Sander J Robins — Page 2

PubMed2002

Treatment of lipid disorders after stroke.

The efficacy of lipid disorder therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease is established. There are, however, no completed studies specifically directed at reducing the risk of stroke with lipid therapy. Although observational cohort studies have failed to demonstrate an association between lipid disorders and stroke incidence, recently completed trials of subjects at risk for coronary heart disease have shown that statins and fibric acid derivatives reduce not only the risk of myocardial infarction and death, but also that of brain infarction and transient ischemic attacks. Lipid drugs are well tolerated and treatment complications are relatively low. It seems prudent to conclude that the stroke patient with an undesirable lipid profile who has a history of coronary heart disease should receive specific treatment for the lipid disorder. Recommendations are more problematic for stroke patients with lipid disorders but no history of coronary heart disease; most should receive therapy for primary prevention of heart disease. Lipid treatment trials focused on stroke risk reduction are urgently needed.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Diabetes, plasma insulin, and cardiovascular disease: subgroup analysis from the Department of Veterans Affairs high-density lipoprotein intervention trial (VA-HIT).

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose level, or insulin resistance are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of gemfibrozil in subjects with varying levels of glucose tolerance or hyperinsulinemia and to examine the association between diabetes status and glucose and insulin levels and risk of cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: Subgroup analyses from the Department of Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial, a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 2531 men with coronary heart disease (CHD), a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 40 mg/dL or less (</=1.04 mmol/L), and a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 140 mg/dL or less (</=3.63 mmol/L). Subjects received either gemfibrozil (1200 mg/d) or matching placebo and were followed up for an average of 5.1 years. In this article, we report the composite end point (CHD death, stroke, or myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Compared with those with a normal fasting glucose level, risk was increased in subjects with known diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.43; P =.001) and those with newly diagnosed diabetes (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10-2.68; P =.02). In persons without diabetes, a fasting plasma insulin level of 39 micro U/mL or greater (>/=271 pmol/L) was associated with a 31% increased risk of events (P =.03). Gemfibrozil was effective in persons with diabetes (risk reduction for composite end point, 32%; P =.004). The reduction in CHD death was 41% (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91; P =.02). Among individuals without diabetes, gemfibrozil was most efficacious for those in the highest fasting plasma insulin level quartile (risk reduction, 35%; P =.04). CONCLUSION: In men with CHD and a low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, gemfibrozil use was associated with a reduction in major cardiovascular events in persons with diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with a high fasting plasma insulin level.

Aged↗