PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Sanghera

Publications and source records attributed to S Sanghera.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Dose response to intrathecal diamorphine for elective caesarean section and compliance with a national audit standard.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind randomised controlled trial investigated the most appropriate dose of intrathecal diamorphine to use with high-dose diclofenac as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for caesarean section under subarachnoid block. We also wished to establish whether it was possible to satisfy the Royal College of Anaesthetists postoperative pain audit recommendation for this patient group. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting for elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block were recruited and divided into four groups. Treatment was standard except that patients were given either placebo or one of three different doses of intrathecal diamorphine (100 microg, 200 microg or 300 microg). All patients were given regular paracetamol, high-dose diclofenac and an hourly subcutaneous diamorphine regimen for breakthrough pain. RESULTS: There was a dose-dependent improvement in analgesia with intrathecal diamorphine. Only 37.9% of patients given 300 microg of intrathecal diamorphine had a visual analogue pain score of 3/10 or less throughout the study. There was a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of itching with intrathecal diamorphine although the incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that for elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block with high dose diclofenac, analgesia was optimal with 300 microg of intrathecal diamorphine. Even the highest dose of intrathecal diamorphine did not achieve the Royal College of Anaesthetists postoperative audit target that 90% of patients should have a pain score of no more than 3/10. We believe that this target is too arduous.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Arm and ankle blood pressure during caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that measurement of non-invasive blood pressure during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia fails in over 50% of cases. We felt that errors would be less likely if blood pressure could be measured at the ankle as it is immobile during caesarean section. The purpose of our study was to determine whether blood pressure measurement at the ankle was equivalent to the arm. METHOD: Following ethical approval, informed consent was obtained from 30 women scheduled for elective caesarean section. Two non-invasive blood pressure cuffs, one on the upper arm and one on the ankle, were used to measure blood pressures at three timed intervals: before spinal insertion, before surgery and after delivery of the neonate. RESULTS: Using the method of Bland and Altman we found that there was only marginal agreement between the two methods. On eight out of 15 occasions where there was a greater than 20% fall in arm systolic blood pressure, this was not detected at the ankle. CONCLUSION: We cannot recommend the use of the ankle to measure blood pressure during caesarean section.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗