Biomedical subjects

Sean Marven

Publications and source records attributed to Sean Marven.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

In vitro effects of adriamycin: a dose-response study.

The in vivo effects of adriamycin (ADR) on the mouse and rat embryos are well described in the literature. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the in vitro effects of ADR. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ADR on the developing mouse embryo and to identify a dose of ADR, which could be used for further studies of ADR effects in vitro. CD1 mouse embryos were collected at day 8.5 post conception. They were cultured in the presence of different doses of ADR (0, 125, 250, 375 and 500 microM). After 24 h, the culture was stopped and the embryos (n = 77) were scored morphologically using the Brown-Fabro scoring system and the mean score for each organ was calculated. Dose-response plots were generated and the effective dose 50 (ED50) for each organ was identified from the plots. The effects of ADR on the developing embryo were found to be dose related and there is a dose-response relationship in most of the plots. The dose-response plots were found to be parallel for some organs. A dose of 250 microM ADR was identified as the appropriate dose for further in vitro studies. The effects of ADR on the embryos were dose related and there is a dose-response relationship in most of the developing systems. The presence of parallel dose-response plots for some regions is suggestive of similar mechanism of action of ADR on these regions. A dose of 250 microM of ADR was identified for the first time in the literature and could be used for further studies of the effects of ADR on the mouse foregut in vitro.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

PubMed2006

Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of routine staged reduction and closure at the bedside, using preformed silos with no general anesthesia (PSnoGA), compared to emergency operative fascial closure (OFC) under general anesthesia for gastroschisis (GS). METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control analysis of neonates with GS was performed between 1990 and 2004 inclusively. Assessment included demographics, method of closure, days on ventilator, days to first enteral feed, days to full oral feeds, days on parenteral nutrition, length of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with GS were treated in our institution between 1990 and 2004. Thirty-five underwent OFC, 4 had Bianchi ward reduction, and 26 received PSnoGA. Seventeen patients with bowel perforation, atresia, ward reduction, medical complications necessitating ventilation, or any other condition requiring urgent surgical intervention were excluded from the analysis. Patients were well matched for gestation and birth weight. Forty-eight patients (OFC = 27 and PSnoGA = 21) were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Median days on ventilator (4 vs 0; P < or = .0001) was significantly reduced, but there was no difference for days to full oral feeds (26 vs 31; P = .26), days on parenteral nutrition (25 vs 30; P = .28), and length of stay (32 vs 36; P = .32), respectively. Complications were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PSnoGA has outcomes statistically similar to OFC, although days on ventilator are significantly reduced. Slow reduction of the bowel avoids abdominal compartment syndrome and closure may be achieved without fascial sutures. PSnoGA is performed at the bedside and aims to avoid general anesthesia, a period of ventilation, and out-of-hours operating, thereby reducing costs. A prospective, multicenter, randomized control trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of PSnoGA.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMed2006

Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

BACKGROUND: Conservative management of advanced complicated appendicitis in children is becoming more common. Formation of an appendiceal mass or abscess may mitigate against urgent appendectomy during the acute stage, and conservative treatment followed by interval appendectomy has been advocated. We present our experience of interval laparoscopic appendectomy in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All children who were offered interval laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2000 and December 2004 were included. Retrospective case note analysis was performed and data collected included demographics, duration of symptoms, method of diagnosis, days of antibiotics, length of interval, operative time, length of hospital stay (conservative treatment and interval laparoscopic appendectomy), analgesia requirements, complications, and histology. RESULTS: Thirty-six children, median age 8 years (range, 1-15 years) diagnosed with appendiceal mass or abscess were offered interval laparoscopic appendectomy by two surgeons in our institution: one patient declined interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Median antibiotic treatment was 10 days (range, 3-23 days). Median length of stay for conservative treatment was 6 days (range, 1-27 days). Five children required percutaneous drainage. For the 35 children who had interval laparoscopic appendectomy, the median interval was 93 days (range, 34-156 days) and median operative time was 55 minutes (range, 25-120 minutes). Median length of stay for interval laparoscopic appendectomy was 1 day (range, 1-3 days). There were no complications following interval laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Interval laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed in children, is associated with a short hospital stay and minimal morbidity, analgesia, and scarring following conservative management of appendiceal mass or abscess. Interval laparoscopic appendectomy eliminates the risk of recurrent appendicitis and serves to excise undiagnosed carcinoid tumors. In future it may be possible to perform interval laparoscopic appendectomy as a day-case procedure in selected patients.

Adolescent↗