PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Scott E Moser

Publications and source records attributed to Scott E Moser.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Student treatment on clerkships based on their specialty interests.

BACKGROUND: Student clerkship experiences may suffer if teachers are not sympathetic to students' clinical interests. PURPOSE: In this study, we quantified these experiences, compared reports of primary care and focused specialty students, and identified clerkships and teachers that posed special problems. METHODS: Students starting their 4th year at 6 schools completed a survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 75%. Students reported that these experiences, which were provoked by their clinical interests, were common: hearing deprecating comments about their interests, being denied learning opportunities, receiving lower evaluations, being discouraged from pursing their interests, and needing to be evasive for self-protection. Primary care students reported less mistreatment than focused specialty students. Students identified some clerkships and types of teachers as special problem sources. Students reported mistreatment triggered by clinical interests at twice the national rates for mistreatment triggered by race or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Such mistreatment is common and challenges medical schools to ensure that students are treated well regardless of their career aspirations.

Adult↗

Meet Dr. Wonderful.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Hospital Administration↗

The RAFT approach to academic detailing with preceptors.

We have adapted "academic detailing" as a method to deliver real-time faculty development to nearly all community preceptors, both rural and urban, using the RAFT technique (Rapport-building, Assessment, Focused preceptor development, Thanks/Trinkets). The method is expensive in terms of faculty time and can be difficult to schedule. However, it has proven to be a valuable, learner-centered method that reaches preceptors missed by traditional faculty development workshops. Preceptors experience support, both student and preceptor problems are identified and addressed early, and academic faculty gain a better understanding of the preceptor environment.

Clinical Clerkship↗

Treatment of medical students during clerkships based on their stated career interests.

BACKGROUND: Clerkship students often face questions from teachers about their career interests and may perceive that their responses change their clerkship experiences significantly. PURPOSE: To explore student experiences with "career interest" inquiries and how responses may influence clerkship experiences. METHODS: A qualitative study of 4th-year medical students by use of focus groups, whose experienced facilitators used a structured interview protocol. Purposeful sampling identified a representative group of participants. Transcribed focus group proceedings were analyzed with a predetermined theme matrix. RESULTS: Participants reported frequently facing career interest inquiries, feeling comfortable with some, and feeling threatened by others. The tone of inquiries ranged from casual to confrontational. Participants perceived that their responses could significantly influence the quality of teaching relationships, access to clinical opportunities, and grades. Students often responded vaguely or deceptively for self-protection. CONCLUSIONS: For clerkship students, career interest inquiries and how students respond can be high-stakes issues, potentially compromising teaching quality, equitable treatment, and fair evaluations. Further quantitative study is essential

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Which patients are most challenging for second-year medical students?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fostering appropriate attitudes toward patients begins with recognition of the physician's personal biases and preferences about patients. We sought to assist second-year medical students to identify those patient attributes that may influence their clinical behavior, especially in difficult patient encounters. This study's objectives were (1) to identify the principal patient characteristics reported by students to evoke negative or positive affective reactions sufficient to compromise the quality of patient care and (2) to examine differences between male and female students on these patient characteristics. METHODS: An anonymous survey was made of all second-year medical students attending a seminar on medical errors. Students recorded the three principal patient characteristics that might evoke in them a negative personal reaction sufficient to compromise the quality of clinical care. Students then recorded three principal patient characteristics that might evoke a positive reaction sufficient to compromise the quality of clinical care. The data were analyzed to identify the primary concerns of the entire group of students and any significant differences between male and female students. RESULTS: Information on negative attitudes was provided by 67 of 71 (94%) students and on positive attitudes by 70 of 71 (99%). Content analysis identified four general categories of patient characteristics associated with negative attitudes (patients who are rude, contributed to medical problem, are abusive to others, and other attributes). Five general categories (patients with whom students have personal connection or patients who have physical and/or social attractiveness, vulnerability, power/influence, and other) were associated with positive attitudes by the students. The leading patient attributes reported as likely to influence clinical behavior were the positive attributes of "personal connection" and "attractiveness." These were reported by 60% and 53% of the class, respectively, compared to the leading negative attributes of "rudeness" and "contributed to own condition," each reported by 51% of students. Significant differences between male and female students only occurred in the categories of "rude" and "attractive." CONCLUSIONS: Students are willing to disclose specific, personal attitudes toward patients that they perceive as sufficiently serious to influence the quality of clinical care. More than half of the students anticipated difficulty in providing optimal care to patients who exhibit certain characteristics. More students reported concerns about positive affective reactions to patients than about negative reactions. Medical education should address these issues in strategies to adequately prepare students for practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗