Sandford L Sheklow | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

A comparative study of organized class-based exercise programs versus individual home-based exercise programs for elderly patients following hip surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of supervised and non-supervised exercise programs for improving health and rehabilitation outcomes for elderly persons following hip surgery. METHOD: Prospective, descriptive and quantitative study involving two groups: The class-based program (group A, n = 34: 21 females, 13 males, mean age 79.2 years +/- 5.23) was directed and administered in the outpatient clinic, and a home-based program (group B, n = 29, 17 females, 12 males, mean age 80.3 years +/- 5.74) which administered in the patient's home. Sixty three elderly patients began at a period of 2 weeks post hip surgery for open reduction with internal fixation. The training period took place for 14 consecutive weeks. The main outcome measures include results from physical performance test, functional reach test and short form-36 health survey questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty five patients completed the exercise program. No significant difference according to gender or Body Mass Index was found between the groups. At the conclusion of 14 weeks of exercise training both groups demonstrated improvement in physical function. However, only 4 of 6 total tasks of a physical performance test were improved in the home-based group compared to improvement in all 6 tasks for the class-based group. The SF-36 scores and the functional reach test indicated that the class-based subjects also presented significant gains in contrast to no significant changes in the home exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups demonstrated improvement in a number of issues. However, there appears to be more positive health outcomes presented by the participants in the supervised/class-based group when compared to the non-supervised/home-based group. And therefore, patients may select to participate to either a home-based or class-based regime. The clinical relevance is the significant of the necessity for close supervision by a professional therapist. In addition, the results could have some political and economical implications on the healthcare system.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Isokinetic leg strength of institutionalized older adults with mental retardation with and without Down's syndrome.

This study compared isokinetic leg strength of aged individuals with mental retardation (MR) with and without Down's syndrome (DS). Nine subjects with MR and DS (mean age = 61) and 16 subjects with MR but without DS (mean age = 63) performed a leg strength test on a Biodex dynamometer. Parameters measured were peak torque, peak torque percent body weight (ratio displayed as a percentage of the maximum torque production to the subject's body weight), and average power percent body weight. In addition, anthropometric measurements (height, weight, skinfolds, and body mass index) and intelligence quotient (IQ) were also analyzed and compared. The results indicate a significant increase of scores for isokinetic knee extension and flexion in the group with MR but without DS over the subjects in the group with MR and DS. As a group, the individuals with MR and DS tended to be smaller and fatter. No significant difference in IQ was observed between the 2 groups with MR. It was concluded that the strength of individuals with MR but without DS is greater than the group of subjects with MR and DS. When comparing their results to aged individuals without MR, a significant decline in muscle strength can be observed among people with MR.

Age Factors↗