PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Saraswati Sukumar

Publications and source records attributed to Saraswati Sukumar.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Alterations in vascular gene expression in invasive breast carcinoma.

The molecular signature that defines tumor microvasculature will likely provide clues as to how vascular-dependent tumor proliferation is regulated. Using purified endothelial cells, we generated a database of gene expression changes accompanying vascular proliferation in invasive breast cancer. In contrast to normal mammary vasculature, invasive breast cancer vasculature expresses extracellular matrix and surface proteins characteristic of proliferating and migrating endothelial cells. We define and validate the up-regulated expression of VE-cadherin and osteonectin in breast tumor vasculature. In contrast to other tumor types, invasive breast cancer vasculature induced a high expression level of specific transcription factors, including SNAIL1 and HEYL, that may drive gene expression changes necessary for breast tumor neovascularization. We demonstrate the expression of HEYL in tumor endothelial cells and additionally establish the ability of HEYL to both induce proliferation and attenuate programmed cell death of primary endothelial cells in vitro. We also establish that an additional intracellular protein and previously defined metastasis-associated gene, PRL3, appears to be expressed predominately in the vasculature of invasive breast cancers and is able to enhance the migration of endothelial cells in vitro. Together, our results provide unique insights into vascular regulation in breast tumors and suggest specific roles for genes in driving tumor angiogenesis.

Blood Vessels↗

Hypermethylation in histologically distinct classes of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A number of different genes are known to be inactivated by aberrant hypermethylation in breast cancer, but it is still unknown to what extent these epigenetic alterations differ according to specific breast cancer phenotypes. We sought to determine whether the extent of hypermethylation or defined profiles of gene hypermethylation are associated with biological characteristics of breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated methylation status of 12 different genes in a series of 109 invasive breast tumors, representing the ductal, lobular, and mucinous histologic subtypes using methylation-specific PCR. Frequencies of methylation were compared across the recognized histologic classes, and multivariate techniques (latent class analysis, factor analysis, recursive partitioning, and hierarchical clustering) were used to seek patterns of methylation for individual genes that distinguish recognized histologic types of breast cancer or define breast cancer phenotypes on a molecular level. RESULTS: All 109 cases studied have aberrant methylation of multiple genes (3 to 10 genes per case), demonstrating that gene hypermethylation is pervasive in breast cancer. Lobular cancers and mucinous cancers, which often have relatively low levels of chromosomal changes, have higher overall frequencies of hypermethylation than ductal cancers (49% in lobular and mucinous versus 40% in ductal), but there is a relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types. Only one of the individual genes studied, BRCA1, has a variable frequency of methylation that is significantly dependent on histologic pattern of tumor growth, with a higher frequency of methylation in mucinous cancers than ductal or lobular cancers. Although some trends of histology-specific gene methylation were seen, methylation patterns could not definitively classify breast cancers according to histologic type. CONCLUSIONS: Although a more comprehensive hypermethylation profile could potentially be useful for breast cancer classification and understanding the biology of this disease, it appears that the hypermethylation patterns across various forms of breast cancer are less distinct than those between breast cancer and cancers of different tissue origins. Furthermore, the relatively unimodal distribution of methylation frequency for all three histologic types does not support there being a distinct CpG island methylator phenotype for breast cancer.

Adult↗

Significant allelic loss of ANX7region (10q21) in hormone receptor negative breast carcinomas.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 10q21 region that harbors the tumor suppressor gene ANX7-GTPase gene have been found in 35% of prostate tumors. Therefore, the rationale for this study is that this gene could also be implicated in breast pathogenesis as well. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites of the 10q21 region, and their correlations with ANX7 status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, Ki-67 status and pathological phenotype in 30 breast carcinomas with matched control specimens. The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using four markers of the 10q21 region (AFMa299ya5, AFM220xe5, AFM 063xc5, AFM200wf4). LOH in at least one marker of the 10q21 region (AFM220xe5 marker close to ANX7) was found in 66% of the first set of informative tumors containing 10 pairs of specimens. Subsequent comparison between 20 carcinomas using AFM220xe5, with and without LOH in terms of pathological parameters showed significant associations with differences in age (P = 0.04) ER (P = 0.05) Ki-67 (P = 0.04) and PR (P = 0.01) a trend toward significance was found for tumor size (P = 0.06) and histological grade III (P = 0.06). These results suggest that the ANX7 gene, or other genes of the 10q21 region, could be functionally related to breast cancer, probably influencing the hormone receptor expression associated with poor prognosis during development.

Annexin A7↗

Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer.

If detected early, breast cancer is eminently curable. To detect breast cancer in samples with little cellularity, a high level of sensitivity is needed. Tumor-specific promoter hypermethylation has provided such a valuable tool for detection of cancer cells in biological samples. To accurately assess promoter hypermethylation for many genes simultaneously in small samples, we developed a novel method, quantitative multiplex-methylation-specific PCR (QM-MSP). QM-MSP is highly sensitive (1 in 10(4)-10(5) copies of DNA) and linear over 5 orders of magnitude. For RASSF1A, TWIST, Cyclin D2, and HIN1, we observed significant differences in both the degree (P < 0.003) and incidence (P < 0.02) of hypermethylation between normal and malignant breast tissues. Evaluation of the cumulative hypermethylation of the four genes within each sample revealed a high level of sensitivity (84%) and specificity (89%) of detection of methylation. We demonstrate the application of this technique for detecting hypermethylated RASSF1A, TWIST, Cyclin D2, HIN1, and RARB in 50-1000 epithelial cells collected from breast ducts during endoscopy or by lavage. Such an approach could be used in a variety of small samples derived from different tissues, with these or different biomarkers to enhance detection of malignancy.

Actins↗

Very high frequency of hypermethylated genes in breast cancer metastasis to the bone, brain, and lung.

PURPOSE: Most often it is not the primary tumor, but metastasis to distant organs that results in the death of breast cancer patients. To characterize molecular alterations in breast cancer metastasis, we investigated the frequency of hypermethylation of five genes (Cyclin D2, RAR-beta, Twist, RASSF1A, and HIN-1) in metastasis to four common sites: lymph node, bone, brain, and lung. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Methylation-specific PCR for the five genes was performed on DNA extracted from archival paraffin-embedded specimens of paired primary breast cancer and its lymph nodes (LN) metastasis (n = 25 each); in independent samples of metastasis to the bone (n = 12), brain (n = 8), and lung (n = 10); and in normal bone, brain, and lung (n = 22). RESULTS: No hypermethylation was detected in the five genes in the normal host tissues. In paired samples, LN metastasis had a trend of higher prevalence of methylation compared with the primary breast carcinoma for all five genes with significance for HIN-1 (P = 0.04). Compared with the primary breast carcinomas, all five genes had higher methylation frequencies in the bone, brain, and lung metastasis, with HIN-1 and RAR-beta methylation being significantly higher (P < 0.01) in each group. Loss of expression of all five genes correlated, with a few exceptions, to hypermethylation of their promoter sequences in metastatic carcinoma cells microdissected from LNs. CONCLUSION: The frequent presence of hypermethylated genes in locoregional and distant metastasis could render them particularly susceptible to therapy targeted toward gene reactivation combining demethylating agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and/or differentiating agents.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancers of young African-American women have a higher frequency of methylation of multiple genes than those of Caucasian women.

PURPOSE: To provide a molecular rationale for negative prognostic factors more prevalent in African-American (AA) than Caucasian (Cau) women, we investigated the frequency of promoter hypermethylation in invasive ductal breast cancers in the two races. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HIN-1, Twist, Cyclin D2, RAR-beta, and RASSF1A were analyzed in DNA from 67 AA and 44 Cau invasive ductal breast cancers, stratified by age and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, by methylation-specific PCR. Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to determine estimated probabilities of methylation. Expression of HIN-1 mRNA was analyzed by in situ hybridization and quantitative reverse transcribed PCR. RESULTS: Significant differences between races were observed in the ER-/PR-, age < 50 subgroup; AA tumors had higher frequency of methylation (P < 0.001) in four of five genes as compared with Cau and also a higher prevalence (80 versus 0%; P < 0.005) of three or more methylated genes per tumor. No differences in gene methylation patterns were observed across the two races for ER+/PR+ tumors in all ages and ER-/PR- tumors in age > 50. ER+/PR+ status was associated with higher frequency of methylation in Cau tumors of all ages but only with the age > 50 subgroup in AA. Frequent Cyclin D2 methylation was significantly associated (P = 0.01) with shorter survival time. CONCLUSION: ER-/PR-, age < 50 tumors in AA women, have a significantly higher frequency of hypermethylation than in those of Cau women. Comparative studies, such as these, could provide a molecular basis for differences in tumor progression and pathology seen in the two races.

Black People↗

Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin elicits rapid and specific cytolysis of breast carcinoma cells mediated through tight junction proteins claudin 3 and 4.

Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) induces cytolysis very rapidly through binding to its receptors, the tight junction proteins CLDN 3 and 4. In this study, we investigated CLDN 3 and 4 expression in breast cancer and tested the potential of CPE-mediated therapy. CLDN 3 and 4 proteins were detected in all primary breast carcinomas tested (n = 21) and, compared to normal mammary epithelium, were overexpressed in approximately 62% and 26%, respectively. Treatment of breast cancer cell lines in culture with CPE resulted in rapid and dose-dependent cytolysis exclusively in cells that expressed CLDN 3 and 4. Intratumoral CPE treatment of xenografts of T47D breast cancer cells in immunodeficient mice resulted in a significant reduction in tumor volume (P = 0.007), with accompanying necrosis. Necrotic reactions were also seen in three freshly resected primary breast carcinoma samples treated with CPE for 12 hours, while isolated primary breast carcinoma cells underwent rapid and complete cytolysis within 1 hour. Thus, expression of CLDN 3 and 4 sensitizes primary breast carcinomas to CPE-mediated cytolysis and emphasizes the potential of CPE in breast cancer therapy.

Animals↗

HOXA5-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells is mediated by caspases 2 and 8.

HOXA5 is a transcriptional factor whose expression is lost in more than 60% of breast carcinomas. Our previous work demonstrated that the overexpression of HOXA5 in MCF7 cells resulted in cell death through a p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. To determine whether p53-independent apoptotic pathways are involved in HOXA5-induced cell death, we engineered a p53-mutant breast cancer cell line, Hs578T, to inducibly express HOXA5. Induction of HOXA5 expression led to cell death with features typical of apoptosis within 24 h, and the expression levels of mutant p53 and its target genes either decreased or remained unchanged. To decipher apoptotic pathways, the HOXA5-expressing cells were treated with a variety of apoptotic inhibitors. Besides a general caspase inhibitor, caspase 2- and 8-specific inhibitors largely abolished HOXA5-induced apoptosis, whereas caspase 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-specific inhibitors had no significant effects. Western blot analysis further confirmed that caspases 2 and 8 were activated after the induction of HOXA5 expression. Further, several small interfering RNAs which specifically silenced caspase 2 and caspase 8 expression significantly blocked HOXA5-induced apoptosis. HOXA5 expression could also sensitize cells to tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis by at least 100-fold. These results indicate that expression of HOXA5 can induce apoptosis through an apoptotic mechanism mediated by caspases 2 and 8.

Apoptosis↗

DNA methylation of RASSF1A, HIN-1, RAR-beta, Cyclin D2 and Twist in in situ and invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Little is known about epigenetic silencing of genes by promoter hypermethylation in lobular breast cancers. The promoter methylation status of 5 cancer-related genes (RASSF1A, HIN-1, RAR-beta, Cyclin D2 and Twist) was evaluated in 2 types of lobular cancers, in situ (LCIS) and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) (n = 32), and compared to ductal in situ (DCIS) and invasive (IDC) breast cancers (n = 71). By using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), 100% of ILC and 69% of LCIS cases were found to have 1 or more hypermethylated genes among the panel of 5 genes (compared to 100% IDC and 95% of DCIS). Two or more hypermethylated genes were detected per tumor in 79% of invasive and 61% of in situ lobular carcinomas compared to 81% of IDC and 77% of DCIS. By contrast, DNA from nearly all normal reduction mammoplasty tissues (n = 8) was unmethylated for the 5 genes. The methylation profiles of lobular vs. ductal carcinomas with respect to RASSF1A, Cyclin D2, RARbeta, and Hin-1 genes were similar, suggesting that gene silencing by promoter hypermethylation is likely to be important in both groups of diseases. Distinctly different, Twist was hyper- methylated less often in ILC (16%, 3/19 cases) than in IDC (56%, 15/27 cases) (p = 0.01). These results suggest that these 2 types of tumors share many common methylation patterns and some molecular differences. Additional studies might lend further understanding into the etiology and clinical behavior of this tumor type.

Adult↗

Loss of the tight junction protein claudin-7 correlates with histological grade in both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Claudins are transmembrane proteins that seal tight junctions, and are critical for maintaining cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial cell sheets. However, their role in cancer progression remains largely unexplored. Here, we report that Claudin-7 (CLDN-7) expression is lower in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of the breast than in normal breast epithelium, as determined by both RT-PCR (9/10) and Western analysis (6/8). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and IDC showed that the loss of CLDN-7 expression correlated with histological grade in both DCIS (P<0.001, n=38) and IDC (P=0.014, n=31), occurring predominantly in high-grade (Nuclear and Elston grade 3) lesions. Tissue array analysis of 355 IDC cases further confirmed the inverse correlation between CLDN-7 expression and histological grade (P=0.03). This pattern of expression is consistent with the biological function of CLDN-7, as greater discohesion is typically observed in high-grade lesions. In line with this observation, by IHC analysis, CLDN-7 expression was lost in the vast majority (13/17) of cases of lobular carcinoma in situ, which is defined by cellular discohesion. In fact, inducing disassociation of MCF-7 and T47D cells in culture by treating with HGF/scatter factor resulted in a loss of CLDN-7 expression within 24 h. Silencing of CLDN-7 expression correlated with promoter hypermethylation as determined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and nucleotide sequencing in breast cancer cell lines (3/3), but not in IDCs (0/5). In summary, these studies provide insight into the potential role of CLDN-7 in the progression and ability of breast cancer cells to disseminate.

Breast↗

Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues.

An aggressive approach to breast cancer control based on preventing the disease must complement efforts at effective treatment. To date clinical trials testing new chemopreventative agents have not generally met with the kind of success expected. A wide range of new breast cancer chemopreventative agents are poised to be tested in clinical trials. We review these novel agents and approaches, including those for which clinical trials have been initiated and those that are promising in the preclinical arena. Further progress in this area requires not only new agents, but novel methods for screening for risk assessment, sampling and development of intermediate biomarkers. We review these novel potential surrogate endpoints, including new imaging-techniques, breast sampling approaches, and methods to assess biomarkers in breast epithelium. Factors that could contribute to a meaningful choice of the chemopreventive agents and the design of clinical trials are discussed.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗

Role of homeobox genes in normal mammary gland development and breast tumorigenesis.

The role of homeobox-containing genes in embryogenesis and organogenesis is well documented. Also, a sizeable body of evidence has accumulated and supports the fact that homeobox genes, when dysregulated, are involved in tumorigenesis. However, the precise mechanisms of homeobox gene functions are largely unknown. The mammary gland, in which most maturation occurs postnatally, provides an ideal model for studying the functions of homeobox genes in both development and tumorigenesis. The expression of many homeobox genes has been detected in both normal mammary gland and neoplastic breast tissues. In the normal mammary gland, the expression of homeobox genes is coordinately regulated by hormone and extracellular matrix (ECM) and other unknown factors in a spatial and temporal manner in both stromal and epithelial cells. Animals with misexpressed homeobox genes displayed different extents of defects in ductal proliferation, side branching, and alveoli formation, implying that homeobox genes are important for normal mammary gland development. Recent studies of homeobox genes in breast cancer cells and primary tumors indicate that they may also play a contributory or causal role in tumorigenesis by regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and/or metastasis.

Animals↗

Methylation profiling of benign and malignant breast lesions and its application to cytopathology.

Methylation of tumor suppressor genes has been implicated in breast cancer development. However, methylation profiles of different breast lesions, subtypes of carcinoma in particular, have not been examined in detail. In this study, we use methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to generate gene methylation profiles of different breast lesions and to test the clinical utility of such profiles. We examined the methylation status of three genes, RARbeta2, RASSF1A, and cyclin D2, on 102 samples of breast tissue, from benign (n = 36), to in situ carcinoma (n = 21), to invasive carcinoma (n = 45). We found that almost all cases of invasive carcinoma (96%) contained at least one methylated gene from our panel, whereas gene methylation was less common among benign lesions (42%) and in situ carcinoma (76%). Of the three genes, cyclin D2 methylation was most specific for malignancy because only 1 of 35 benign cases was methylated at this gene (1 case was not informative). The major histologic subtypes of invasive carcinoma show similar methylation profiles in the genes examined. We next performed MSP analysis on archival breast fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy samples and corresponding surgical biopsy specimens and found a high concordance between the two types of specimens. We then analyzed 17 breast FNA biopsy samples with an indeterminate diagnosis. In this setting, MSP had a high specificity (100%) and modest sensitivity (67%) for identifying malignancy.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Cyclin E is a target of WT1 transcriptional repression.

WT1 was originally identified as a Wilms' tumor suppressor gene, but it may have oncogenic potential in leukemia and in some solid tumors. WT1 is a transcription factor that has been implicated in the regulation of target genes related to apoptosis, genitourinary differentiation, and cell cycle progression. Because induction of WT1 leads indirectly to increased p21 expression in osteosarcoma cells, we investigated the possibility that other genes involved in the G(1)/S phase transition might also be WT1 targets. Cyclin E plays a crucial role in the cell cycle by activating cyclin-dependent kinase 2, which phosphorylates Rb, leading to progression from G(1) into S phase. We identified several WT1 binding sites in the cyclin E promoter. We demonstrate that WT1 binds to these sites and that in transient transfection assays WT1 represses the cyclin E promoter. This activity is dependent on the presence of a binding site located downstream of the transcription start site. In intact cells, induction of WT1 expression down-regulates cyclin E protein levels. These results provide the first demonstration that WT1 can directly modulate the expression of a gene involved in cell cycle progression.

3T3 Cells↗

The role of WT1 in oncogenesis: tumor suppressor or oncogene?

Although originally identified as a tumor suppressor gene, WT1 is overexpressed in a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, including acute leukemia, breast cancer, malignant mesothelioma, renal cell carcinoma, and others. Overexpression of both wild-type and mutant WT1 has been reported. In some cases, this finding represents overexpression of a gene that should be expressed at lower levels, but in other cases, WT1 is expressed at high levels in a tissue type in which there is normally no expression at all. In this review, the mechanisms of altered WT1 expression are explored, including changes in promoter methylation. WT1 target genes that may be important for oncogenesis are discussed, as is the use of WT1 expression as a diagnostic tool. The prognostic implications of altered WT1 expression and the potential for immunotherapy aimed at WT1 are also discussed.

Animals↗

Distant metastasis in breast cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Distant metastasis is responsible for the death of nearly 45,000 women per year in the US alone. At present, we have no clear understanding about the genetic events that govern the ability of breast cancer cells to settle at and colonize in specific sites in the body. This information is critical for developing therapeutic strategies that would target the tumor cells and their supporting environment at distant sites. This review will discuss investigations on 1) the steps of the metastatic pathway, 2) innovative technologies such as radiologic imaging and molecular manipulations of cells that would help us to study metastasis in real time, 3) strengths and weaknesses of current models for studying metastasis, and 4) how best to design large comprehensive gene searches during metastatic progression of breast cancer. These advances will enable the development of therapies targeted towards blocking the outgrowth of metastatic cells.

Animals↗

Mitoxantrone mediates demethylation and reexpression of cyclin d2, estrogen receptor and 14.3.3sigma in breast cancer cells.

In addition to its action as a topoisomerase II poison, mitoxantrone is activated by formaldehyde to bind DNA, forming DNA-adducts specifically at 5'CpG and CpA sequences, with an enhancement of adducts at methylated CpG sites. The butyric acid prodrug, AN-9 (pivaloyloxymethyl butyrate), releases formaldehyde upon cellular hydrolysis and our previous studies have shown that mitoxantrone acts synergistically with AN-9 in cytotoxicity assays. In this paper, we investigated the impact of methylation levels in the cell on mitoxantrone-induced cytotoxicity using the colon cancer cell line HCT116 and its derived DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 and DNMT 3a knockout (DKO8) cell line. We found that decreased methylation levels in the DNMT-null cells led to at least a 2-fold reduction in mitoxantrone-induced cytotoxicity. Next, we studied the impact of mitox-antrone alone, and in combination with AN-9, on hypermethylated genes and their mRNA expression in breast cancer cells. Using methylation-specific PCR and RT-PCR, we found that mitoxantrone treatment of breast cancer cell lines resulted in demethylation of the 14.3.3s, Cyclin D2 and ERa genes, followed by re-expression of their mRNA. The effect of mitoxantrone on re-expression of key genes involved in cell cycle regulation, and ensuing death of the cells may be an additional, previously undiscovered mechanism of action of mitoxantrone.

14-3-3 Proteins↗