PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Wood-Dauphinee

Publications and source records attributed to S Wood-Dauphinee.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Is stroke unit care portable? A systematic review of the clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: It is not known if mobile stroke teams can achieve the good results seen in trials of geographically discrete stroke wards (stroke units). OBJECTIVE: To establish the effectiveness of mobile stroke teams. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled clinical trials that compared peripatetic systems of organised stroke care (stroke team care) with alternative hospital services. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (using Cochrane Collaboration methodology and involving the primary trialists). Clinical outcomes included death, dependency, the need for institutional care and measures of the process of care such as the delivery of key investigations and treatments. RESULTS: Six clinical trials (1,085 patients) were identified; five (781 patients) compared some form of stroke team care with conventional care in general medical wards and one (304 patients) compared team care with a comprehensive stroke unit. Compared with care in general wards, stroke team care improved some aspects of the process of care, but clinical outcomes were similar. Compared with a comprehensive stroke unit, stroke team patients were significantly less likely to survive (P <0.001), return home (P < 0.001) or regain independence (P < 0.0001). Most aspects of the process of care were also poorer than in the stroke unit. CONCLUSIONS: Care from a mobile stroke team had no major impact on death, dependency or the need for institutional care.

Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a task-orientated intervention in enhancing competence in walking in people with stroke. DESIGN: Two-centre observer-blinded stratified block-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: General community. SUBJECTS: Between May 2000 and February 2003, 91 individuals with a residual walking deficit within one year of a first or recurrent stroke consented to participate. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental intervention comprised 10 functional tasks designed to strengthen the lower extremities and enhance walking balance, speed and distance. The control intervention involved the practice of upper extremity activities. Subjects in both groups attended sessions three times a week for six weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Six-minute walk test (SMWT), 5-m walk (comfortable and maximum pace), Berg Balance Scale, timed 'up and go'. RESULTS: At baseline, subjects in the experimental (n = 44) and control (n = 47) groups walked an average distance of 209 m (SD = 126) and 204 m (SD =131), respectively, on the SMWT. Mean improvements of 40 m (SD =72), and 5 m (SD =66) were observed following the experimental and control interventions, respectively. The between-group difference was 35 m (95% confidence interval (CI) 7, 64). Significant between-group effects of 0.21 m/s (95% CI 0.12, 0.30) and of 0.11 m/s (95% CI 0.03, 0.19) in maximum and comfortable walking speed, respectively, were observed. People with a mild, moderate or severe walking deficit at baseline improved an average of 36 (SD =96), 55 (SD = 56) and 18 m (SD = 23), respectively, in SMWT performance following the experimental intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings support the efficacy of a task-orientated intervention in enhancing walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke, particularly in people with moderate walking deficits.

Adult↗

The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the evidence for physical therapy interventions aimed at improving functional outcome after stroke. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, PEDro, EMBASE and DocOnline were searched for controlled studies. Physical therapy was divided into 10 intervention categories, which were analysed separately. If statistical pooling (weighted summary effect sizes) was not possible due to lack of comparability between interventions, patient characteristics and measures of outcome, a best-research synthesis was performed. This best-research synthesis was based on methodological quality (PEDro score). RESULTS: In total, 151 studies were included in this systematic review; 123 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 28 controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Methodological quality of all RCTs had a median of 5 points on the 10-point PEDro scale (range 2-8 points). Based on high-quality RCTs strong evidence was found in favour of task-oriented exercise training to restore balance and gait, and for strengthening the lower paretic limb. Summary effect sizes (SES) for functional outcomes ranged from 0.13 (95% Cl 0.03-0.23) for effects of high intensity of exercise training to 0.92 (95% Cl 0.54-1.29) for improving symmetry when moving from sitting to standing. Strong evidence was also found for therapies that were focused on functional training of the upper limb such as constraint-induced movement therapy (SES 0.46; 95% Cl 0.07-0.91), treadmill training with or without body weight support, respectively 0.70 (95% Cl 0.29-1.10) and 1.09 (95% Cl 0.56-1.61), aerobics (SES 0.39; 95% Cl 0.05-0.74), external auditory rhythms during gait (SES 0.91; 95% Cl 0.40-1.42) and neuromuscular stimulation for glenohumeral subluxation (SES 1.41; 95% Cl 0.76-2.06). No or insufficient evidence in terms of functional outcome was found for: traditional neurological treatment approaches; exercises for the upper limb; biofeedback; functional and neuromuscular electrical stimulation aimed at improving dexterity or gait performance; orthotics and assistive devices; and physical therapy interventions for reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain and hand oedema. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed small to large effect sizes for task-oriented exercise training, in particular when applied intensively and early after stroke onset. In almost all high-quality RCTs, effects were mainly restricted to tasks directly trained in the exercise programme.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗

Quality of life after multiple trauma. Aim and scope of the conference.

From September 29 until October 2, 1999, a group of international experts met in Wermelskirchen, Germany, for a consensus conference on "Quality of Life after Multiple Trauma". The meeting was initiated and sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research. It was the aim of the group to develop evidence-based guidelines for the systematic evaluation and application of Quality of Life (QoL) measures in patients with severe trauma. The present paper describes the format of the meeting, the selection of the participants, the time schedule, and the proceeding, in order to facilitate the interpretation of the results. The work was structured according to the different types of injury: traumatic brain injury (TBI), multiple injuries without TBI, spinal cord injury, and children with TBI. For each injury group, a specific task force group with 9-13 members was established, consisting of methodologists as well as clinicians from different disciplines. The conference was organised as an alternate sequence of plenary sessions and small working group meetings. The work itself was structured according to the following five questions which have been agreed on and distributed to the participants in advance: 1. What is the major problem (ranking) of the patient at different time points after the accident? 2. Which domains of QoL are affected in the sequelae of trauma? 3. Which instruments are useful to evaluate QoL in trauma patients? 4. Which studies have assessed QoL aspects with which instruments? 5. What instruments should be used in which patient group at what time? The moderators of each task force group summarised the respective results and tried to give recommendations for future application of QoL assessment in trauma patients. As far as possible, the statements should be based on the existing evidence. Furthermore, the groups should recommend QoL measures for use across different patient groups and time points.

Advisory Committees↗

Reliability of the gross motor function measure for children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

PURPOSE: The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is a criterion-referenced evaluative measure designed to detect change over time for children diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP). Reliability of this measure has not been tested for children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and interrater reliabilities of the GMFM for use with children diagnosed with OI. METHOD: One physical therapist administered and scored the GMFM for 19 children with OI who were followed at the Shriners Hospital for Children. The assessments were videotaped, then viewed and scored by five physical therapists, including the author, at least six weeks later. Intra- and interrater reliabilities were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Kappa statistics were calculated for items demonstrating more disagreement than the majority. RESULTS: The ICCs for intrarater reliability of the five dimensions and total score were 0.99. The ICCs for interrater reliability were 0.98 for the lying and rolling dimension and 0.99 for the other dimensions and total score. Kappa statistics for items demonstrating more disagreement than the majority ranged from 0.552 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of the reliability of the GMFM for children with OI when scored by pediatric physical therapists familiar with the measure. The videotape provided a consistent situation because each therapist did not directly interact with each child, but rather rated a videotaped session of the child's performance.

Journal Article↗

Inferring quality of life from performance-based assessments.

PURPOSE: Performance based measures have been suggested as an approach to estimate quality of life, but the associations have not been extensively evaluated. This study's purpose was to determine the associations between quality of life and performance based assessments of disablements in community dwelling individuals post-stroke. METHODS: Forty five people were evaluated in a cross-sectional pilot study. The subjects' quality of life (SF-36), ability in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL), manual dexterity, mobility, neurological impairment, and perception of lateral neglect were evaluated. Multiple regression was employed to find the strongest associations. RESULTS: Neurological impairment explained 34% of the variation in the women's physical health summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Instrumental ADL and neurological impairment together explained 66% of the women's mental health summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Manual dexterity of the hemiplegic hand explained 39% of the variation in the men's PCS. CONCLUSION: Performance based measures may be useful to estimate quality of life in non-communicative individuals.

Aged↗

There's no place like home : an evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because stroke management is aimed at facilitating community reintegration, it would be logical that the sooner the patient can be discharged home, the sooner reintegration can commence. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation on function, community reintegration, and health-related quality of life during the first 3 months after stroke. METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out involving patients who required rehabilitation services and who had a caregiver at home. When medically ready for discharge, persons with stroke were randomized to either the home intervention group (n=58) or the usual care group (n=56). The home group received a 4-week, tailor-made home program of rehabilitation and nursing services; persons randomized to the usual care group received services provided through a variety of mechanisms, depending on institutional, care provider, and personal preference. The main outcome measure was the Physical Health component of the Measuring Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 (SF-36). Associated outcomes measures included the Timed Up & Go (TUG), Barthel Index (BI), the Older Americans Resource Scale for instrumental activities of daily living (OARS-IADL), Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL), and the SF-36 Mental Health component. RESULTS: The total length of stay for the home group was, on average, 10 days, 6 days shorter than that for the usual care group. There were no differences between the 2 groups on the BI or on the TUG at either 1 or 3 months after stroke; however, there was a significantly beneficial impact of the home intervention on IADL and reintegration (RNL). By 3 months after stroke, the home intervention group showed a significantly higher score on the SF-36 Physical Health component than the usual care group. The total number of services received by the home group was actually lower than that received by the usual care group. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation appeared to translate motor and functional gains that occur through natural recovery and rehabilitation into a greater degree of higher-level function and satisfaction with community reintegration, and these in turn were translated into a better physical health.

Aged↗

Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going?

The term "quality of life" first surfaced in 1920, but it was not until the 1960s that it came to public notice in North America. This article describes the history of quality of life assessment, discusses its current status, and suggests challenges for the future. The development of generic measures began in the early 1970s and continues today. Disease-specific measures have also proliferated. The 1980s and 1990s saw an increase in methodological rigor, and additional emphasis on analytic approaches, interpretation of scale scores, cultural and language issues, as well as on the development of shorter measures. Future challenges include conceptualization and testing of theoretical models, further refinement of individualized measures for use in routine clinical practice, the use of computer adapted testing in quality of life assessment, and the inclusion of quality of life information in health databases.

Forecasting↗

Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment.

This article describes the methods adopted by the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project to translate the SF-36 Health Survey. Translation methods included the production of forward and backward translations, use of difficulty and quality ratings, pilot testing, and cross-cultural comparison of the translation work. Experience to date suggests that the SF-36 can be adapted for use in other countries with relatively minor changes to the content of the form, providing support for the use of these translations in multinational clinical trials and other studies. The most difficult items to translate were physical functioning items, which used examples of activities and distances that are not common outside of the United States; items that used colloquial expressions such as pep or blue; and the social functioning items. Quality ratings were uniformly high across countries. While the IQOLA approach to translation and validation was developed for use with the SF-36, it is applicable to other translation efforts.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗

Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Increasingly, translated and culturally adapted health-related quality of life measures are being used in cross-cultural research. To assess comparability of results, researchers need to know the comparability of the content of the questionnaires used in different countries. Based on an item-by-item discussion among International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) investigators of the content of the translated versions of the SF-36 in 10 countries, we discuss the difficulties that arose in translating the SF-36. We also review the solutions identified by IQOLA investigators to translate items and response choices so that they are appropriate within each country as well as comparable across countries. We relate problems and solutions to ratings of difficulty and conceptual equivalence for each item. The most difficult items to translate were physical functioning items that refer to activities not common outside the United States and items that use colloquial expressions in the source version. Identifying the origin of the source items, their meaning to American English-speaking respondents and American English synonyms, in response to country-specific translation issues, greatly helped the translation process. This comparison of the content of translated SF-36 items suggests that the translations are culturally appropriate and comparable in their content.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗

Testing the equivalence of translations of widely used response choice labels: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

The similarity in meaning assigned to response choice labels from the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) was evaluated across countries. Convenience samples of judges (range, 10 to 117; median = 48) from 13 countries rated translations of response choice labels, using a variation of the Thurstone method of equal appearing intervals. Judges marked a point on a 10-cm line-representing the magnitude of a response choice label (e.g., "good" relative to the anchors of "poor" and "excellent"). Ratings were evaluated to determine the ordinal consistency of response choice labels within a response scale; the degree to which differences between adjacent response choice labels were equal interval; and the amount of variance due to response choice label, country, judge, and interaction between response choice label and country. Results confirmed the hypothesized ordering of response choice labels; the percentage of ordinal pairs ranged from 88.7% to 100% (median = 98.2%) across countries and response scales. Examination of the average magnitudes of response choice labels supported the "quasi-interval" nature of the scales. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results supported the generalizability of response choice magnitudes across countries; labels explained 64% to 77% of the variance in ratings, and country explained 1% to 3%. These results support the equivalence of SF-36 response choice labels across countries. Departures from the assumption of equal intervals, when observed, were similar across countries and were greatest for the two response scales that are recalibrated under standard SF-36 scoring. Results provide justification for scoring translations of individual items using standard SF-36 scoring; whether these items form the same scales in other countries as they do in the United States is evaluated with tests of scaling assumptions.

Analysis of Variance↗

Proxy use of the Canadian SF-36 in rating health status of the disabled elderly.

Professionals have often depended on proxies to assess health status of elderly individuals unable to provide this information. This study set out to estimate agreement between elderly subjects and their proxies on perceptions of health status, when patients were inpatients in a rehabilitation setting or outpatients in a day hospital, and to determine if there were overestimations or underestimations by proxies. Eighty-three consenting elderly patients living in Montreal, Canada, completed a generic health-status questionnaire, the SF-36, and named a significant other and a health care provider who knew them well. These individuals completed the same questionnaire on behalf of the patients. Agreement between patient and proxy was assessed pairwise (patient/health professional and patient/significant other) using intraclass correlation coefficients. The possibility of a biased rating by type of proxy was determined via paired t-tests. When concordance within respondent pairs was examined, results indicated only poor to moderate agreement regardless of setting and type of proxy for all scales. A trend toward underestimating by proxies was found. Proxy completion of health status questionnaires did not provide similar information, but these preliminary findings need replication.

Aged↗

Correlates of health-related quality of life in upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients.

Reflecting a limited understanding of the definition and determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the majority of research in this field has concentrated upon the effect of disease- and treatment-related variables. That work specifically investigating HRQoL among upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer patients is no exception to this observation. Treating subject-related and non-subject-related variables separately, the aim of this study was to investigate predictors of global HRQoL rating in a sample of UADT cancer patients, concentrating upon the relative importance of sociodemographic and clinical variables. A cross-sectional study design was used with a sample of 188 UADT cancer patients. Global HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument, global domain (global QoL). Other study variables were collected by subject interview and chart review. Two multivariate regression models were independently developed, containing, respectively, subject-rated and non-subject rated variables. In the model containing subject-rated predictors of global QoL, emotional, breathing, physical, financial, pain and appetite problems were significant predictors (F = 14.6, p < 0.0001 and r2 = 0.54). Among non-subject-rated sociodemographic and clinical variables tested, unemployment, older age, female gender, being dentate and a more advanced disease stage predicted worse global QoL rating, while oral as opposed to pharyngeal or laryngeal cancer predicted a better global QoL rating (F = 5.1, p < 0.0001 and r2 = 0.21). In the latter model, a greater proportion of the variance was explained by sociodemographic variables than by clinical variables.

Adult↗

Effectiveness of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast for mild-to-moderate asthma. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The increasing costs of managing asthma are due in part to the introduction of new medications, such as leukotriene receptor antagonists. These antagonists interfere with the action of leukotrienes, which are implicated in bronchoconstriction and the formation of airway edema in patients with asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists must be shown to be clinically and economically effective for their clinical use to be justified. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who might benefit from regular anti-inflammatory therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 28 outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: 146 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who were 12 years of age or older, had not smoked cigarettes in the previous 6 months, had a smoking history of less than 10 pack-years, had an FEV1 at least 55% of the predicted value with no upper limit, had demonstrated bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and were symptomatic during the 7-day run-in period. All patients were seen every 2 to 3 weeks for 13 weeks. INTERVENTION: 103 patients received zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily), and 43 patients received placebo (twice daily). All patients received inhaled beta-agonists as needed. MEASUREMENTS: Data were obtained from medical examinations, patient questionnaires, and daily diaries. The clinical effectiveness outcomes were days per month without asthma symptoms, limitation of activity, use of beta-agonists, sleep disturbance, and episodes of asthma (the latter was a composite measure made up of the first four outcomes plus the occurrence of adverse events). The economic effectiveness outcomes were frequency and type of unscheduled health care contacts, use of beta-agonist inhalers, consumption of nonasthma medications, and days of absence from work or school. RESULTS: The zafirlukast group had 89% more days without symptoms (adjusted rates, 7.0 compared with 3.7 days per month; P = 0.03), 89% more days without use of beta-agonists (adjusted rates, 11.3 compared with 6.0 days per month; P = 0.001), and 98% more days without episodes of asthma (adjusted rates, 10.1 compared with 5.1 days per month; P = 0.003). They also had 55% (95% CI, 19% to 74%) fewer health care contacts (18.5 compared with 40.7 per 100 per month; P = 0.007) and 55% (CI, 3% to 79%) fewer days of absence from work or school (15.6 compared with 35.0 per 100 per month; P = 0.04). They used 17% fewer canisters of inhaled beta-agonists (P = 0.17) and 19% less nonasthma medication (P < 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: A daily regimen of zafirlukast added to as-needed inhaled beta-agonists is more effective than beta-agonists alone in treating mild-to-moderate asthma. The clinical and economic effectiveness of zafirlukast, a potential alternative to inhaled corticosteroids, provides further impetus to use regular "preventive" therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

Absenteeism↗

Nonmedical bed-days for stroke patients admitted to acute-care hospitals in Montreal, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reducing the amount of nonoptimal time stroke patients spend in the hospital should be a priority because prolonged hospitalization is not only costly but may be detrimental for persons with stroke through deconditioning, social isolation, and the fostering of dependent relationships. The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of time spent by stroke patients in acute-care hospitals that was not justified for medical reasons and to identify mechanisms contributing to nonmedical bed-days. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with 2232 persons admitted for acute stroke to one of 13 hospitals in Montreal, Canada, during 1991. Information was collected on the patient, the stroke, functional status, course in hospital, services, and discharge. Nonmedical bed-days were calculated as the difference between the time to meet specified criteria and time of discharge. Associations with nonmedical bed-days were estimated with adjustment for patient mix. RESULTS: Acute-care stay averaged 27 days, yielding 60,279 bed-days. Almost 50% of the cohort remained in the hospital after meeting criteria for medical discharge, resulting in 43% of total bed-days not accounted for medically. Fifty percent of persons with delayed discharge did not go home but were discharged to another acute-care hospital or to rehabilitation or long-term care, accounting for 66% of the nonmedical bed-days. Hospital and discharge destination remained strongly associated with nonmedical days, even after adjustment for patient mix. CONCLUSIONS: The single greatest contributor to excessive nonmedical stay appeared to be the need in Quebec for increased access to alternate levels of care, including skilled nursing facilities and rehabilitation centers.

Adult↗

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development.

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale is a new measure of functional disability for patients with back pain. Functional disability was operationalized in terms of perceived difficulty associated with simple physical activities. The content of the scale was developed in several stages, including a literature review, two studies seeking the opinions of patients and experts, pilot testing, and a large, longitudinal study of back pain patients. Forty-eight disability items were extensively studied using standard methods such as test-retest reliability, item-total correlations, and factor analysis, as well as modern techniques based on item response theory. Items that were highly effective in discriminating between different levels of disability were selected for the final, reduced scale. The scale has 20 items, representing six empirically derived categories of activities affected by back pain. Measurement properties of this instrument have been previously discussed.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Quality-of-life assessment: recent trends in surgery.

A literature review conducted for a 1989 article on assessing the quality of life in surgical studies revealed that quality of life was more often mentioned than measured. Few authors reported the use of known, standardized scales. The objective of this study was to determine if and to what extent this situation has changed. A MEDLINE search of surgical studies published between 1989 and 1995 produced over 277 abstracts of surgical studies containing the words "quality of life." The abstracts were studied in three time periods: 1989-1990, 1991-1992 and 1993-1995. Findings indicated that the use of the term "quality of life" increased markedly over the study period, and studies using standardized measures escalated from 27.4% in 1989-1990 to 48.3% in 1993-1995. Those abstracts not stating how quality of life was assessed decreased from 48.4% in the early period to 21.7% in the last period. Of the abstracts reporting studies that used quality of life measures, 33% came from cancer studies, 21.7% from cardiovascular or respiratory studies, 14.8% from gastroenterology studies, 13.4% from nephrology studies and 6.1% from orthopedic studies. Surgical investigators selected a variety of global measures of quality of life as well as disease-specific instruments. The abstracts also revealed that surgeons are using quality-of-life assessment to monitor patients over time, to help select patients for surgery, to determine the effect of surgical treatment and for making policy decisions. Notwithstanding the limitations of this project, there is evidence in the literature that surgeons are increasingly willing to assess the impact of the surgical interventions by quality-of-life measures and are becoming more familiar with the diverse measures used to assess quality of life.

Bibliometrics↗