PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandra Smit

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra Smit.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

KCFtools: rapid alignment-free method for introgression screening and GWAS using k-mer profiles.

MOTIVATION: In the era of multiple genome references, researchers often align sequencing reads against distinct assemblies or even multiple references simultaneously. This enables applications such as the detection of introgressed segments or highly variable genomic regions, which are especially prevalent in large-genome crop species such as lettuce or wheat. However, these applications come at the cost of increased computational burden, inconsistencies in mapping methods, and reduced reproducibility across studies. To address these limitations, we developed KCFtools, a Java-based toolkit that identifies the presence and absence of k-mers in nonoverlapping genomic or transcriptomic windows by comparing query and reference genomes. This alignment-free approach enables the efficient computation of an identity score for each window, thereby facilitating robust detection of introgressed or variable regions across genomes. RESULTS: We systematically evaluated the performance and accuracy of the k-mer-based method implemented in KCFtools, benchmarking it against conventional single nucleotide variation-based introgression detection pipelines. Our results demonstrate that KCFtools effectively captures introgressed segments and structurally diverse regions, even in species with fragmented or highly divergent reference genomes. In addition, we extended KCFtools to generate genotype matrices from k-mer variation tables. These matrices are compatible with genome-wide association studies software and allow the identification of loci associated with phenotypic traits. We showcase the utility of this approach by detecting known and novel associations for downy mildew resistance in lettuce, underscoring the pipeline's potential for high-resolution, reference-agnostic population genetic analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/sivasubramanics/kcftools.

Software↗

Natural selection is not required to explain universal compositional patterns in rRNA secondary structure categories.

We have encountered an unexpected property of rRNA secondary structures that may generalize to all RNAs. Analysis of 8892 ribosomal RNA sequences and structures from a wide range of species revealed unexpected universal compositional trends. First, different categories of rRNA secondary structure (stems, loops, bulges, and junctions) have distinct, characteristic base compositions. Second, the observed patterns of variation are similar among sequences from large and small rRNA subunits and all domains of life, despite extensive evolutionary divergence. Surprisingly, these differences do not seem to be related to selection for different compositions in different structural categories, but rather relate to the overall composition of the molecule: Randomized RNAs with no evolutionary history show the same structure-dependent compositional biases as rRNAs. These compositional trends may improve the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction, because they allow us to compare predicted structures against known compositional preferences. They also suggest caution in interpreting differences in the rate of change of the GC content in different parts of the molecule as evidence of differential selection.

Base Composition↗

Abundance of correctly folded RNA motifs in sequence space, calculated on computational grids.

Although functional RNA molecules are known to be biased in overall composition, the effects of background composition on the probability of finding a particular active site by chance has received little attention. The probability of finding a particular motif has important implications both for understanding the distribution of functional RNAs in ancient and modern organisms with varying genome compositions and for tuning SELEX pools to optimize the chance of finding specific functions. Here we develop a new method for calculating the probability of finding a modular motif containing base-paired regions, and use a computational grid to fold several hundred million random RNA sequences containing the core elements of the isoleucine aptamer and the hammerhead ribozyme to estimate the probability that a sequence containing these structural elements will fold correctly when isolated from background sequences of different compositions. We find that the two motifs are most likely to be found in distinct regions of compositional space, and that the regions of greatest abundance are influenced by the probability of finding the conserved bases, finding the flanking helices, and folding, in that order of importance. Additionally, we can refine our estimates of the number of random sequences required for a 50% probability of finding an example of each site in unbiased random pools of length 100 to 4.1 x 10(9) for the isoleucine aptamer and 1.6 x 10(10) for the hammerhead ribozyme. These figures are consistent with the facile recovery of these motifs from SELEX experiments.

Base Composition↗

Do universal codon-usage patterns minimize the effects of mutation and translation error?

BACKGROUND: Do species use codons that reduce the impact of errors in translation or replication? The genetic code is arranged in a way that minimizes errors, defined as the sum of the differences in amino-acid properties caused by single-base changes from each codon to each other codon. However, the extent to which organisms optimize the genetic messages written in this code has been far less studied. We tested whether codon and amino-acid usages from 457 bacteria, 264 eukaryotes, and 33 archaea minimize errors compared to random usages, and whether changes in genome G+C content influence these error values. RESULTS: We tested the hypotheses that organisms choose their codon usage to minimize errors, and that the large observed variation in G+C content in coding sequences, but the low variation in G+U or G+A content, is due to differences in the effects of variation along these axes on the error value. Surprisingly, the biological distribution of error values has far lower variance than randomized error values, but error values of actual codon and amino-acid usages are actually greater than would be expected by chance. CONCLUSION: These unexpected findings suggest that selection against translation error has not produced codon or amino-acid usages that minimize the effects of errors, and that even messages with very different nucleotide compositions somehow maintain a relatively constant error value. They raise the question: why do all known organisms use highly error-minimizing genetic codes, but fail to minimize the errors in the mRNA messages they encode?

Animals↗