PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S S Nitecki

Publications and source records attributed to S S Nitecki.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

CT angiography of the carotid arteries in trauma to the neck.

OBJECTIVES: serious vascular injuries to the neck may be asymptomatic or masked by other life-threatening conditions. Angiography, the "gold standard" vascular imaging modality, is an invasive procedure. Moreover, it is time-consuming and thus may delay a needed vascular intervention. The results of screening angiography are negative in more than 80% of cases. Therefore other less invasive and faster screening tests, such as the Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography, have been tested. This retrospective study was done to evaluate the use of CT angiography (CTA) in suspected vascular injuries of the neck. METHODS: from 1995 to 1998, 16 patients with suspected traumatic carotid artery injury underwent CTA. Twelve of these patients had penetrating injuries and four had blunt injuries to the neck. CTAs were obtained by Elscint Twin Flash Spiral Scanner, while MIP reconstructions were carried out on an Omnipro, Elscint (Indy, Silicon Graphics) work station and interpreted by a radiologist. RESULTS: all the CTAs were diagnostic. Positive findings included one complete tear of the right common carotid artery (confirmed by surgery) due to a penetrating injury and one bilateral internal carotid artery thrombosis after blunt injury to the neck. In addition, three patients with multiple trauma were operated on, due to either proximity only or questionable neurological findings. Surgical exploration confirmed the negative findings seen on CTA. CONCLUSION: CT angiography of the carotid arteries in cervical trauma may be used as an accurate decisive tool for a needed surgical intervention. More studies with larger number of patients and comparison with angiography are needed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify significant differences in the clinical and radiologic characteristics and outcome between patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: We reviewed 29 consecutive patients who underwent repair of an inflammatory AAA between 1985 and 1994. This group was matched in a case-control fashion by date of surgery and by the performing surgeon to a group of 58 patients who underwent repair of noninflammatory AAAs. RESULTS: The two groups had comparable characteristics of age, gender, and cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with inflammatory AAAs were significantly more symptomatic than those with noninflammatory AAAs (93% vs 9%, p < 0.001), were more likely to have a family history of aneurysms (17% vs 1.5%, p = 0.007), and tended to be current smokers (45% vs 24%, p = 0.049). The most significant laboratory difference was an elevated sedimentation rate in patients with inflammatory AAAs (mean, 53 mm/hr vs 12 mm/hr, p < 0.00001). Inflammatory AAAs also were significantly larger than noninflammatory AAAs at presentation (6.8 cm vs 5.9 cm, p < 0.05). Although operative mortality was low in both groups, patients with an inflammatory AAA tended to have higher morbidity, including sepsis (p < 0.01) and renal failure (p = 0.04). Five-year survival rates, however, were similar for the two groups (79% for inflammatory and 83% for noninflammatory AAAs). On follow-up computed tomographic scans, the retroperitoneal inflammatory process resolved completely in 53% of the patients, but 47% of patients had persistent inflammation that involved the ureters in 32% and resulted in long-term solitary or bilateral renal atrophy in 47%. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study provides preliminary evidence that inflammatory AAAs may have a relatively strong familial connection and that current smoking may play an important role in the inflammatory response. The study also documents that persistent retroperitoneal inflammation may be more prevalent than has been previously reported, and stresses the need for an improved understanding of the pathogenesis and long-term management of inflammatory AAAs.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Is it really improving?

OBJECTIVE: The authors review their recent experience with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has traditionally had a 5-year survival rate less than 10% after curative resection. Recently, several groups have reported markedly improved 5-year survival rates (approaching 25%) for patients undergoing curative resection. METHODS: Institutional experience with 186 consecutive patients (1981-1991) with pathologic diagnoses of ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatic resection was reviewed. Histologic specimens of all 3-year survivors (n = 31) were re-reviewed by two pathologists, one internal and one external; nonductal pancreatic cancers then were excluded. RESULTS: After histologic re-review, 12 patients did not have ductal adenocarcinoma, leaving a total of 174 patients for analysis (102 men, 72 women; mean age 63 years, range 34-82 years). Mean follow-up was 22 months (range 4-109). Classical pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 71%, pylorus-preserving resection in 9%, and total pancreatectomy in 20%. Hospital mortality was 3%. Twenty-eight patients (16%) had macroscopically incomplete resections; 98 (56%) had lymph node metastases within the resected specimens, and 21 patients (12%) had extensive perineural invasion. Overall actuarial 5-year survival was 6.8%. Five-year survival was greater for node-negative versus node-positive patients (14% vs. 1%, p < 0.001), and for smaller (< 2 cm) versus larger tumors (20% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival for the subset of patients with negative nodes and no perineural or duodenal invasion (69 patients) was 23% (p < 0.001). Mean survival of the 12 excluded patients was 53 +/- 7 months compared with 17.5 +/- 1 months in the 174 patients with ductal pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year survival for patients undergoing pancreatic resection for lesions deemed to be clinically "curable" intraoperatively and histologically reviewed/confirmed to be ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is approximately 7%. Survival is greater (23%) in the subset of patients with negative nodes and no duodenal or perineural invasions. Pathologic review of all patients with pancreatic ductal cancer adenocarcinoma is mandatory if survival data are to be meaningful.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The natural history of surgically treated primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to determine the prognostic variables and optimal surgical procedure for patients with adenocarcinoma of the appendix. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix is a rare malignancy that constitutes less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, the prognostic factors and the preferred surgical procedure and outcome are poorly understood. METHODS: The authors reviewed their institutional experience from 1976 to 1992 in treating 94 consecutive patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Patients with carcinoid tumors or those in whom the diagnosis of primary cecal cancer could not be ruled out were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Fifty-two (55%) patients had the mucinous variety, of which 22 had pseudomyxoma peritonei; the other 45% had the colonic and adenocarcinoid types of tumor. The most common presentation was that of acute appendicitis. Interestingly, in no patients was the correct diagnosis made before surgery, and it was entertained intraoperatively in only 30 patients (32%). The cure 5-year survival rate was 55%, but it varied with stage (A, 100%; B, 67%; C, 50%; and D, 6%; p < 0.01) and with grade (I, 68%, and III, 7%; p < 0.01). Patients with the mucinous type had a better prognosis than those with the colonic type (p < 0.01). The survival rate was superior after right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy alone (68% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Right hemicolectomy performed as a secondary procedure resulted in the upstaging of 38% of the patients' tumors. A second primary malignancy occurred in 33 patients (35%), of which 17 were located in the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSIONS: Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix should be treated by right hemicolectomy, even if it is a secondary procedure. Surveillance for synchronous or metachronous tumors, especially in the gastrointestinal tract, is warranted.

Actuarial Analysis↗