Uprighting a horizontally impacted mandibular second molar.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Sandhya Jain.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy fails to reduce the prevalence of anemia. However, 2 or 3 intramuscular doses of iron given at monthly intervals were recently found to be effective. OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety and efficacy in treating pregnancy anemia of 3 intramuscular doses of iron given at monthly intervals with those of daily oral iron supplementation. DESIGN: In a prospective, partially randomized study, 148 pregnant women received daily oral doses of 100 mg elemental Fe and 500 micro g folic acid, and 106 pregnant women received 3 intramuscular doses of 250 mg elemental Fe as iron dextran at 1-mo intervals and oral doses of 5 mg folic acid twice weekly. One hundred women in each group completed the study. Changes in hemoglobin, iron indicators, pregnancy outcomes, and birth weight were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Hemoglobin and iron indicators improved significantly with both treatments. The increase in serum ferritin concentration after parenteral iron treatment was significantly higher than that after oral iron treatment. No significant differences between the 2 groups in pregnancy outcomes and birth weight were observed. Systemic side effects were more common in the parenteral iron group, whereas gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the oral iron group. CONCLUSIONS: The intramuscular administration of 3 doses of 250 mg Fe at monthly intervals appears to have good compliance and efficacy and may be used in women who cannot tolerate oral administration of iron. However, intramuscular administration of iron is appropriate only in hospital settings well equipped to treat anaphylactic crises.
A series of Eu(III) metallopeptides, designed on the basis of the structural similarity of the helix-turn-helix and EF-hand motifs, have been studied by Eu(III) (7)F(0) --> (5)D(0) excitation spectroscopy. The impact of EF-hand ligand set differences on the hydration number and Eu(III) coordination environment are compared among the peptides. The conditional binding affinities were determined by Eu titration (P3, log K(a) = 6.0 +/- 0.4; P3W, log K(a) = 5.9 +/- 0.2; P5b, log K(a) = 5.3 +/- 0.1). Two similar coordination environments occur in each case, consistent with structural flexibility about the metal site. The coordination environments are consistent with 8- or 9-coordinate Eu(III), including six peptide-based ligands and two to three water molecules (P3, q = 1.9 +/- 0.2; P3W, q = 2.3 +/- 0.2; P4a, q = 1.9 +/- 0.3; P5b, q = 2.6 +/- 0.2). The Eu(III) (7)F(0) --> (5)D(0) excitation spectra are pH-dependent, as reported for several EF-hand proteins (oncomodulin, parvalbumin). A higher energy transition occurs at pH > 6, and has been assigned to deprotonation of coordinated water. The pK(a) leading to this new transition is dependent on Eu(III) Lewis acidity, which varies with the inner and outer sphere ligand set. The noncoordinating ninth position of the Eu-binding loop, which is poised to make second-sphere contacts to the coordinated water, stabilizes the deprotonated form of the coordinated solvent more effectively when it is Thr (P5b) than Asp (P3W). Upon DNA-binding by the metallopeptides, the pK(a) of the pH-dependent peak increases, but no new DNA-dependent transitions are observed. This indicates no DNA-based Eu(III) ligands are introduced, such as phosphate oxygen atoms of the DNA backbone. The hydration number decreases in the presence of DNA (P3W + DNA, q = 1.9 +/- 0.2; P5b + DNA, q = 1.7 +/- 0.2), indicating that DNA-binding by the metallopeptides organizes rather than compromises the Eu-binding site within the peptide.