Biomedical subjects

S W Xie

Publications and source records attributed to S W Xie.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Three-dimensional echocardiography improves noninvasive assessment of left ventricular volume and performance.

To calculate left ventricular (LV) volume by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), assumptions must be made about ventricular symmetry and geometry. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) can quantitate LV volume without these limitations, yet its incremental value over 2DE is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of LV volume determination by 3DE to standard 2DE methods. To compare the accuracy of 3DE with standard 2DE algorithms for quantitating LV volume, 28 excised canine ventricles of known volume and varying shapes (15 symmetric and 13 aneurysmal) and 10 instrumented dogs prepared so that instantaneous ventricular volume could be measured were examined by 2DE (bullet and biplane Simpson's formulas) and again by 3DE. In both excised and beating hearts, 3DE was more accurate in quantitating volume than either 2DE method (excised: error = 0.6 +/- 3.2, 2.5 +/- 10.7, and 4.0 +/- 8.5 ml by 3D, bullet, and Simpson's, respectively; beating: error = -0.5 +/- 3.5, -0.3 +/- 9.6, and -7.6 +/- 8.0 ml by 3DE, bullet, and Simpson's, respectively). This difference in accuracy between 3DE and 2DE methods was especially apparent in asymmetric ventricles distorted by ischemia or right ventricular volume overload. Stroke volume and ejection fraction calculated by 3DE also demonstrated better agreement with actual values than the bullet or Simpson methods with less variability (ejection fraction: error = -2.0% +/- 5.1%, 7.7% +/- 8.5%, and 6.8% +/- 12.3% by 3DE, bullet, and Simpson's, respectively). In both in vitro and in vivo settings, 3DE provides improved accuracy for LV volume and performance than current 2DE algorithms.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Quantification of pericardial effusions by three-dimensional echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography for the quantification of asymmetric pericardial effusion volume and to compare this new technique with two-dimensional echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Quantification of pericardial effusion by two-dimensional echocardiography relies on a symmetric distribution of the fluid. Three-dimensional echocardiography can quantitate volume without these limitations, but its accuracy for pericardial effusion volume has not yet been assessed. METHODS: In six open chest dogs, 41 different asymmetrically distributed pericardial effusions of known volume were created by serial infusions of fluid through a pericardial catheter. The hearts were imaged using an automated echocardiographic method that integrates three-dimensional spatial and imaging data. The surfaces of the pericardial sac and heart were then reconstructed, and the volumes of pericardial effusions were calculated. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed simultaneously, and volumes were calculated using the prolate ellipsoid method. Asymmetric distribution of the fluid was obtained by applying localized hydrostatic pressure to the pericardium. RESULTS: The volumes of pericardial effusion quantified using three-dimensional echocardiography correlated well with actual volumes (y = 1.0x - 1.4, SEE = 7.7 ml, r = 0.98). Two-dimensional echocardiography had an acceptable correlation (y = 1.0x + 2.3, SEE = 23 ml, r = 0.84), but a marked degree of variation from the true value was observed for any individual measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional echocardiography accurately quantifies pericardial effusion volume in vivo, even when the fluid is distributed asymmetrically, whereas two-dimensional echocardiography is less reliable. This new technique may be of clinical value in quantitating pericardial effusion, especially in the serial evaluation of asymmetric or loculated effusions.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1987