PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Samia Madi-Jebara

Publications and source records attributed to Samia Madi-Jebara.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Staged anesthesia for combined carotid and coronary artery revascularization: a different approach.

OBJECTIVE: Combined coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are performed in an attempt to reduce the risk of postoperative stroke after CABG surgery in patients with significant or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The choice between regional and general anesthesia for CEA is still under debate. Regional anesthesia offers an excellent monitoring technique of the neurologic status of the awake patient during carotid clamping. In an attempt to improve monitoring of the neurologic status and avoid the use of temporary shunting in patients undergoing the combined procedure, a different approach is described combining regional anesthesia for CEA followed immediately by general anesthesia for CABG surgery. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized case series. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for combined CEA and CABG surgery underwent a "staged" anesthetic approach from January to December 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Pulmonary, femoral artery, and urinary catheters were inserted under local anesthesia. A deep cervical plexus block was then performed and supplemented by a superficial cervical plexus block. The patient was draped for standard combined CEA and CABG surgery. CEA was then performed using standard techniques. Without altering the surgical field, general anesthesia was given and endotracheal intubation performed following the successful CEA. Coronary revascularization was then completed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CEA and CABG surgery were completed successfully in all patients. There was no need for conversion from local to general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was easily performed in all patients. There was no hospital mortality in this series. No neurologic events were observed during the CEA. A reversible ischemic stroke, ipsilateral to the CEA, occurred postoperatively on awakening from CABG surgery in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: This staged anesthetic approach for combined CABG and CEA surgery is an alternative in this complex subset of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Prophylactic ondansetron is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting but not on pruritus after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of ondansetron for prevention of pruritus, nausea and vomiting after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Referral center, institutional practice. PATIENTS: 100 nonbreastfeeding women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with sufentanil-morphine-bupivacaine anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After the umbilical cord was clamped, patients in Group 1 received ondansetron 8 mg intravenously (IV) and patients in Group 2 received placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and severity of postoperative (24-hour) pruritus, nausea and vomiting, surgical pain, and side effects related to ondansetron were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: In the ondansetron group, 38 patients had pruritus (16 mild and 22 severe) and 9 patients had nausea and vomiting (5 mild and 4 severe). In the placebo group, 41 patients had pruritus (21 mild and 20 severe) and 29 patients had nausea and vomiting (9 mild and 15 severe). The frequency and severity of the nausea and vomiting episodes were significantly reduced in the ondansetron group. Pain scores were comparable between groups. No side effects related to ondansetron were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IV ondansetron 8 mg is safe and effective in reducing the frequency and the severity of nausea and vomiting, but not pruritus, following cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Postoperative oral amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prophylactic effect of postoperative oral amiodarone on the incidence and severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had coronary artery surgery (n = 200). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 (n = 100) received oral amiodarone, 15 mg/kg, 4 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit, followed by 7 mg/kg/d until hospital discharge. Patients in group 2 (n = 100) received placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Incidence, duration, and recurrence of new episodes of AF and maximal ventricular rate response were recorded from day 0 until hospital discharge. Side effects related to amiodarone and complications induced by new-onset AF were noted. The incidence of new-onset AF (12% v 25%) and maximal ventricular rate response (120 +/- 21 beats/min v 135 +/- 24 beats/min) were significantly lower in the amiodarone group. There were no side effects related to the administration of amiodarone. The incidence of complications induced by AF was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative prophylactic oral amiodarone after coronary artery surgery is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of new-onset AF and maximal ventricular rate response.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Thoracic epidural and intrathecal analgesia have similar effects on pain relief and respiratory function after thoracic surgery].

PURPOSE: To compare in a prospective randomized trial the effects of thoracic epidural infusions of fentanyl (F) and bupivacaine (B) to intrathecal morphine (M) and sufentanil (S) on analgesia and respiratory function following thoracotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 55 patients undergoing an elective postero-lateral thoracotomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I (n = 27): received intrathecal S (5 microg) and M (0.5 mg) one hour before surgery. Group II (n = 28) received, after induction of anesthesia, an initial dose of 10 to 20 mL of a solution of B 0.25% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) via an epidural thoracic catheter previously inserted between T5 and T8. The same solution was infused during surgery. After surgery, patients received a continuous infusion of B 0.1% and F 2 microg.mL(-1) with a bolus every 15 min if needed. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), SpO(2), PaCO(2), respiratory rate (RR), forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow rate and forced vital capacity were recorded at different times from the day before surgery till T48 = 48 hr after surgery. Subjective pain was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring at rest and during cough. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between both groups concerning VAS, HR, MAP, SpO(2), PaCO(2) and RR. Variations of the respiratory function tests were identical in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that intrathecal M and S offer analgesia comparable to thoracic epidural infusion of B and F.

Analgesia↗