Biomedical subjects

S Stoney Simons

Publications and source records attributed to S Stoney Simons.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

STAMP, a novel predicted factor assisting TIF2 actions in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated induction and repression.

The coactivator TIF2 was predicted to interact with an unknown factor to modify both the relative inhibition in glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene repression and several parameters of agonists and antisteroids in GR-regulated induction. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of the predicted factor as a new 1,277-amino-acid endogenous protein (STAMP). STAMP associates with coactivators (TIF2 and SRC-1) and is selective for a subset of the steroid/nuclear receptors including GRs. Transfected STAMP increases the effects of TIF2 in GR-mediated repression and induction. Conversely, the levels of both induction and repression of endogenous genes are reduced when STAMP small interfering RNAs are used to lower the level of endogenous STAMP. Endogenous STAMP colocalizes with GR in intact cells and is recruited to the promoters of endogenous GR-induced and -repressed genes. We suggest that STAMP is an important new, downstream component of GR action in both gene activation and gene repression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

Effects of acetylation, polymerase phosphorylation, and DNA unwinding in glucocorticoid receptor transactivation.

Varying the concentration of selected factors alters the induction properties of steroid receptors by changing the position of the dose-response curve (or the value for half-maximal induction=EC(50)) and the amount of partial agonist activity of antisteroids. We now describe a rudimentary mathematical model that predicts a simple Michaelis-Menten curve for the multi-step process of steroid-regulated gene induction. This model suggests that steps far downstream from receptor binding to steroid can influence the EC(50) of agonist-complexes and partial agonist activity of antagonist-complexes. We therefore asked whether inhibitors of three possible downstream steps can reverse the effects of increased concentrations of two factors: glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and Ubc9. The downstream steps (with inhibitors in parentheses) are protein deacetylation (TSA and VPA), DNA unwinding (CPT), and CTD phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (DRB and H8). None of the inhibitors mimic or prevent the effects of added GRs. However, inhibitors of DNA unwinding and CTD phosphorylation do reverse the effects of Ubc9 with high GR concentrations. These results support our earlier conclusion that different rate-limiting steps operate at low and high GR concentrations versus high GR with Ubc9. The present data also suggest that downstream steps can modulate the EC(50) of GR-mediated induction, thus both supporting the utility of our mathematical model and widening the field of biochemical processes that can modify the EC(50).

Acetylation↗

PubMed2006

How much is enough? Modulation of dose-response curve for steroid receptor-regulated gene expression by changing concentrations of transcription factor.

The position of the dose-response curve for steroid-regulated gene expression determines how much variation in response will accompany the normal physiological changes in circulating steroid. Over the last several years, it has become clear that the concentration of steroid hormone required for half-maximal induction or repression by a given receptor-steroid complex, which is normally called the EC50, is not constant for all responsive genes. Thus, the position of the dose-response curve can change so that a single concentration of steroid produces very different percentages of maximal activity. This, in turn, allows for the differential expression of genes by a common steroid hormone concentration during development, differentiation, and homeostasis. Here we review the variety of factors that influence the EC50 and position of the dose-response curve for steroid hormone receptors, discuss what is known about the mechanisms, and highlight promising areas for future research.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Corepressor binding to progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors involves the activation function-1 domain and is inhibited by molybdate.

Corepressors are known to interact via their receptor interaction domains (RIDs) with the ligand binding domain in the carboxyl terminal half of steroid/nuclear receptors. We now report that a portion of the activation function-1 domain of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), which is the major transactivation sequence, is necessary but not sufficient for corepressor [nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT)] RID binding to GRs and PRs in both mammalian two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Importantly, these two receptor sequences are functionally interchangeable in the context of GR for transactivation, corepressor binding, and corepressor modulatory activity assays. This suggests that corepressors may act in part by physically blocking portions of receptor activation function-1 domains. However, differences exist in corepressor binding to GRs and PRs. The C-terminal domain of PRs has a higher affinity for corepressor than that of GRs. The ability of some segments of the coactivator TIF2 to competitively inhibit corepressor binding to receptors is different for GRs and PRs. With each receptor, the cell-free binding of corepressors to ligand-free receptor is prevented by sodium molybdate, which is a well-known inhibitor of receptor activation to the DNA-binding state. This suggests that receptor activation precedes binding to corepressors. Collectively, these results indicate that corepressor binding to GRs and PRs involve both N- and C-terminal sequences of activated receptors but differ in ways that may contribute to the unique biological responses of each receptor in intact cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Role of activation function domain-1, DNA binding, and coactivator GRIP1 in the expression of partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptor-antagonist complexes.

The determinants of the partial agonist activity of most antisteroids complexed with steroid receptors are not well understood. We now examine the role of the N-terminal half of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) including the activation domain (AF-1), the DNA binding site sequence, receptor contact with DNA, and coactivator binding on the expression of partial agonist activity in two cell lines for GRs bound by five antiglucocorticoids: dexamethasone mesylate (Dex-Mes), dexamethasone oxetanone (Dex-Ox), progesterone (Prog), deoxycorticosterone (DOC), and RU486. Using truncated GRs, we find that the N-terminal half of GR and the AF-1 domain are dispensable for the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoids. This contrasts with the AF-1 domain being required for the partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. DNA sequence (MMTV vs a simple GRE enhancer) and cell-specific factors (CV-1 vs Cos-7) exert minor effects on the level of partial agonist activity. Small activity differences for some complexes of GAL4/GR chimeras with GR- vs GAL-responsive reporters suggest a contribution of DNA-induced conformational changes. A role for steroid-regulated coactivator binding to GRs is compatible with the progressively smaller increase in partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes > Prog > RU486 with added GRIP1 in CV-1 cells. This hypothesis is consistent with titration experiments, where low concentrations of GRIP1 more effectively increase the partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes than Prog complexes. Furthermore, ligand-dependent GRIP1 binding to DNA-bound GR complexes decreases in the order of Dex > Dex-Mes > Prog > RU486. Thus, the partial agonist activity of a given GR-steroid complex in CV-1 cells correlates with its cell-free binding of GRIP1. The ability to modify the levels of partial agonist activity through changes in steroid structure, DNA sequence, specific DNA-induced conformational changes, and coactivator binding suggests that useful variations in endocrine therapies may be possible by the judicious selection of these parameters to afford gene and tissue selective results.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain is sufficient for the modulation of glucocorticoid induction properties by homologous receptors, coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2, and Ubc9.

Several factors modulate the position of the dose-response curve of steroid receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, thereby causing differential gene activation by circulating hormones and unequal gene repression during endocrine therapies with antisteroids. We now ask whether the modulatory activity of three factors (homologous receptor, coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2, and Ubc9) requires the same or different domains of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). In all cases, we find that neither the amino terminal half of the receptor, which contains the activation function-1 activation domain, nor the DNA binding domain is required. This contrasts with the major role of activation function-1 in determining the amount of gene expression and partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. However, the situation is more complicated with Ubc9, where GR N-terminal sequences prevent the actions of Ubc9, but not added GR or transcription intermediary factor 2, at low GR concentrations. Inhibition is relieved by deletion of these sequences or by replacement with the comparable region of progesterone receptors but not by overexpression of the repressive sequences. These results plus the binding of C-terminal GR sequences to the suppressive N-terminal domain implicate an intramolecular mechanism for the inhibition of Ubc9 actions at low GR concentrations. A shift from noncooperative to cooperative steroid binding at high GR concentrations suggests that conformational changes reposition the inhibitory N-terminal sequence to allow Ubc9 interaction with elements of the ligand binding domain. Collectively, these results indicate a dominant role of GR C-terminal sequences in the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes. They also reveal mechanistic differences both among individual modulators and between the ability of the same factors to regulate the total amount of gene expression.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

PCR expression mutagenesis: a high-throughput mutation assay applied to the glucocorticoid receptor ligand-binding domain.

Glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) are extensively studied members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily that regulate the transcription rates of numerous genes. Notwithstanding, the role of each GR amino acid in the various steps of transactivation is still unknown. A recent report shows that linear DNA has the same capacity as super-helical plasmid DNA for gene expression in transient transfection assays. Based on this observation, we describe a high-throughput assay to analyze a large set of alanine point mutations that are introduced by two rounds of PCR. The PCR products are then directly transfected into cells. This PCR expression mutagenesis (PEM) technique is used to identify several new residues of the GR ligand binding domain that influence ligand binding and/or transactivation. PEM thus provides a quick method for screening large quantities of mutant proteins. In combination with automation, PEM provides a more rapid and efficient tool for probing the role of each amino acid in the biological functions of a given protein.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Equilibrium interactions of corepressors and coactivators with agonist and antagonist complexes of glucocorticoid receptors.

Corepressors and coactivators can modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) complexed with agonist and antagonist steroids, respectively, in intact cells. We recently reported that GR-antagonist complexes bind to the coactivator TIF2, (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), which is consistent with the whole-cell effects of coactivators being mediated by direct interactions with GR complexes. We now ask whether the whole-cell modulatory activity of corepressors also entails binding to both GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes and whether the association of corepressors and coactivators with GR complexes involves competitive equilibrium reactions. In mammalian two-hybrid assays with two different cell lines and in cell-free pull-down and whole-cell immunoprecipitation assays, the corepressors NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) and SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) associate with agonist and antagonist complexes of GRs. Both N- and C-terminal regions of GR are needed for corepressor binding, which requires the CoRNR box motifs that mediate corepressor binding to other nuclear/steroid receptors. Importantly, whole-cell GR interactions with corepressors are competitively inhibited by excess coactivator and vice versa. However, the regions of the coactivator TIF2 that compete for GR binding to corepressor and coactivator are not the same, implying a molecular difference in GR association with coactivators and corepressors. Finally, when the whole-cell ratio of coactivators to corepressors is altered by selective cofactor binding to exogenous thyroid receptor beta +/- thyroid hormone, the GR dose-response-curve and partial agonist activity are appropriately modified. Such modifications are independent of histone acetylation. We conclude that mutually antagonistic equilibrium interactions of corepressors and coactivators modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes in a manner that is responsive to the intracellular ratio of these two classes of cofactors. This modulation provides an attractive mechanism for differential control of gene expression during development, differentiation, homeostasis, and endocrine therapies.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Structure/activity relationships for GMEB-2: the second member of the glucocorticoid modulatory element-binding complex.

The position of the dose-response curve of agonist complexes of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), and the partial agonist activity of GR-antagonist complexes, can be modulated by two proteins (GMEB-1 and -2), which bind as oligomers to a DNA element that is called a glucocorticoid modulatory element, or GME. This element is active when located upstream of the glucocorticoid response element that controls the expression of a reporter gene. Here, we report the structure/activity relationships of GMEB-2 and compare them to our previous findings for GMEB-1. Most of the activities of GMEB-2, such as homo- and heterooligomerization, binding to GR and to CBP, DNA binding, and modulation of the above GR transcriptional properties, require large regions of the protein. Only the intrinsic transactivation activity could be localized to a small region of the protein. These studies shed light on the mechanism of action of GMEB-2 and further support our previous conclusion that the ability of factors to modulate the position of the dose-response curve, and the partial agonist activity, of GR complexes is unrelated to effects on the total levels of GR-induced gene expression. These studies also identify regions of GMEB-2 possessing yet unidentified properties that are critical for several activities. Finally, as the domain organization of GMEB-2 and -1 is extremely similar, we conclude that the quantitative differences in activities derive from variations in amino acid sequence rather than more global features of protein structure.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Modulation of transcriptional sensitivity of mineralocorticoid and estrogen receptors.

Recent reports describe the ability of factors to modulate the position of the dose-response curve of receptor-agonist complexes, and the amount of partial agonist activity of receptor-antagonist complexes, of androgen, glucocorticoid (GRs), and progesterone receptors (PRs). We now ask whether this modulation extends to the two remaining steroid receptors: mineralocorticoid (MRs) and estrogen receptors (ERs). These studies of MR were facilitated by our discovery that the antiglucocorticoid dexamethasone 21-mesylate (Dex-Mes) is a new antimineralocorticoid with significant amounts of partial agonist activity. Elevated levels of MR, the co-activators TIF2 and SRC-1, and the co-repressor SMRT do modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of MR complexes. Interestingly, the precise responses are indistinguishable from those seen with GRs in the same cells. Thus, the unequal transactivation of common genes by MRs versus GRs probably cannot be explained by differential responses to changing cellular concentrations of homologous receptor, co-activators, or co-repressors. We also find that the dose-response curve of ER-estradiol complexes is left-shifted to lower steroid concentrations by higher amounts of exogenous ER. Therefore, the modulation of either the dose-response curve of agonists or the partial agonist activity of antisteroid, and in many cases the modulation of both properties, is a common phenomenon for all of the classical steroid receptors.

Affinity Labels↗

PubMed2003

Phenotypic alterations in breast cancer cells overexpressing the nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen signaling plays a critical role in a number of normal physiological processes and has important implications in the treatment of breast cancer. The p160 nuclear receptor coactivator, AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer 1), is frequently amplified and overexpressed in human breast cancer and has been shown to enhance estrogen-dependent transactivation. METHODS: To better understand the molecular and physiological consequences of AIB1 overexpression in breast cancer cells, an AIB1 cDNA was transfected into the low AIB1 expressing, estrogen-receptor (ER) negative breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-436. The features of a derivative cell line, designated 436.1, which expresses high levels of AIB1, are described and compared with the parental cell line. RESULTS: A significant increase in the levels of CREB binding protein (CBP) was observed in 436.1 cells and immunofluorescent staining revealed altered AIB1 and CBP staining patterns compared to the parental cells. Further, transient transfection assays demonstrated that the overall estrogen-dependent transactivation in 436.1 cells is approximately 20-fold higher than the parental cells and the estrogen dose-response curve is repositioned to the right. Finally, cDNA microarray analysis of approximately 7,100 cDNAs identified a number of differentially expressed genes in the 436.1 cells. CONCLUSION: These observations lend insight into downstream signaling pathways that are influenced by AIB1.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Visualization and mechanism of assembly of a glucocorticoid receptor.Hsp70 complex that is primed for subsequent Hsp90-dependent opening of the steroid binding cleft.

A minimal system of five proteins, hsp90, hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23, assembles glucocorticoid receptor (GR).hsp90 heterocomplexes and causes the simultaneous opening of the steroid binding cleft to access by steroid. The first step in assembly is the ATP-dependent and hsp40 (YDJ-1)-dependent formation of a GR.hsp70 complex that primes the receptor for subsequent ATP-dependent activation by hsp90, Hop, and p23. This study focuses on three aspects of the GR priming reaction with hsp70. First, we have visualized the primed GR.hsp70 complexes by atomic force microscopy, and we find the most common stoichiometry to be 1:1, with some complexes of a size approximately 1:2 and a few complexes of larger size. Second, in a recent study of progesterone receptor priming, it was shown that hsp40 binds first, leading to the notion that it targets hsp70 to the receptor. We show here that hsp40 does not perform such a targeting function in priming the GR. Third, we focus on a short amino-terminal segment of the ligand binding domain that is required for GR.hsp90 heterocomplex assembly. By using two glutathione S-transferase (GST)/ligand binding domain fusions with (GST/520C) and without (GST/554C) hsp90 binding and steroid binding activity, we show that the priming step with hsp70 occurs with GST/554C, and it is the subsequent assembly step with hsp90 that is defective.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Anthrax lethal factor represses glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor activity.

We report here that a bacterial toxin, anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx), at very low concentrations represses glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transactivation in a transient transfection system and the activity of an endogenous GR-regulated gene in both a cellular system and an animal model. This repression is noncompetitive and does not affect ligand binding or DNA binding, suggesting that anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx) probably exerts its effects through a cofactor(s) involved in the interaction between GR and the basal transcription machinery. LeTx-nuclear receptor repression is selective, repressing GR, progesterone receptor B (PR-B), and estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha), but not the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) or ERbeta. GR repression was also caused by selected p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase inhibitors, suggesting that the LeTx action may result in part from its known inactivation of MAP kinases. Simultaneous loss of GR and other nuclear receptor activities could render an animal more susceptible to lethal or toxic effects of anthrax infection by removing the normally protective antiinflammatory effects of these hormones, similar to the increased mortality seen in animals exposed to both GR antagonists and infectious agents or bacterial products. These finding have implications for development of new treatments and prevention of the toxic effects of anthrax.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

A second pathway for modulating glucocorticoid receptor transactivation properties.

We recently reported that three factors (a cis-acting element and changing concentrations of receptor or coactivator TIF2) act at a common rate-limiting step to modulate the position of the dose-response curve and the partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). The ability of saturating levels of GR, and added inhibitors, to prevent the actions of the three modulators (cis-acting element, GR, and TIF2) but not the currently investigated C-terminal fragment of E1A-13S (E1A-133C) indicates that E1A-133C alters GR properties via a second pathway that is downstream of the common step for the original three modulators. hSur2 binds to E1A-133C. We find that hSur2 modulates GR transactivation properties, thus suggesting that the effects of E1A-133C are due to the recruitment of hSur2. hSur2 also modifies GR activities in the presence of saturating GR concentrations, which is consistent with hSur2 acting downstream of the common step for the original three modulators. The H160Y mutation, which eliminates hSur2 binding to E1A, blocks most of the activity of E1A-133C. This suggests that the modulatory activity of E1A-133C is largely due to the binding of hSur2, which is a component of the Mediator complex. Collectively, these data support the existence of a new pathway for modulating GR transactivation processes, thereby increasing the number of cellular mechanisms that permit differential control of gene expression by endogenous levels of glucocorticoid hormones.

Adenovirus E1A Proteins↗

PubMed2003

The importance of being varied in steroid receptor transactivation.

A major response of steroid receptors to steroid hormones is the induction of gene transcription. Two relevant, albeit less studied, properties of these receptors are the EC(50) values of the receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of the receptor-antagonist complexes. Contrary to earlier expectations, neither the EC(50) value nor the partial agonist activity is constant for a given receptor-steroid complex. This variation is, however, beneficial to cells and organisms because it provides a mechanism both for differential control of gene expression by a single concentration of circulating hormone and for limiting side-effects during endocrine therapies. In this article, the factors and proposed mechanisms for the modulation of the EC(50) value and partial agonist activity of receptor-steroid complexes are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Modulation of induction properties of glucocorticoid receptor-agonist and -antagonist complexes by coactivators involves binding to receptors but is independent of ability of coactivators to augment transactivation.

Coactivators such as TIF2 and SRC-1 modulate the positioning of the dose-response curve for agonist-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoid complexes. These properties of coactivators differ from their initially defined activities of binding to, and increasing the total levels of transactivation by, agonist-bound steroid receptors. We now report that constructs of TIF2 and SRC-1 lacking the two activation domains (AD1 and AD2) have significantly less ability to increase transactivation but retain most of the activity for modulating the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity. Mammalian two-hybrid experiments show that the minimum TIF2 segment with modulatory activity (TIF2.4) does not interact with p300, CREB-binding protein, or PCAF, which also modulates GR activities. DRIP150 and DRIP205 have been implicated in coactivator actions but are unable to modulate GR activities. The absence of synergism by PCAF or DRIP150 with SRC-1 or TIF2, respectively, further suggests that these other factors are not involved. The ability of a TIF2.4 fragment (i.e. TIF2.37), which is not known to interact with proteins, to block the actions of TIF2.4 suggests that an unidentified binder mediates the modulatory activity of TIF2. Pull-down experiments with GST/TIF2.4 demonstrate a direct interaction of TIF2 with GR in a hormone-dependent fashion that requires the receptor interaction domains of TIF2 and is equally robust with agonists and most antiglucocorticoids. These observations, which are confirmed in mammalian two-hybrid assays, suggest that the capacity of coactivators such as TIF2 to modulate the partial agonist activity of antisteroids is mediated by the binding of coactivators to GR-antagonist complexes. In conclusion, the modulatory activity of coactivators with GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes is mechanistically distinct from the ability of coactivators to augment the total levels of transactivation and appears to involve the binding to both GR-steroid complexes and an unidentified TIF2-associated factor(s).

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Mutations at positions 547-553 of rat glucocorticoid receptors reveal that hsp90 binding requires the presence, but not defined composition, of a seven-amino acid sequence at the amino terminus of the ligand binding domain.

Glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) must heterocomplex with hsp90 to have an open steroid binding cleft that can be accessed by steroid. We reported that a seven-amino acid sequence (547-553 of rat GR) overlapping the amino-terminal end of the ligand binding domain is required for hsp90 binding to GR. We have now conducted saturation mutagenesis of this sequence, which appears to be part of the surface where the ligand binding cleft merges with the surface of the ligand binding domain. No single point mutation causes significant changes in any of a variety of biochemical and biological properties in addition to hsp90 binding. A triple mutation (P548A/T549A/V551A) increases by >100-fold the steroid concentration required for half-maximal induction without affecting the level of maximal induction or coactivator response. Interestingly, this triple mutant displays reduced binding of steroid and hsp90 in whole cells, but it possesses wild type affinity for steroid and normal hsp90 binding capacity under cell-free conditions. This phenotype of a dramatic shift in the dose response for transactivation would be expected from an increase in the rate of disassembly of the triple mutant GR.hsp90 heterocomplex in the cell. Mutation of the entire seven-amino acid region to CAAAAAC maintains the presence of a critical alpha-helical structure and heterocomplex formation with hsp90 but eliminates steroid binding and transcriptional activation, thus disconnecting hsp90 binding from opening of the ligand binding cleft and steroid binding.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Structure/activity elements of the multifunctional protein, GMEB-1. Characterization of domains relevant for the modulation of glucocorticoid receptor transactivation properties.

GMEB-1 was initially described as a component of a 550-kDa heteromeric DNA binding complex that is involved in the modulation of two properties of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transactivation, the dose-response curve of agonists and the partial agonist activity of antagonists. Subsequently, GMEB-1 was also found to bind to hsp27, to associate with the coactivator TIF2 in yeast cells, and to participate in Parvovirus replication. To understand these multiple activities of GMEB-1 at a molecular level, we have now determined which regions are associated with the various activities associated with the modulation of GR transactivation properties. These activities include, homooligomerization, heterooligomerization, DNA binding, binding to GR and the transcriptional cofactor CBP, and GR modulation. Complex activities such as DNA binding and GR modulation, are found to require the physical combination of those domains that would be predicted from the involved biochemical processes. We have previously documented that GMEB-1 possesses both GR modulatory and intrinsic transactivation activity. However, the domains for these two activities of GMEB-1 are found not to overlap. This separation of activities provides a structural basis for our prior biological observations that the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes is independent of the total levels of gene activation by the same GR complexes.

Animals↗