PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sarah E Pinder

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah E Pinder.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Geminin predicts adverse clinical outcome in breast cancer by reflecting cell-cycle progression.

Geminin inhibits DNA replication by preventing Cdt1 from loading minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins onto DNA. The present study has investigated whether the frequency of geminin expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was used first to examine geminin expression in normal and malignant breast tissue (n = 67). Correlations with cell-cycle parameters, pathological features, and clinical outcome were then determined using an invasive breast carcinoma tissue microarray (n = 165). Breast carcinomas were scanned for mutations (n = 61) and copy number imbalances (n = 241) of the geminin gene. Finally, the cell cycle distribution of geminin in breast cancer cells was investigated in vivo and in vitro. Despite a putative tumour suppressor function, it was found that increased geminin expression is a powerful independent indicator of adverse prognosis in invasive breast cancer. Both poor overall survival (p = 0.0002) and the development of distant metastases (p = 0.005) are predicted by high geminin expression, which performs better in this patient cohort than traditional factors currently used to determine prognosis and appropriate therapy. No mutations or deletions of the geminin gene and no evidence that a high frequency of protein expression is related to gene amplification were found. It is shown that geminin is expressed from S to M phase in breast carcinoma tissue and cell lines, disappearing at the metaphase--anaphase transition. While MCM proteins identify all non-quiescent cells, geminin identifies the sub-fraction that have entered S phase, but not exited mitosis, thereby indicating the rate of cell-cycle progression. It is suggested that this explains its unexpected value as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Adult↗

Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 is a strong independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that prognostic information in breast cancer may be derived from an accurate assessment of epithelial cell cycle entry, as indicated by expression of minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry to examine the distribution of Mcm-2 in breast tissue. Power calculations based on a pilot study of 67 whole tissue sections led to selection of an independent 347-core breast carcinoma tissue microarray validation set. We tested for associations between Mcm-2 (and Ki-67) labeling index (LI) and various clinicopathologic parameters. RESULTS: Mcm-2 was expressed more frequently than the standard proliferation marker Ki-67 in whole tissue sections of normal breast (P =.0003) and breast carcinoma (P <.0001). In 221 assessable cores of invasive carcinoma, the Mcm-2 LI showed a positive association with tumor size (P =.002), mitotic index (P <.0001), histologic grade (P <.0001), and the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) score (P <.0001). Using a cutoff value of 50%, Mcm-2 LI was associated with overall survival (P =.0007), disease-free interval (P =.0002), and with the development of regional recurrence (P =.011) and distant metastases (P =.0016). Cox regression analysis suggested that the Mcm-2 LI is a strong prognostic factor in breast cancer that is independent and superior to histologic grade, lymph node stage, and Ki-67 LI, but not the NPI score. CONCLUSION: Mcm-2 may be of utility as a prognostic marker to refine the prediction of outcome in breast cancer, for example when combined with parameters currently used in the NPI.

Adult↗

The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH)--current definitions and classification.

Intraductal epithelial proliferations of the breast are at present classified into three groups; distinction is made histologically and clinically between usual epithelial hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and between ADH and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although evidence indicates that these boundaries are not ideal on a morphological, immunohistochemical, or genetic basis, this three-tier system is accepted and used at present. The current definitions, histological features, and system of classification of ADH and DCIS are described in this manuscript.

Breast Neoplasms↗

An immunohistochemical study of metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma, phyllodes tumor and fibromatosis of the breast.

The diagnosis of metaplastic (sarcomatoid) carcinoma (MSC) of breast often requires immunohistochemistry with a cytokeratin (CK) panel to distinguish them from phyllodes tumors (PT), primary sarcomas, and fibromatoses. CK staining may be heterogeneous in metaplastic carcinomas. The aim of the study was to investigate the theory that MSCs show evidence of myoepithelial differentiation and to evaluate immunohistochemical markers that may be helpful in distinguishing MSCs from PT and fibromatosis. We reviewed histology and performed immunohistochemistry for AE1/AE3, 34betaE12, CK5 and CK14, Cam5.2, CK7 and CK19, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) (B55), smooth muscle actin (SMA), S100, desmin, vimentin, CD31, CD34, and bcl-2 on paraffin-embedded tissue from 18 MSCs, 26 PTs, and 8 fibromatoses. We assessed staining by using a semiquantitative method. Sarcomatous areas in MSCs were positive for 34betaE12 in 11 cases; for SMA in 10; for CK5 in 7; for CK14 in 6; for Cam5.2, AE1/AE3, and S100 in 5; and for CK7 and CK19 in 3. No CK expression was seen in stromal areas in PT or in fibromatoses. CD34 and bcl-2 were more frequently expressed in spindle cell areas in PTs (18 and 12 of 26, respectively) than in MSCs (0 and 2 of 18, respectively). MSCs show strong evidence of myoepithelial differentiation. CD34 and, to a lesser extent, bcl-2 positivity in PTs may be helpful in differentiating these two lesions from MSCs, particularly in small biopsies, because CK staining in MSCs may be heterogeneous. In our hands, 34betaE12 was the CK most frequently expressed in sarcomatoid areas in MSCs.

Adult↗

Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma.

Breast core biopsy is one of the major nonoperative methods of diagnosis. Increasingly, there is also a need to provide prognostic data to facilitate timely patient management. We present the results from 500 patients with invasive breast carcinoma, who underwent core biopsy followed by a therapeutic surgical procedure. Grade and type of the invasive and in situ carcinoma, together with the presence or absence of vascular invasion, were determined in both biopsy and definitive surgical excision and the results compared. There was 67% agreement with overall grade (kappa value 0.48), with scores for tubule formation, pleomorphism, and mitotic scoring achieving values of 82%, 73%, and 58%, respectively. Only 60% of grade 1 and 2 carcinomas showed concordance, but 84% of grade 3 tumors showed agreement between core and excision results. Tumor typing, vascular invasion, and grading of ductal carcinoma in situ had agreement values of 74%, 69%, and 65%, respectively. The major problem with assessing prognostic factors on needle biopsy specimens is undersampling of the most informative areas. However, in those patients in whom preoperative assessment of prognostic factors is most likely to be beneficial, i.e., those with grade 3 carcinomas, a high level of agreement was achieved in this large study.

Biopsy, Needle↗