PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sachin M Navare

Publications and source records attributed to Sachin M Navare.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Risk stratification with electrocardiographic-gated dobutamine stress technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission tomographic imaging: value of heart rate response and assessment of left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the significance of heart rate response to dobutamine and the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function during risk stratification of patients undergoing dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (DSMPI). BACKGROUND: Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging has been shown to effectively risk stratify highly selected patients. However, based on perfusion alone, patients with normal and abnormal tests have twice the risk as comparable patients with exercise testing. The added value of assessment of LV function and the heart rate response to dobutamine in risk stratification of these patients is unknown. METHODS: Follow-up information (cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction) was obtained on 1,367 consecutive patients who underwent DSMPI due to inability to perform adequate exercise and contraindications to vasodilators. Perfusion images were interpreted using a 17-segment model. Abnormal perfusion and function were defined as: summed stress score > or =4 and ejection fraction <50%, respectively. RESULTS: Annualized event rates (AERs) were related to the extent/severity of perfusion defects and worsening LV function. A three-risk category model was constructed from combined assessment of perfusion and function, with AERs of 2.4% (both normal), 5.8% (discordant), and 11.3% (both abnormal); p < 0.001. Stress electrocardiogram (ECG) data added incremental value to myocardial perfusion alone but not to combined assessment of perfusion and function. Importantly, inability to achieve 85% of mean predicted heart rate was associated with worse outcomes and was an independent predictor of cardiac events. For patients in whom perfusion, function, and stress ECG response were normal, inability to achieve target heart rate was associated with significantly higher AER (1.5% vs. 3.4%, respectively, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients undergoing DSMPI, assessment of perfusion and function is effective in risk stratification. The stress ECG and heart rate response to dobutamine have prognostic value and should be incorporated into image interpretation so as to maximize risk stratification.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of 16-frame and 8-frame gated SPET imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET) allows for simultaneous assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function. Presently 8-frame per cardiac cycle ECG gating of SPET images is standard. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 8-frame and 16-frame gated SPET on measurements of LV volumes and to evaluate the effects of the presence of myocardial perfusion defects and of radiotracer dose administered on the calculation of LV volumes. A total of 86 patients underwent technetium-99m SPET myocardial perfusion imaging using 16-frame per cardiac cycle acquisition. Eight-frame gated SPET images were generated by summation of contiguous frames. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated from the 16-frame and 8-frame data sets. The patients were divided into groups according to the administered dose of the radiotracer and the size of the perfusion defect. Results. Sixteen frame per cardiac cycle acquisition resulted in significantly larger EDV (122+/-72 ml vs 115+/-68 ml, P<0.0001), smaller ESV (64+/-58.6 ml vs 67.6+/-59.5 ml, P<0.0001), and higher LVEF (55.3%+/-18% vs 49%+/-17.4%, P<0.0001) as compared to 8-frame SPET imaging. This effect was seen regardless of whether a high or a low dose was administered and whether or not significant perfusion defects were present. This study shows that EDV, ESV and LVEF determined by 16-frame gated SPET are significantly different from those determined by 8-frame gated SPET. The radiotracer dose and perfusion defects do not affect estimation of LV parameters by 16-frame gated SPET.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacologic radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Pharmacologic stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging has enabled patients who cannot complete adequate exercise to undergo diagnostic and prognostic evaluation for coronary artery disease. Pharmacologic stress agents belong to two groups: vasodilators (such as adenosine and dipyridamole), and inotropes (such as dobutamine). All have similar sensitivity (89%-91%) and specificity (78%-86%) for the diagnosis of coronary disease. For risk stratification, the risk of future cardiac events is related to the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities. Pharmacologic stress testing permits risk stratification as early as 1 to 4 days following an acute myocardial infarction, and is superior to exercise stress testing in this regard. Similarly, it identifies patients at high risk for perioperative cardiac events prior to noncardiac surgery. This review summarizes the current evidence available regarding the diagnostic and prognostic use of pharmacologic stress testing.

Coronary Artery Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and exercise stress MPI have comparable diagnostic accuracy, their comparative value for risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary disease is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data of 14,918 patients were combined from 24 studies evaluating prognosis in patients undergoing either pharmacologic stress or exercise stress MPI. Studies were included if a 2 x 2 table for hard cardiac events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction [MI]) could be constructed from the data available. Excluded were studies performed for post-MI, post-revascularization, or preoperative risk stratification. A weighted t test was used to compare the cardiac events, and a random effects model was used to calculate summary odds ratios. Summary odds ratios for hard cardiac events were similar for pharmacologic stress and exercise stress MPI. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves also showed no difference in discriminatory power between the stressors. The cardiac event rates were significantly higher with normal and abnormal test results with pharmacologic stress MPI than with exercise stress MPI (1.78% vs 0.65% [P < .001] for normal results and 9.98% vs 4.3% [P < .001] for abnormal results). Subgroup analysis revealed that both cardiac death and nonfatal MI were significantly higher with pharmacologic stress MPI. Patients undergoing pharmacologic stress MPI had a significantly higher prevalence of poor prognostic factors, and meta-regression revealed that exercise capacity was the single most important predictor of cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that exercise stress MPI and pharmacologic stress MPI are comparable in their ability to risk-stratify patients. However, patients undergoing pharmacologic stress studies are at a higher risk for subsequent cardiac events. This is true even for those with normal perfusion imaging results.

Comorbidity↗