PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Shacham

Publications and source records attributed to S Shacham.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Modeling the 3D structure of GPCRs from sequence.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large and functionally diverse protein superfamily, which form a seven transmembrane (TM) helices bundle with alternating extra-cellular and intracellular loops. GPCRs are considered to be one of the most important groups of drug targets because they are involved in a broad range of body functions and processes and are related to major diseases. In this paper we present a new technology, named PREDICT, for modeling the 3D structure of any GPCR from its amino acid sequence. This approach takes into account both internal protein properties (i.e., the amino acid sequence) and the properties of the membrane environment. Unlike competing approaches, the new technology does not rely on the single known structure of rhodopsin, and is thus capable of predicting novel GPCR conformations. We demonstrate the capabilities of PREDICT in reproducing the known experimental structure of rhodopsin. In principle, PREDICT-generated models offer new opportunities for structure-based drug discovery towards GPCR targets.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mechanism of GnRH receptor signaling on gonadotropin release and gene expression in pituitary gonadotrophs.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), the first key hormone of reproduction, is synthesized and secreted from the hypothalamus in a pulsatile manner and stimulates pituitary gonadotrophs (5-10% of the pituitary cells) to synthesize and release gonadotropin luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Gonadotrophs consist of 60% multihormonal cells (LH+FSH) and 18% LH- and 22% FSH-containing cells. LH and FSH, members of the glycoprotein hormone family, stimulate spermatogenesis, folliculogenesis, and ovulation. Although GnRH plays a pivotal role in gonadotropin synthesis and release, other factors such as gonadal steroids and gonadal peptides exert positive and negative feedback mechanisms, which affect GnRH actions. GnRH actions include activation of phosphoinositide turnover as well as phospholipase D and A2, mobilization and influx of Ca2+, activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). A complex crosstalk between the above messenger molecules mediates the diverse actions of GnRH. Understanding the signaling mechanisms involved in GnRH actions is the basis for our understanding of basic reproductive functions in general and gonadotropin synthesis and release in particular.

Animals↗

Mechanism of GnRH receptor signaling: from the membrane to the nucleus.

The purpose of this review is to update the information concerning the intracellular effect of GnRH. Binding of GnRH to a G-protein coupled receptor leads to stimulation of Gq and/or G11 protein and to activation of phospholipase C beta. Inositol 1-4-5-triphosphate and early diacylylycerol are the second messengers required for conventional protein kinase C activation. Activation of phospholipase A2 and phospholipase D are also involved, as demonstrated by the liberation of Arachidonic Acid and Phosphatidic Acid. Pituitary cells also express atypical protein kinase C isoforms which mode of activation is not known. Hypothesis concerning transcriptional regulation are presented.

Animals↗

Mechanism of GnRH receptor signaling: combinatorial cross-talk of Ca2+ and protein kinase C.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), the first key hormone of reproduction, is synthesized in the hypothalamus and is released in a pulsatile manner to stimulate pituitary gonadotrope-luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) synthesis and release. Gonadotropes represent only about 10% of pituitary cells and are divided into monohormonal cells (18% LH and 22% FSH cells) and 60% multihormonal (LH + FSH) cells. GnRH binds to a specific seven transmembrane domain receptor which is coupled to Gq and activates sequentially different phospholipases to provide Ca2+ and lipid-derived messenger molecules. Initially, phospholipase C is activated, followed by activation of both phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and phospholipase D (PLD). Generation of the second messengers inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol (DAG) lead to mobilization of intracellular pools of Ca2+ and activation of protein kinase C (PKC). Early DAG and Ca2+, derived via enhanced phosphoinositide turnover, might be involved in rapid activation of selective Ca(2+)-dependent, conventional PKC isoforms (cPKC). On the other hand, late DAG, derived from phosphatidic acid (PA) via PLD, may activate Ca(2+)-independent novel PKC isoforms (nPKC). In addition, arachidonic acid (AA) which is liberated by activated PLA2, might also support selective activation of PKC isoforms (PKCs) with or without other cofactors. Differential cross-talk of Ca2+, AA, and selective PKCs might generate a compartmentalized signal transduction cascade to downstream elements which are activated during the neurohormone action. Among those elements is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade which is activated by GnRH in a PKC-, Ca(2+)-, and protein tyrosine kinase (PTK)-dependent fashion. Transcriptional regulation can be mediated by the activation of transcription factors such as c-fos by MAPK. Indeed, GnRH activates the expression of both c-jun and c-fos which might participate in gene regulation via the formation of AP-1. The signaling cascade leading to gonadotropin (LH and FSH) gene regulation by GnRH is still not known and might involve the above-mentioned cascades. AA and selective lipoxygenase products such as leukotriene C4 also participate in GnRH action, possibly by cross-talk with PKCs, or by an autocrine/paracrine amplification cycle. A complex combinatorial, spatial and temporal cross-talk of the above messenger molecules seems to mediate the diverse effects elicited by GnRH, the first key hormone of the reproductive cycle.

Animals↗

Mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the pituitary of alphaT3-1 cell line: differential roles of calcium and protein kinase C.

The mechanism of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK, ERK) stimulation by the GnRH analog [D-Trp6]GnRH (GnRH-a) was investigated in the gonadotroph-derived alphaT3-1 cell line. GnRH-a as well as the protein kinase C (PKC) activator 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) stimulated a sustained response of MAPK activity, whereas epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulated a transient response. MAPK kinase (MEK) is also activated by GnRH-a, but in a transient manner. GnRH-a and TPA apparently activated mainly the MAPK isoform ERK1, as revealed by Mono-Q fast protein liquid chromatography followed by Western blotting as well as by gel kinase assay. GnRH-a and TPA stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, and this effect as well as the stimulation of MAPK activity were inhibited by the PKC inhibitor GF 109203X. Similarly, down-regulation of TPA-sensitive PKC subspecies nearly abolished the effect of GnRH-a and TPA on MAPK activity. Furthermore, the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibitor genistein inhibited protein tyrosine phosphorylation and reduced GnRH-a-stimulated MAPK activity by 50%, suggesting the participation of genistein-sensitive and insensitive pathways in GnRH-a action. Although Ca2+ ionophores have only a marginal stimulatory effect, the removal of Ca2+ markedly reduced MAPK activation by GnRH-a and TPA, but had no effect on GnRH-a and TPA stimulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Interestingly, the removal of Ca2+ also partly inhibited the activation of MAPK by EGF and vanadate/H2O2. Thus, a calcium-dependent component(s) downstream of PKC and PTK might also participate in MAPK activation. Elevation of cAMP by forskolin exerted partial inhibition on EGF, but not on TPA or GnRH-a action, suggesting that MEK activators other than Raf-1 might be involved in GnRH action. We conclude that Ca2+, PTK, and PKC participate in the activation of MAPK by GnRH-a, with Ca2+ being necessary downstream to PKC and PTK.

Animals↗

Signal transduction of the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor: cross-talk of calcium, protein kinase C (PKC), and arachidonic acid.

1. The decapeptide neurohormone gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is the first key hormone of the reproductive system. Produced in the hypothalamus, GnRH is released in a pulsatile manner into the hypophysial portal system to reach the anterior pituitary and stimulates the release and synthesis of the gonadotropin hormones LH and FSH. GnRH, a Ca2+ mobilizing ligand, binds to its respective binding protein, which is a member of the seven transmembrane domain receptor family and activates a G-protein (Gq). 2. The alpha subunit of Gq triggers enhanced phosphoinositide turnover and the elevation of multiple second messengers required for gonadotropin release and biosynthesis. 3. The messenger molecules IP3, diacylglycerol, Ca2+, protein kinase C, arachidonic acid and leukotriene C4 cross-talk in a complex networks of signaling, culminating in gonadotropin release and gene expression.

Animals↗

Active coping reduces reports of pain from childbirth.

Two studies were conducted in which pain and negative moods during labor were examined in relation to two key, independent variables: instructions to monitor labor contractions given to parturients on admission to the labor service and attendance at LaMaze (childbirth preparation) classes. In Study 1 (N = 48) pain and negative moods showed a sharp decline at Stage 2 (active labor) for women told to monitor and those who had attended classes; there was no decline for the control group. In Study 2 (N = 29), women attending LaMaze classes reported a similar decline in pain during active labor and were more energetic and less tired at admission. Of the three different mechanisms used to derive hypotheses, schema-directed coping provided the best account for the decline in pain and distress during active labor. A second mechanism, accurate expectations, seemed to account for the enhanced energy at the point of admission, in anticipation of birth.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

CSF beta-endorphin and the severity of pain.

Beta-endorphin-like immunoreactivity (i beta-EP) was measured in the CSF at myelography of 24 patients suspected of vertebral disk disease. Patients made several ratings of mood and pain for the 24 hours preceding myelography. Composite scores for pain, negative mood, and positive mood were derived by factor analysis. Pain Factor scores were negatively correlated with i beta-EP (r = -0.59, p less than 0.001), indicating a possible role for i beta-EP in the perception of the severity of pain. No significant correlation was shown between Positive or Negative Mood Factor scores and CSF i beta-EP. A physiologic indicator of pain severity is discussed.

Emotions↗

Emotional states and pain: intraindividual and interindividual measures of association.

The present study investigated the correlation between cancer pain severity and mood states, and addressed methodological issues involved in measuring the association between these groups of variables. Five monthly interviews were administered to 95 cancer pain patients; each interview contained four measures of pain severity and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The relationships between the two sets of variables were assessed using both interindividual (cross-sectional) and intraindividual (within-subject) methods of correlational analysis. Both types of analyses suggested small but significant positive correlations between the pain measures and negative mood states, and inverse correlations between pain and positive mood. The data also indicated that patients reported high levels of pain but reported little mood disturbance. In addressing methodological issues, the study clarified conceptual and computational differences between the two types of correlational analyses and indicated the appropriate applications of each method.

Affective Symptoms↗

A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States.

The feasibility of using a shorter version of the Profile of Mood States is examined. Eighty-three cancer patients were administered the Profile of Mood States. The scales' internal consistency (coefficient alpha) and the items' face validity were used as criteria for eliminating items. The number of items was reduced from 65 to 37 and the correlation coefficients between the short and original scales were all above .95, indicating the suitability of the short version for estimating the original mood scale scores in this population.

Affective Symptoms↗

Effects of preparatory information about sensations, threat of pain, and attention on cold pressor distress.

Pain experience is conceptualized as a combination of stimulus sensations (e.g., aching) and emotional distress. In Experiment 1, less distress was reported to cold pressor stimulation by subjects first told about stimulus sensations than by subjects who were uninformed or were told about symptoms of bodily arousal (e.g., tension). Adding a pain warning to sensation information blocked distress reduction, presumably by eliciting an emotional interpretation of the stimulus. In Experiment 2, subjects attending only to hand sensations reported less distress than subjects attending to their bodies. This decrease in the power of the stimulus to provoke emotion is presumably mediated by a schema of hand sensations formed by attention. In Experiment 3, subjects attending to hand sensations early in the immersion and distracting themselves later reported the same low levels of distress as did subjects who attended to hand sensations throughout. Subjects distracted throughout and subjects attending to hand sensations later showed no distress reduction. Therefore, stimulus schematization must precede distress reduction. Implications for distress control are discussed.

Arousal↗