Biomedical subjects
S Shakib
Publications and source records attributed to S Shakib.
Evaluation of BioStar FLU OIA assay for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens.
BACKGROUND: Demand for the rapid diagnosis of influenza infections has increased with the advent of the availability of neuraminidase antiviral therapy for influenza A and B. Several rapid assays that detect both influenza A and B are now available. OBJECTIVES: In this study we compared the performance of the BioStar FLU OIA assay to Bartels Viral Respiratory Screening and Identification Kit (Bartels Inc., Issaquah, WA), and cell culture. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 145 patient specimens for influenza virus detection submitted in either viral transport medium or in sterile containers were evaluated by the three methods. Specimen types included nasal washings, nasal swabs, sputum, throat swabs, and bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) fluids. RESULTS: Fifty six positive specimens were identified based on culture and/or DFA. Of these, 30 specimens were positive by the OIA assay for an overall sensitivity of 54%. The OIA assay detected 48% (n = 21) of the 44 culture positive specimens and 81% (n = 29) of the 36 DFA positive specimens. Eighty six of the 89 culture/DFA negative samples were negative by the OIA assay (97% specificity). Analysis of the OIA assay sensitivity from samples submitted in M4 transport medium or in sterile containers revealed that M4 transport medium does not reduce the sensitivity of the OIA assay. Fifteen of the 27 positive samples submitted in M4 transport medium were positive by the OIA assay (56% sensitivity) compared to 15 of 29 positive samples transported in sterile containers (52% sensitivity). Twelve specimens were either culture and/or DFA positive for viruses other than influenza, but negative by the OIA assay, suggesting that there was no cross reactivity of the OIA assay with the other virus types recovered in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The overall excellent specificity of the BioStar FLU OIA allows for treatment of positive patients for influenza, however, a negative result should be confirmed by DFA and culture.
Evaluation of the dose-response relationship for intra-nasal oxymetazoline hydrochloride in normal adults.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dose-response relationship of increasing doses of oxymetazoline compared with placebo in normal subjects, and to determine the sensitivities of rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry and symptoms in discriminating between differing doses of oxymetazoline in normal subjects. METHODS: The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-response design. One hundred and twenty-five healthy volunteers with no nasal obstruction were randomized to administration of a single intra-nasal dose of oxymetazoline (6.25 microg, 12.5 microg, 25 microg or 50 microg) or placebo to each nasal cavity. Nasal airway resistance (NAR) was measured by active posterior rhinomanometry. Total minimum cross-sectional area (tMCA) and volume (tVOL) were measured by acoustic rhinometry. Symptoms of congestion (CON) were assessed on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The two highest doses of oxymetazoline produced a significant decrease in NAR compared with placebo (P = 0.015) but not between placebo and 12.5 microg or 6.25 microg. There was a dose-response relationship for tVOL, which increased significantly after all doses compared with placebo (P < 0. 001) and showed differences between 6.25-microg and 25-microg (P < 0. 014) and 12.5-microg and 50-microg (P < 0.05) doses. tMCA increased compared with placebo after all treatments (P = 0.028), but there were no significant differences between any of the active doses. There were no significant changes in CON after any treatments compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: tVOL shows a clear dose-response relationship for the range of doses of oxymetazoline administered. tVOL provides a sensitive and discriminatory measure of small nasal changes after low doses of oxymetazoline. NAR is able to discriminate between doses, but is less sensitive than tVOL and tMCA, requiring a higher threshold dose before significant changes are seen in nasal patency.
The nasal airways response in normal subjects to oxymetazoline spray: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
AIMS: The effects of a single dose of oxymetazoline nasal spray on nasal patency have been compared with placebo using three separate measuring systems in normal subjects. METHODS: The study was a placebo-controlled, randomised double-blind crossover trial. Subjects without ear, nose or throat disease and with resting nasal airways resistance >0.15 Pa s cm-3 were selected so that a fall in airways resistance could be detected. Nasal airways resistance (NAR) was measured by NR6-2 rhinomanometer. Acoustic rhinometry (SR-2000 rhinometer) provided the sum of the minimum cross-sectional areas (tMCA) and volume (tVOL) of the left and right nasal cavities. Symptoms of congestion were assessed on a visual analogue scale (CON, range 0-100). Measurements were made for 60 min before and for 120 min after bilateral administration of oxymetazoline nasal spray (0.9 mg) or placebo (0.9% saline). Crossover occurred 7-21 days later. Results for all measures were analysed as change from average baseline value by trapezoidal AUC, and statistical significance was tested by 2-way anova. RESULTS: NAR, tMCA, tVOL and CON did not change after placebo, but NAR and CON fell and tMCA and tVOL increased significantly at all timepoints after oxymetazoline. NAR_AUC, tVOL_AUC, tMCA_AUC were significantly different between placebo and oxymetazoline (P<0.001) as was CON_AUC (P=0.012). The day-to-day intraindividual repeatability of baseline NAR tMCA and tVOL was <10%. CONCLUSIONS: Normal subjects can be used to detect the effects of nasally vasoactive drugs with a variety of complementary systems, with the advantages of easy subject recruitment and low variability.
Value of the Australian antibiotic guidelines nomogram in monitoring aminoglycoside concentrations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.