PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S S Steinberg

Publications and source records attributed to S S Steinberg.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

New prospective studies of the association of Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization and chronic lung disease.

This study examined the association between Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization and the development of chronic lung disease (CLD) in 93 premature infants who were treated with surfactant and who had birth weights < 1251 g. Nasopharyngeal and tracheal cultures for U. urealyticum were obtained at 2 +/- 1 and at 14 +/- 1 days after birth and were positive in 17 (18%) of 93 patients. Infants born vaginally were 4.5 times more likely to be colonized than were those born by cesarean section. Colonization with U. urealyticum was associated with 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.20, P = .024) times the risk of developing CLD and with a greater incidence of > or = 2+ polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the tracheal aspirate at 2 +/- 1 days of age compared with uncolonized infants (P = .025). We conclude that U. urealyticum colonization is associated with CLD even after surfactant treatment. The presence of U. urealyticum is also associated with inflammatory cells in the tracheal aspirate.

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia↗

Evaluation of immediate adverse reactions to foods in adult patients. I. Correlation of demographic, laboratory, and prick skin test data with response to controlled oral food challenge.

Forty-five adult patients, referred to here as the index population, with a history of immediate adverse reactions after food ingestion were evaluated by history, physical examination, laboratory studies, and skin testing. Fifty-six percent of these patients reported adverse reactions to only one food, whereas 84% of the patients reported up to three foods as being capable of eliciting reactions. The average age obtained by history at which adverse reactions began to occur was 19 4/5 yr. The occurrence of these reactions persisted over an average of 14 4/5 yr. Most reactions involved the gastrointestinal tract alone or in combination with the skin or respiratory tract. The most frequently involved foods were shellfish, peanuts, eggs, fish, tomatoes, and walnuts. Twenty-five of the patients participated in oral challenge with the suspected food. The food challenge was positive in 10 patients. Comparison of information obtained by history including personal or family history of any other allergic disease, age of onset of sensitivity, the length of time of suspected sensitivity in years, and the number of foods to which the sensitivity was believed to exist revealed no significant differences between food challenge-positive (FC+) and food challenge-negative (FC-) patients. However, a significant difference in the reaction patterns reported by history in the FC+ and FC- patients was noted in that FC+ patients more often described reactions in which a combination of gastrointestinal, respiratory, and dermatologic symptoms occurred. The complete blood count with differential, blood chemistries, and serum immunoglobulin levels were similar in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Evaluation of immediate adverse reactions to foods in adult patients. II. A detailed analysis of reaction patterns during oral food challenge.

Eighty-three oral food challenges were performed on 25 patients with a history of immediate adverse reaction to foods. Seventy-one food challenges were performed in 24 patients, whereas 12 placebos were administered to nine patients. Of the 71 food challenges observed, 12 were positive in 10 patients. All challenges with placebo were negative. Doses of challenge foods provoking observable reactions ranged from 5 to 100 gm. The clinical signs and symptoms noted on food challenge reproduced those reported by history. Reactions were mild, generally self-limited, and were not accompanied by elevations in urinary histamine. A plasma histamine elevation was observed in one patient. A 10- to 12-mo follow-up survey of nine patients with negative food challenges revealed that six patients had resumed eating the challenge food on a regular basis without experiencing adverse reactions, whereas three patients continued to avoid the challenge food. All 10 patients with positive food challenges continued to avoid the challenge food.

Administration, Oral↗