PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sarah Randall

Publications and source records attributed to Sarah Randall.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16-24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group.

BACKGROUND: In England, screening for genital chlamydial infection has begun; however, screening frequency for women is not yet determined. AIM: To measure chlamydia incidence and reinfection rates among young women to suggest screening intervals. METHODS: An 18-month prospective cohort study of women aged 16-24 years recruited from general practices, family planning clinics and genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics: baseline-negative women followed for incidence and baseline-positive women for reinfection; urine tested every 6 months via nucleic acid amplification; and behavioural data collected. Extra test and questionnaire completed 3 months after initial positive test. Factors associated with infection and reinfection investigated using Cox regression stratified by healthcare setting of recruitment. RESULTS: Chlamydia incidence was mean (95% CI) 4.9 (2.7 to 8.8) per 100 person-years (py) among women recruited from general practices, 6.4 (4.2 to 9.8) from family planning clinics and 10.6 (7.4 to 15.2) from GUM clinics. Incidence was associated with young age, history of chlamydial infection and acquisition of new sexual partners. If recently acquiring new partners, condom use at last sexual intercourse was independently associated with lower incidence. Chlamydia reinfection was mean (95% CI) 29.9 (19.7 to 45.4) per 100/person-year from general practices, 22.3 (15.6 to 31.8) from family planning clinics and 21.1 (14.3 to 30.9) from GUM clinics. Factors independently associated with higher reinfection rates were acquisition of new partners and failure to treat all partners. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual behaviours determined incidence and reinfection, regardless of healthcare setting. Our results suggest annual screening of women aged 16-24 years who are chlamydia negative, or sooner if partner change occurs. Rescreening chlamydia-positive women within 6 months of baseline infection may be sensible, especially if partner change occurs or all partners are not treated.

Adolescent↗

Who has chlamydia? The prevalence of genital tract Chlamydia trachomatis within Portsmouth and South East Hampshire, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of genital tract Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and men attending different health care settings in Portsmouth and South East Hampshire. DESIGN: Prospective, opportunistic screening. SETTING: Multiple health care sites. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting sexually active women and men. INTERVENTION: A urine sample was tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and positive patients were offered treatment and partner notification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence or absence of chlamydia infection according to age, gender, health care setting and reason for attendance. RESULTS: A total of 14,756 samples were tested giving an overall prevalence of 9.6%. The prevalence was significantly higher in women attending for a termination of pregnancy, antenatal care, women and men attending genitourinary medicine and in those with genital tract symptoms. The prevalence was different for men and women at different ages. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection was high but differed at various health care settings and by reason for attendance.

Adolescent↗

UK department of health guidance on prescribing for impotence following the introduction of sildenafil: potential to contain costs in the average health authority district.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness at containing service costs of the UK's Department of Health (DoH) guidance on prescribing for impotence implemented after the introduction of sildenafil and taking effect from 1 July 1999. DESIGN: A pragmatic economic analysis of the impact of the DoH guidance on specialist-care activity and costs and primary-care prescribing costs from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Primary-care prescribing costs and specialist-care activity and cost data were collected for 12-month periods before and after the introduction of the guidance. SETTING: Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority. RESULTS: Specialist-care activity and associated costs fell by 70% in the first year following the introduction of the DoH guidance while primary-care prescribing costs doubled. The overall cost for providing impotence services in Portsmouth and South East Hampshire in 1999-2000 was pound 232,619, and is similar to the cost incurred in 1998-1999 of pound 225,108 (uplifted to 1999-2000 values). CONCLUSIONS: The DoH guidance on prescribing for impotence has effectively reduced specialist-care activity and costs in Portsmouth and South East Hampshire. It offers the potential to allow the overall costs of impotence services in the district to be contained even with the use of higher cost drugs, such as sildenafil.

Adult↗