PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S T Klapp

Publications and source records attributed to S T Klapp.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

On marching to two different drummers: perceptual aspects of the difficulties.

People have remarkable difficulty generating two responses that must follow different temporal sequences, unless the temporal patterns are simply related (e.g., periods in 2:1, 3:1 relation). For example, it is hard to tap to two conflicting rhythms presented concurrently (i.e., a polyrhythm) using the right and left hands (Klapp, 1979), or to tap while articulating a conflicting speech utterance (Klapp, 1981). The present experiments indicate that difficulties in processing conflicting rhythms occur even when people must (a) merely monitor the stimuli and indicate the termination of one rhythmic sequence or (b) tap with a single hand. Responding to polyrhythms is thus difficult even without multiple limb coordination. Furthermore, the difficulty of two-handed tapping to polyrhythms that involve two different tones was found to decrease as the pitch difference between the tones was decreased. This result indicates that the difficulty of rhythmic coordination can be perceptually manipulated in a striking fashion. Polyrhythmic performance thus provides an excellent opportunity for examining possible interactions of perceptual and motor organizations.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1979

Programmed control of aimed movements revisited the role of target visibility and symmetry.

Reaction time prior to starting a 2-mm amplitude aimed movement was studied as a function to target size and experimental procedure. Consistent with a report by Klapp, choice reaction time increased as target size decreased when the visual signal that initiated the reaction time interval also indicated which of two targets was to be hit. This result implies response programming during the reaction time interval, with more programming time for slower movements to smaller targets. By contrast, in a simple reaction time procedure, there was no effect of target size on reaction time, suggesting that the response can be programmed in advance when the appropriate target is precued. This provided a control for speed-accuracy trade-off, supporting the programming interpretation of the choice reaction time result. In another condition in which both targets could be viewed while waiting for the auditory signal that initiated the reaction time interval and indicated which target to hit, choice reaction time was independent of target size provided that both possible targets on each trial were of the same size. The overall results suggest that response programs include both spatial and temporal information, and that parallel programming of different spatial goals is possible provided that the responses are of the same duration.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1976

Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed.

When the nature of motor response is varied, holding the number of alternative responses constant, differences in choice reaction time can be attributed to differences in response programming time. The present experiments suggest that although changes in response duration are not necessary to produce small differences in programming time, such response duration changes may be a sufficient condition for the programming time to change and necessary condition for very large changes in programming time. Implications of this conclusion for theories of response programming are discussed.

Feedback↗
PubMed1975

Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements.

In the Fitts paradigm the subject moves a stylus to the left or right of an initial rest position to reach targets that vary in size and in distance from the initial position. The classic finding for relatively long movements is that movement time, measured from leaving the initial position until contact with the target, depends on both distance and target size according to a relationship known as "Fitts' law." By contrast, reaction time, measured from the signal to move until the stylus leaves the initial position, is independent of these parameters. While replicating these results for long movements, the present data show a different pattern for very short movements, for which Fitts' law no longer holds and for which reaction time increases as the size of the target is decreased. These findings were interpreted as implying that long movements are under feedback control, whereas short movements are predominately programmed and ballistic. This conclusion was supported by the additional finding that elimination of visual feedback was more disruptive to the long than to the short movements.

Adolescent↗