PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Salvatore Sia

Publications and source records attributed to Salvatore Sia.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Analgesia before performing a spinal block in the sitting position in patients with femoral shaft fracture: a comparison between femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl.

We conducted this prospective, randomized study to compare the analgesic effect of femoral nerve block and IV fentanyl administration when given to facilitate the sitting position for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femoral shaft fracture. Five minutes before the placement of spinal block, group FEM patients (n = 10) received a femoral nerve block with lidocaine 1.5% 15 mL, and group IVA patients (n = 10) received IV fentanyl 3 microg/kg. Visual analog scale values during positioning (median and range) were lower in group FEM: 0.5 (0-1) versus 3 (2-6) (P < 0.001). Time to perform spinal anesthesia (mean +/- sd) was shorter in group FEM: 1.8 +/- 0.7 min versus 3.0 +/- 1.1 min (P < 0.05). Quality of patient positioning for spinal anesthesia (0 = not satisfactory, 1 = satisfactory, 2 = good, and 3 = optimal) (median and range) was higher in group FEM: 3 (2-3) versus 1.5 (1-3) (P < 0.005). Patient acceptance was less in group IVA (P < 0.05). In one group IVA patient, an oxygen saturation <90% was recorded during the procedure. We conclude that femoral nerve block is more advantageous than IV administration of fentanyl to facilitate the sitting position for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femoral shaft fractures.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The effect of exogenous epinephrine on the incidence of hypotensive/bradycardic events during shoulder surgery in the sitting position during interscalene block.

UNLABELLED: Sudden hypotensive and/or bradycardic events (HBE) have been reported in 13%-28% of patients undergoing shoulder surgery in the sitting position during interscalene block. The Bezold-Jarisch reflex is the most likely mechanism for these events. It has been hypothesized that exogenous epinephrine might be a key component to the occurrence of HBE. We conducted this prospective, randomized study to verify this hypothesis. Patients received a local anesthetic solution with (Group E; n = 55) or without (Group P; n = 55) epinephrine for interscalene block; no further exogenous epinephrine was administered. Blood pressure control was achieved with IV urapidil, a peripheral vasodilator, as needed. The incidence of HBE was 11% in Group P versus 29% in Group E (P = 0.015). Increased intraoperative heart rate and arterial blood pressure were recorded in Group E (P = 0.000). Urapidil was administered to 13% of Group P and to 31% of Group E patients (P = 0.018). Urapidil administration induced a HBE in 4% of Group P and in 5% of Group E patients. We conclude that exogenous epinephrine is involved in the development of HBE in this setting. IMPLICATIONS: Sudden hypotensive and/or bradycardic events occur during shoulder surgery in the sitting position during interscalene block. In this study, we demonstrated that the presence of epinephrine in the local anesthetic mixture significantly increases the incidence of these events.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2002

Four-injection brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: a comparison between axillary and humeral approaches.

UNLABELLED: We conducted this prospective, randomized study to compare the success rate, performance time, and onset time of surgical anesthesia of a four-injection brachial plexus block performed at the axillary (Group Axillary; n = 50) or at the humeral (Group Humeral; n = 50) level using a peripheral nerve stimulator. All patients received 40 mL of a mixture of equal parts of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine. Four patients in Group Axillary and two in Group Humeral were excluded from the study because all of the four nerves were not localized in the allotted time. The incidence of complete block (91% versus 89%), defined as block of all the sensory areas below the elbow, and the onset time of sensory block (15 +/- 6 min versus 16 +/- 7 min) were not different between the groups. The performance time was shorter in Group Humeral (7 +/- 2 min versus 8 +/- 2 min; P < 0.005). Block performance pain was lower in Group Axillary patients (16 +/- 9 min versus 23 +/- 12 min; P < 0.005). For four-injection brachial plexus block, we conclude that both the axillary and the humeral approaches provide a high success rate and a rapid onset of sensory anesthesia; the differences found between the groups could be considered clinically unimportant. IMPLICATIONS: Two methods of brachial plexus block using a nerve-stimulator were compared in a prospective study. A four-injection technique was performed at the axillary or at the humeral level. Both approaches provided a fast onset and a high success rate. The differences found between the groups could be considered clinically unimportant.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of proximal and distal radial nerve motor responses in axillary block using triple stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stimulation of the radial nerve at the axilla may cause either a proximal movement (forearm extension) or distal movements (supination, wrist or finger extension). In the most recent studies on axillary block, only a distal twitch was accepted as valid. However, this approach was based only on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to verify if a proximal motor response can be considered a satisfactory endpoint. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. One hundred fifty patients received a triple-injection axillary brachial plexus block in which the radial nerve was located by a proximal (group PROX) or a distal motor response (group DIST). Patients were assessed for sensory and motor block of the branches of the radial nerve by a blinded investigator at 5-minute intervals over 30 minutes. RESULTS: An 81% success rate for anesthetizing the sensory distal branches of the radial nerve was seen in group PROX; a significantly higher success rate was recorded in group DIST (95%). The onset time of sensory block for the distal branches of the radial nerve was significantly shorter in group DIST (9.9 +/- 6 v 15.4 +/- 7 minutes). The time to perform the block was slightly shorter and the localization of the nerve simpler in group PROX. The overall block success rate was not significantly different in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetic injection at the proximal radial twitch significantly reduces the efficacy and prolongs the onset time of the radial nerve block. Searching for distal response is significantly more difficult and time consuming than searching for proximal response. However, it does not significantly increase patient discomfort or adverse effects.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of injection at the ulnar and the radial nerve in axillary block using triple stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A triple-stimulation technique for axillary block consists of the localization and injection of 2 nerves, median and musculocutaneous, which lie superior to the axillary artery, and of 1 nerve, the radial, which lies inferior. However, in some patients, the ulnar nerve is located first during the search for the radial nerve. The aim of this study was to verify if an ulnar motor response could be considered a satisfactory endpoint as a radial motor response. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Ninety patients received a triple-injection axillary brachial plexus block in which the radial nerve (group RAD) or the ulnar nerve (group ULN) was located and injected inferior to the axillary artery. Patients were assessed for sensory and motor block by a blinded investigator at 5-minute intervals over 30 minutes. RESULTS: A statistically significant higher overall block success rate was recorded in group RAD (91% vs. 73%), and this result was related to a larger success rate for anesthetizing the radial nerve (95% vs. 77%). A statistically significant shorter onset time of sensory block for the radial nerve was recorded in group RAD versus group ULN (9 +/- 5 min vs. 16 +/- 7 min), whereas the reverse was true for the ulnar nerve (13 +/- 7 min for group RAD vs. 10 +/- 3 min for group ULN). The time to perform the block was slightly but statistically significantly shorter in group ULN (6.5 +/- 1.7 min vs. 7.8 +/- 1.8 min). CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetic injection at the ulnar nerve significantly reduces the efficacy and prolongs the onset time of the radial-nerve block when triple-stimulation axillary block is performed.

Adult↗