PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandra D Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra D Anderson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Bronchial challenges in athletes applying to inhale a beta2-agonist at the 2004 Summer Olympics.

BACKGROUND: The International Olympic Committee Medical Commission required a medical justification for athletes to inhale a beta2-agonist before an event at the Summer Games in Athens in 2004. OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the percentage of athletes applying to use an inhaled beta2-agonist on the basis of the results of objective tests to establish a diagnosis of asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We also sought to compare this percentage with the percentage of athletes simply notifying the intention to use a beta2-agonist at the previous Summer Games in Sydney in 2000. METHODS: An analysis was made of tests that measured the change in FEV1 in response to a bronchodilator or in response to a provoking stimulus, such as exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, hypertonic saline, or methacholine. RESULTS: Ten thousand six hundred fifty-three athletes competed in Athens; 4.2% were approved to use a beta2-agonist, and 0.4% were rejected. This approval rate was 26% less than the notifications in 2000 in Sydney (5.7%). Compared with Sydney 2000, there was a significant reduction of submissions and approvals for athletes from the United States, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada and in triathlon and swimming sports. CONCLUSION: The need to provide objective testing has resulted in a reduction in the number of athletes seeking approval to use an inhaled beta2-agonist. Objective evidence has provided information for the doctor that is likely to improve the health of the athlete because many athletes appeared to be undertreated at the time of testing. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We show that documentation of airway narrowing in athletes, particularly in response to exercise or surrogate stimuli for exercise, aids in the diagnosis and management of asthma by providing evidence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness that will respond to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and is usually associated with a reduction in respiratory symptoms on exercise.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Hyperosmolar agents and clearance of mucus in the diseased airway.

Clearance of mucus is an important function of the airways to maintain hygiene. In disease, persistent inflammation leads to excessive production of mucus, with high viscoelasticity and adhesivity, which is not easily transported by cilia or cough interactions. Accumulated mucus in the airways can lead to airway obstruction, bacterial colonisation, and recurrent infections, resulting in poor quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Hyperosmolar agents have the potential to alter the physical properties of mucus and facilitate its clearance by increasing the water in the airway lumen and by reducing the entanglements of the mucin network. Clinical studies using radioaerosols, and imaging with a gamma camera, have demonstrated that hypertonic saline (HS; 3-14.4%) and mannitol (300-400 mg) increase clearance of mucus acutely in patients with mild asthma, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis (CF). Further, in sputum studies, a reduction in the viscoelastic properties, surface tension and spinnability and an increase in the hydration of mucus have been measured in response to HS, mannitol, and other sugars. Inhalation of mannitol (400 mg) twice daily over 2 weeks improved the quality of life significantly in patients with bronchiectasis. Inhalation of 7% HS, four times daily, over 2 weeks improved significantly the baseline mucus clearance rate and lung function in CF patients. In addition, inhalation of 7% HS twice daily over 12 months showed similar results to the short-term studies without a change in the bacterial load in CF patients. Further studies of the long-term clinical effect of hyperosmolar agents are needed.

Aerosols↗
PubMed2006

How does exercise cause asthma attacks?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To remind readers that evaporative water loss from the airway surface is the stimulus for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. To emphasize that recruitment of the peripheral airways determines severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. To draw attention to the potential for injury of the epithelium and for plasma exudation to contribute to the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes. To emphasize that many inflammatory mediators are involved in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and that some are found in both asthmatic and healthy subjects. RECENT FINDINGS: That inflammatory mediators are released into the airways in response to exercise and can be measured by inducing sputum (histamine, cysteinyl leukotrienes) or collecting condensate from exhaled air (cysteinyl leukotrienes and adenosine). The concentration of mediators was reduced in response to a combination of loratadine and montelukast. Exercise is a stimulus for upregulating the genes coding for the 5-lipoxygenase pathway in healthy subjects. SUMMARY: Dehydration of the airways results in release of mediators. The likely source of these mediators is the mast cell. Epithelial injury occurs in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The process of repair may contribute to the development of airway hyperresponsiveness in healthy subjects. Measuring the airway response to exercise, or a surrogate for exercise, as an indicator of airway hyperresponsiveness is warranted in patients with symptoms of asthma.

Asthma, Exercise-Induced↗
PubMed2005

The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled mannitol is a new bronchial provocation test (BPT) developed to improve portability and standardisation of osmotic challenge testing. Osmotic challenge tests have an advantage over the traditional methods of measuring airway hyperresponsiveness using methacholine as they demonstrate higher specificity to identify asthma and thus the need for treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The safety and the efficacy of mannitol (M) as a BPT to measure airway hyperresponsiveness were compared to hypertonic (4.5%) saline (HS) in people both with and without signs and symptoms of asthma. METHODS: A phase III, multi-centre, open label, operator-blinded, crossover design, randomised trial, with follow-up. Asthmatics and non-asthmatics (6-83 yr) were recruited and 592 subjects completed the study. Mannitol was delivered using a low resistance dry powder inhaler and HS was delivered using an ultrasonic nebuliser. The FEV1 was measured 60 seconds after each dose of mannitol (5,10,20,40,80,160,160,160 mg) and after each exposure to HS (0.5,1.0,2.0,4.0,8.0 minutes). A 15% fall in FEV1 defined a positive test. Adverse events were monitored and diaries kept for 7 days following the tests. RESULTS: Mean pre-test FEV1 (mean +/- SD) was 95.5 +/- 14% predicted. 296 were positive to mannitol (M+) and 322 positive to HS (HS+). A post study physician conducted clinical assessment identified 82.3% asthmatic (44% classified mild) and 17.7% non-asthmatic. Of those M+, 70.1% were taking ICS and of those mannitol negative (M-), 81.1 % were taking ICS. The % fall in FEV1 for mannitol in asthmatics was 21.0% +/- 5.7 and for the non-asthmatics, 5.5% +/- 4.8. The median PD15 M was 148 mg and PD15 HS 6.2 ml. The sensitivity of M to identify HS+ was 80.7% and the specificity 86.7%. The sensitivity of M compared with the clinical assessment was 59.8% and specificity 95.2% and increased to 88.7% and 95.0% respectively when the M- subjects taking ICS were excluded. Cough was common during testing. There were no serious adverse events. The diarised events were similar for mannitol and HS, the most common being headache (17.2%M, 19%HS), pharyngolaryngeal pain (5.1%M, 3%HS), nausea (4.3%M, 3%HS), and cough (2.2%M, 2.4%HS). CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of mannitol was demonstrated in non-asthmatic and clinically diagnosed asthmatic adults and children.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: pathogenesis.

There is still active debate on the acute mechanism of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Although it is unlikely that vasoconstriction and hyperemia of the bronchial vasculature are essential events for EIB, it is likely that this vasculature enhances the airway response to dehydration and contributes to the pathogenesis of EIB, particularly in elite athletes. Accumulating evidence suggests that airway smooth muscle (ASM) becomes more sensitive as a result of repeated exposure to bulk plasma in response to airway injury from dehydration. Recent evidence also demonstrates sufficient concentrations of mediators that could affect ASM. Paradoxically, mediator release from mast cells may be enhanced and their contractile effects greater when beta(2)-receptor agonists are taken daily. The effect of drugs that have the potential to reduce microvascular leak and reduce or inhibit release or action of these mediators needs to be investigated in elite athletes.

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Inhaled mannitol for the treatment of mucociliary dysfunction in patients with bronchiectasis: effect on lung function, health status and sputum.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled mannitol increases mucus clearance in patients with bronchiectasis by an unclear mechanism. The effect of mannitol on lung function, health status and sputum properties was investigated. METHODOLOGY: Nine patients with bronchiectasis inhaled 400 mg of mannitol once daily for 12 days. Health status was assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Sputum was analysed for viscosity, elasticity, spinnability, surface tension, contact angle, solids, mucociliary transportability (MCTR) on a frog palate, and cough transportability (CTR) on a simulated cough machine. RESULTS: Lung function was unchanged with treatment (baseline FEV1 82.0 +/- 16.2%) apart from an improvement in FEF from 85.4 +/- 13% (baseline) to 90.7 +/- 14.4% (P < 0.05; 12th treatment; visit 7). The total SGRQ score (mean +/- SD) of 49.3 +/- 13.8 at baseline, decreased by 12.4 +/- 10.2 (P < 0.01; visit 7) and 10.1 +/- 9.4 units (P < 0.02) 6-10 days after treatment cessation. The baseline subscores for symptoms (72.9 +/- 11.8), activity (44.7 +/- 20.9) and impact (44.4 +/- 14.3) were reduced by 0.8 +/- 9.1 (P > 0.7), 8.4 +/- 16.0 (P > 0.1) and 19.2 +/- 13.7 (P < 0.005) units, respectively (visit 7). Mannitol reduced the baseline (mean +/- SE) surface tension from 94.5 +/- 1.4 to 84.7 +/- 2.1 mN/m (P < 0.0001), contact angle from 51.1 +/- 2.8 to 33.2 +/- 2.4 degrees (P < 0.0001), spinnability from 11.6 +/- 0.4 to 10.0 +/- 0.2 mm (P < 0.005), and solids from 5.7 +/- 0.4 to 4.3 +/- 0.7% (P < 0.02), acutely (visit 7). Viscosity, elasticity and MCTR did not change significantly, while CTR was increased from 25.8 +/- 1.0 to 34.1 +/- 2.7 mm (P < 0.003). CONCLUSION: Mannitol significantly improved the health status over 12 days and this improvement was maintained for 6-10 days after cessation of treatment. In addition, mannitol reduced the tenacity, increased the hydration of mucus acutely and improved cough clearability in patients with bronchiectasis.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Dissociation in the effect of nedocromil on mannitol-induced cough or bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled mannitol induces both bronchoconstriction and cough. Nedocromil sodium greatly attenuates mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction. Knowledge about the effect of nedocromil on mannitol-provoked cough might, therefore, clarify the mechanisms of this response. METHODOLOGY: Inhalation challenges with mannitol powder were performed after inhalation of 8 mg of nedocromil or its placebo in 24 subjects with asthma. The study was double-blind, randomised, and placebo-controlled. The mannitol-provoked coughs were manually recorded and the mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction was measured with a spirometer. RESULTS: The cumulative dose of mannitol that provoked at least two coughs tended to be higher on the nedocromil day than on the placebo day (34 (22--53) mg vs 26 (18--37) mg, P=0.051). The cumulative number of coughs per dose of mannitol was slightly, but significantly, lower on the nedocromil than on the placebo day (4.2 (2.8--6.3) coughs/100 mg vs 6.1 (4.0--9.4) coughs/100 mg, P=0.037). However, when analysed on a constant-dose basis, nedocromil provided no protection for coughing (-1% protection), whereas the protection for bronchoconstriction was clear (55% protection). CONCLUSIONS: Nedocromil strongly attenuates mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction but has a negligible effect on mannitol-provoked cough. Therefore, these responses seem to have different pathways in asthma. Recording of both provoked coughs and induced bronchoconstriction during mannitol challenge may provide supplementary information about a patient's disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Mucociliary clearance in patients with chronic asthma: effects of beta agonists.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic asthma is characterized by airway inflammation, mucus hypersecretion and impaired mucociliary clearance (MCC). We investigated baseline MCC and the acute effect of terbutaline in chronic asthmatics with sputum production while on long-term treatment with salmeterol in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). METHODOLOGY: MCC was measured at baseline and in response to 1 mg terbutaline (or placebo) on three visits over 80 min in 16 asthmatics (52+/-13 years of age). Subjects who had greater than 10% absolute increase in MCC above baseline and placebo, after terbutaline, were categorized in group A and subjects who had less than 10% in group B. RESULTS: In group A subjects (n=6), MCC increased from 23.7+/-4.0% at baseline to 43.7+/-4.9% with terbutaline (P<0.0001) and to 34.4+/-5.7% with placebo (P<0.01). In group B subjects (n=10), MCC remained similar: 11.3+/-3.2% at initial baseline, 12.0+/-3.2% with terbutaline and 7.3+/-3.0% with placebo (P>0.05). Group B subjects withdrew from all beta(2) agonists for a week and MCC was remeasured. After withdrawal, baseline MCC (7.0+/-1.8%) was similar to the initial baseline value (P>0.1) and MCC with terbutaline (15.8+/-4.9%) was greater than baseline (P<0.005) but remained abnormal in most subjects. Baseline percentage predicted FEV(1) and FEF(25--75%) were 77.3+/-7.2 and 41.7+/-5.6 in group A and 59.9+/-8.1 and 29.5+/-8.4 in group B subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: MCC was impaired in most of these asthmatics with persistent airway obstruction and sputum production, despite regular treatment with ICS and salmeterol. In addition, there was little or no stimulation of MCC acutely after terbutaline in most of these asthmatics.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Prediction of treatment-response to inhaled corticosteroids by mannitol-challenge test in COPD. A proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: There are no predictors known that can identify COPD patients who will respond to treatment with ICS. METHOD: We investigated 30 patients (median age 65 (range 44-83, 12 females) with mild to moderately severe COPD. All patients had post bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio of less than 70% and a reversibility of less than 12% and 200 ml from baseline. We wanted to determine if airway responsiveness (AHR) to histamine and mannitol could predict who would respond to a 3-month course of ICS. RESULTS: At baseline, all patients had AHR to histamine, but only 7 (23%) patients to mannitol. After 3 months of treatment with ICS, there was no significant change in spirometry or the quality of life when analysing all individuals together. However, FEV1% predicted improved from 67% (IQR12) to 79% (IQR16) in mannitol positive patients; whereas it was unchanged in the mannitol negative patients. The difference in the mean change of FEV1% predicted between the two groups was 12 (IQR13.5) and this was highly significant (p=0.001). The improvement in quality of life (SGRQ 30 (IQR10.5) to 21 (IQR12; p=0.01) was only significant in the patients positive to mannitol. CONCLUSION: We propose that AHR to mannitol could predict ICS-responsiveness in mild to moderately severe COPD patients.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Field exercise vs laboratory eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation to identify airway hyperresponsiveness in elite cold weather athletes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: For the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, athletes were required to submit objective evidence of asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) for approval to inhale a beta(2)-agonist. Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) was recommended as a laboratory challenge that would identify airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) consistent with EIB. The objective was to compare the change in FEV(1) provoked by EVH with that provoked by exercise in cold weather athletes. DESIGN: Spirometry was measured before and for 15 min after challenges. The two challenges were performed in random order at least 24 h apart. SETTING: EVH was performed in the laboratory at 19 degrees C, and exercise took place in the field in the cold (2 degrees C, 45% relative humidity). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight athletes (25 female subjects; median age, 16 years). INTERVENTIONS: For the EVH, athletes inhaled dry air containing 5% carbon dioxide for 6 min at a target ventilation equivalent to 30 times baseline FEV(1). Exercise was performed by cross-country skiing, ice skating, or running for 6 to 8 min. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: AHR consistent with EIB was defined as >or= 10% fall in FEV(1) from baseline after challenge. Eleven athletes were exercise positive (EX+) [FEV(1) fall, 20.5 +/- 7.3%], and 17 athletes were EVH positive (FEV(1) fall, 14.5 +/- 4.5%) [mean +/- SD]. Of 19 subjects with AHR, 58% were identified by exercise and 89% were identified by EVH. EVH identified 9 of 11 subjects who were EX+ and a further 8 subjects with potential for EIB. The average ventilation during EVH was 28 times FEV(1). CONCLUSION: Performing EVH for 6 min in the laboratory had a greater chance of identifying AHR in these athletes compared with 6 to 8 min of field exercise in the cold. The EVH test will be useful to evaluate elite summer sports athletes whose widely different forms of exercise provide an "equipment" challenge to any laboratory.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Coughing during mannitol challenge is associated with asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To define whether coughing during mannitol challenge is a nonspecific side effect of this challenge or is associated with asthma. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven steroid-naive, asthmatic subjects and 10 healthy subjects. MEASUREMENTS: The participants completed a symptom questionnaire, recorded peak expiratory flows (PEFs), and underwent spirometry, skin tests, and bronchial provocations with mannitol, histamine, and cold air. Seventeen of the asthmatic subjects were treated with budesonide, 800 micro g per day, and the measurements were repeated after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Coughs were recorded during the mannitol challenges, and the cough sensitivity was expressed as the cumulative number of coughs divided by the cumulative dose of mannitol. RESULTS: The asthmatic subjects coughed more during the mannitol challenge than the healthy subjects (8.3 coughs per 100 mg [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.2 to 11.0] vs 1.1 coughs per 100 mg [95% CI, 0.4 to 3.0]; p < 0.0001). Even those asthmatic subjects who did not develop bronchoconstriction after the maximal cumulative dose of mannitol (635 mg) coughed significantly more than the healthy subjects (53 coughs [95% CI, 34 to 72] vs 12 coughs [95% CI, 4 to 21]; p = 0.003). Budesonide treatment decreased the cough sensitivity (p = 0.023), which was significantly associated with improvements in overall symptom frequency, cough frequency, diurnal PEF variation, FEV(1), and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Coughing during mannitol challenge is associated with asthma and occurs independently of bronchoconstriction. It can be used to study the mechanisms of asthmatic cough. Furthermore, the measurement of the mannitol-provoked coughing may be useful both in the diagnosis of asthma as well as in the assessment of the effects of an anti-inflammatory therapy on this common disorder.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future.

The safety and efficacy of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) taken intermittently for the prevention of exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in children is well established. However, the safety and efficacy of LABAs taken twice daily, either alone or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, for the prevention of EIA is not as clear because of issues of tolerance (defined as being less responsive to the influence of LABAs). There have been many observations on short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (SABAs) and EIA that should have alerted us to the potential for tolerance and desensitization to occur with LABAs. For example, we expected that the use of LABAs for EIA would overcome the problem of the short duration of protection of SABAs, and to some extent they have. The protective period of a LABA is two to three times longer in duration than that of a SABA. However, when a LABA is taken daily it is apparent that the duration of its protective effect is reduced and there is a risk of EIA occurring well within the 12-hour administration schedules. Furthermore, daily use of LABAs attenuates the bronchodilator effect of SABAs, an effect that is greater the more severe the bronchoconstriction. This 'tolerance' increases both the time and the amount of therapy that is needed to recover from bronchoconstriction, and thus, could potentially impact on the success of rescue therapy should severe EIA occur. The daily use of LABAs also increases the sensitivity of the bronchial smooth muscle to contractile agents. This increase in sensitivity is almost equivalent to the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids reduce sensitivity to the same contractile agents. The increased sensitivity to contractile agents may occur either by a reduction in the inhibitory effect of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists on release of mediators from mast cells or by a direct effect on the bronchial smooth muscle. These unwanted effects of LABAs are not necessarily reduced by concomitant treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. As the number of children being treated with LABAs increases, it is predicted that problems with breakthrough EIA will also increase. We need to know the percentage of children taking a LABA daily who are requiring either extra doses of a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to prevent (or reverse) EIA or other provocative stimuli. If this percentage is significant then we may need to reconsider the position of LABAs in the treatment of children with asthma who regularly perform strenuous physical activity.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2004

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review.

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

The effects of histamine and leukotriene receptor antagonism on nasal mannitol challenge in allergic rhinitis.

AIMS: It is unclear as to which mediators are involved in mediating the response to nasal mannitol challenge, a novel osmotic stimulus. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design was employed. Nine patients with allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive a single-dose of desloratadine 5 mg, montelukast 10 mg or placebo, and underwent nasal mannitol challenges with nasal peak inspiratory flow recordings over 60 min. The change in peak nasal inspiratory flow was calculated as percentage change from baseline as the peak response and area under the time-response curve (AUC). RESULTS: Desloratadine and montelukast conferred a significant degree of protection compared to placebo for peak and AUC response, but there were no significant differences between the two drugs. For the peak response as percentage fall, the mean difference (95% CI) vs placebo was 27.7 (8.0, 47.4)% for desloratadine and 17.6 (1.9, 33.3)% for montelukast. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that histamine and cysteinyl-leukotrienes are involved in mediating the response to nasal mannitol in allergic rhinitis.

Acetates↗
PubMed2003

Responses to bronchial challenge submitted for approval to use inhaled beta2-agonists before an event at the 2002 Winter Olympics.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the number and percentage of athletes competing in Olympic Games notifying use of beta2-agonists, from 1.7% at Los Angeles (1984) to 5.5% at Sydney (2000). For Salt Lake City (2002), the International Olympic Committee requested objective evidence to use beta2-agonists for asthma or exercise-induced asthma (EIA). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence submitted for approval to use a beta2-agonist. METHODS: Objective evidence for asthma or EIA included (1) an increase of 12% or more of the predicted FEV1 in response to bronchodilator, (2) a reduction in FEV1 of 10% or greater from baseline in response to exercise or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, (3) a PD20 FEV1 to methacholine or histamine at a dose of less than 200 microg (2 mg/mL) or less than 1320 microg (13.2 mg/mL) for those taking inhaled corticosteroids for 3 months. RESULTS: There were 165 applications. Of these, 147 (89%) included evidence of a challenge, bronchodilator response, or both, and 163 test results were submitted. One hundred thirty (5.2%) applications were approved. For those with positive responses, the median value (1) was 16.2% of predicted FEV1 for response to a bronchodilator (n = 13), (2) was a 15.9% decrease in FEV1 for response to a physical challenge (n = 36), and, (3) for PD20 FEV1, was 173 microg for response to a pharmacologic challenge (n = 45). CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrated that it is feasible to request objective evidence to justify use of beta2-agonists on the medical grounds of asthma or EIA.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Sensitivity and validity of three bronchial provocation tests to demonstrate the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and validity of mannitol, histamine, and cold air challenges to demonstrate the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma. DESIGN: A prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen patients with recently diagnosed, steroid-naive asthma who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of Finnish Social Insurance Institution and were hyperresponsive to both mannitol and histamine. INTERVENTIONS: The following procedures were carried out at baseline and after 3 months and 6 months of treatment with inhaled budesonide, 800 microg/d: symptom assessment with a questionnaire, ambulatory peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements twice daily for 2 weeks, and bronchial challenges with mannitol, histamine, and cold air. RESULTS: Budesonide decreased the sum symptom score, daily use of bronchodilating drugs, and diurnal PEF variation, but did not change FEV(1) percentage of predicted significantly. In addition, budesonide significantly decreased mannitol (p = 0.005) and histamine (p = 0.002) response dose ratios. The magnitude of the budesonide-induced change in responsiveness to these two challenges did not differ significantly. The effect of budesonide on cold air responsiveness did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.064). Change in mannitol responsiveness correlated significantly with the changes in sum symptom score and in FEV(1). Change in cold air responsiveness correlated with the changes in sum symptom score and in diurnal PEF variation. Change in histamine responsiveness correlated only with change in FEV(1). CONCLUSIONS: Mannitol challenge is both a sensitive and valid test to demonstrate the effects of ICS in asthma. Histamine challenge is equally sensitive for this purpose, but its validity may be lower than that of mannitol challenge. Cold air challenge seems to be a valid test to demonstrate the effects of ICS, but its sensitivity may be lower than that of mannitol and histamine challenges.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2003

Responsiveness to three bronchial provocation tests in patients with asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare a new bronchial provocation test, the mannitol challenge, with cold air and histamine challenges to demonstrate airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in patients with difficult-to-diagnose asthma. DESIGN: A prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with recently diagnosed, steroid-naive, mild, or atypical asthma fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of Finnish Social Insurance Institution, and 10 healthy control subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Each subject completed a symptom questionnaire and underwent spirometry, diffusion capacity measurement, skin-prick tests, and bronchial provocations with mannitol, histamine, and cold air. The severity of asthma was classified according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of the asthmatic patients responded to mannitol (> or =15% fall in FEV(1)), 24% to cold air (> or =9% fall in FEV(1)), and 81% or 49% to histamine (provocative dose causing a 15% fall in FEV(1) [PD(15)] < 1.0 mg or < 0.4 mg, respectively). None of the healthy control subjects responded. The GINA classification was not associated with responsiveness to any of the challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Mannitol is more sensitive than cold air in demonstrating AHR in patients with mild or atypical asthma. Histamine was more sensitive than both mannitol and cold air if 1.0 mg was used as a cut-off value for histamine PD(15). However, if the cut-off value for histamine PD(15) is lowered to 0.4 mg, which represents a specific diagnosis of asthma according to previous studies, the sensitivity values of mannitol and histamine challenges are comparable.

Adult↗