PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Santiago Arroyo

Publications and source records attributed to Santiago Arroyo.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Rufinamide.

Rufinamide is a triazole derivative structurally unrelated to currently marketed antiepileptic drugs. Rufinamide was profiled for anticonvulsant activity at the National Institutes of Health and showed broad-spectrum anticonvulsant properties at nontoxic doses in animal models. The principal mechanism of action of rufinamide is considered to be the modulation of the activity of sodium channels and, in particular, prolongation of the inactive state of the channel. Rufinamide provides an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for use as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures and with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). In LGS, rufinamide is effective in controlling multiple seizure types and in reducing the severity of the seizures. The most commonly observed (> or =10%) adverse experiences seen in association with rufinamide are headache, dizziness, fatigue, somnolence and nausea. Rufinamide is generally well tolerated, and its safety profile is well-established.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Pregabalin add-on treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in adults with partial seizures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin (PGB), 150 mg/day, and PGB, 600 mg/day, as an add-on treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures concurrently treated with one to three anticonvulsants (AEDs). METHODS: An international (13 countries), multicenter (45 centers), 12-week, double-blind, randomized study in which patients with partial seizures received placebo (n = 96); PGB, 150 mg/day (n = 99); or PGB, 600 mg/day (n = 92); given 3 times a day (t.i.d.). The primary efficacy criterion was reduction in seizure frequency during treatment as compared with baseline, as measured by RRatio, the symmetrical percentage change in seizure rates determined from daily seizure diaries. The RRatio between the 8-week baseline (pretreatment phase) and the 12-week treatment period were compared between each of the PGB groups and the placebo group by using an analysis of variance analysis of the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, were both significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the RRatio [-11.5 (p = 0.0007) and -31.4 (p < or = 0.0001), respectively, vs. 0.9]. These RRatio values correspond to seizure-frequency reductions from baseline of -1.8, 20.6, and 47.8% for placebo, 150 mg/day, and 600 mg/day, respectively. PGB efficacy was significantly dose related (p < or = 0.0001). Secondary efficacy variables corroborated the findings of the primary analysis. Significantly more patients were responders (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the PGB, 600 mg/day (43.5%), group than in the placebo group (6.2%) (p < or = 0.001). PGB was well tolerated. Dose-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (> or =10%), mostly mild or moderate in intensity, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and weight gain. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 10% of patients at 150 mg/day and 18.5% of patients at 600 mg/day, compared with 6.2% of patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, is highly effective and well-tolerated add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Translating monotherapy trials into clinical practice: a look into the abyss.

To be approved for monotherapy by regulatory authorities, new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) must first be tested in well-controlled studies in refractory patients (conversion to monotherapy trials) or in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. However, the applicability of the information obtained in these trials to day-to-day clinical practice is limited. Clinical trials in newly diagnosed patients, particularly those allowing dose flexibility, offer more useful information, but a close scrutiny of methodological details is required to avoid misinterpretation of the findings. In many instances, the neurologist has a drug with a label, but lacks critical information on optimal titration rates, optimal target and maintenance dosages, response rates in populations with different epilepsy syndromes, different age ranges and comorbidities, and long-term safety data. Such information becomes available only through general clinical experience, well-designed phase IV studies, and postmarketing surveillance.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2003

Safety profile of levetiracetam.

A good balance between safety and tolerability is necessary for an antiepileptic drug (AED) to be successful in the management of patients with epilepsy. Levetiracetam is one of the new generation of AEDs licensed as an add-on therapy for the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures. Leveti-racetam's mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Controlled clinical trials, open-label studies, and postmarketing surveillance indicate that leveti-racetam has a favorable safety profile characterized by little effect on vital signs or clinical laboratory values, reported adverse events that are mild to moderate, and no known drug-drug interactions. The tolerability of levetiracetam may extend to both pediatric and elderly patients based on analyses of small numbers of patients. Tolerability is maintained over the long term. Levetirac-etam does not appear to have a different safety profile in learning-disabled patients. Levetiracetam appears to have a good balance between tolerability and efficacy in the treatment of a wide variety of patients with partial epilepsy.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Is refractory epilepsy preventable?

About a third of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will not be fully controlled with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and many of them will have frequent and disabling seizures. These patients will undergo multiple drug trials, most often without complete seizure remission. Moreover, refractory epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity (from seizures and medications), social isolation, unemployment, and overall reduced quality of life. There is evidence that refractory epilepsy can be a progressive disorder, which, if controlled early, might never develop into a full syndrome with all of its associated sequelae. The difficulty lies in identifying at an early stage patients who are likely to progress to intractability. No currently known markers enable clinicians to make this identification with confidence. Advances in pharmacogenomics and our understanding of pharmacologic responsiveness in epilepsy may change this situation. Even now, we are able to identify many patients with a poor prognosis earlier than before, particularly in the pediatric population, in which syndromic classification may provide an approach to predict intractability. The early initiation of aggressive therapy may improve outcome and overall quality of life.

Disease Progression↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychiatric disorders, trauma, and MMPI profile in a Spanish sample of nonepileptic seizure patients.

The aim of this study was to examine clinical characteristics in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and to analyze the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) profiles and their relation to psychopathology. Thirty patients with nonepileptic seizures confirmed through video-electroencephalography were included. A structured clinical interview (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R), a measure of personality variables (MMPI), and several structured interviews designed for collecting data on clinical and personal history were administered. Descriptive and comparative statistical methods were used. Of the sample, 67.7% met criteria for two or more simultaneous Axis I diagnoses, and 60% for an Axis II personality disorder. The most frequently elevated scales of the MMPI were Schizophrenia and Depression. There were multiple scale elevations in 12 profiles, the 91.7% of which had elevated "neurotic" and "psychotic" scales. The subgroup with personality disorders showed higher scores on the MMPI Paranoia and Hypomania scales, and the subgroup with traumatic experiences showed higher scores on the MMPI Hypomania scale. Our sample comprising patients with nonepileptic seizures showed a significant degree of psychopathology and absence of a unique character substrate. According to grades of clinical severity of pseudoseizures, several subgroups and different therapeutic implications may be defined.

Adult↗