PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sanjay A Pai

Publications and source records attributed to Sanjay A Pai.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma presenting as a bladder neoplasm.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is known to involve the bladder, either primarily or secondary. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma has not been documented at this site before. We report a case of a systemic anaplastic cell lymphoma in a 22-year-old man who presented with multisystemic symptoms and signs, including those suggestive of bladder disease. He was HIV-negative. Biopsy of the bladder showed a high grade lymphoma composed of large cells with nuclei containing prominent nucleoli. The tumor cells expressed CD30, CD45, EMA and ALK-1. A diagnosis of anaplastic large cell lymphoma, of null cell phenotype was made. The lymph node biopsy showed similar features on hematoxylin and eosin section. The patient was put on a regime of CHOP and is disease-free 33 months after diagnosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

V.R. Khanolkar: father of pathology and medical research in India.

Vasant Ramji Khanolkar was the first pathologist in India. He made major contributions to the epidemiology and understanding of cancer, blood groups, and leprosy. He was the first to show the existence of dhoti cancers, and was among the earliest to demonstrate the carcinogenicity of tobacco and the use of needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of neoplasms. He was an acclaimed teacher and was on the boards of numerous international organizations. He was a bibliophile and his writings are Oslerian in style. He serves as a role model to the few in India who are aware of him. He deserves to be called the "Father of pathology and medical research in India."

Awards and Prizes↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Errors by surgical pathologists in India: results of a questionnaire survey.

BACKGROUND: Data from the United Kingdom show that most surgical pathologists are aware of about one serious mistake in their reports every year. There are no corresponding data from India or the developing world. I made an attempt to determine the rate of error made by Indian pathologists. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to 96 pathologists and 71 clinicians in different cities. The questions included some related to their experience with error in histopathology, as well as a few on the respondents' views on the legal and ethical aspects in the case of medical error. RESULTS: Fifty pathologists and 47 clinicians responded. Of the evaluable responses, 32 pathologists were aware of 86 errors in the past 5 years, while 30 clinicians recalled 162 errors. Most mistakes that pathologists remembered were cases related to lymphoid disease (n = 15) while for clinicians, gastrointestinal tract (n = 12) and lymphoid tissue (n = 9) were common sites of error. Benign-malignant errors were the most common type of error. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy between the rates of error between the two groups suggests that better pathologist-clinician communication is required. Medical councils and related governing bodies should consider introducing a quality control programme for anatomic pathology.

Clinical Medicine↗