PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Urwin

Publications and source records attributed to S Urwin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Preschool language intervention: a follow-up study.

A follow-up study was undertaken of 38 children who had attended a preschool language unit with detailed assessments of 25 by speech therapists and an educational psychologist. The subjects were assessed in a number of areas (language, learning and social skills) using standardized tests and rating schedules completed by teachers and parents. The initial results are presented in terms of group characteristics. At a mean age of 8.3 years the children were still making progress in all areas of development. Although some 16% of the children were attending specialist schools or classes (language unit, physically handicapped unit, schools for children with severe speech and language problems), the majority (84%) were within the mainstream of education. A continuing language difficulty was apparent on standardized tests. Reading and spelling were slightly depressed, but not significantly so. However, parents and teachers saw the children as differing little from their peers. The conclusion is reached that preschool intervention can prevent later educational failure.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Preschool language intervention--a follow-up of some within-group differences.

A more detailed study was made of the children who had been followed-up by Urwin, Cook & Kelly (1988) 4-8 years after leaving a preschool language group. Children were independently allocated into groups according to their speech and language diagnosis prior to entry to the Unit. There were two major dimensions--receptive/expressive versus expressive only, and phonology versus non-phonology. Comparisons were made between the group as indicated by children's performance at follow-up for measures of ability, achievement, language and social functioning. Conclusions are drawn about the long-term effects of the early language difficulty and preschool intervention. Attention is also drawn to differences in perceiving the effects of language difficulty between the specialist professionals on the one hand and parents and teachers on the other.

Child↗