PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandeep Dutta

Publications and source records attributed to Sandeep Dutta.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Distinct absorption characteristics of oral formulations of valproic acid/divalproex available in the United States.

Five oral formulations of valproic acid (VPA)/divalproex sodium are approved and commonly used in the US for treatment of epilepsy, mania/bipolar disorder and migraine prophylaxis. These formulations have unique pharmacokinetic and formulation characteristics and are designed to treat distinct patient populations. We compared the absorption characteristics of all five oral VPA/divalproex formulations currently available in the US. Plasma VPA concentration-time profiles, following single oral dose (250mg) administration of five VPA/divalproex formulations under fasting conditions, from three pharmacokinetic studies in healthy subjects (N=9-15 each) were compared. The five VPA/divalproex formulations demonstrated marked absorption differences. The rate of absorption, as characterized by maximum concentration (C(max)) and time to C(max) (T(max)), may be rank-ordered as: VPA syrup (34.2mg/L, 0.9h)>VPA capsule (31.4mg/L, 2.2h)>divalproex sodium sprinkle capsule (20.7mg/L, 4.0h; lag-time congruent with1h) congruent withdivalproex sodium enteric-coated delayed-release tablet (26.0mg/L, 3.4h; lag-time congruent with2h)>divalproex sodium extended-release (divalproex-ER) tablet (11.8mg/L, 19.7h). Divalproex-ER had approximately 11% lower exposure (AUC). The comparable AUC across the five formulations, when corrected for bioavailability differences, demonstrates that formulation primarily affects the drug-release and in vivo absorption of VPA. Only divalproex-ER demonstrated true sustained-release characteristics.

Absorption↗
PubMed2006

Comparative absorption profiles of divalproex sodium delayed-release versus extended-release tablets -- clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: The distinct absorption characteristics of the conventional enteric-coated, delayed-release (DR) and the novel extended-release (ER) divalproex sodium formulations are not well recognized. OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively and qualitatively differentiate the absorption characteristics of divalproex-DR and -ER formulations. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (N = 28) received single 1000 mg doses of divalproex-DR and divalproex-ER tablets in a crossover fashion. Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses were used to estimate valproic acid (VPA) pharmacokinetics from the plasma concentration-time profiles determined from intensive blood sampling over 48 hours. RESULTS: VPA was not absorbed from divalproex-DR in the first 2 hours (absorption lag-time) after dosing. After VPA release in the intestine, approximately 63% of the dose was absorbed in less than 1 hour, that is, 2.9 hours (mean absorption time) from dosing. Maximum concentration (C(max)) was achieved approximately 4 hours after dosing. VPA absorption was complete ( approximately 93% of dose) within 3 absorption half-lives ( approximately 4.5 h) post-absorption lag-time, that is, 6-7 hours from dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, initially at a modest rate, followed by slow and extended absorption at a constant rate for more than 20 hours; VPA concentrations at 1 and 2 hours were 28% and 40% of C(max). Approximately 53% of the dose was absorbed within 12 hours (mean absorption time); complete absorption occurred over more than 20 hours without any dose dumping. CONCLUSIONS: VPA absorption from enteric-coated divalproex-DR is rapid following a lag-time of approximately 2 hours and is complete within 6-7 hours of dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, but occurs at a slow, approximately constant rate over more than 20 hours.

Absorption↗
PubMed2006

A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.

Based on the structure of the original helical FDK algorithm, a three-dimensional (3D)-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm is proposed for image reconstruction in volumetric CT under helical source trajectory. In addition to its dependence on view and fan angles, the 3D weighting utilizes the cone angle dependency of a ray to improve reconstruction accuracy. The 3D weighting is ray-dependent and the underlying mechanism is to give a favourable weight to the ray with the smaller cone angle out of a pair of conjugate rays but an unfavourable weight to the ray with the larger cone angle out of the conjugate ray pair. The proposed 3D-weighted helical CB-FBP reconstruction algorithm is implemented in the cone-parallel geometry that can improve noise uniformity and image generation speed significantly. Under the cone-parallel geometry, the filtering is naturally carried out along the tangential direction of the helical source trajectory. By exploring the 3D weighting's dependence on cone angle, the proposed helical 3D-weighted CB-FBP reconstruction algorithm can provide significantly improved reconstruction accuracy at moderate cone angle and high helical pitches. The 3D-weighted CB-FBP algorithm is experimentally evaluated by computer-simulated phantoms and phantoms scanned by a diagnostic volumetric CT system with a detector dimension of 64 x 0.625 mm over various helical pitches. The computer simulation study shows that the 3D weighting enables the proposed algorithm to reach reconstruction accuracy comparable to that of exact CB reconstruction algorithms, such as the Katsevich algorithm, under a moderate cone angle (4 degrees) and various helical pitches. Meanwhile, the experimental evaluation using the phantoms scanned by a volumetric CT system shows that the spatial resolution along the z-direction and noise characteristics of the proposed 3D-weighted helical CB-FBP reconstruction algorithm are maintained very well in comparison to the FDK-type algorithms. Moreover, the experimental evaluation by clinical data verifies that the proposed 3D-weighted CB-FBP algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT under helical source trajectory meets the challenges posed by diagnostic applications of volumetric CT imaging.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Every-12-hour administration of extended-release divalproex in patients with epilepsy: impact on plasma valproic acid concentrations.

Extended-release divalproex sodium (divalproex-ER) biopharmaceutics after every-12-hour (q12h) administration was compared with that of once-daily divalproex-ER and conventional divalproex given every 6 hours (q6h) in a multiple-dose (14-day), randomized, three-period crossover design study in 24 patients with epilepsy concomitantly receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic medication(s). Plasma valproic acid (VPA) minimum concentration (Cmin) for divalproex-ER q12h was higher than the once-daily divalproex-ER Cmin (P=0.043). Once-daily divalproex-ER Cmin values were not different from those for divalproex q6h, suggesting that adequate trough steady-state concentrations are maintained with once daily dosing, despite enzyme-inducing comedication. The degree of peak-trough fluctuation (DFL, calculated as (Cmax-Cmin)/Cavg) in VPA concentration was less with both q12h (35.2% less) and once-daily (16.9% less) divalproex-ER regimens compared with q6h divalproex (P0.024). The DFL for divalproex-ER dosed as a q12h regimen was 22% less than that for once-daily divalproex-ER (P=0.02). The DFL in VPA concentration with divalproex-ER can be minimized with once-daily administration and more so with q12h administration, compared with conventional enteric-coated divalproex taken q6h.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Does it really matter when a blood sample for valproic acid concentration is taken following once-daily administration of divalproex-ER?

Divalproex sodium extended-release (divalproex-ER) is a novel formulation intended for once-daily oral administration, either morning or evening. Questions have risen concerning the optimal time for obtaining a blood sample for valproic acid (VPA) concentration in relation to the dose. Trough sampling is easily achieved just before a morning daily dose, but the best time to sample after an evening daily dose is unclear, because collecting a blood sample 21 to 24 hours later may be limited by the operational hours of the laboratory. This investigation provides practical guidance regarding blood sample timing. Steady-state plasma VPA concentration-time profiles from 5 published divalproex-ER studies (healthy subjects and epilepsy patients) were analyzed. The concentration-time profile for each subject/patient was expressed as a percentage of his/her trough concentration and summary statistics computed. Typically, when taking divalproex-ER once daily in the morning, a blood sample collected 21 to 24 hours later is expected to have a concentration within 3% of the trough value. Conversely, for divalproex-ER dosed once-daily in the evening, for example 8 PM, a blood draw 12 to 15 hours later (ie, 8 to 11 AM) will give a plasma VPA concentration value that is 18% to 25% higher, on average, than the trough value. However, waiting longer, (for example 18 to 21 hours, ie 2 to 5 PM) will result in concentration values that are merely 3% to 13% higher than trough values, which may provide acceptable information for monitoring purposes. The greatest deviation from trough VPA concentration occurs around the peak, that is 3 to 15 hours after a once-daily divalproex-ER dose; sampling during this time period is recommended only if a clinical need exists to test for a higher VPA concentration. Despite the apparent smoothness of the VPA concentration-time profile after a once-daily divalproex-ER dose, the timing of the blood sample does matter and impacts the proper interpretation of the VPA concentration.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2005

Once-a-day extended-release dosage form of divalproex sodium III: development and validation of a Level A in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC).

Defining a quantitative and reliable relationship between in vitro drug release and in vivo absorption is highly desired for rational development, optimization, and evaluation of controlled-release dosage forms and manufacturing process. During the development of a once-daily extended-release (ER) tablet of divalproex sodium, a predictive in vitro drug release method was designed and statistically evaluated using three formulations with varying release rates. In order to establish an internally and externally validated Level A IVIVC, a total of five different ER formulations of divalproex sodium were used to evaluate a linear IVIVC model based on the in vitro test method. For internal validation, a single-dose four-way crossover study (N = 16) was performed using fast-, medium-, and slow-releasing ER formulations and a 12-h IV infusion of valproic acid as reference. To validate the IVIVC externally, a second three-way crossover study (N = 36) was performed using slightly-fast-, medium-, and slightly-slow-releasing ER formulations. The in vivo absorption-time profile was inferred by deconvolution of the observed plasma concentration-time profiles against the unit disposition function (UDF). A linear IVIVC model was established in which the in vivo absorption was expressed as a function of in vitro drug release. Plasma profiles of ER formulations were estimated via convolution of in vitro release profiles with the UDF. Successful internal and external validations of the model were demonstrated by individual and average absolute percent prediction errors of </=9% for both C(max) and AUC(infinity). In conclusion, a Level A IVIVC describing the entire time-course of plasma concentrations was developed and validated, both internally and externally, for ER formulations of divalproex sodium.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Quantification of emphysema severity by histogram analysis of CT scans.

Emphysema is characterized by the destruction and over distension of lung tissue, which manifest on high resolution computer tomography (CT) images as regions of low attenuation. Typically, it is diagnosed by clinical symptoms, physical examination, pulmonary function tests, and X-ray and CT imaging. In this paper we discuss a quantitative imaging approach to analyze emphysema which employs low-level segmentations of CT images that partition the data into perceptually relevant regions. We constructed multi-dimensional histograms of feature values computed over the image segmentation. For each region in the segmentation, we derive a rich set of feature measurements. While we can use any combination of physical and geometric features, we found that limiting the scope to two features - the mean attenuation across a region and the region area - is effective. The subject histogram is compared to a set of canonical histograms representative of various stages of emphysema using the Earth Mover's Distance metric. Disease severity is assigned based on which canonical histogram is most similar to the subject histogram. Experimental results with 81 cases of emphysema at different stages of disease progression show good agreement against the reading of an expert radiologist.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetics and safety of extended-release divalproex sodium tablets: morning versus evening administration.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics and safety of 1000-mg extended-release divalproex sodium given once daily either in the morning or evening were compared. METHODS: Healthy volunteers 19-55 years of age were enrolled in this open-label, parallel-design study. Subjects were randomized to receive extended-release divalproex either in the morning or in the evening. Blood samples were taken immediately before and at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124.5, 126, 127.5, 129, 130.5, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136.5, 138, 139.5, 141, 142.5, and 144 hours after the first dose of each six-day regimen. Plasma samples were assayed for total valproic acid concentrations using gas chromatography. Valproic acid pharmacokinetic values were measured, and the safety of each regimen was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean steady-state valproic acid exposure, maximum concentration, and minimum concentration were 1771 mg x hr/L, 86.9 mg/L, and 55.5 mg/L for the morning dosing and 1728 mg x hr/L, 84.8 mg/L, and 57.4 mg/L for the evening dosing regimens, respectively. Adverse events reported by two or more subjects were abdominal pain and somnolence for the morning dosing regimen and asthenia, headache, and pain for the evening dosing regimen. All adverse events were mild or moderate; none caused subject withdrawal from the study. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters (p > 0.51) and safety between groups. Diurnal variation in plasma valproic acid concentrations was minimal with once-daily administration of extended-release divalproex. CONCLUSION: Evening once-daily administration of extended-release divalproex was not associated with substantial differences in pharmacokinetics or safety compared with morning once-daily administration.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Predicted serum valproic acid concentrations in patients missing and replacing a dose of extended-release divalproex sodium.

PURPOSE: Computer simulations were used to analyze changes in steady-state total plasma valproic acid concentrations when a patient misses a dose of once-daily extended-release divalproex sodium, replaces it at a later time, and resumes scheduled therapy. METHODS: Valproic acid concentration-time profiles were simulated for 1000 hypothetical patients for each of two missed-dose scenarios using a one-compartment (assumes rapid distribution) population kinetic model with nonlinear protein binding. For each scenario, a lognormal distribution of clearance of unbound valproic acid, volume of distribution of unbound valproic acid, protein-binding values, and albumin concentration was generated. All simulations incorporated 20% interpatient variability and 10% residual error. RESULTS: Our pharmacokinetic simulations predicted that the chance for high plasma valproic acid concentrations resulting in clinical toxicity is low when extended-release divalproex doses are replaced within 12 hours followed by resumption of scheduled administration, perhaps due to the controlled, near zero-order absorption characteristics of the extended-release formulation. If a patient misses a dose of extended-release divalproex, it should be replaced as soon as the patient remembers. The next dose should be taken at the regularly scheduled time. A missed dose of extended-release divalproex may be replaced up to 12 hours later without any clinically significant change in plasma valproic acid concentrations in a majority of the patients. CONCLUSION: Simulation of two scenarios suggested that a missed dose of extended-release divalproex sodium may be replaced up to 12 hours later without any clinically significant perturbation in plasma valproic acid concentrations in the majority of adolescent and adult patients with epilepsy.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2004

Bioavailability of divalproex extended-release formulation relative to the divalproex delayed-release formulation.

Divalproex sodium extended-release tablet (divalproex-ER) is a novel formulation of the conventional divalproex sodium delayed-release tablet (divalproex). In five multiple-dose studies in healthy subjects (n=82) and epilepsy patients (n=86) the estimates of divalproex-ER/divalproex ratios for steady-state 24 h valproic acid area under the curve (AUC) central values, maximum concentration (C(max)) central values and minimum concentration (C(min)) means had ranges of 0.77-0.97, 0.71-0.87 and 0.78-1.03, respectively. These studies used different divalproex regimens (two, three or four times daily) and meal conditions (fasting, low, medium and high calorie meals). Divalproex-ER was administered once daily. A meta-analysis of divalproex-ER/divalproex relative bioavailability across five studies under different meal conditions and divalproex dosing frequencies was performed. This meta-estimate of relative bioavailability was used to provide dosing recommendations for conversion of patients from divalproex to divalproex-ER. The estimated AUC, C(max) and C(min) divalproex-ER/divalproex ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.89 (0.85-0.94), 0.79 (0.74-0.84) and 0.96 (0.90-1.02), respectively. The food and divalproex regimen had no effect on the relative bioavailability. While switching from divalproex to divalproex-ER, the divalproex-ER daily dose may have to be increased by an average of 12% (calculated as 1.0/0.89) to achieve comparable plasma exposure. Since the divalproex-ER dosage strengths (250 and 500 mg) are not 12% higher than the divalproex dosage strengths (125, 250 and 500 mg), an 8% to 20% higher divalproex-ER daily dose should be considered for conversion from divalproex to divalproex-ER.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of the bioavailability of 250 and 500 mg divalproex sodium extended-release tablets in healthy volunteers.

Divalproex sodium extended-release tablet (divalproex-ER), 500 mg strength, is approved for use in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches and epilepsy. The bioavailability of novel 250 mg divalproex-ER formulations, under development to allow greater flexibility in dosing, was compared with the available 500 mg divalproex-ER in a single-dose, fasting and nonfasting, randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. One group of 15 subjects was dosed after a 10 h overnight fast and another group of 24 subjects was dosed after a high-fat breakfast. Plasma valproic acid concentration-time profiles were used to assess pharmacokinetics. Bioequivalence assessments were made via the 90% confidence interval for maximum plasma valproic acid concentration (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)). The relative bioavailability point estimates (90% confidence interval) for C(max) and AUC(infinity) were 1.05 (0.94-1.16) and 0.95 (0.83-1.09) under fasting conditions, and 1.01 (0.91-1.12) and 0.97 (0.87-1.08) under nonfasting conditions, respectively. The test 250 mg tablet formulation was bioequivalent to the reference 500 mg tablet formulation, under both fasting and nonfasting conditions, as the 90% confidence intervals for both C(max) and AUC(infinity) were within the 0.80-1.25 interval.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Divalproex-ER pharmacokinetics in older children and adolescents.

Valproic acid pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability after administration of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets was characterized in older children and adolescents. In this multiple-dose, open-label, pharmacokinetic study, the patients were divided into two age groups, 8-11 years (older children; n = 15) and 12-17 years (adolescents; n = 14). Once-daily administration of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets (doses ranged from 250 to 1750 mg) in older children and adolescents produced relatively flat plasma valproic acid concentration-time profiles over the entire 24-hour dosing interval, similar to the pharmacokinetic performance of this formulation in adults. The mean (standard deviation) oral clearance values for unbound valproic acid were 94.3 (51.8) and 82.3 (28.2) mL/h/kg and for total valproic acid were 11.2 (3.77) and 9.06 (2.03) mL/h/kg in older children and adolescents, respectively. Two patients discontinued for administrative reasons, whereas one discontinued for an adverse event (flulike syndrome). Adverse events reported by three or more patients were flu syndrome (5 patients, 17.2%) and headache (3 patients, 10.3%). Reported adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity and similar to those reported in previous divalproex studies. This study demonstrates that in older children and adolescents, once-daily administration of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets may potentially be used to sustain plasma valproic acid concentrations within the usually accepted therapeutic ranges for various indications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Absolute bioavailability and absorption characteristics of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets in healthy volunteers.

Conventional delayed-release, enteric-coated divalproex sodium tablet has an absolute bioavailability of approximately 100%. Divalproex sodium extended-release (ER) tablet is a novel formulation of valproic acid (VPA) designed to release the drug slowly at a constant zero-order rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the absolute bioavailability and absorption characteristics of divalproex ER. Healthy adult volunteers (n = 16) received divalproex ER and intravenous VPA in crossover fashion. Absolute bioavailability was calculated as the divalproex ER/intravenous VPA ratio of area under the curve extrapolated to infinity. The duration and rate of absorption of VPA from divalproex ER tablets were determined by deconvolution analysis. The geometric mean absolute bioavailability of divalproex ER was 0.896. The mean (coefficient of variation) duration of drug absorption from divalproex ER was 21.8 (17%) hours, and the zero-order absorption rate was 21.6 (24%) mg/h for a 500-mg tablet. Divalproex ER has a lower absolute bioavailability than conventional divalproex tablets but exhibits good extended-release characteristics without any dose dumping.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Valproate unbound fraction and distribution volume following rapid infusions in patients with epilepsy.

The availability of an intravenous formulation now makes possible rapid administration of valproate (VPA) loading doses, but estimates of key VPA pharmacokinetic parameters in patients have limited the use of this approach. VPA disposition was characterized in 112 epilepsy patients, with or without enzyme inducing comedications, randomized to either 3.0 or 1.5mg/kg/min infusions of valproate sodium injection. Maximum dose was </=15mg/kg per infusion. Total and unbound plasma VPA concentrations were determined from blood samples obtained prior to and for 6h following the infusion. Analyses of covariance assessed the effect of induction, weight, age, gender, albumin, creatinine, and infusion rate on pharmacokinetics. Maximum total and unbound VPA concentrations were 94 and 14mg/l, respectively. Total concentration fell below 50mg/l within 3h in induced and 6h in uninduced patients. VPA unbound fraction decreased from 15% at maximum concentration to 9% at 45mg/l. The mean (S.D.) distribution volume was 0.21 (0.044)l/kg. Induction status, albumin concentration, and infusion rate significantly affected pharmacokinetics. Measurement of unbound VPA may be useful when alterations in binding are suspected. Infusions up to 3mg/kg/min produce predictable total VPA concentrations when induction status and albumin levels are considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Oral/intravenous maintenance dosing of valproate following intravenous loading: a simulation.

Valproic acid (VPA) has a narrow therapeutic range (50-100mg/l) and exhibits nonlinear protein binding. Additionally, VPA pharmacokinetics are dependent on age, induction status, and formulation; so titration and dosing vary between individuals. The aim of these simulations was to determine optimal intravenous (i.v.) loading dose, and i.v. and oral VPA maintenance regimens. A 5-min 15mg/kg loading dose resulted in total and free plasma VPA concentrations of approximately 65 and 7.5mg/l in children, and approximately 80 and 11mg/l in adults, 1h after the infusion; induction status had little effect. For uninduced children and adults, 7.5 and 3.5mg/kg q6h i.v. valproate sodium, initiated 6h after loading dose maintains therapeutic plasma VPA concentrations. The rapid decline of plasma VPA concentrations following an i.v. loading dose in combination with the delayed initial absorption of drug from delayed-release divalproex sodium tablets warrant beginning q12h oral maintenance regimens of delayed-release divalproex sodium within 2h of a loading dose in the uninduced population. Plasma VPA concentrations can be sustained in the therapeutic range using once-daily maintenance regimens of extended-release divalproex sodium tablets if initiated concurrently with i.v. loading dose in the uninduced population. A two-fold higher i.v. and oral maintenance regimen dose may be required in induced patients.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of the bioavailability of unequal doses of divalproex sodium extended-release formulation relative to the delayed-release formulation in healthy volunteers.

Valproate formulations, divalproex sodium extended-release (ER) and the traditional divalproex sodium delayed-release (DR) formulations, are not bioequivalent. This study evaluated if ER QD regimens with 14 and 20% higher daily doses were equivalent to the corresponding DR BID regimens with respect to exposure (AUC) while achieving lower maximum concentration (C(max)) and higher minimum concentration (C(min)) values. This was a Phase I, multiple-dose, fasting, randomized, open-label, crossover design study in healthy adult volunteers (n=36). The two crossover comparisons of unequal total daily doses were: 1000 mg ER versus 875 mg DR and 1500 mg ER versus 1250 mg DR. For each of 14 and 20% higher ER versus DR dose comparisons, the ER and DR regimens were equivalent with respect to AUC. Furthermore, the ER formulation achieved a lower C(max) central value and a higher C(min) mean than the corresponding values for the DR formulation. The mean peak-to-trough fluctuations of valproic acid plasma concentrations were 42-48% lower for the ER formulation compared with the DR. The higher ER doses were as well tolerated as DR, with a small number of adverse events that were non-serious in nature and mild in intensity. Therefore, increasing the once-daily ER dose 14-20% while converting from a total daily DR dose given twice-daily results in equivalent exposure with lower C(max) and higher C(min) values.

Adult↗