PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S S Gottlieb

Publications and source records attributed to S S Gottlieb.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Comparative effects of three beta blockers (atenolol, metoprolol, and propranolol) on survival after acute myocardial infarction.

The beneficial impact of beta blockade after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is clear, but beta-adrenergic blockers differ in multiple characteristics, including lipophilicity and selectivity. The impact of these factors on the effects of beta blockade is unknown. We therefore compared the effects of different beta blockers on mortality after AMI. Charts of 201,752 patients with AMI were abstracted by the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a quality assurance program sponsored by the Health Care Financing Administration. Of the 69,338 patients prescribed beta blockers, we compared mortality of patients receiving different beta-adrenergic blockers using the Cox proportional-hazards model accounting for multiple factors that might influence survival. The mortality rates of the 2 selective agents, metoprolol and atenolol, were virtually identical (13.5% and 13.4% 2-year mortality, respectively). Compared with metoprolol, patients discharged on propranolol had a slightly increased mortality (15.9% 2-year mortality), which may be related to undetected differences at baseline. Survival with all of the drugs was superior to the 23.9% 2-year mortality seen in patients not receiving beta blockers. Beta blockade overall was associated with a 40% improvement in survival. Although the use of beta blockade after AMI has major prognostic importance, the present study suggests that the specific beta blocker chosen will have little influence on mortality.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Are all beta-blockers the same for chronic heart failure?

beta-Adrenergic receptor blockade has been conclusively proven to increase survival and morbidity in patients with heart failure. Hospitalization rate decreases and patients feel better after receiving beta-blockers. Furthermore, this benefit is observed in a wide range of patients. The beta-blockers bisoprolol, metoprolol, and carvedilol have been extensively evaluated in heart failure patients. These drugs all show marked benefit. Bucindolol, an investigational beta-blocker, showed only mild improvement in survival in patients with heart failure. The beta-blockers differ regarding beta-selectivity, vasodilation properties, and perhaps other ancillary properties. At present, the importance and consequences of these differences are unknown.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Renal effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonists in congestive heart failure.

Renal function is a very important prognostic indicator in patients with congestive heart failure. While some of the prognostic importance of poor renal function is related to the worse physiology associated with it, there are suggestions that the dysfunction itself is detrimental. Recently, it has been shown that adenosine may mediate much kidney activity. In addition to vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory effects, adenosine is intrinsic to the tubuloglomerular feedback which occurs when an acute increase in sodium levels in the proximal tubule feeds back to decrease glomerular filtration. Adenosine works via both adenosine A1 and A2 receptors. A1-receptor antagonists decrease afferent arteriolar pressure, and increase urine flow and sodium excretion. Studies suggest that A1-receptor antagonists cause a diuretic effect not by a change in the renal haemodynamics, but by the inhibition of water and sodium reabsorption in tubular sites secondary to direct tubuloglomerular feedback. Less consistent has been the occasional finding of increased glomerular filtration rate despite the lack of improved renal plasma flow. Clinically important questions are: what role adenosine plays in causing the poor renal function associated with heart failure and what A1-receptor antagonists do in such situations? If an A1-receptor antagonist could cause diuresis while maintaining or improving glomerular filtration, it would be a useful adjunct in the treatment of severe heart failure. We evaluated the effects of the A1-receptor antagonist CVT-124 (BG-9719) in heart failure patients. CVT-124 increased sodium excretion without decreasing glomerular filtration rate. These data suggest that adenosine might be an important determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2000

Acute hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan in patients with severe heart failure. Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: We determined the short-term hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan, a novel calcium-sensitizing agent, in patients with decompensated heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 21+/-1%) who had a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >/=15 mm Hg and a cardiac index </=2.5 L x min(-1) x m(-2) were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and randomized 2:1 to intravenous infusion of levosimendan or placebo. Drug infusions were uptitrated over 4 hours from an initial infusion rate of 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) to a maximum rate of 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and maintained at the maximal tolerated infusion rate for an additional 2 hours. Levosimendan caused dose-dependent increases in stroke volume and cardiac index beginning with the lowest infusion rate and achieving maximal increases in stroke volume and cardiac index of 28% and 39%, respectively. Heart rate increased modestly (8%) at the maximal infusion rate and was not increased at the 2 lowest infusion rates. Levosimendan caused dose-dependent decreases in pulmonary capillary wedge, right atrial, pulmonary arterial, and mean arterial pressures. Levosimendan appeared to improve dyspnea and fatigue, as assessed by the patient and physician, and was not associated with a significant increase in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan caused rapid dose-dependent improvement in hemodynamic function in patients with decompensated heart failure. These hemodynamic effects appeared to be accompanied by symptom improvement and were not associated with a significant increase in the number of adverse events. Levosimendan may be of value in the short-term management of patients with decompensated heart failure.

Cardiotonic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Acute endothelin A receptor blockade causes selective pulmonary vasodilation in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels in patients with chronic heart failure correlate with pulmonary artery pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance. ET(A) receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells mediate pulmonary vascular contraction and hypertrophy. We determined the acute hemodynamic effects of sitaxsentan, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic stable heart failure receiving conventional therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 48 patients with chronic New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 21+/-1%) treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Patients with a baseline pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >/=15 mm Hg and a cardiac index </=2.5 L. min(-1). m(-2) were randomized to 1 of 3 doses (1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg/kg) of sitaxsentan or placebo as an intravenous infusion over 15 minutes. Hemodynamic responses were assessed by catheterization of the right side of the heart for 6 hours. Sitaxsentan decreased pulmonary artery systolic pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary artery pressure, and right atrial pressure (P</=0.001, 0.003, 0.017, and 0.031, respectively) but had no effect on heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, or systemic vascular resistance. Plasma ET-1 levels were elevated at baseline and decreased with sitaxsentan. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe heart failure receiving conventional therapy, acute ET(A) receptor blockade caused selective pulmonary vasodilation associated with a reduction in plasma ET-1. Sitaxsentan may be of value in the treatment of patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic heart failure.

Cardiac Output, Low↗
PubMed2000

The effect of coenzyme Q10 in patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Coenzyme Q10 is commonly used to treat congestive heart failure on the basis of data from several unblinded, subjective studies. Few randomized, blinded, controlled studies have evaluated objective measures of cardiac performance. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of coenzyme Q10 on peak oxygen consumption, exercise duration, and ejection fraction. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: University and Veterans Affairs hospitals. PATIENTS: 55 patients who had congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association class III and IV symptoms, ejection fraction less than 40%, and peak oxygen consumption less than 17.0 mL/kg per minute (or <50% of predicted) during standard therapy were randomly assigned. Forty-six patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: Coenzyme Q10, 200 mg/d, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (measured by radionuclide ventriculography) and peak oxygen consumption and exercise duration (measured by a graded exercise evaluation using the Naughton protocol) with continuous metabolic monitoring. RESULTS: Although the mean (+/-SD) serum concentration of coenzyme Q10 increased from 0.95+/-0.62 microg/mL to 2.2+/-1.2 microg/mL in patients who received active treatment, ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption, and exercise duration remained unchanged in both the coenzyme Q10 and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Coenzyme Q10 does not affect ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption, or exercise duration in patients with congestive heart failure receiving standard medical therapy.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2000

Effects of BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1-adenosine receptor antagonist, and furosemide on glomerular filtration rate and natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of furosemide and the selective A1 adenosine receptor BG9719 on renal function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that adenosine may affect renal function by various mechanisms, but the effects of blockade of this system in humans is unknown. In addition, the effects of a therapeutic dose of furosemide on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) in heart failure patients are controversial. METHODS: On different days, 12 patients received placebo, BG9719 and furosemide. Glomerular filtration rate, RPF and sodium and water excretion were assessed immediately following drug administration. RESULTS: Glomerular filtration rate was 84 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73m2 after receiving placebo, 82 +/- 24 following BG9719 administration and a decreased (p < 0.005) 63 +/- 18 following furosemide. Renal plasma flow was unchanged at 293 +/- 124 ml/min/1.73m2 on placebo, 334 +/- 155 after receiving BG9719 and 374 +/- 231 after receiving furosemide. Sodium excretion increased from 8 +/- 8 mEq following placebo administration to 37 +/- 26 mEq following BG9719 administration. In the six patients in whom it was measured, sodium excretion was 104 +/- 78 mEq following furosemide administration. CONCLUSIONS: Natriuresis is effectively induced by both furosemide and the adenosine A1 antagonist BG9719 in patients with CHF. Doses of the two drugs used in this study did not cause equivalent sodium and water excretion but only furosemide decreased GFR. These data suggest that adenosine is an important determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Depression is common and precludes accurate assessment of functional status in elderly patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) and depression are independently known to result in physical decline and diminished functional capacity in the general population. The prevalence and relationship of depressive symptoms in CHF to physical limitations has not been objectively examined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to ascertain depressive symptoms in 33 elderly ambulatory individuals with CHF. Self-report assessment of functional status, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), and measurement of energy expenditure by doubly labeled water and Caltrac Accelerometer (Muscle Dynamics, Torrance, CA) were performed. Depressed and nondepressed groups were compared. Forty-two percent of the patients scored in the depressed range (CES-D score of 16 or greater). There were no differences in demographic variables or severity of illness between the depressed and nondepressed patients. Energy expenditure was comparable across groups. Although obtaining similar maximal heart rate and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) on CPX, the depressed group showed less exertion on exercise testing with a significantly lower respiratory quotient (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms were common and unrelated to the severity of CHF. Although depressed individuals tended to report worse physical functioning than nondepressed individuals, objective assessment of energy expenditure was comparable. Depressed patients appear to underestimate their functional ability. Subsequently, inaccurate assessment of functional status may occur.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

The impact of beta-blockade on mortality rates in patients with congestive heart failure.

The beneficial effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on mortality rates in patients after a myocardial infarction have been clear for decades. The efficacy data are now just as apparent for patients with heart failure. Although there are many subgroups of patients in whom the mortality effects of beta-blockers are not proven, knowledge about these specific populations continues to increase. Nevertheless, more information is needed so that we can properly tailor our therapy for individual patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

A four-part regimen for clinical heart failure.

Combination therapy with a diuretic, digoxin, ACE inhibitor, and beta-blocker can help patients with heart failure caused by severe systolic dysfunction feel better and live longer. Especially with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, the key to success is starting at low doses and titrating carefully to proven target doses. The demanding complexity of the four-drug regimen is well worth the results.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Effects of exercise training on peak performance and quality of life in congestive heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Exercise programs for patients with heart failure have often enrolled and evaluated relatively healthy, young patients. They also have not measured the impact of exercise performance on daily activities and quality of life. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the impact of a 6-month supervised and graded exercise program in 33 elderly patients with moderate to severe heart failure randomized to usual care or an exercise program. Six of 17 patients did not tolerate the exercise program. Of those who did, peak oxygen consumption increased by 2.4 +/- 2.8 mL/kg/min (P < .05) and 6-minute walk increased by 194 ft (P < .05). However, outpatient energy expenditure did not increase, as measured by either the doubly labeled water technique or Caltrac accelerometer. Perceived quality of life also did not improve, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study, Functional Status Assessment, or Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with severe heart failure can safely exercise, with an improvement in peak exercise tolerance. However, not all patients will benefit, and daily energy expenditure and quality of life do not improve to the same extent as peak exercise.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1998

Effect of beta-blockade on mortality among high-risk and low-risk patients after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Long-term administration of beta-adrenergic blockers to patients after myocardial infarction improves survival. However, physicians are reluctant to administer beta-blockers to many patients, such as older patients and those with chronic pulmonary disease, left ventricular dysfunction, or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. METHODS: The medical records of 201,752 patients with myocardial infarction were abstracted by the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, which was sponsored by the Health Care Financing Administration. Using a Cox proportional-hazards model that accounted for multiple factors that might influence survival, we compared mortality among patients treated with beta-blockers with mortality among untreated patients during the two years after myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A total of 34 percent of the patients received beta-blockers. The percentage was lower among the very elderly, blacks, and patients with the lowest ejection fractions, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, elevated serum creatinine concentrations, or type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless, mortality was lower in every subgroup of patients treated with beta-blockade than in untreated patients. In patients with myocardial infarction and no other complications, treatment with beta-blockers was associated with a 40 percent reduction in mortality. Mortality was also reduced by 40 percent in patients with non-Q-wave infarction and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Blacks, patients 80 years old or older, and those with a left ventricular ejection fraction below 20 percent, serum creatinine concentration greater than 1.4 mg per deciliter (124 micromol per liter), or diabetes mellitus had a lower percentage reduction in mortality. Given, however, the higher mortality rates in these subgroups, the absolute reduction in mortality was similar to or greater than that among patients with no specific risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: After myocardial infarction, patients with conditions that are often considered contraindications to beta-blockade (such as heart failure, pulmonary disease, and older age) and those with nontransmural infarction benefit from beta-blocker therapy.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

The effects of diuresis on the pharmacokinetics of the loop diuretics furosemide and torsemide in patients with heart failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and torsemide before and after diuresis in patients presenting with marked fluid overload. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 44 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, ejection fraction < or =40%, and an estimated excess fluid body weight > or =6.8 kg. Oral furosemide or torsemide was administered before and after diuresis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed before and after diuresis. RESULTS: Following diuresis, maximum plasma concentration increased from 11.0+/-5.0 microg/mL to 13.9+/-6.8 with torsemide (P <0.05) and from 3.1< or =1.5 to 3.9+/-1.9 with furosemide (P=0.16). Maximum concentration increased by more than 30% in only one third of the patients. Total absorption (by area under the curve method) increased 6% among patients on torsemide (P=0.38) and 7% among patients on furosemide (P=0.63) and increased >30% in only 1 torsemide and 2 furosemide patients. The time to maximum concentration decreased from 1.40+/-.82 h to 0.81+/-0.36 with torsemide (P <0.01). There were no differences between furosemide and torsemide in the effects of edema on absorption. CONCLUSION: Marked diuresis altered the pharmacokinetics of both furosemide and torsemide in only a small percentage of patients. The use of adequate doses of oral diuretics in edematous patients may be successful, thereby permitting home treatment with oral diuretics and avoiding the cost of hospitalizations or home intravenous administration services.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Skeletal muscle atrophy and peak oxygen consumption in heart failure.

We measured skeletal muscle mass and peak oxygen consumption (VO2) in 13 cachectic heart failure patients, 14 noncachectic patients, and in 52 healthy controls to examine skeletal muscle atrophy and its relation to low peak VO2 in heart failure patients. Our results show that skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with prior weight loss and is related to low peak VO2 in heart failure patients.

Aged↗