PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandra F Simmons

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra F Simmons.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

The minimum data set weight-loss quality indicator: does it reflect differences in care processes related to weight loss?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nursing homes (NHs) that score differently on prevalence of weight loss, according to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) quality indicator, also provide different processes of care related to weight loss. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Sixteen skilled nursing facilities: 11 NHs in the lower (25th percentile-low prevalence) quartile and five NHs in the upper (75th percentile-high prevalence) quartile on the MDS weight-loss quality indicator. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred long-term residents. MEASUREMENTS: Sixteen care processes related to weight loss were defined and operationalized into clinical indicators. Trained research staff conducted measurement of NH staff implementation of each care process during assessments on three consecutive 12-hour days (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.), which included direct observations during meals, resident interviews, and medical record abstraction using standardized protocols. RESULTS: The prevalence of weight loss was significantly higher in the participants in the upper quartile NHs than in participants in the lower quartile NHs based on MDS and monthly weight data documented in the medical record. NHs with a higher prevalence of weight loss had a significantly larger proportion of residents with risk factors for weight loss, namely low oral food and fluid intake. There were few significant differences on care process measures between low- and high-weight-loss NHs. Staff in low-weight-loss NHs consistently provided verbal prompting and social interaction during meals to a greater proportion of residents, including those most at risk for weight loss. CONCLUSION: The MDS weight-loss quality indicator reflects differences in the prevalence of weight loss between NHs. NHs with a lower prevalence of weight loss have fewer residents at risk for weight loss and staff who provide verbal prompting and social interaction to more residents during meals, but the adequacy and quality of feeding assistance care needs improvement in all NHs.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate incontinence care in the nursing home.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the reliability and feasibility of a standardized protocol to assess and score urinary incontinence care in nursing homes. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Eighteen nursing homes (NHs). PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twenty-six incontinent residents. MEASUREMENTS: Resident interview data were used to score three quality indicators, and usable data were retrieved from 117 (27%) of 426 incontinent residents in 18 homes who were selected for interview based on evidence that they could accurately describe the care they received. Medical record data were used to score six quality indicators for a subset of 58 participants in five homes. RESULTS: Zero to 98% of the participants were scored as receiving care consistent with the intent of the indicator across the nine indicators. All NHs failed to provide chart documentation of an assessment to determine an incontinent resident's appropriateness for a scheduled toileting program (0% passed). The absence of an assessment to determine a resident's potential responsiveness to toileting assistance may explain why 103 incontinent residents who were documented on the Minimum Data Set as being on a scheduled toileting program reported that they received the same number of toileting assists per day (1.3) as the group of 114 incontinent residents who were not on a scheduled toileting program (1.0). The received toileting assistance frequencies reported by both groups were too low to maintain continence. CONCLUSION: The standardized quality assessment system generated scores for nine incontinence quality indicators with good interrater reliability and provided explicit scoring rules that can facilitate replication. The focus of the indicators on care processes that are under the control of NH staff make the protocol useful for external survey and internal quality improvement purposes.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

The minimum data set urinary incontinence quality indicators: do they reflect differences in care processes related to incontinence?

PURPOSE: To determine if nursing homes that score in the lower 25th percentile (low prevalence) versus the upper 75th percentile (high prevalence) on each of two Minimum Data Set (MDS) incontinence quality indicators provide different incontinence care processes DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SUBJECTS: 347 long-term residents in 14 skilled nursing facilities for the MDS "prevalence of incontinence" indicator and 432 residents in 16 skilled nursing facilities for the MDS "prevalence of incontinence without a toileting plan" indicator. MEASURES: Nine care processes related to incontinence were defined and operationalized into clinical indicators. Research staff assessed implementation of each care process on 3 consecutive 12-hour days (7 am to 7 pm ). The assessment included resident interviews, physical performance evaluations, and chart abstraction using standardized protocols. RESULTS: Homes with lower prevalence rates on both MDS incontinence quality indicators (good outcomes) had a significantly higher proportion of participants with chart documentation of two relevant care processes: 1 an evaluation of the resident's incontinence history and 2 toileting assistance rendered by staff. However, interviews with incontinent residents capable of accurately reporting care activity occurrence showed no difference in toileting assistance frequency between homes in the upper and lower quartiles for either MDS incontinence indicator. Participants reported an average of 1.8 toileting assists per day across all homes with a narrow average frequency range between homes (1.6-2.0). These frequencies of toileting assistance are not sufficient to improve urinary incontinence. There was also no difference in the frequency of toileting assistance received by incontinent participants rated on the MDS as receiving scheduled toileting (n = 75, mean = 1.9 +/- 1.24) compared to incontinent residents rated on the MDS as not receiving scheduled toileting (n = 131, mean = 1.8 +/- 1.22). None of the homes provided chart documentation that supported staff decisions to place or not place a resident on a scheduled toileting program. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of incontinence assessment and treatment as documented by scheduled toileting interventions was poor across all homes, and the MDS incontinence quality indicators were not associated with clinically important differences in related care processes. Chart documentation that a resident was on a scheduled toileting program or received toileting assistance was not related to resident reports of the frequency of received assistance.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Translating clinical research into practice: a randomized controlled trial of exercise and incontinence care with nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES: To examine clinical outcomes and describe the staffing requirements of an incontinence and exercise intervention. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with blinded assessments of outcomes at three points over 8 months. SETTING: Four nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-six incontinent residents. INTERVENTION: Research staff provided the intervention, which integrated incontinence care and exercise every 2 hours from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 5 days a week. MEASUREMENTS: Average and maximum distance walked or wheeled, level of assistance required to stand, maximum pounds lifted by arms, fecal and urinary incontinence frequency, and time required to implement intervention. RESULTS: Intervention residents maintained or improved performance whereas the control group's performance declined on 14 of 15 outcome measures. Repeated measures analysis of variance group-by-time significance levels ranged from P <.0001 to.05. The mean time required to implement the intervention each time care was provided was 20.7 +/- 7.2 minutes. We estimate that a work assignment of approximately five residents to one aide would be necessary to provide this intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The incontinence care and exercise intervention resulted in significant improvement for most residents, and most who could be reliably interviewed expressed a preference for such care. Fundamental changes in the staffing of most nursing homes will be necessary to translate efficacious clinical interventions into everyday practice.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Quality assessment in nursing homes by systematic direct observation: feeding assistance.

Background. Direct observation of care is an important data source for nursing home (NH) quality assessment, especially in light of evidence that chart information is inaccurate or incomplete for many daily care areas. The purpose of this study was to describe a standardized feeding assistance observational protocol that is designed for routine use by external (survey teams) and internal (licensed NH staff) quality assurance personnel to (i) maximize the amount of useful information gained from relatively brief observational periods; (ii) provide specific rules of measurement, which allow for replication and valid comparisons between NHs; and (iii) provide specific scoring rules that allow defensible categorical statements to be made about feeding assistance care quality within the NH. Methods. Four feeding assistance care quality indicators (QIs) were defined and operationalized in this study for 302 long-term residents in 10 skilled NHs: (i) Staff ability to accurately identify residents with clinically significant low oral food and fluid intake during mealtime; (ii) Staff ability to provide feeding assistance to at-risk residents during mealtime; (iii) Staff ability to provide feeding assistance to residents identified by the Minimum Data Set as requiring staff assistance to eat; and (iv) Staff ability to provide a verbal prompt to residents who receive physical assistance at mealtimes. Results. There were significant differences between facilities for three of the four QIs. The proportion of participants in each facility where staff "failed" the QIs ranged as follows: (Quality Indicator i) 42% to 91%; (ii) 25% to 73%; (iii) 11% to 82%; and (iv) 0% to 100%. Conclusions. A standardized observational protocol can be used to accurately measure the quality of feeding assistance care in NHs. This protocol is replicable and shows significant differences between facilities with respect to accuracy of oral intake documentation and the adequacy and quality of feeding assistance during mealtimes.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of methods to assess nursing home residents' unmet needs.

PURPOSE: This paper compares three interview methodologies to assess nursing home (NH) residents' unmet needs with regard to activity of daily living (ADL) care. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a survey of 70 residents across seven ADL care domains. The three types of interview methods included: (a) direct satisfaction questions about ADL care, (b) questions that compared residents' preferences about ADL care frequency or occurrence to perceptions of the ADL care delivered (discrepancy measure), and (c) open-ended questions that asked what residents wanted changed about ADL care. RESULTS: Estimates of the proportion of residents with unmet needs were significantly higher with the discrepancy and open-ended measures as compared to the direct satisfaction measures across most ADL care domains (McNemar's Test; p <.05-p <.01). IMPLICATIONS: The analysis of residents' responses to open-ended questions produced the most useful information for individualizing aspects of technical care and assessing the interpersonal quality of care, whereas the discrepancy questions elicited specific information useful for changing the frequency or occurrence of ADL care. Interview methodologies that directly ask residents questions about satisfaction with ADL care are the least useful for designing improvement interventions.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate pain detection and management in the nursing home.

CONTEXT: Assessment and management of pain for nursing home residents is frequently reported to be inadequate, yet few studies have used objective criteria to measure the quality of care related to pain. OBJECTIVE: Field test a standardized resident interview and medical record review protocol to assess and score quality indicators relevant to pain. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Thirty nursing homes (NHs). PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ninety-four residents met overall eligibility criteria. Quality indicators were scored for those residents who met specific eligibility requirements for each pain indicator. MEASUREMENTS: Medical record reviews were completed for 542 participants, and data were used to score 12 indicators related to pain assessment, management, and response to treatment. A seven-item pain interview was attempted with all 794 participants and completed with 478 participants who were rated by NH staff as cognitively aware. RESULTS: Quality indicators could be reliably scored. Physicians scored low on assessment of pain, performing targeted history and physical examinations, documenting risk factors for use of analgesics, and documenting response to treatment. Forty-eight percent of participants (227/478) reported symptoms of chronic pain during the interview, and 81% of this group reported a preference for a pain medication. However, nearly half had no physician assessment of pain in the past year and only 42% were receiving pain medication. Licensed nurse assessments of pain were documented weekly; but, more than 50% of those reporting symptoms of chronic pain on interview had nurse pain scores of 0 for 4 consecutive weeks prior to interview. CONCLUSIONS: Infrequent or incomplete physician pain assessment and treatment and inaccurate documentation by licensed nurses limits evaluation of pain care quality based on medical record review alone. A brief resident interview identified participants reporting symptoms of chronic pain not documented in the medical record and those with a preference for medication. Initial targeting of residents with self-reported pain maximizes the efficiency of the standardized scoring system described in this study. Focusing on explicit process measures clearly identifies areas for improvement and represents an important step in assessing the quality of pain care in the NH.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of megestrol acetate on oral food and fluid intake in nursing home residents: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of megestrol acetate (Megace OS; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) on the oral food and fluid intake of nursing home (NH) residents under two conditions: usual NH care and optimal mealtime feeding assistance. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, preliminary trial in four NHs. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 17) were recruited from a larger study designed to assess nutritional care quality. Eligibility for the Megace OS trial required participants to consistently eat less than 75% of most meals under both usual NH care and optimal feeding assistance conditions at baseline. INTERVENTION: Megace OS, an oral liquid suspension of megestrol acetate, was given daily in a 400-mg dose for 63 days. MEASUREMENTS: Each participant's oral food and fluid intake was monitored weekly for 1 day (three meals) during which research staff conducted direct observations of usual NH care (weeks 1, 3, and 5 and day 63) or provided optimal feeding assistance (weeks 2, 4, and 6). Average total percent intake was compared from baseline across the assessment weeks of the trial under the two mealtime care conditions. RESULTS: Megace OS had a significant effect on oral food and fluid intake only under the optimal mealtime feeding assistance condition, in which average total percent eaten increased from 50% (+/-15%) at baseline to 63% (+/-14%) post-63 days of the trial. There was no change in participants' oral food and fluid intake under the usual NH care condition (average total percent intake at baseline 43% +/- 12% vs. 43% +/- 20% post-63 days). CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study suggest that Megace OS is not an effective nutritional intervention to increase oral intake under usual NH care conditions, which is often characterized by inadequate feeding assistance. However, Megace OS in combination with optimal mealtime feeding assistance does significantly increase oral intake in a frail NH sample at high risk for weight loss.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of a controlled exercise trial on pain in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES: To report preliminary data relevant to the effects of an exercise and toileting intervention on pain among incontinent nursing home (NH) residents. DESIGN: A randomized controlled intervention trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one incontinent residents in one skilled NH. INTERVENTION: The intervention was implemented by research staff for a total of 4 times a day (every 2 hours), 5 days a week, for 32 weeks. Residents were provided with incontinence care and assistance to either walk or, if nonambulatory, wheel their chairs, and to repeat sit-to-stand movements. MEASUREMENTS: Pain was measured in two ways at baseline and again at 32 weeks: (1) a count of the number of verbal expressions and pain behaviors during a standardized physical performance assessment; and (2) a modified Geriatric Pain Measure administered in a one-on-one interview format. RESULTS: There were significant differences between intervention and control groups on all physical performance measures over time, with the intervention group remaining stable and the control group showing a significant decline in sit-to-stand, walking, and wheelchair propulsion endurance. Both groups showed mild to moderate pain at baseline according to each of the two pain measures, while there were no significant changes in pain reports between groups over time based on either measure. There was, however, a trend for pain to increase in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant changes in pain reports were attributable to exercise despite significant improvements in physical performance. In fact, there was a tendency for pain reports to increase with exercise. These preliminary findings suggest that exercise alone may be ineffective for pain management among incontinent NH residents. Care providers should consider that exercise to improve physical function may increase pain symptoms, requiring preemptive analgesia, other pain control strategies, or modified exercise techniques for this frail segment of the NH population.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accuracy of minimum data set in identifying residents at risk for undernutrition: oral intake and food complaints.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the accuracy of nursing home (NH) staff in documenting two Minimum Data Set (MDS) items that are used to identify residents at risk for undernutrition, low oral intake and food complaints, using standardized observation and interview assessment protocols implemented by research staff. DESIGN AND METHODS: MDS information related to low oral intake (item K4c: <75% of most meals) and complaints about the taste of food (item K4a) was compared to independent evaluations of low oral intake and food complaints for a random sample of 75 residents in two proprietary NHs within the same month that a complete MDS assessment was due for each participant. Direct observations were conducted by research staff during nine mealtime periods for 3 consecutive days according to a standardized mealtime observational protocol to estimate low oral intake; and, two one-on-one interviews with residents were conducted on two consecutive days using standardized questions to assess the stability of food complaints. RESULTS: Research staff documentation based on direct observation and resident interviews showed a significantly larger number of residents being identified as potentially at risk for undernutrition due to low oral intake (73%) and/or stable complaints about the taste of food (32%) as compared with NH staff documentation of MDS items K4c (44%) and K4a (0%), respectively, within the same month. A total of 47% of the participants expressed stable complaints about some aspect of the NH food service (eg, variety, appearance, temperature). CONCLUSION: The documentation of low oral intake and food complaints on the MDS was inaccurate and resulted in a significant underestimate of residents with either of these risk factors for undernutrition.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of megestrol acetate on oral food and fluid intake in nursing home residents: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of megestrol acetate (Megace OS; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) on the oral food and fluid intake of nursing home (NH) residents under two conditions: usual NH care and optimal mealtime feeding assistance. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a prospective, preliminary trial in four NHs. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 17) were recruited from a larger study designed to assess nutritional care quality. Eligibility for the Megace OS trial required participants to consistently eat less than 75% of most meals under both usual NH care and optimal feeding assistance conditions at baseline. INTERVENTION: Megace OS, an oral liquid suspension of megestrol acetate, was given daily in a 400-mg dose for 63 days. MEASUREMENTS: Each participant's oral food and fluid intake was monitored weekly for 1 day (three meals) during which research staff conducted direct observations of usual NH care (weeks 1, 3, and 5 and day 63) or provided optimal feeding assistance (weeks 2, 4, and 6). Average total percent intake was compared from baseline across the assessment weeks of the trial under the two mealtime care conditions. RESULTS: Megace OS had a significant effect on oral food and fluid intake only under the optimal mealtime feeding assistance condition, in which average total percent eaten increased from 50% (+/- 15%) at baseline to 63% (+/- 14%) post-63 days of the trial. There was no change in participants' oral food and fluid intake under the usual NH care condition (average total percent intake at baseline 43% +/- 12% vs. 43% +/- 20% post-63 days). CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study suggest that Megace OS is not an effective nutritional intervention to increase oral intake under usual NH care conditions, which is often characterized by inadequate feeding assistance. However, Megace OS in combination with optimal mealtime feeding assistance does significantly increase oral intake in a frail NH sample at high risk for weight loss.

Activities of Daily Living↗