Biomedical subjects

S Staszewski

Publications and source records attributed to S Staszewski.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a combination of indinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir in multiply pretreated HIV-1 infected adults.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in a protease inhibitor only combination. METHODS: Plasma drug levels of patients taking indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/100mg twice daily (n = 24, group 1) were compared to patients taking either lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (n = 35, group2) or indinavir/ritonavir 800/100mg (n = 33, group3) twice daily plus nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). Steady-state drug concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS. Minimum and maximum concentrations (C subsetmin, C subsetmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC subset0-12h), total clearance (CL subsettot) and half-life (t1/2) were calculated. HIV viral load, CD4 cell count and adverse events causing early termination of therapy were correlated over a period of 48 weeks. RESULTS: Plasma levels of lopinavir/ritonavir were significantly enhanced when combined with indinavir compared to a regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir+NRTI: Mean lopinavir AUC subset(0-12h) 80,912 ng*h/mL vs. 60,548 ng*h/mL; C subsetmin 4,633 ng/mL vs. 3,258 ng/mL; C subsetmax 8,023 ng/mL vs. 6,710 ng/mL. Mean ritonavir AUC(0-12h) 6,907 ng*h/mL vs. 3,467 ng*h/mL; Cmin 220 ng/mL vs. 125 ng/mL; C subsetmax 1,059 ng/mL vs. 522 ng/mL. Indinavir levels were comparable for both indinavir containing regimen. A significantly smaller number of patients stopped indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir therapy (group1: 16.7%) than indinavir/ritonavir + NRTI treatment (group3: 45.5%) due to adverse events. Virological failure was the main reason for early termination of treatment with indinavir/lopinavir/ ritonavir before week 48 (group1: 50%). CONCLUSIONS: indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/ 100mg twice daily represents a therapy option with an adequate safety but only short term efficacy for extensively pretreated patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

A randomized, open-label study to compare the effects of two different doses of recombinant human growth hormone on fat reduction and fasting metabolic parameters in HIV-1-infected patients with lipodystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown beneficial effects of recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) in reducing visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in HIV-1-infected patients with lipodystrophy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to r-hGH 4 mg daily (group A) or three times per week (group B) over 12 weeks, followed by a 2 mg daily maintenance dose for 12 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed to assess body composition. RESULTS: A total of 26 subjects were included in the study. VAT was reduced overall by 35.1 cm(2) (29.5%) at week 12 and by 49 cm(2) (39.9%) at week 24, respectively, compared with baseline (P<0.001 for both comparisons). By week 12, VAT was reduced by 27 and 29% (A vs B; P=0.47) while facial fat was reduced by 3.3 and 2.6 cm(2) in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.96). Over 24 weeks, VAT was reduced by 42 and 38% (P=0.35) and facial fat by 3.2 and 2.4 cm(2) in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.91), compared with baseline. There was a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in group A than in group B (4.9 vs 2.4 mg/dL in week 12 and 7.1 vs -0.4 mg/dL in week 24; P=0.03). Fasting insulin levels increased, whereas glucose and insulin measured in oral glucose tolerance tests remained unchanged. Drug-related side effects were transient and reversible, but more common in group A (67%) than in group B (29%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms reports that r-hGH effectively reduces VAT, with a relatively small reduction of facial and limb fat.

Adipose Tissue↗

PubMed2006

The feasibility of clinical endpoint trials in HIV infection in the highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) era.

BACKGROUND: Planning clinical-endpoint trials in patients with HIV remain difficult as long-term follow-up of many patients is required. Cohort studies of patients with HIV can provide key estimates of the likely disease progression, required sample size and follow-up. OBJECTIVES: To verify the assumptions used in designing ESPRIT, a large randomized clinical trial assessing the clinical benefit of interleukin-2 treatment in patients with HIV infection, to use EuroSIDA to mimic the inclusion criterion of ESPRIT in order to compare the observed event rate in ESPRIT with the projected rate in EuroSIDA, and to project the required length of ESPRIT. METHODS: Patients in EuroSIDA who satisfied the ESPRIT recruitment criteria were selected. Patients were followed from baseline to new AIDS or death. RESULTS: The incidence of clinical progression in the selected EuroSIDA patients (N = 4482) was 1.5 per 100 PYFU (95% CI 1.3-1.7), and did not increase with increasing time from baseline, contrary to what was assumed in the design of the ESPRIT trial. In ESPRIT (N = 4150), for which the comparative data remain blinded, the incidence was 1.1 per 100 PYFU (95% CI 0.9-1.3), with no increase over time. The average follow-up required to complete ESPRIT and accrue the 320 events required by protocol would be seven years, 10 months using the projected rates from the EuroSIDA study, and seven years, 11 months if the observed event rate in ESPRIT continued unchanged. LIMITATIONS: Differences between patients recruited to observational studies or clinical trials cannot always be adjusted for. CONCLUSIONS: Event rates in EuroSIDA were similar in the first two years to those used in the design of ESPRIT, but did not increase over time, leading to an increase in the expected duration of ESPRIT. Clinical endpoint trials in HIV infection remain feasible, and large cohort studies are critical to the planning and ongoing assessment of design assumptions in such trials. The underlying assumptions of the clinical trial should be re-examined to ensure the original trial assumptions remain valid.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2004

Time to virological failure of 3 classes of antiretrovirals after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy: results from the EuroSIDA study group.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of virological triple drug-class failure (TCF) and to summarize the clinical outcome for patients who started receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: The present study is an observational longitudinal study of 3496 treatment-experienced (TE) and treatment-naive (TN) patients monitored from the time they started receiving HAART (baseline) until TCF occurred (as determined on the basis of viral loads), until AIDS was newly diagnosed, or until death. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-five patients (12.7%) had TCF; 370 (16.6%) of 2230 patients were TE, and 75 (5.9%) of 1266 patients were TN. At 6 years after starting HAART, 21.4% of TE and 11.2% of TN patients had TCF (P<.0001). The prevalence of TCF at or after 2002 was 15.5% in TE patients and 4.8% in TN patients. TN patients had a 32% annual increase in the incidence of TCF (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%-54%; P<.0001); at 5 years after starting HAART, the rate was comparable for TE and TN patients (3.3 and 3.4 cases/100 person-years of follow-up [PYFU], respectively). The incidence of new cases of AIDS or death was 2.7 cases/100 PYFU in patients who did not experience TCF and 5.0 cases/100 PYFU in patients who did experience TCF, an estimated 36% increase with each category of TCF (95% CI, 19%-56%; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of TCF was low after patients started receiving HAART, particularly among TN patients. Despite the influx of patients who had started receiving HAART more recently, the prevalence of TCF increased over calendar time. Patients with TCF had a higher incidence of newly diagnosed AIDS or death. Treatment of patients with TCF deserves further investigation.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2004

["State of the HAART". Current strategies for antiretroviral therapy].

The goal of antiretroviral therapy is to interrupt the disease progression and to approach normal life expectancy for individuals with HIV. The condition for this is to deter the emergence of resistant HIV. This aim is achieved by improved patient drug adherence, sufficient enteral resorption and the control of interactions, as well as good tolerability and full antiviral activity. An insufficient drug exposure for protease inhibitors is overcome by the use of a booster agent. Emerging HIV-resistance can be described in a phase model:Phase 1:replication of wild-type HIV under incomplete suppressive therapy. Phase 2:transformation of wild-type into resistant HIV through accumulation of mutations. A preventive, resistance-guided switch of therapy preserves therapeutic options for the future. Phase 3:replication of resistant HIV (no more mutations possible).a)stable immunity: continue with failing therapy.b)threatening disease progression: resistance-guided switch to a salvage-regimen.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

PubMed2004

Updated European recommendations for the clinical use of HIV drug resistance testing.

In most European countries, HIV drug resistance testing has become a routine clinical tool. However, its practical implementation in a clinical context is demanding. The European HIV Drug Resistance Panel was established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists on this topic and to propose quality control measures. The panel recommends resistance testing for the following indications: i) drug-naive patients with acute or recent infection; ii) therapy failure, including suboptimal treatment response, when treatment change is considered; iii) pregnant HIV-1-infected women and paediatric patients with detectable viral load when treatment initiation or change is considered; and iv) genotype source patient when post-exposure prophylaxis is considered. In addition, for drug-naive patients with chronic infection in whom treatment is to be started, the panel suggests that resistance testing should be strongly considered and recommends testing the earliest sample for drug resistance if suspicion of resistance is high or prevalence of resistance in this population exceeds 10%. The panel does not favour genotyping over phenotype, however it is anticipated that genotyping will be used more often because of its greater accessibility, lower cost and faster turnaround time. For the interpretation of resistance data, clinically validated systems should be used to the greatest extent possible. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take regular part in quality assurance programs. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and meet regularly to discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response. The panel also encourages the timely collection of epidemiological information to estimate the impact of transmission of resistant HIV and the prevalence of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in the different European countries.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed2003

Prognostic importance of initial response in HIV-1 infected patients starting potent antiretroviral therapy: analysis of prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: We examined whether the initial virological and immunological response to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) is prognostic in patients with HIV-1 who start HAART. METHODS: We analysed 13 cohort studies from Europe and North America including 9323 adult treatment-naive patients who were starting HAART with a combination of at least three drugs. We modelled clinical progression from month 6 after starting HAART, taking into account CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA measured at baseline and 6 months. FINDINGS: During 13408 years of follow-up 152 patients died and 874 developed AIDS or died. Compared with patients who had a 6-month CD4 count of fewer than 25 cells/microL, adjusted hazard ratios for AIDS or death were 0.55 (95%CI 0.32-0.96) for 25-49 cells/microL, 0.62 (0.40-0.96) for 50-99 cells/microL, 0.42 (0.28-0.64) for 100-199 cells/microL, 0.25 (0.16-0.38) for 200-349 cells/microL, and 0.18 (0.11-0.29) for 350 or more cells/microL at 6 months. Compared with patients who had a 6-month HIV-1 RNA of 100000 copies/mL or greater, adjusted hazard ratios for AIDS or death were 0.59 (0.41-0.86) for 10000-99999 copies/mL, 0.42 (0.29-0.61) for 500-9999 copies/mL, and 0.29 (0.21-0.39) for 6-month HIV-1 RNA of 500 copies/mL or fewer. Baseline CD4 and HIV-1 RNA were not associated with progression after controlling for 6-month concentrations. The probability of progression at 3 years ranged from 2.4% in the patients in the lowest-risk stratum to 83% in patients in the highest-risk stratum. INTERPRETATION: At 6 months after starting HAART, the current CD4 cell count and viral load, but not values at baseline, are strongly associated with subsequent disease progression. Our findings should inform guidelines on when to modify HAART.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2002

Limited effect of food composition on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir administered twice daily.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of two different breakfasts on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir under steady state conditions. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were evaluated in a 17 days open labeled one sequence crossover study evaluating the effect of a 'light' breakfast (350 kcal) compared to a standard breakfast (800 kcal) on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir at steady state during 1250 mg twice daily (BID) administration. RESULTS: After administration with a standard breakfast higher concentrations of nelfinavir were observed during the terminal phase than after administration with a 'light' breakfast. The comparison of the log subset 10 transformed parameters C subset 1-hr-postdose, AUC subset 0-12h, C subset max, and C subset 12 hours, showed that the AUC subset 0-12h was decreased by 13% (P = 0.01) after administration with the 'light' breakfast. Nelfinavir 1250 mg BID was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although drug intake with a 'light' breakfast' showed a statistically significant decrease for nelfinavir AUC subset 0-12h, this marginal 13% reduction is not considered clinically relevant. No significant effects of the two different breakfasts were found for the remaining three parameters tested C subset 1-hr-postdose, C subset max, and C subset 12 hours.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Durability of HIV-1 viral suppression over 3.3 years with multi-drug antiretroviral therapy in previously drug-naive individuals.

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the long-term durability of viral suppression in individuals initially achieving a viral load of less than 50 copies/ml within 24 weeks of starting antiretroviral therapy, nor the extent to which therapy interruption accounts for the loss of suppression. METHODS: We intensely followed all 336 antiretroviral-naive patients attending the Goethe Universitat Clinic who began multi-drug combination regimens and in whom a viral load of less than 50 copies/ml was achieved within 24 weeks, in order to assess the risk of viral load rebound. Inspection of case notes allowed the distinction of viral rebound according to whether there was an associated complete interruption of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients experienced viral rebound during 543.1 person-years of follow-up, giving a 25.3% risk of rebound by 3.3 years from first achieving viral suppression. However, for 47 of the patients with viral rebound there was an associated documented complete interruption of antiretroviral therapy, mostly as a result of co-morbidities, leaving 14 who appear to represent a failure of the virological efficacy of therapy (viral breakthrough; 5.2% risk by 3.3 years). The risk of viral breakthrough declined with the increased duration of suppression (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The intrinsic virological effectiveness of multi-drug antiretroviral therapy in previously drug-naive individuals appears to be such that viral suppression, once achieved, can be maintained for several years in patients not interrupting therapy. The major challenge is to develop regimens that can be taken consistently and safely for such long periods of time.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

HIV viral load response to antiretroviral therapy according to the baseline CD4 cell count and viral load.

CONTEXT: It is unclear whether delay in initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) may lead to a poorer viral load response for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of viral load response to ART with baseline CD4 cell count and baseline viral load. DESIGN: Inception cohort of 3430 therapy-naive patients with HIV, of whom 3226 patients had at least 1 viral load count after the start of ART. SETTING: Three cohort studies of patients cared for in HIV clinics in Europe between 1996 and 2000. PATIENTS: All patients initiating ART consisting of at least 3 drugs initiated in or after 1996 and for whom CD4 cell count and viral load were available in the prior 6 months (at most). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Viral load decrease to below 500 copies/mL; viral load rebound to above 500 copies/mL (2 consecutive values). RESULTS: Of 3226 patients during the median follow-up of 119 weeks, 2741 (85%) experienced viral suppression to less than 500 copies/mL by 32 weeks. Relative hazards (RHs) of achieving this were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.21) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.84-1.04) for baseline CD4 cell counts between 200 and 349 x 10(6)/L and baseline CD4 cell counts lower than 200 x 10(6)/L, respectively, compared with baseline CD4 cell counts of 350 x 10(6)/L or higher, after adjustment for several factors including baseline viral load. For baseline viral load, the RHs were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.84-1.07) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58-0.74), for 10 000 to 99 999 and 100 000 copies/mL or greater, respectively, compared with less than 10 000 copies/mL, but the probability of viral load lower than 500 copies/mL at week 32 was similar in all 3 groups. Subsequent rebound above 500 copies/mL was no more likely with a lower baseline CD4 cell count or higher viral load. CONCLUSION: In this study, lower CD4 cell counts and higher viral loads at baseline were not associated with poorer virological outcome of ART. Those with baseline viral loads of greater than 100 000 copies/mL had a slower rate of achieving viral suppression.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Simplification with abacavir-based triple nucleoside therapy versus continued protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antiviral efficacy, safety and adherence in patients switched to an abacavir-containing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen after long-term HIV-1 RNA suppression with a dual NRTI/protease inhibitor (PI) combination. METHODS: In an open-label, multicentre study, patients receiving 2NRTI plus PI for at least 6 months, with a history of undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA since the initiation of therapy and plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening, were randomly assigned to replace the PI with abacavir (n = 105) or continue the same treatment (n = 106). Clinical assessments included plasma HIV-1 RNA, chemistry, haematology, lymphocyte counts, and adverse event reports. Adherence to treatment was assessed by patient self-report. RESULTS: A significantly longer time to treatment failure was demonstrated in the abacavir arm compared with the PI arm (P = 0.03) while treatment failure was experienced by significantly more patients in the PI arm: 24 (23%) versus 12 (12%) (P = 0.03). Therapy-limiting toxicity led to treatment failure in eight versus 14 cases in the abacavir and PI arms, respectively, whereas virological rebound was the cause in four versus two cases. Significant reductions in cholesterol and non-fasting triglyceride plasma levels at 48 weeks were observed in the abacavir arm (P < 0.001 andP = 0.035, respectively). The number of patients reporting no difficulty in taking their therapy showed a marked increase from baseline in the abacavir arm. CONCLUSION: The replacement of PI by abacavir in a triple combination regimen following prolonged suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA provides continued virological suppression, significant improvements in lipid abnormalities and enhanced ease of dosing.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine vs indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: A randomized equivalence trial.

CONTEXT: Abacavir, a nucleoside analogue, has demonstrated suppression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication alone and in combination therapy. However, the role of abacavir in a triple nucleoside combination regimen has not been evaluated against a standard protease inhibitor-containing regimen for initial antiretroviral treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antiretroviral equivalence and safety of an abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen compared with an indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine regimen. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter, phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial with an enrollment period from August 1997 to June 1998, with follow-up through 48 weeks at 73 clinical research units in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe. PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-two antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults with a plasma HIV RNA level of at least 10 000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count of at least 100 x 10(6)/L. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified by baseline HIV RNA level and randomly assigned to receive a combination tablet containing 150 mg of lamivudine and 300 mg of zidovudine twice daily plus either 300 mg of abacavir twice daily and indinavir placebo or 800 mg of indinavir every 8 hours daily plus abacavir placebo. After 16 weeks, patients with confirmed HIV RNA levels greater than 400 copies/mL were eligible to continue receiving randomized treatment or receive open-label therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Virologic suppression, defined as HIV RNA concentration of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who met the end point of having an HIV RNA level of 400 copies/mL or less at week 48 was equivalent in the abacavir group (51% [133/262]) and in the indinavir group (51% [136/265]) with a treatment difference of -0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -9% to 8%). In patients with baseline HIV RNA levels greater than 100 000 copies/mL, the proportion of patients achieving less than 50 copies/mL was greater in the indinavir group than in the abacavir group with 45% (45/100) vs 31% (30/96) and a treatment diference of -14% (95% CI, -27% to 0%). The 2 treatments were comparable with respect to their effects on CD4 cell count. There was no difference between groups in the frequency of treatment-limiting adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. One death in the abacavir group was attributed to hypersensitivity reaction, which occurred following rechallenge with abacavir, approximately 3 weeks after initiating study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults, the triple nucleoside regimen of abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine was equivalent to the regimen of indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in achieving a plasma HIV RNA level of less than 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy over the first 24 weeks of therapy according to the pre-therapy viral load and the weeks 4-8 viral load.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the viral response to HAART by weeks 4 and 8 in previously antiretroviral-naive patients. To assess whether the weeks 4 or 8 viral loads are useful predictors of viral suppression by week 24. DESIGN: A large clinical database including 453 antiretroviral-naive patients whose plasma viral load was monitored every 4 weeks. METHODS: Observed probabilities of achieving a viral load < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24 (days 84-168) from starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were calculated according to viral loads at weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS: A total of 42.4% of patients (153/361) reached < or = 500 copies/ml viral load by week 4 and 70.4% (245/348) by week 8. Viral suppression below 500 copies/ml by 4-8 weeks was similar irrespective of the pre-HAART viral load. In patients with viral loads above 10000 copies/ml at week 4, 60.6% (20/33) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24. In patients with viral loads still above 10000 copies/ml at week 8, only 42.3% (11/26) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24, and only 33.3% (3/9) maintained viral suppression below 500 copies/ml to week 48. CONCLUSION: Viral loads at weeks 4 and 8 should be monitored to detect early signs of low subsequent viral suppression. For previously antiretroviral-naive patients whose viral loads after 8 weeks of HAART are still above 10000, there is an urgent need to assess adherence to therapy, drug levels and resistance, so management can be modified accordingly to reduce the rate of week 24 virological failure.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Virological and immunological effects of treatment interruptions in HIV-1 infected patients with treatment failure.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the immunological and virological effects of treatment interruptions in HIV-1-infected patients with treatment failure and multidrug-resistant virus. METHODS: Drug susceptibility was assessed using Antivirogram and genotypic analysis was based on population and clonal sequencing for 48 patients who had interrupted treatment (> or = 2 months). RESULTS: Treatment interruption resulted in viral load increases (mean 0.7 log 10 copies/ ml; P = 0.0001) and CD4 cell count decreases (mean 89 x 10(6) cells/l; P = 0.0001). A complete shift to wild-type virus at the phenotypic, genotypic and clonal level was observed in 28/45 patients. These patients differed from those that did not show a shift to wild type in baseline CD4 cell counts (192 versus 59 x 10(6) cells/l; P= 0.007) and in the relationship between baseline viral load and CD4 cell count (no correlation versus a significant negative correlation; P= 0.008). Response to re-initiation of treatment fell with increasing viral load [relative hazard (RH) 0.33; P= 0.001] and with increasing total number of drugs with reduced susceptibility (RH 0.51; P = 0.0003); it improved with the number of new drugs received (RH 2.12; P = 0.0002) and a shift to wild type (RH 5.22, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in surrogate markers suggest that treatment provided benefit in spite of virological failure and resistant virus. Although patients with a shift to wildtype virus responded better in the short term to treatment re-initiation, the long-term effects are not known and the risk of immune deterioration needs to be carefully considered.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The impact of protease inhibitor-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy on progression of HIV disease and its relationship to CD4 and viral load.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of disease progression according to viral load and CD4 cell count in patients receiving or not receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), defined as protease inhibitor-containing regimens. DESIGN: An observational study, with prospectively collected data. METHODS: All patients attending the HIV Outpatient clinic as of 1 January 1995 (n = 2083) were included. Follow-up was until the first AIDS-defining event or death. Associations between viral load or CD4 cell count and disease progression were assessed using a person-years approach. Event rates were compared using Poisson regression analysis; a multivariate model was used to assess the independent effects of CD4, viral load and treatment group on event rates and to consider interactions between these variables. RESULTS: The event rates increased with lower CD4 cell count and higher viral load for both treatment groups and were generally lower in the HAART group. In a multivariate analysis, lower CD4 cell counts and higher viral loads remained significantly associated with disease progression, irrespective of treatment group. However, the event rate was significantly lower for the HAART group compared with the control group (relative rate 0.53, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HAART-treated patients with high viral loads and CD4 cell counts experienced reduced disease progression compared with individuals with the same CD4 cell count and viral load not receiving HAART. Consequently, the short-term prognosis associated with viral load levels and CD4 cell counts may differ in patients on HAART. Whether this effect will be observed with non-protease-inhibitor-containing HAART is not known at this time.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Incidence of myocardial infarctions in HIV-infected patients between 1983 and 1998: the Frankfurt HIV-cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is associated with an increased incidence of myocardial infarctions (MI) in HIV infected patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 4993 HIV infected patients treated at our hospital between January, 1 1983 and December, 31 1998. The incidence of myocardial infarctions during 4 observation periods with different antiretroviral treatment strategies are compared. Possible risk factors for MI are evaluated by univariate analysis and using a multiple regression model. RESULTS: 29 patients with MI were diagnosed between 1983 and 1998. The incidence of MI per 1000 patient-years increased from 0.86 (1983-86), 1.14 (1987-90), 0.59 (1991-94) to 3.41 (1995-98) respectively (p = 0.002). Age >40, previous HAART therapy, homo-, or bisexual mode of HIV transmission and previous AIDS diagnosis were significantly associated with MI in univariate analysis. Age >40 and previous HAART therapy remained significantly associated with MI in a multiple regression model. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MI in HIV infected patients increased in our cohort after the introduction of HAART.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of clinical HIV-1 isolates reveals extensive protease inhibitor cross-resistance: a survey of over 6000 samples.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in HIV-1 the extent of phenotypic and genotypic antiretroviral drug resistance and cross-resistance towards the protease inhibitors (PIs) saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and nelfinavir among a set of patient samples originating from European and US routine clinical practice and submitted for phenotypic drug resistance testing and/or genotypic analysis. The mutational pattern(s) underlying both resistance and cross-resistance to PIs was investigated. METHOD: Over 6000 patient isolates with plasma viral load greater than 1000 copies/ml plasma were analysed. Phenotypic resistance was evaluated by a recombinant virus assay. Phenotypic resistance is expressed as the fold-increase of the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of a compound for a patient-derived recombinant virus isolate compared with that for a wild-type laboratory virus. Genotypic analysis is reported as amino acid changes at positions in the HIV-1 protease compared to a wild-type reference. RESULTS: Phenotypic resistance to any single PI was observed in 17 to 25% of the clinical isolates investigated. Phenotypic cross-resistance among PIs (> 10-fold increase in IC50 value) was detected in 59 to 80% of the samples resistant (> 10-fold increase in IC50 value) to at least one PI. The prevalent mutations in PI-resistant isolates involved substitutions at codons 10, 36, 46, 54, 71, 77, 82 and 90. The most frequent mutational pattern in samples with PI cross-resistance involved combined substitutions at positions 10 and 90, extended with substitutions at positions 54, 71, 77, 82 or 84. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive use of first-generation PIs leads to the emergence of HIV-1 isolates possessing cross-resistance to all members of this class. Identification of particular mutational profiles among these isolates may assist in the design of new generation inhibitors with specific activity against protease-mutant HIV strains.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2000

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) genotype and susceptibility to RT inhibitors during abacavir monotherapy and combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in HIV-1 susceptibility (genotype and phenotype) during an initial abacavir monotherapy phase followed by the addition of zidovudine and lamivudine. DESIGN: Sixty HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects were randomized to receive 100, 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily. Subjects completing 24 weeks of randomized therapy or meeting a protocol defined switch criterion could switch to open label abacavir/zidovudine/lamivudine. METHODS: Plasma HIV-1 reverse transcriptase was genotyped at baseline, week 12, and at the last time point on ABC monotherapy. Drug susceptibility was analysed at baseline and on subsequent samples with sufficient HIV-1 RNA levels using the recombinant virus assay. Virological responses (week 24) were correlated to week 24 genotypes. RESULTS: Mutant viruses were not detected before week 12 with the exception of one subject. At the latest time point on abacavir monotherapy (range, weeks 6-48), 21 out of 43 subjects harboured virus with resistance conferring mutations including single, double and triple combinations of K65R, L74V, Y115F and M184V. The most common mutational pattern was L74V + M184V (11/21 cases). Twenty of the 21 subjects with isolates containing abacavir-associated mutations reached week 48, and upon addition of lamivudine/zidovudiine, 16 out of 20 (80%) had week 48 plasma HIV-1 -RNA below 400 copies/ml. At week 48, 16 out of 46 genotypes were obtained; one of these was wild-type; 15 contained M184V either alone, in combination with K65R and/or L74V and/or Y115F or with thymidine analogue-associated mutations. Week 48 viral load levels for these 15 subjects was low (median 3.43 log10 copies/ml or -1.99 log10 copies reduction from baseline). Genotype correlated well with phenotypic resistance to ABC; four samples with three abacavir-associated mutations had high level abacavir resistance (> 8-fold) and six samples with two or three mutations showed intermediate (4-8-fold) resistance. All samples with single mutations retained full ABC susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance conferring mutations to abacavir were relatively slow to develop during the monotherapy phase, and did not preclude durable efficacy of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine up to 48 weeks.

Cohort Studies↗