Biomedical subjects

Satoko Ishigaki

Publications and source records attributed to Satoko Ishigaki.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

CT depiction of small arteries in the pancreatic head: assessment using coronal reformatted images with 16-channel multislice CT.

BACKGROUND: To assess the capabilities of 16-channel multislice CT in acquiring almost exclusively arterial-phase images of the pancreas and depicting small pancreatic arteries in coronal reformatted images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 45 consecutive patients, arterial-phase contrast enhancement was measured in the aorta and its branches, portal venous system, and pancreas. Coronal reformatted images of 1.2- or 1.3-mm slice thickness at 0.8- or 0.9-mm intervals were generated from axial images acquired with 0.5-mm collimation. Two radiologists evaluated the quality of imaging in the arterial phase and the visibility of the pancreatic arteries in coronal reformatted images. RESULTS: Mean enhancement in the aorta and its branches was greater than 300 HU, while that in the portal venous system and pancreas was less than 100 HU. The images were judged to be suitable for delineating the pancreatic arteries in all patients. The following arteries were visualized: anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal (39 patients), posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal (41), anterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal (39), posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal (33), dorsal pancreatic (42), its right branch (34), and transverse pancreatic (37). CONCLUSION: Multislice CT can depict small pancreatic arteries using coronal reformatted images generated from almost exclusively arterial-phase axial images acquired with 0.5-mm collimation.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Interobserver agreement and performance score comparison in quality control using a breast phantom: screen-film mammography vs computed radiography.

Our objective was to evaluate interobserver agreement and to compare the performance score in quality control of screen-film mammography and computed radiography (CR) using a breast phantom. Eleven radiologists interpreted a breast phantom image (CIRS model X) by four viewing methods: (a) original screen-film; (b) soft-copy reading of the digitized film image; (c) hard-copy reading of CR using an imaging plate; and (d) soft-copy reading of CR. For the soft-copy reading, a 17-in. CRT monitor (1024x1536x8 bits) was used. The phantom image was evaluated using a scoring system outlined in the instruction manual, and observers judged each object using a three-point rating scale: (a) clearly seen; (b) barely seen; and (c) not seen. For statistical analysis, the kappa statistic was employed. For "mass" depiction, interobserver agreement using CR was significantly lower than when using screen-film ( p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the kappa value for detecting "microcalcification"; however, the performance score of "microcalcification" on CR hard-copy was significantly lower than on the other three viewing methods ( p<0.05). Viewing methods (film or CR, soft-copy or hard-copy) could affect how the phantom image is judged. Paying special attention to viewing conditions is recommended for quality control of CR mammograms.

Female↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multi-slice CT of thyroid nodules: comparison with ultrasonography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in comparison with ultrasonography (US) for the differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules and the evaluation of tumor extension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with thyroid nodules (14 malignant, 16 benign) who underwent both MSCT and US participated in the present study. MSCT with contrast enhancement was performed, and 3D shaded volume rendering (SVR) and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) were employed to differentiate benign from malignant nodules and to evaluate tumor extension. US images were obtained using a 7.5 MHz annular array probe. A three-point rating scale was used for image interpretation, and the kappa statistic was employed to evaluate agreement between MSCT and US. RESULTS: Sensitivity in differentiating benign from malignant nodules was found to be 85.7% for US and 78.6% for MSCT. Disagreement between MSCT and US occurred in assessing the homogeneity of the solid component and the presence of fibrous capsule. In two of seven T4 cases, MPR provided a more accurate diagnosis than US examination in detecting extracapsular invasion. CONCLUSION: For differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, US was found to be better than MSCT. However, MSCT could be useful for the evaluation of advanced cases with suspicion of extracapsular extension.

Diagnosis, Differential↗