Biomedical subjects

S Vinterbo

Publications and source records attributed to S Vinterbo.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A comparison of machine learning methods for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions.

We analyze the discriminatory power of k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, artificial neural networks (ANNs), decision tress, and support vector machines (SVMs) on the task of classifying pigmented skin lesions as common nevi, dysplastic nevi, or melanoma. Three different classification tasks were used as benchmarks: the dichotomous problem of distinguishing common nevi from dysplastic nevi and melanoma, the dichotomous problem of distinguishing melanoma from common and dysplastic nevi, and the trichotomous problem of correctly distinguishing all three classes. Using ROC analysis to measure the discriminatory power of the methods shows that excellent results for specific classification problems in the domain of pigmented skin lesions can be achieved with machine-learning methods. On both dichotomous and trichotomous tasks, logistic regression, ANNs, and SVMs performed on about the same level, with k-nearest neighbors and decision trees performing worse.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Effects of case removal in prognostic models.

Constructing and updating prognostic models that learn from training cases is a time-consuming task. The more compact, and yet informative, the training sets are, the faster one can build and properly evaluate such models. We have compared different regression diagnostic methods for selection and removal of training cases in prognostic models. Univariate determinations were performed using classical regression diagnostic statistics. Multivariate determinations were performed using (1) a sequential "backward" selection of cases, and (2) a non-sequential genetic algorithm. The genetic algorithm produced final models that kept few cases and retained predictive capability. A genetic algorithm approach to case selection may be better suited for guiding removal of cases in training sets than a univariate or a sequential multivariate approach, possibly because of its ability to detect sets of cases that are influential en bloc but may not be sufficiently influential when considered in isolation.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Disambiguation data: extracting information from anonymized sources.

Privacy protection is an important consideration when releasing medical databases to the research community. We show that while recent advances in anonymization algorithms provide increased levels of protection, it is still possible to calculate approximations to the original data set. In some cases, one can even uniquely reconstruct entries in a table before anonymization. In this paper, we demonstrate how knowledge of an anonymization algorithm based on ambiguating data cell entries can be used to undo the anonymization process. We investigate the effect of this algorithm and its reversal on data sets of varying sizes and distributions. It is shown that by using a computationally complex disambiguation process, information on individuals can be extracted from an anonymized data set.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

A genetic algorithm approach to multi-disorder diagnosis.

One of the common limitations of expert systems for medical diagnosis is that they make an implicit assumption that multiple disorders do not co-occur in a single patient. The need for this simplifying assumption stems from the fact that finding minimal sets of disorders that cover all symptoms for a given patient is generally computationally intractable (NP-hard). In this paper, we explain the need for performing multi-disorder diagnosis, review previous approaches, formulate the problem using set theory notation, and propose the use of a search method based on a genetic algorithm. We test the algorithm and compare it to another approach using a simple example. The genetic algorithm performs well independently of the order of symptoms, and has the potential to perform multi-disorder diagnosis using existing or newly developed knowledge bases.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

Building knowledge in a complex preterm birth problem domain.

Data mining methods used a racially diverse sample (n = 19,970) of pregnant women and 1,622 variables that were collected in Duke's TMR electronic patient record over a 10-year period. Different statistical and data mining methods were similar when compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Best results found that seven demographic variables yielded .72 and addition of hundreds of other clinical variables added only .03 to the area under the curve (AUC). Similar results across methods suggest that results were data-driven and not method-dependent, and that demographic variables may offer a small set of parsimonious variables with predictive accuracy in a racially diverse population. Work to determine relevant variables for improved predictive accuracy is ongoing.

Area Under Curve↗

PubMed2000

A set-covering approach to specific search for literature about human genes.

With the advent of the cDNA microarray and oligonucleotide array technologies it has become possible to study a large number of genes in a single experiment. While experiments with thousands of genes are routinely performed, searching for literature about several genes by traditional methods is time consuming and error-prone. In addition to the inherent limitations of free text search, use of the conventional Boolean operators often result in either none (when AND'ing terms) or far too many (when OR'ing terms) hits. We have created a two-step procedure as an approach to meeting the challenge of multi-gene queries. Our results so far shows that the returned sets of articles scores high on relevance.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

This paper evaluates the variable selection performed by several machine-learning techniques on a myocardial infarction data set. The focus of this work is to determine which of 43 input variables are considered relevant for prediction of myocardial infarction. The algorithms investigated were logistic regression (with stepwise, forward, and backward selection), backpropagation for multilayer perceptrons (input relevance determination), Bayesian neural networks (automatic relevance determination), and rough sets. An independent method (self-organizing maps) was then used to evaluate and visualize the different subsets of predictor variables. Results show good agreement on some predictors, but also variability among different methods; only one variable was selected by all models.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

A genetic algorithm to select variables in logistic regression: example in the domain of myocardial infarction.

Actual use of regression models in clinical practice depends on model simplicity. Reducing the number of variables in a model contributes to this goal. The quality of a particular selection of variables for a logistic regression model can be defined in terms of the number of variables selected and the model's discriminatory performance, as measured by the area under the ROC curve. A genetic algorithm was applied to search for the best variable combinations for modeling presence of myocardial infarction in a data set of patients with chest pain. Using an external validation set, the resulting model was compared with models constructed with standard backward, forward and stepwise methods of variable selection. The improvement in discriminatory ability yielded by the genetic algorithm variable selection method was statistically significant (p < 0.02).

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

Modelling cardiac patient set residuals using rough sets.

Many medical studies deal with the assessment of the prognostic or diagnostic power of some particular test with respect to some particular medical condition. However, even though a test is deemed to be powerful in this respect, the test may not be strictly needed to perform for everyone. If the test is costly or invasive, this issue is of particular interest. This paper presents a methodology based on rough set theory and Boolean reasoning that can be used to identify those patients for whom performing the test is redundant or superfluous. Furthermore, the methodology enables one to automatically construct a set of descriptive and minimal if-then rules that model the patient group in need of the test. A reanalysis of a previously published real-world dataset of patients with chest pain is used as a case study.

Coronary Disease↗