Biomedical subjects

S Unal

Publications and source records attributed to S Unal.

110 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Kruis scoring system and Manning's criteria in diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome: is it better to use combined?

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by abdominal pain and alteration of bowel habits. Manning et al. have reported that certain symptoms distinguished IBS from organic gastrointestinal disease (OGD); these were pain relieved by defecation, looser or more frequent stools at the onset of pain, abdominal distention, mucus, and a feeling of incomplete evacuation. Another simple scoring system for discriminating IBS from OGD that incorporated historical data, physical examination findings, and basic investigations was first devised by Kruis et al. In differential diagnosis of IBS from OGD, to evaluate the reliability of Manning's criteria and Kruis scoring system when used apart or combined; we studied 347 out-patients who completed a bowel disease questionnaire which objectively measured Manning's criteria and scoring system of Kruis. The group included 165 patients with IBS and 182 patients with OGD. The Manning's criteria discriminated IBS from OGD with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87% if three or more items were regarded as positive. Also the Kruis scoring system discriminated IBS from OGD with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 91%. When used together, these systems discriminated IBS from OGD with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 97%. Manning's criteria and Kruis scoring system had a strong correlation when compared in IBS, but not in OGD.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Forty-six patients were randomized to receive either 45 or 90-ml oral sodium phosphate (NaP) (Fleet Phospho-Soda), or X-Prep (a Senna preparation) before elective colonoscopy to compare the quality of colon cleansing, ease of preparation, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Before colonoscopy, one of us administered a questionnaire to the patient to assess how well the preparation was tolerated (scale from 1 to 5: 1 = easy, to 5 = unable to finish) and about the presence of four symptoms:abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. The quality of colon cleansing was graded by two gastroenterologists (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor), who were unaware of how the patient was prepared or tolerated the preparation. The overall quality of bowel preparation with 90-ml oral NaP was better than with X-Prep and 45-ml NaP (p < 0.01). Patients found preparation with NaP to be easier than X-Prep (p < 0.002). No difference was seen in the incidence of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or dizziness. In the 90-ml NaP group, a significant rise in sodium and chloride occurred. However, increments were not greater than 5%. Hyperphosphatemia was noted with NaP, but was transient, and no concomitant decrease in calcium was seen. We conclude that, in the groups of patients studied, 90-ml NaP is a safe colonic cleansing agent that is better tolerated and more effective than others.

Administration, Oral↗