PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sandrine Hughes

Publications and source records attributed to Sandrine Hughes.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Divergent mtDNA lineages of goats in an Early Neolithic site, far from the initial domestication areas.

Goats were among the first farm animals domesticated, approximately 10,500 years ago, contributing to the rise of the "Neolithic revolution." Previous genetic studies have revealed that contemporary domestic goats (Capra hircus) show far weaker intercontinental population structuring than other livestock species, suggesting that goats have been transported more extensively. However, the timing of these extensive movements in goats remains unknown. To address this question, we analyzed mtDNA sequences from 19 ancient goat bones (7,300-6,900 years old) from one of the earliest Neolithic sites in southwestern Europe. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that two highly divergent goat lineages coexisted in each of the two Early Neolithic layers of this site. This finding indicates that high mtDNA diversity was already present >7,000 years ago in European goats, far from their areas of initial domestication in the Near East. These results argue for substantial gene flow among goat populations dating back to the early neolithisation of Europe and for a dual domestication scenario in the Near East, with two independent but essentially contemporary origins (of both A and C domestic lineages) and several more remote and/or later origins.

Animals↗

Mitogenomic analyses place the gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the crocodile tree and provide pre-K/T divergence times for most crocodilians.

Based on morphological analyses, extant members of the order Crocodylia are divided into three families, Alligatoridae, Crocodylidae, and Gavialidae. Gavialidae includes one species, the gharial, Gavialis gangeticus. In this study we have examined crocodilian relationships in phylogenetic analyses of seven mitochondrial genomes that have been sequenced in their entirety. The analyses did not support the morphologically acknowledged separate position of the gharial in the crocodilian tree. Instead the gharial joined the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) on a common branch that was shown to constitute a sister group to traditional Crocodylidae (less Tomistoma). Thus, the analyses suggest the recognition of only two Crocodylia families, Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae, with the latter encompassing traditional Crocodylidae plus Gavialis/Tomistoma. A molecular dating of the divergence between Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae suggests that this basal split among recent crocodilians took place approximately 140 million years before present, at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary. The results suggest that at least five crocodilian lineages survived the mass extinction at the KT boundary.

Alligators and Crocodiles↗

Using analytical ultracentrifugation to study compositional variation in vertebrate genomes.

Although much attention has recently been directed to analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), the revival of interest has hardly addressed the applications of this technology in genome analysis, and the extent to which AUC studies can quickly and effectively complement modern sequence-based analyses of genomes, e.g. by anticipating, extending or checking results that can be obtained by cloning and sequencing. In particular, AUC yields a quick overview of the base compositional structure of a species' genome even if no DNA sequences are available and the species is unlikely to be sequenced in the near future. The link between AUC and DNA sequences dates back to 1959, when a precise linear relation was discovered between the GC (guanine+cytosine) level of DNA fragments and their buoyant density in CsCl as measured at sedimentation equilibrium. A 24-hour AUC run of a high molecular weight sample of a species' total DNA already yields the GC distribution of its genome. AUC methods based on this principle remain sensitive tools in the age of genomics, and can now be fine-tuned by comparing CsCl absorbance profiles with the corresponding sequence histograms. The CsCl profiles of vertebrates allow insight into structural and functional properties that correlate with base composition, and their changes during vertebrate evolution can be monitored by comparing CsCl profiles of different taxa. Such comparisons also allow consistency checks of phylogenetic hypotheses at different taxonomic levels. We here discuss some of the information that can be deduced from CsCl profiles, with emphasis on mammalian DNAs.

Animals↗

Compositional patterns in reptilian genomes.

Sauropsids form a complex group of vertebrates including squamates (lizards and snakes), turtles, crocodiles, sphenodon and birds (which are often considered as a separate class). Although avian genomes have been relatively well studied, the genomes of the other groups have remained only sparsely characterized. Moreover, the nuclear sequences available in databanks are still very limited. In the present study, we have analysed the compositional patterns, i.e. the GC (molar fraction of guanine and cytosine in DNA) distributions, of 31 reptilian (particularly snake) genomes by analytical ultracentrifugation of DNAs in CsCl gradients. The profiles were characterized by their modal buoyant density rho(o), mean buoyant density < rho>, asymmetry < rho>- rho(o), and heterogeneity H. The modal buoyant density distribution of reptilian DNAs clearly distinguishes two groups. The snakes fall in the same range of modal densities as most mammals, whereas crocodiles, turtles and lizards show higher values (>1.700 g/cm(3)). As far as the more important compositional properties of asymmetry and heterogeneity are concerned, previous studies showed that amphibians and fishes share relatively low values, whereas birds and mammals are characterized by highly heterogeneous and asymmetric patterns (with the exception of Muridae, which have a lower heterogeneity). The present results show that the snake genomes cover a broad range of asymmetry and heterogeneity values, whereas the genomes of crocodiles and turtles cover a narrow range that is intermediate between those of fishes/amphibians and those of mammals/birds.

Animals↗