PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Samik K Bandyopadhyay

Publications and source records attributed to Samik K Bandyopadhyay.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Laparoscopic management of cholecystoenteric fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystoenteric fistulas are a rare complication of gallstone disease and affect 3-5% of patients with cholelithiasis. Most fistulas are diagnosed intraoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and June 2003, 12428 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our department. Cholecystoenteric fistula was diagnosed intraoperatively and treated in 63 patients: 45 patients (71.4%) had cholecystoduodenal fistulas, while cholecystogastric and cholecystocolic fistulas were found in 9 patients (14.3%) and 4 patients (6.3%), respectively; and 5 patients (7.9%) were found to have Mirizzi syndrome type I along with a cholecytoenteric fistula. The operation could be completed laparoscopically in 59 patients. An endostapler was used in 47 patients to transect the fistula and in 12 patients the defect in the bowel was repaired with intracorporeal sutures. RESULTS: Major morbidity occurred in 3 patients (4.76%). One patient developed a loculated subdiaphragmatic collection which was treated by ultrasound guided aspiration and antibiotic therapy. Prolonged biliary drainage occurred in 2 patients. In addition, 7 patients (11.11%) had minor postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.2 days. All the patients are asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. CONCLUSION: Cholecystoenteric fistula is a difficult problem usually diagnosed intraoperatively. A high degree of suspicion at operation is mandatory. A stapled cholecystofistulectomy may be the procedure of choice since it avoids contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Complete laparoscopic management of cholecystoenteric fistulas is possible in well-equipped high-volume centers.

Adult↗

Abandoned endoscopic procedures.

Intraoperatively, it may be prudent at times to abandon or defer the intended therapeutic procedure due to adverse prevailing conditions. A decision to abandon or defer an endoscopic procedure would necessarily result in less morbidity compared with conventional open surgery. A retrospective review of endoscopic procedures that were abandoned or deferred and subsequent patient outcomes were noted. Between January 1998 to May 2003, 48 procedures out of a total of 11,550 endoscopic surgical procedures had to be abandoned. Previously unsuspected intraabdominal malignancy was the cause in 32 patients. Anesthesia-related problems led to the decision in 6 patients. Coincidental tuberculosis and failure in accessing the target organ were the cause in two patients each. An ectopic gallbladder, an absent gallbladder, a pancreatic phlegmon, and a failure to achieve proper single-lung ventilation led to the decision in one patient each. In two patients, presence of dense intraabdominal adhesions that precluded further progress led the surgeon to abandon the surgery. The patients with intraabdominal malignancy were staged for their disease and treated accordingly. Nine patients without malignancy who had their operation deferred due to diverse reasons were operated on a later date, whereas 4 patients were lost to follow-up. The 9 patients who underwent operation at a later date are well on follow-up. Four patients with intraabdominal malignancy died, whereas the others are well in follow-up after being treated according to the stage of their disease. Certain adverse situation encountered intraoperatively may lead the surgeon to change the approach to surgery and abandon the procedure. He may consider operation at a suitable time later or consider a different treatment altogether. The morbidity consequent to such a decision is much less if the operative approach is an endoscopic one.

Adolescent↗