PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Staszewski

Publications and source records attributed to S Staszewski.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Mega-HAART: preliminary results and correlation with baseline resistance.

This is a brief report of preliminary results of the assessment of the correlation between baseline viral drug susceptibility and virological response in patients receiving mega-HAART. A total of 37 patients received > or = 6 drugs with a median follow-up of 8 months. There was evidence of extensive loss of viral drug susceptibility at baseline among the 24 patients analysed. Results showed that the magnitude and duration of virological response was associated with phenotypic viral drug resistance, although resistance did not lead to virological failure in all cases, and susceptibility did not lead to response in all cases.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

A dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abacavir alone or in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral treatment-naive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antiretroviral efficacy, safety and tolerance of three dosing regimens of the novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, abacavir (1592U89) over 24 weeks and its efficacy in open-label combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. DESIGN: Sixty HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy naive subjects (entry criteria; CD4+ cell count > or = 100 cells/mm(3), plasma HIV-1 RNA > or = 30 000 copies/ml), randomized into 20 subjects per cohort received 100, 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily. Subjects successfully completing 24 weeks' randomized therapy could switch to open label therapy (abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine at 300, 300 and 150 mg twice daily, respectively) for a further 24 weeks of studly, as could subjects meeting one or more switch criteria. METHODS: Subjects were assessed for antiretroviral activity by measuring changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA load and CD4+ cell counts. Evaluation of safety and tolerance was based on clinical adverse events and laboratory analyses. RESULTS: At week 4, subjects receiving 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily had greater reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA (median changes -1.55 and -1.61 log10) copies/ml, respectively); differences (P = 0.007 and P < or = 0.001, respectively) than subjects receiving 100 mg abacavir twice daily (median change, -0.63 log10 copies/ml). Differences between the 300 and 600 mg twice daily groups were not clinically or statistically significant. At 24 weeks, analysis showed a median change in plasma HIV-1 RNA of -0.70 and -1.30 log10 copies/ml in the 300 and 600 mg twice daily groups, respectively. During the open label phase in which zidovudine/lamivudine was added to 300 mg abacavir twice daily, a further median reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA of 1.74 log10 copies/ml was seen. At 48 weeks pooled data from all abacavir-treated subjects showed a sustained reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA of 2.8 log10) copies/ml; 65% and 43% of subjects had < or = 400 and < or = 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, respectively, and a further median increase of 111 CD4+ cells/mm3 were seen. Abacavir was generally well tolerated with few clinically significant adverse events. Two subjects (3.3%) developed hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. There were no differences between the groups with regard to serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of antiretroviral therapy naive subjects, treatment with 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily was statistically superior to a 100 mg twice daily dose at 4 weeks. Combinations therapy containing abacavir-zidovudine-lamivudine was a highly effective antiretroviral regimen, resulting in substantial reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA which may be comparable to combinations containing protease inhibitors. Abacavir was generally tolerated.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count and the risk of progression to AIDS and death during treatment with HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

CONTEXT: There is little information available on the correlation between HIV-1 RNA level, CD4 cell count and the risk of progression to AIDS or death during treatment with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To define the correlation between HIV-1 RNA level, CD4 cell count and the 1 year risk of progression to AIDS or death. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of six randomized clinical trials of zidovudine/lamivudine versus control treatments. SETTING: Investigational sites in Europe, North America, Australia and South Africa. PATIENTS: The trials recruited 1488 adult HIV-1-infected male and female patients aged > or = 18 years, with inclusion CD4 cell count between 25 and 500 x 10(6) cells/l. Patients were either nucleoside analogue-naive or pre-treated, and at all stages of HIV-1 disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Progression (defined as all new and recurrent AIDS-defining events or death) was correlated with the HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 cell count during the first 8 to 52 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: During a median 1 year follow up, progression was largely restricted to patients with both low CD4 cell count (< or = 200 x 10(6) cells/l) and high HIV-1 RNA level (> 5000 copies/ml). There was an increase in the incidence of progression events with rises in HIV-1 RNA level > 5000 copies/ml and reductions in CD4 cell count under 200 x 10(6) cells/l. The events occurring with HIV-1 RNA < 5000 copies/ml were generally atypical. CONCLUSIONS: Progression to AIDS or death is rare for patients with HIV-1 RNA < or = 5000 copies/ml, particularly when CD4 cell count is more than 200 x 10(6) cells/l.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

The M184V mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) conferring lamivudine resistance does not result in broad cross-resistance to nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and magnitude of M184V-mediated changes in susceptibility to zalcitabine, didanosine, stavudine and abacavir (1592U89 succinate) in a cohort of lamivudine-treated patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 255 samples from patients treated with lamivudine and zidovudine with or without other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) were analysed for susceptibility to zidovudine, lamivudine, zalcitabine, didanosine and stavudine using a recombinant virus assay. Seventy-three samples originated from patients exposed to zidovudine and lamivudine only. A subset of 27 samples was investigated for cross-resistance to abacavir. Resistance was defined as a change in median inhibitory concentration more than fivefold compared with wild-type (high-level resistance, > 10-fold). A genotypic analysis of plasma-derived reverse transcriptase coding regions was carried out in samples with cross-resistance. RESULTS: The majority of samples displayed wild-type or greater than wild-type sensitivity to zalcitabine, didanosine and stavudine: resistance was seen in 17.2, 9 and 6.3% of the total sample population, respectively. Of these, 1.2, 2.7 and 2.4%, respectively, showed high-level resistance. The prevalence of resistance to a particular NRTI was lower in samples from patients not pretreated with that NRTI and in samples from patients exposed to zidovudine-lamivudine only. Cross-resistance was more prevalent in samples with high ZDV resistance. There was no obvious correlation between cross-resistance and genotype; all but two samples were mutant at codon 184. There were no consistent changes at positions associated with zidovudine resistance. The majority of samples from a subset (n=27) were four- to eightfold less sensitive to abacavir. There were no other genotypic changes in addition to M184V known to be associated with abacavir resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-resistance was not commonly observed in this lamivudine-treated cohort. M184V per se is not expected to compromise subsequent treatment with NRTI such as didanosine-stavudine or combinations containing abacavir.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine in patients treated with zidovudine-lamivudine combination therapy: association with therapy failure.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains dually resistant to zidovudine and lamivudine (3TC) may arise during zidovudine-3TC combination therapy. The objective of this cross-sectional study (n = 43 patients) was to test the association between therapy response (clinical and immunologic) to zidovudine-3TC and the level of phenotypic zidovudine resistance and zidovudine resistance-associated genotype of 3TC-resistant isolates. Other variables included were baseline CD4+ cell count, baseline Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification, virus load, and time receiving zidovudine. Phenotypic resistance was assessed using a recombinant virus assay. Genotypic analysis was based on population sequencing of plasma HIV-1. In a univariate analysis using a logistic regression model, it was found that therapy response was significantly associated with phenotypic and genotypic zidovudine resistance, baseline CD4+ cell count, and virus load. After adjustment for all variables, phenotypic resistance to zidovudine remained the only significantly associated factor, independent of baseline CD4+ cell count, baseline CDC classification, and virus load.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Patterns of resistance and cross-resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients treated with the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor loviride.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains resistant to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) may easily be selected for in vitro and in vivo under a suboptimal therapy regimen. Although cross-resistance is extensive within this class of compounds, newer NNRTIs were reported to retain activity against laboratory strains containing defined resistance-associated mutations. We have characterized HIV-1 resistance to loviride and the extent of cross-resistance to nevirapine, delavirdine, efavirenz, HBY-097, and tivirapine in a set of 24 clinical samples from patients treated with long-term loviride monotherapy by using a recombinant virus assay. Genotypic changes associated with resistance were analyzed by population sequencing. Overall, phenotypic resistance to loviride ranged from 0.04 to 3.47 log10-fold. Resistance was observed in samples from patients who had discontinued loviride for up to 27 months. Cross-resistance to the other compounds was extensive; however, fold resistance to efavirenz was significantly lower than fold resistance to nevirapine. No genotypic changes were detected in three samples; these were sensitive to all of the NNRTIs tested. The most common genotypic change was the K103N substitution. The range of phenotypic resistance in samples containing the K103N substitution could not be predicted from a genotypic analysis of known NNRTI resistance-associated mutations. The Y181C substitution was detected in one isolate which was resistant to loviride and delavirdine but sensitive to efavirenz, HBY-097, and tivirapine. Our data indicate that the available newer NNRTIs which retain activity against some HIV-1 strains selected by other compounds of this class in vitro may have compromised clinical efficacy in some patients pretreated with NNRTI.

Acetamides↗

A rapid method for simultaneous detection of phenotypic resistance to inhibitors of protease and reverse transcriptase in recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients treated with antiretroviral drugs.

Combination therapy with protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors can efficiently suppress human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, but the emergence of drug-resistant variants correlates strongly with therapeutic failure. Here we describe a new method for high-throughput analysis of clinical samples that permits the simultaneous detection of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) phenotypic resistance to both RT and PR inhibitors by means of recombinant virus assay technology. HIV-1 RNA is extracted from plasma samples, and a 2.2-kb fragment containing the entire HIV-1 PR- and RT-coding sequence is amplified by nested reverse transcription-PCR. The pool of PR-RT-coding sequences is then cotransfected into CD4+ T lymphocytes (MT4) with the pGEMT3deltaPRT plasmid from which most of the PR (codons 10 to 99) and RT (codons 1 to 482) sequences are deleted. Homologous recombination leads to the generation of chimeric viruses containing PR- and RT-coding sequences derived from HIV-1 RNA in plasma. The susceptibilities of the chimeric viruses to all currently available RT and/or PR inhibitors is determined by an MT4 cell-3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide-based cell viability assay in an automated system that allows high sample throughput. The profile of resistance to all RT and PR inhibitors is displayed graphically in a single PR-RT-Antivirogram. This assay system facilitates the rapid large-scale phenotypic resistance determinations for all RT and PR inhibitors in one standardized assay.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Nevirapine/didanosine/lamivudine once daily in HIV-1-infected intravenous drug users.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected, active intravenous drug users received once-daily therapy consisting of a combination of didanosine (2',3'-dideoxyinosine or DDI), lamivudine [(-)-beta-L-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine or 3TC] and nevirapine. Preliminary results for the first 24 weeks show that the regimen provides potent immunological and antiviral effects.

Adult↗

Changing incidence of AIDS-defining illnesses in the era of antiretroviral combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of AIDS-defining opportunistic infections and malignancies over a 5-year period from 1992 to 1996. STUDY POPULATION: Subcohort of 1003 homosexual men with HIV infection and CD4 count less than 200 x 10(6) cells/l from the Frankfurt AIDS Cohort Study. METHODS: Data including the earliest date that a CD4 T-lymphocyte count < 200 x 10(6)/l was reached and the dates of AIDS-defining events were compiled from medical records. Incidence analyses for AIDS-defining events and death during the subsequent 5 years (1992-1996) were performed using rates per 100 person-years of exposure. RESULTS: During the observation period, the number of patients per year with CD4 T-lymphocyte counts < 200 x 10(6)/l varied between 402 and 511. In 1992, 56.7% of patients experienced at least one AIDS-defining illness, and 20.7% in 1996. The annual number of AIDS-defining events per 100 patient-years of observation declined from 143.5 in 1992 to 38.3 in 1996, and the number of AIDS-related deaths fell from 25.7 to 12.9. Analysis of the number of events confirmed this trend for malignancies and single opportunistic infections, with the exception of mycobacterial diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AIDS-defining events in patients with advanced HIV infection at Frankfurt University Hospital has declined by more than 70% from 1992 to 1996.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Reductions in HIV-1 disease progression for zidovudine/lamivudine relative to control treatments: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Four randomized double-blind trials have demonstrated that zidovudine/lamivudine (ZDV/3TC) reduces HIV RNA and raises CD4 counts relative to control treatments (ZDV or ZDV/zalcitabine (ddC)]. A meta-analysis of the clinical events in these trails was conducted to determine whether treatment with ZDV/3TC was also associated with a clinical benefit. DESIGN: The four trials, ZDV/3TC versus ZDV (NUCA3001, NUCB3001, NUCB3002) or versus ZDV/ddC (NUCA3002), were run concurrently, using the same doses of ZDV and 3TC. SETTING: Investigational sites in Europe and North America. PATIENTS: The trials recruited 972 HIV-1-positive, male and female patients aged > or = 18 years, with CD4 counts of 100-500 cells x 10(6)I. Two trials were for ZDV-naive patients and two were for ZDV pre-treated patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression to first new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) B or C event was compared between all ZDV/3TC arms and all control (ZDV, ZDV/ddC) arms. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients progressed to a first new CDC B/C event during the four trials, while 28 progressed to a new CDC event. Meta-analysis of the trials showed a 49% reduction in progression to new CDC B/C events (relative risk, 0.509; 95% confidence interval, 0.365-0.710; P < 0.0001) and a 66% reduction in progression to new CDC C events (relative risk, 0.344; 95% confidence interval, 0.169-0.700; P = 0.003) for the ZDV/3TC patients relative to the control patients. Reductions in progression to CDC B/C disease were seen in subgroups of naive and pre-treated patients, those with high and low CD4 counts and symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: ZDV/3TC combination treatment delays the progression of CDC B/C disease compared with control treatments. In view of the low incidence of CDC C events, the results for progression to CDC C disease should be interpreted with caution.

Adolescent↗

Increased serum and mRNA levels of RANTES associated with elevated levels of activated CD8+CD38+ T cells in HIV-1 infected individuals.

The serum levels of the beta-chemokine RANTES and, albeit less, MIP-1 beta were found to be increased in 37 HIV-1 infected compared to seronegative individuals. In contrast the serum levels of IL-16 were only sporadically elevated in seropositives as well as in seronegatives. Concomitantly, the RANTES gene expression increased about tenfold in seropositives, whereas the MIP-1 beta and IL-16 mRNA levels were not elevated. No correlation between the increase of the MIP-1 beta and RANTES serum concentrations and the plasma virus load, the number of the peripheral CD4+ T cells or the therapy status of the patients was found. However, the increased proportion of activated CD8+CD38+ T cells in the peripheral blood of all seropositives paralleled the increased RANTES serum levels detected indicating that immune activation in HIV-1-infected individuals may contribute to increased RANTES serum levels.

ADP-ribosyl Cyclase↗

Frequencies of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus genomes and of specific antibodies in German risk and non-risk populations.

The prevalence of the new flavivirus GB virus C/hepatitis virus G (GBV-C/HGV) in different German populations was investigated by detection of viral genomes and anti-E2 antibodies. While blood donors had an overall prevalence of 10.4% there were increased rates for hemophiliacs (54.7%), hemodialysis patients (30.2%), male homosexuals (30.2%) and intravenous drug users (74.4). Most GBV-C/HGV positive samples were either viral genome positive or antibody positive, exclusively. Samples with the rare constellation "positive for both GBV-C/HGV genome and specific antibody" originated in almost all cases from patients who were additionally infected with HIV or HCV. Probable transmission of GBV-C/HGV by PCR-positive blood transfusions was observed in 5 of 6 cases approximately six months after transfusion.

Blood Donors↗

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy in zidovudine-experienced patients. A randomized controlled comparison with zidovudine monotherapy. Lamivudine European HIV Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of lamivudine given in combination with zidovudine with continued zidovudine monotherapy. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of 223 patients treated for 24 weeks. SETTING: Patients from 32 hospitals in Europe were enrolled throughout a 1-year period. PATIENTS: Adult human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-positive, zidovudine-experienced ( > or = 24 weeks prior zidovudine) patients with CD4+ cell counts between 0.10 and 0.40 x 10(9)/L (100-400 cells/microL). INTERVENTION: Patients received either 200 mg of zidovudine every 8 hours, 150 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours plus zidovudine, or 300 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours plus zidovudine for 24 weeks. All patients were then allowed to receive zidovudine and open-label lamivudine combination therapy. Twelve patients withdrew because of adverse events during the 24-week treatment period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was measured by evaluating immunological and viral load changes, and safety was assessed by evaluating clinical manifestations and laboratory indexes of toxic effects. RESULTS: Patients receiving low- or high-dose combination therapy had greater treatment effects compared with patients receiving continued zidovudine monotherapy during the first 24 weeks as documented by changes in CD4+ cell counts (+0.04 vs +0.03 vs -0.02 x 10(9)/L, respectively; P < .001); log10 HIV-1 RNA as measured by the Roche assay (-0.96 vs -0.77 vs +0.07 copies/mL, respectively; P < .001) or log10 HIV-1 RNA measured by the quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay (-0.59 vs -1.06 vs -0.02 copies/mL, respectively; P < .011); and immune-complex dissociated (ICD) p24 antigen (-74% vs -68% vs +27%, respectively; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in viral measurements, in CD4+ cell counts, or in safety profile between the groups receiving 2 doses of lamivudine in combination with zidovudine. The effects on CD4+ cell counts and ICD p24 antigen were sustained throughout 48 weeks for patients continuing combination therapy. Patients switching to combination therapy at week 24 showed improvement. CONCLUSION: In zidovudine-experienced HIV-1-infected patients, combination treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine is well tolerated and provides greater and more sustained increases in CD4+ cell counts and decreases in viral load than continued zidovudine monotherapy.

Adult↗

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients. A randomized controlled comparison with zidovudine monotherapy. Lamivudine European HIV Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy with zidovudine monotherapy in treating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of 129 patients throughout 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of open-label lamivudine in combination with zidovudine. SETTING: Outpatients from 14 hospitals in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom were enrolled within 6 months. PATIENTS: HIV-1-positive, antiretroviral-naive ( < or = 4 weeks prior zidovudine use) patients aged atleast 18 years with CD4+ cell counts between 0.10 x 10(9)/L and 0.40 x 10(9)/L (100-400/microL). INTERVENTION: Patients received either 300 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours in combination with 200 mg of zidovudine every 8 hours for 24 weeks or zidovudine monotherapy for 24 weeks. All patients were then allowed to receive zidovudine in combination with open-label lamivudine (300 mg every 12 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was assessed by changes in CD4+ cell counts beta 2-microglobulin, neopterin, HIV-1 immune-complex dissociated (ICD) p24 antigenemia, and HIV-1 viral load. Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse clinical events and defined laboratory-measured toxic effects. RESULTS: Combination therapy showed superior treatment effects compared with monotherapy during the first 24 weeks as documented by changes in CD4+ cell counts (increase of 0.08 x 10(9)/L vs 0.02 x 10(9)/L; P < .001), ICDp24 (-88% vs -49%; P = .04), cellular viremia (-1.27 vs -0.20 log10 median tissue-culture infected dose [TCID50] per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells; P = .001), and viral load measured by HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a Roche method (-1.33 vs -0.57 log10 copies/mL; P = .001) or an immune-capture method (-0.6 vs -0.14log10 copies/mL; P = .008). Observed changes were sustained to 48 weeks for patients continuing to receive combination therapy. Patients switching to receive combination therapy at week 24 showed improvements in CD4+ cell count and viral load to week 48. Mutation results suggested that mutations associated with zidovudine resistance may have developed more slowly over the first 24 weeks in patients receiving combination therapy. In contrast, mutations associated with lamivudine resistance appeared to develop rapidly, despite sustained antiviral treatment effect. However, the number of patients evaluated for genotypic changes was small, and confirmation of these results is needed in larger studies. No statistically significant differences in incidence or severity of clinically manifested or laboratory-measured toxic effects were noted between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lamivudine and zidovudine results in a potent and sustained antiviral effect in antiretroviral-naive patients that is superior to that observed with zidovudine monotherapy.

Adult↗

Virological and immunological analysis of a triple combination pilot study with loviride, lamivudine and zidovudine in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two antiretroviral regiments, loviride plus lamivudine (3TC) plus zidovudine (ZDV) (triple combination) and loviride plus ZDV (double combination) in terms of pharmacokinetic interactions, tolerability, safety, and immunological and virological efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: An open, case-controlled, pharmacokinetic and 24-week continuous treatment pilot study. PATIENTS: Twenty p24 antigen-positive patients, 10 per treatment group, were matched according to p24 antigenaemia less or more than 100 pg, CD4 count less or more than 150 x 10-(6)/l, and gender. Eight out of 10 cases and seven out of 10 controls had received previous antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Both treatment combinations were well tolerated. Median absolute and percentage CD4 count increases above baseline were more pronounced in the triple combination arm than in the double combination arm. Median p24-antigen and plasma viraemia level decreases below baseline were more pronounced in the triple combination arm. The M(184)I/V mutation was detected in all plasma samples of triple combination patients examined at week 12. Mutations conferring resistance to loviride and ZDV were found in a significant subset of patients in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Both combination regimens have an excellent safety/tolerability profile, but a higher level of in vivo efficacy is achieved by the triple combination, despite genotypic changes conferring resistance to one or all of these agents. The conclusions drawn are limited by small population size and the heterogenous pretreatment history. However, they support the validity of and strongly encourage a rationally designed multidrug combination approach to HIV therapy.

Acetamides↗