PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sarah Little

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah Little.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Common cold and influenza symptom management: the use of pharmacokinetic considerations to predict the efficacy of a twice-daily treatment for colds and flu.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the two pharmacokinetic studies reported here was to compare the relative bioavailability of an ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine modified-release capsule with each of the active ingredients given alone as standard formulations. STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of two open, randomised, cross-over studies, one single dose and one multiple dose, in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomised in a cross-over design to single or multiple doses of a combination of ibuprofen (600 mg) plus pseudoephedrine (90 mg) in a slow-release formulation and the individual active products alone as standard formulations; ibuprofen 400 mg, pseudoephedrine 60 mg. RESULTS: The single-dose study demonstrated that the bioavailabilities of ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine achieved with the slow-release formulation were not significantly different from those with standard tablets of each ingredient alone. In addition, mean plasma levels of ibuprofen predictive of clinical efficacy were achieved within 0.5-1 h and lasted for 10-12 h thereafter. The time required to reach clinically effective blood levels of pseudoephedrine was longer, starting at approximately 2 h. However, the plasma levels predicted that the clinical effect would then last for at least a further 12 h. Trough levels from the multiple-dose study showed that clinically relevant analgesic and decongestant plasma levels were maintained for 24 h during twice-daily dosing. The slow-release formulation was well tolerated with only mild adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Blood levels would predict that the present slow-release formulation of ibuprofen plus pseudoephedrine should offer reliable day and night control of cold and flu and sinus symptoms and be associated with a favourable safety profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature of changes in the field of hepatic resectional surgery and their impact on perioperative outcome. METHODS: Demographics, extent of resection, concomitant major procedures, operative and transfusion data, complications, and hospital stay were analyzed for 1,803 consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection from December 1991 to September 2001 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality and trends in operative and perioperative variables over the period of study were analyzed. RESULTS: Malignant disease was the most common diagnosis (1,642 patients, 91%); of these cases, metastatic colorectal cancer accounted for 62% (n = 1,021). Three hundred seventy-five resections (21%) were performed for primary hepatic or biliary cancers and 161 (9%) for benign disease. Anatomical resections were performed in 1,568 patients (87%) and included 544 extended hepatectomies, 483 hepatectomies, and 526 segmental resections. Sixty-two percent of patients had three or more segments resected, 42% had bilobar resections, and 37% had concomitant additional major procedures. The median blood loss was 600 mL and 49% of patients were transfused at any time during the index admission. Median hospital stay was 8 days, morbidity was 45%, and operative mortality was 3.1%. Over the study period, there was a significant increase in the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections and a decrease in the number of hepatic segments resected. In parallel with this, there was a significant decline in blood loss, the use of blood products, and hospital stay. Despite an increase in concomitant major procedures, operative mortality decreased from approximately 4% in the first 5 years of the study to 1.3% in the last 2 years, with 0 operative deaths in the last 184 consecutive cases. On multivariate analysis, the number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only independent predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, the use of parenchymal-sparing segmental resections has increased significantly. The number of hepatic segments resected and operative blood loss were the only predictors of both perioperative morbidity and mortality, and reductions in both are largely responsible for the decrease in perioperative mortality, which has occurred despite an increase in concomitant major procedures.

Adolescent↗