis with Pipkin IV fractures (unstable and displaced fractures of the acetabulum).

Femur Head↗
PubMed1997

[Dislocated multiple fragment fractures of the head of the humerus. Does dislocation of the humeral head fragment signify a worse prognosis?].

PROBLEM: The vascularity of the articular fragment is of key importance for the final outcome in three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head. Displacement of the articular segment may compromise the arterial blood supply to the humeral head and result in avascular necrosis. There is still controversy as to whether three-and four-part fracture dislocations (articular fragment outside the glenoid) have an even worse prognosis than displaced three- and four-part fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1985 and May 1993, 102 patients with three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head were treated by ORIF (mostly tension band wiring) at our institution. In a retrospective study we analysed the functional (Constant 100 point score) and radiological outcome of 67 (66%) of these patients. There were 21 patients with fracture dislocations (FD), n = 5 type B2X, n = 5 type B3X, n = 3 type C2X, n = 8 type C3X, according to the classification of Habermeyer [7]. The "X" represents the dislocation of the articular fragment, whereas the classification to each type is done after reduction of the head. The remaining 46 patients presented with displaced, but not dislocated, three- and four-part fractures (DF), n = 24 type B2, n = 7 type B3, n = 3 type C2, n = 12 type C3. Average follow-up was 25 months (7-72 months). Patients with FD were significantly younger (average age 50 years) than patients with DF (average age 63 years, P < 0.05) and showed a significantly higher incidence of traumatic nerve or plexus lesions (FD 19%, DF 2%, P < 0.05). RESULTS: Concerning the functional results, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The FD patients even showed a slight tendency to better results than patients with DF. This was true for the three-part fractures (average Constant score 78 versus 67 points), as well as for the four-part fractures (average Constant score 62 versus 55 points). The significantly younger age of the FD patients may explain their better results. The entire group of patients with three-part fractures showed a significantly better functional outcome (average Constant score 68 points) than patients with four-part fractures (average Constant score 55 points, P < 0.05). The rate of partial and total avascular necrosis of the humeral head was strongly correlated to the fracture type (number of fragments, fracture of the anatomical or surgical neck, according to the classification of Habermeyer),but again there was no difference between the FD and DF group (B2X: 20%, B3X: 20%, C2X: 33%, C3X: 63%; B2: 25%, B3: 29%, C2: 33%, C3: 67%). Astonishingly, the FD were not associated with an increased rate of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Three (axillary nerve) out of the five observed primary nerve and plexus lesions had a full neurological recovery after 6-12 months; the two patients with alterations of the brachial plexus showed a slow tendency of improvement at follow-up (12 and 18 months), but still had gross muscular atrophy and impaired sensory function. CONCLUSION: In displaced three-and four-part fractures of the humeral head the dislocation of the articular segment does not seem to increase the risk of avascular necrosis, if treated by timely and careful ORIF with respect to the vascularity. Even with the increased risk of primary nerve and plexus lesions in fracture dislocations, good functional results can be achieved by early operative nerve decompression and fracture stabilization in this middle-aged patient group. However, older patients with displaced or dislocated four-fragment fractures through the anatomical neck (type C3) have a poor chance of a favourable outcome, and therefore primary prosthetic replacement should be considered.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Quality management in early clinical multiple trauma care. Documentation of treatment and evaluation of critical care quality].

Quality management in early clinical care of patients with multiple injuries (description of actual process, identification of problems, implementation of quality improvement) is not possible without sufficient baseline data about the present situation of medical treatment. This study investigates whether the current documentation of treatment in the emergency room is appropriate to judge upon the quality of the process and to detect problems. In addition, a set of baseline data is presented. The performance in the treatment of 126 multiple injured patients was prospectively recorded from 1988 to 1993 and compared with an idealized process based upon an algorithm. The quality of present data recording was analysed, and criteria for judgement of quality of care were assessed. The algorithm was divided into 117 possible steps (one step consisting of a single decision criterion, the decision and the corresponding procedure). Per patient, only 61% +/- 12% of these steps were sufficiently documented to allow judgement. Using several criteria for assessment, the following baseline data could be observed (times shown refer to admission to the trauma room): (1) trauma room time of 129 +/- 55 min; (2) completion of basic radiological and sonographic diagnostics in 91% of patients; (3) first blood collection after 17 +/- 11 min; (4) cranial computerised tomography after 55 +/- 20 min; (5) missed injuries during the trauma room period in 32% of patients; (6) intubation after 20 +/- 19 min; (7) insertion of a chest tube after 30 +/- 17 min; (8) first blood transfusion in shock after 32 +/- 17 min; (9) transfused blood within the first hour of 4.2 +/- 2.8 units and within the second hour of 8.5 +/- 4.7 units; (10) emergency operations in shock after 98 +/- 55 min; (11) early operations after 156 +/- 69 min; (12) craniotomy after 124 +/- 37 min; (13) unplanned surgery within 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit in 11% of patients. The study presented here supplies information on timing and other process data of the acute clinical care of seriously injured patients. In particular, the data represent indicators for the quality of emergency room management, which may be used as baseline to compose improvement measures of structure and process. The quality of data collection has to be improved for carrying out an exact analysis of the process.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Quality management in early clinical polytrauma management. II. Optimizing therapy by treatment guidelines].

To enhance the quality of treatment of patients with multiple injuries (blunt trauma), guidelines for the acute clinical management (trauma-algorithm) were implemented at our clinic in 1994. The impact of these guidelines was analysed, comparing two prospectively recorded collectives of polytraumatized patients 4/1988-12/1993 (A; n = 126) and 1/1994-6/1996 (B; n = 74). Nine specifically defined parameters were used to assess the therapeutic process of early clinical trauma management. All parameters showed an improvement after implementation of the algorithm (group B): (1) Complete radiological and sonographic basic diagnostics in 97% vs. 92% of patients; (2) time interval of 38 min vs. 55 min until cranial CT was done after severe head injury (GCS < 10); (3) reduction of delayed diagnosis of lesions to 5% vs. 24%; (4) duration of 16 min vs. 20 min until intubation; (5) period of 23 min to 30 min to pleural drainage; (6) duration of 18 min vs. 32 min until transfusion in shock; (7) period of 79 min vs. 98 min until emergency operation in shock; (8) duration of 95 min vs. 124 min until trepanation, and (9) operation rate within 24 h after admission to ICU in 3% vs. 12%. The lethality rates of each collective were assessed after subdivision in three groups (I-III) with middle (ISS: 18-24), high (ISS: 25-49) and extreme (ISS: 50-75) injury severity. In all groups of both collectives ISS values, age, initial loss of consciousness (GCS) and shock were comparable (except the higher injury severity of collective B in group I). In all groups a reduction of lethality could be shown for collective B: Group I, 0% vs. 20% (P < 0.05); group II, 8% vs. 24% (P < 0.05); and group III, 40% vs. 71%, not significant because of the small group in B (n = 5). The implementation of therapeutic management guidelines led to an improvement of both treatment processes and outcome. In order to regularly reassess validity and practicability of such guidelines as well as further enhance therapeutic quality, a continuous evaluation programme representing a quality management system should be inaugurated.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Algorithms in trauma management].

A well-controlled, meticulous process has a far higher probability of resulting in a high quality of medical care than improvization and unstructured creativity. Algorithms display decision-making treatment processes and problem-solving strategies by giving clearly defined and formalized guidelines. The flow chart for decision-making follows the yes/no dichotomy of binary logic. The systematic ordering of decision points and consequent actions is guided by medical priority and thus regulates the time-frame and sequence of each single step in a logical manner. With the help of clinical algorithms highly complex processes such as the management of the severely injured patient can be translated into a clearly structured, logical pathway. Clinical algorithms represent scientifically recognized treatment rules, indicate a solution for solving problems and help users to organize ideas and recognize connections. They delineate a consistent and valid guideline, while allowing deviations in proven exceptions. The use of algorithms allows a systematic search for errors in the process of quality management. In emergency situations they suggest a structured means of problem solving for the less experienced user. Algorithms are useful instruments in the teaching of medical decision-making.

Algorithms↗