PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Salanterä

Publications and source records attributed to S Salanterä.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

An exploratory study of clinical decision-making in five countries.

PURPOSE: To identify the cognitive processes nurses use in their decision-making in long- and short-term care settings in five countries, and the demographic variables associated with their decision-making. METHOD AND SAMPLES: The instrument used was a 56-item questionnaire that has been shown to be reliable in earlier studies. The sample consisted of five convenience samples of registered nurses working in either geriatric wards (n = 236) or acute medical-surgical wards (n = 223) in hospitals or nursing homes in Canada, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. FINDINGS: Five models of decision-making were identified on the basis of factor analysis. They represent both analytical and intuitive cognitive processes. Analytical cognitive processes were emphasized in information collection, problem definition, and planning of care, and intuitive cognitive processes were emphasized in planning, implementing, and evaluating care. Professional education, practical experience, field of practice, and type of knowledge were significantly associated with decision-making models as well as with country of residence of the participants. The highest proportion of analytically oriented decision-makers was found among nurses in long-term care, the decision-making of nurses in short-term care was more intuitively oriented. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that decision-making of participants varied from country to country and in different nursing situations. Future research should be focused on reasons for these differences, the relationship between the task and the nurses' type of knowledge, and how nurses use their knowledge to make decisions in different nursing situations.

Canada↗

Nursing students' knowledge of and views about children in pain.

It is important to evaluate the outcomes of the given education to gain knowledge about the abilities of our students to meet the needs of nursing practice. Pain associated with different illnesses and procedures is one of the most common symptoms that children experience in the hospital. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the views and knowledge base of graduating nursing students in the area of taking care of children in pain. The data were collected with a purpose-designed Likert-type instrument from all nursing students that graduated during one year from the child nurse specializing program in Finland (n = 85), with a response rate of 86%. Results indicate that students have mainly positive views and attitudes towards taking care of children in pain. The views and attitudes differ when older and younger students and students from different schools are compared. Students lack knowledge especially in the area of pain medications as well as in the assessment of pain. In the knowledge section, the results did not differ greatly when different schools, younger and older students or previous working experience and no working experience were compared. In some of the researched schools, many of the students felt a lack of confidence about their knowledge. There is a need for more detailed education in the area of taking care of children with pain.

Adult↗

Nursing activities and outcomes of care in the assessment, management, and documentation of children's pain.

This study describes how assessment and documentation of children's acute postoperative pain is managed by nurses in university hospitals in Finland. A survey was conducted of 303 nurses working in children's wards of university-affiliated hospitals, and at the same time a retrospective chart review of 50 consecutive cases of operation of acute appendicitis was carried out. Charts were analyzed by content analysis, and the results of the survey are reported with percentage distribution and nonparametric statistical calculations. The results indicate that nurses assess pain mainly by observing the child's behavior and changes in physiology. Pain measurement instruments are rarely used, and nurses do not recognize them. The documentation of pain care is unsystematic and does not support the continuity of care. There is a clear need for development of assessment and documentation practices in the studied hospitals. Future research should look at the postoperative care of pain at home as well as care in non-university-affiliated hospitals.

Adolescent↗

Nurses' knowledge about pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge base and practices of Finnish nurses in the area of children in pain. The convenience sample consisted of 265 nurses working on children's wards in university hospitals. Data were collected using an instrument designed for the study. The results showed that there remain gaps in the knowledge base of nurses with regard to both pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management in children. The education and the area of expertise were significant influences on knowledge scores. Nurses used a fairly wide range of nonpharmacological pain alleviation methods but most of these were such that the nurse was in an active role and the child was passive. There is a clear need for further education. Nurses should take a more active role in seeking new information and also should be encouraged to use nonpharmacological methods that let the children be active participants in their own care.

Adult↗

Finnish nurses' attitudes to pain in children.

This study measured the attitudes of Finnish paediatric nurses to children in pain and the connection between nurses' attitudes, nurses' attributes and nurses' own view of their knowledge and ability to take care of children in pain. The measurements were based on a purpose-designed instrument consisting of a 41-item Likert-type questionnaire and demographic data. The convenience sample consisted of paediatric nurses at all five university hospitals in Finland (n = 303). The response rate was 87%. ANOVA and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA were used as statistical methods. The results show that, taken as a whole, the attitudes of these nurses do not hinder effective pain management but there are some misconceptions that need further attention. It also emerged that such attributes as nurses' age, education, experience, place of work and field of expertise do not have a significant effect on nurses' attitudes. Nurses working in operating theatres felt they had a limited scope to work together with parents and in some hospitals nurses felt they had limited scope to work together with other staff groups. The units differed significantly in nurses' views about the unit's possibilities to provide treatment for pain. The findings of this study indicate that although nurses' attitudes to pain management are mainly positive, there is much variation in how they feel they can actually provide quality care to control pain. More attention should be paid to training nurses and to providing knowledge about the treatment of pain in children. Future research should look at nurses' existing knowledge base as well as their activities in the assessment and management of pain.

Adolescent↗

Decision-making models in different fields of nursing.

The purpose of this study was to identify the decision-making models used by nurses in different fields of nursing and to find out which variables explain the use of those models. The instrument for the project was developed on the basis of existing decision-making theories and earlier studies on nurses' decision making. The sample consisted of 483 Finnish nurses from five fields of nursing: long-term care, short-term medical-surgical care, critical care, health care, and psychiatric care. The statistical analyses consisted of factor analysis, factor scores, and correspondence analysis. Five different models of nursing decision making were identified. The nature of the nursing task and the nursing context showed associations with decision making on all models. The structure of knowledge and nurses' practical experience did not provide an explanation for nurses' decision making on any model.

Critical Care↗

Public health nurses' decision making in Canada, Finland, Norway, and the United States.

The purpose of this study was to describe the decision-making processes of 369 public health nurses in Canada, Finland, Norway, and the United States, and to discuss any differences observed among these countries. The results indicate that public health nurses used different decision-making models on the job and that these models varied considerably. Five different decision-making models were identified, each exhibiting features of different decision-making theories. The differences between decision making of public health nurses in different countries were statistically significant. The differences in decision making appear to be due to differences in health care systems in the 4 countries and the nature of the nursing task and context.

Canada↗

Decision-making models of Finnish nurses and public health nurses.

This study described nursing decision-making models and variables related to these models. For this purpose a 56-item Likert-type questionnaire was constructed according to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition as applied to nursing by Benner and information processing theory. The target group consisted of 100 registered nurses working in inpatient clinics and 100 public health nurses working in preventive health care. The decision-making variables explored were nurses' experience, education and knowledge as well as the nature of the nursing task and context. The results revealed four different types of decision-making: (a) unquestioning/questioning decision-making, (b) creative-diversive decision-making, (c) patient/nurse-oriented decision-making, and (d) rule- and situation-based decision-making. The most important factors related to decision-making were experience and the nature of the nursing task and context.

Analysis of Variance↗

High Doppler-derived cardiac output in the cerebral arteriovenous fistula measured by pulsed Doppler ultrasound.

Cerebral arteriovenous fistula may cause a significant increase in cardiac output. So far, the right ventricular output measurement with conventional cardiac output methods has been difficult in newborn infants because of the shunts through the foramen ovale and patent ductus arteriosus. This difficulty can be avoided by measuring left ventricular output with the pulsed Doppler ultrasound method. In our case, the patient was a newborn infant with large patent ductus arteriosus and an arteriovenous malformation of the great cerebral vein of Galen. The malformation was found by noticing a loud murmur from the infant's head. The diagnosis was later confirmed by ultrasound scanning and a computer tomography. Left ventricular output was enormous with values from 740 to 830 ml/min/kg, when the normal value for the newborn infant at this age is 260 ml/min/kg. Because of constant cardiac failure, the malformation was operated on. The infant died of cardiac failure during this operation. An enormous left ventricle output in an infant with arteriovenous fistula and patent ductus arteriosus predisposes to cardiac failure. The Doppler ultrasound method in newborn infants seems to be a useful tool to determine cardiac function.

Blood Flow Velocity↗

Clinical judgement and information seeking by nurses and physicians working with cancer patients.

This study examined and compared the processes of information collection and clinical judgement by nurses (n=107) and physicians (n=27) working with cancer patients. The data was collected in two university hospitals by means of a computer-simulated case description and the thinking-aloud method. Data interpretation was based on SPSS statistical software and the method of content analysis. Statistical differences between the two groups were tested with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis Anova or the Mann-Whitney U-test. The Wilcoxon test was applied in pairwise comparisons. Independent questions were analysed by cross-tabulation and Pearson's chi(2). According to the results nurses and physicians apply different approaches to clinical judgement and problem-solving. On the basis of the status statement they received in the program both groups pointed to similar problems and sought a great deal of additional information. However the type of information required was different in the two groups. There were also significant differences in the knowledge base applied for purposes of clinical judgement: nurses tended to rely on personal knowledge, physicians on theory. Physicians were able to identify their patient's major clinical problems, but nurses had more difficulty doing this. On the other hand, nurses took a broader view on the general well-being of patients than physicians did.

Decision Making↗

Decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States.

In this study, our intention was to describe the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care, and the differences of nurses' decision making in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States. The instrument used in the study was a 56-item Likert-type questionnaire that has been used in previous studies and has proved to be a reliable tool. The target group comprised a nonrandom sample of nurses (N = 314) from five countries. The samples are not representative; therefore, the results in these cases cannot be generalized. The results showed that the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care was broadly based, and that there were some country differences in data collection, problem definition, and planning. In contrast, decision making related to the implementation and evaluation of nursing is quite similar in the different countries. Canada and the United States on the one hand, and Finland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland on the other, showed more similarities with each other in data collection, problem definition, and nursing planning related to decision making. Neither experience nor nurse's knowledge structure was associated with different decision-making approaches.

Canada↗

Decision making of psychiatric nurses in Finland, Northern Ireland, and the United States.

The purpose of this study was to describe the decision-making process of 339 psychiatric nurses in Finland, Northern Ireland, and the United States and to discuss any differences observed among nurses in these countries. The instrument used in the study was a 56-item, Likert-type questionnaire tested in several previous studies that have confirmed its validity and reliability. Three different models of decision making were identified on the basis of factor analysis. Overall, it may be concluded that the decision-making process of psychiatric nurses is broadly based, but it varies between countries. Nurses from Northern Ireland used only analytical decision-making models; nurses from Finland made decisions strongly favored analytical decision-making models but also used some intuitive models; and American nurses used intuitive decision-making and analytical-processing models.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗

Patient education and health-related quality of life: surgical hospital patients as a case in point.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the connections between patient education and health-related quality of life as an outcome variable. Data were collected among surgical hospital patients (n = 237) in Finland. On the basis of the results, there seems to be a positive relationship between received knowledge and health-related quality of life, and as such, the study produced knowledge about one quality indicator in nursing care. More research is needed to explore this connection in greater details.

Adolescent↗