PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

S S Sharfstein

Publications and source records attributed to S S Sharfstein.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Prospective cost allocations for the chronic schizophrenic patient.

Schizophrenia affects from 0.5 percent to 1.0 percent of the population and is often a chronic relapsing illness with high morbidity. Because it strikes young adults, the lifetime direct and indirect costs are considerable. One method of budgeting the costs of treatment is through a prospective method with the development of "risk-adjusted" capitation rates that take into account a patient's past use of services, perceived health status, and level of disability. Such a system may provide opportunities to improve the quality of mental health services by increasing service flexibility, particularly in the development and differentiation of outpatient services. The essence of the approach is to encourage early intervention by reducing financial barriers for patients, especially barriers to alternatives to expensive inpatient services. One method currently employed in Rochester, New York, which creates a capitation payment system for the chronically mentally ill, will be described. The implications of this system for public policy will be discussed as we struggle to treat and care for chronic schizophrenic patients in humane and compassionate ways.

Capitation Fee

Determining disability due to mental impairment: APA's evaluation of Social Security Administration guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: APA evaluated the Social Security Administration's (SSA's) medical standards and guidelines for determining disability due to mental impairment to determine how well the standards and guidelines operationalize the statutory definition of disability in a manner consistent with current psychiatric practice. METHOD: Seventy-two psychiatrists were trained in one of two procedures: those in the sequential evaluation condition were trained in the process and forms used by the SSA's reviewing medical consultants, and those in the statutory definition condition were trained in the statutory definition of disability and application of clinical judgment according to this standard. Decisions regarding claimant's ability or inability to work were recorded on an instrument designed for the study. Each condition consisted of 12 panels of three members. They reviewed 732 actual claims for disability benefits. The panelists reviewed claims independently, then rendered panel judgments. Each claim was reviewed by one panel in each condition. RESULTS: The proportion of agreement between conditions for panel decisions (0.77) was higher than chance agreement (kappa = 0.46). The high level of agreement on claims judged to have good medical evidence and on which confident decisions were made (proportion of agreement = 0.96, kappa = 0.78) suggests that disagreements largely reflected ambiguities in application of the standards and guidelines to more complex cases or those with inadequate information. CONCLUSIONS: The SSA's revised medical standards and guidelines reflect clinical decisions about ability to work based on the statute and, with procedural modifications, should be retained. The SSA should be involved in further systematic studies to develop a field of scientific inquiry into disability and psychiatric disorders.

Adult

The Social Security Disability Evaluation Study.

Disability has continued to gain attention as a research topic in the mental health field. Both the SSA and the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research currently fund research aimed at understanding the vocational needs of severely mentally ill adults, particularly those in supportive employment programs. The National Institute of Mental Health funds research on disability and rehabilitation, particularly research on innovative approaches to increasing the individual's level of functioning and quality of life. All of these federal agencies anticipate continued funding of research on disability. This evaluation of the SSA's 1985 medical standards and guidelines by the APA is an example of the type of disability research that seeks to address issues related to individuals as well as important policy questions. In this evaluation, both the appropriateness and utility of the standards and guidelines were assessed, and the quality of disability decisions for severely mentally impaired applicants was studied.

Disability Evaluation

Managed care and the discharge dilemma.

Efforts at cost containment in medicine and psychiatry are ubiquitous. The escalating costs of health care have led to a variety of initiatives to manage the use of expensive settings and treatments. Cost containment aims to be cost efficient. When it is applied to the treatment of the severely mentally ill, clinical and ethical dilemmas intensify. Access to health insurance is more restricted for the mentally ill (Sharfstein et al. 1984). The benefits that are available are rationed by "fourth party" case managers, independent operators who make money by selling "third party" insurance companies the services of reviewing ongoing care in such a way as to contain costs and conserve resources. Most often this involves pressure to develop discharge plans and to move patients from the expensive inpatient to the less expensive outpatient setting as soon as it is safe and feasible (Melnick and Lyter 1987). For some patients, however, as illustrated below, this proves to be a most formidable task.

Adult

The catastrophic case. A special problem for general hospital psychiatry in the era of managed care.

In the quest for cost containment, case-managed care can harm some patients who are catastrophically ill and treatment resistant. One such case is presented and the "catch-22" situation described where the case manager determined that the chronicity and severity of the case deemed the patient "custodial" and discharge planning was ordered despite the fact that the patient had excellent continued inpatient benefits. The consequences of premature discharge or transfer to a state facility should be studied carefully as we move to more case-managed care. The process of managed care, which has become increasingly costly and time consuming, should also be scrutinized.

Adult

Financing the medical management of mental disorders.

In 1987 Medicare benefits for the mentally ill were expanded for the first time in 22 years. A major change was the removal of limits and copayments for the "medical management of psychopharmacologic agents." Payment for medical management recognizes the trend toward the remedicalization of psychiatry; however, medical management can be defined either broadly or narrowly. The authors suggest pricing strategies for both medical management of mental disorders and psychotherapy. Enlightened design of psychiatric benefits will cover all forms of treatment according to appropriate rules. Access to treatment for mental illness is at stake as these rules develop.

Costs and Cost Analysis

How to survive in the private practice of psychiatry.

The private practice of psychiatry is being transformed by the new economics of medical care. Patients are paying more out-of-pocket for necessary care (demand-side cost sharing), and health care providers are being asked to assume part of the risk of treatment through prospective payment (supply-side cost sharing). Specific survival strategies for psychiatrists in private practice include development of a balanced practice, expansion of referral networks, participation in alternative delivery systems such as health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations, active involvement in utilization and claims review, participation in outcome studies, and expansion of patient care advocacy and community involvement.

Health Maintenance Organizations