Biomedical subjects

Sandra I Oba

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra I Oba.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Auditory stream segregation was measured in cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a subjective "Yes-No" task in which listeners indicated whether a sequence of stimuli was perceived as two separate streams or not. Stimuli were brief, 50-ms pulse trains A and B, presented in an A_B_A_A_B_A... sequence, with 50 ms in between consecutive stimuli. All stimuli were carefully loudness-balanced prior to the experiments. The cochlear electrode location of A was fixed, while the location of B was varied systematically. Measures of electrode discrimination and subjective perceptual difference were also included for comparison. There was strong intersubject variation in the pattern of results. One of the participants participated in a second series of experiments, the results of which indicated that he was able to perceptually segregate stimuli that were different in cochlear electrode location, as well as stimuli that were different in temporal envelope. Although preliminary, these results suggest that it is possible for some cochlear implant listeners to perceptually segregate stimuli based on differences in cochlear location as well as temporal envelope.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels.

Envelope detection and processing are very important for cochlear implant (CI) listeners, who must rely on obtaining significant amounts of acoustic information from the time-varying envelopes of stimuli. In previous work, Chatterjee and Robert [JARO 2(2), 159-171 (2001)] reported on a stochastic-resonance-type effect in modulation detection by CI listeners: optimum levels of noise in the envelope enhanced modulation detection under certain conditions, particularly when the carrier level was low. The results of that study suggested that a low carrier level was sufficient to evoke the observed stochastic resonance effect, but did not clarify whether a low carrier level was necessary to evoke the effect. Modulation thresholds in CI listeners generally decrease with increasing carrier level. The experiments in this study were designed to investigate whether the observed noise-induced enhancement is related to the low carrier level per se, or to the poor modulation sensitivity that accompanies it. This was done by keeping the carrier amplitude fixed at a moderate level and increasing modulation frequency so that modulation sensitivity could be reduced without lowering carrier level. The results suggest that modulation sensitivity, not carrier level, is the primary factor determining the effect of the noise.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

The effects of modulated maskers on detection thresholds of a 50-Hz sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) in a signal carrier were measured in nine cochlear implant (CI) listeners as a function of masker envelope type and for different masker-signal electrode separations. Both signal and masker were 200-ms-long pulse trains, presented concurrently in an interleaved stimulation mode. Masker envelopes were SAM at 20, 50, (0- and pi-phase re: the signal modulator), and 125 Hz, as well as noise amplitude modulated (NAM), all with a fixed 20% modulation depth. Comparisons were made against steady-state maskers that had an amplitude equal to the mean amplitude of the modulated maskers or to their peak amplitude (SS(peak)). Modulation thresholds were larger in the presence of the dynamic maskers versus the SS(peak) maskers; however, there was significant intersubject variability in the pattern of results. Effects of relative phase between masker and signal were not consistent across subjects. Envelope masking (the dB difference in modulation detection thresholds between modulated and SS(peak) maskers) was generally larger for the lower-modulation-frequency maskers than the 125-Hz masker. The spatial distribution of masked modulation detection thresholds was found to be considerably different from spatial forward-masking patterns obtained in the same subjects. Finally, modulation thresholds measured for a very wide separation between the masker and signal showed significant envelope masking. These results suggest that, as has been shown in acoustic stimulation, central, across-channel temporal processing mechanisms also occur in electrical stimulation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗