PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S T Steele

Publications and source records attributed to S T Steele.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening.

Several studies have examined the role of tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) in screening for cervical cancer but as yet the relevance is unclear. We looked at HPV testing for types 16, 18, 31, and 33 on material taken at the time of a cervical smear in 2009 eligible women having routine screening. Women with any degree of dyskaryosis or high levels of one of these HPV types were referred for colposcopy. 44% of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions of grade 2/3 detected had negative cytology and were found only by HPV testing. A further 22% of the CIN 2/3 lesions were positive for HPV but showed only borderline or mild cytological changes. The positive predictive value of HPV testing was 42%, which was similar to that for moderate dyskaryosis. HPV types 16 and 31 were more sensitive and specific for CIN 2/3 than were types 18 or 33. However, 25% of the CIN 2/3 lesions were not detected by these four HPV tests. We suggest that HPV testing could usefully augment but not replace conventional cytology. These results should stimulate a much larger randomised trial to assess the impact of these improved CIN 2/3 detection rates on the subsequent incidence of invasive cancer.

Adult↗

Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.

Cervical smears taken by the wooden Ayre spatula (widely used in the United Kingdom) and by a plastic spatula (Armovical) were compared for their ability to detect dysplastic cervical epithelium and endocervical cells. At the same time, the value of taking duplicate smears was assessed. Paired cervical smears were obtained at a single attendance from 21,352 women, using the 2 types of spatulas in 4 different sequences. Although individually the Armovical proved superior to the Ayre spatula for the collection of endocervical epithelial material, this advantage was not complemented by any marked improvement in its detection of cervical dysplasia. Paired smear sampling, however, was clearly more rewarding in this respect and also allowed the introduction of laboratory quality control, as each preparation of any given pair was examined by a different screener. The false-negative rate was 18.5%: it comprised 11.1% sampling error and 7.4% screening error. It is concluded that paired smear sampling in population screening would significantly reduce the false-negative rate.

Carcinoma in Situ↗