Biomedical subjects

Sebastiaan F W Neggers

Publications and source records attributed to Sebastiaan F W Neggers.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Spatiotemporal overlap between brain activation related to saccade preparation and attentional orienting.

Recent brain imaging studies provided evidence that the brain areas involved with attentional orienting and the preparation of saccades largely overlap, which may indicate that focusing attention at a specific location can be considered as an unexecuted saccade towards that location (i.e. the premotor theory of attention). Alternatively, it may be proposed that attentional orienting is simply relevant for preparing saccades, but the two processes may also be completely unrelated. In two experiments, we examined temporal activation of brain areas by measuring the electroencephalogram. Central cues indicated the likely side (left or right) at which a to-be-attended target would occur, or to which a saccade had to be prepared. Cue direction-related activity was determined, time-locked to cue onset. In addition, in our second experiment, delayed saccades had to be carried out, which allows to focus on processes strongly related to saccade execution. In nearly all tasks, an early directing attention negativity (EDAN), an anterior directing attention negativity (ADAN), and a late directing attention positivity (LDAP) were observed, time-locked to cue onset. Source analyses supported the view that this activity probably originates from areas within the ventral intraparietal sulcus (vIPS) and the frontal eye fields (FEF). The saccade-locked analysis also indicated that the FEF plays an important role in triggering saccades, but the role of vIPS appears to be minimal. The latter finding disfavors the premotor theory of attention, as it suggests that the relation between attention and action is less direct.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Neural correlates of human wayfinding in stroke patients.

Wayfinding is a complex cognitive function involving different types of information, such as knowledge about landmarks and direction information. This variety of processes suggest that multiple neural mechanisms are involved, e.g., the hippocampal system, the posterior parietal and temporal cortical areas. Although patient studies and imaging studies have given important insights in the exact neural circuitry underlying wayfinding, many controversies remain. Therefore, the current study sets out to further examine the neuroanatomical correlates of wayfinding in a sample of 31 stroke patients with unilateral lesions, tested with a series of different wayfinding tasks, including landmark recognition, landmark ordering, route reversal and route drawing. For all patients, the exact location of their lesion was determined using CT or MRI scans. Based on existing literature, a number of relevant brain areas were demarcated, after which the extent of damage to these areas was determined for each patient separately. Performance on the landmark recognition task was impaired by damage to the right hippocampal formation, whereas a weak correlation was found between damage to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and processing the order of the landmarks. Several brain areas were found to be involved in retracing a route from the end to the beginning, including the right hippocampal formation, the right posterior parietal cortex, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the right temporal lobe. Finally, damage to the right temporal lobe impaired the ability to draw the route.

Brain↗

PubMed2005

Brain areas involved in spatial working memory.

Spatial working memory entails the ability to keep spatial information active in working memory over a short period of time. To study the areas of the brain that are involved in spatial working memory, a group of stroke patients was tested with a spatial search task. Patients and healthy controls were asked to search through a number of boxes shown at different locations on a touch-sensitive computer screen in order to find a target object. In subsequent trials, new target objects were hidden in boxes that were previously empty. Within-search errors were made if a participant returned to an already searched box; between-search errors occurred if a participant returned to a box that was already known to contain a target item. The use of a strategy to remember the locations of the target objects was calculated as well. Damage to the right posterior parietal and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impaired the ability to keep spatial information 'on-line', as was indicated by performance on the Corsi Block-Tapping task and the within-search errors. Moreover, patients with damage to the right posterior parietal cortex, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the hippocampal formation bilaterally made more between-search errors, indicating the importance of these areas in maintaining spatial information in working memory over an extended time period.

Brain↗

PubMed2004

Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space.

Under many circumstances, humans do not judge the location of objects in space where they really are. For instance, when a background is added to a target object, the judged position of a target with respect to oneself (egocentric position) is shifted in the opposite direction as the placement of such a background with respect to the body midline. It is an ongoing debate whether such effects are due to a uni- or bi-directional interaction between allo- and egocentric spatial representations in the brain, or reflect a response strategy, known as the perceived midline shift. In this study, the effects of allocentric stimulus coordinates on perceived egocentric position were examined more precisely and in a quantitative manner. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the judged allocentric position (with respect to a background) is also influenced by the egocentric position in space of that object. Allo- and egocentric coordinates were varied independently. Also, the effect of background luminance on the observed interactions between spatial coordinates was determined. Since background luminance had an effect on the size of the interaction between allocentric stimulus coordinates and egocentric judgments, and no reverse interaction was found, it seems that interactions between ego- and allocentric reference frames is most likely only unidirectional, with the latter affecting the former. This interaction effect was described in a quantitative manner.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Spatial tapping interferes with the processing of linguistic spatial relations.

Simple spatial relations may be represented either in a propositional format that is dependent on verbal rehearsal or in a picture-like format that is maintained by visual-spatial rehearsal. In sentence-picture and picture-picture verification tasks, we examined the effect of an articulatory suppression and a spatial tapping dual task on the encoding of simple spatial relations (e.g., triangle left of circle). Articulatory suppression did not interfere, while spatial tapping lowered performance in both tasks. Apparently, both linguistic and perceptual inputs of simple spatial relations engaged the visual-spatial working memory. In the sentence-picture verification experiments, spatial tapping only hampered performance of participants who were classified on the basis of their RT patterns as having used a visual-spatial strategy, while it had no effect for those who were classified as having applied a verbal strategy. Therefore, this study provides converging evidence, using a dual-task methodology, that both separate verbal and visual-spatial strategies exist for the processing of simple spatial sentences.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2003

Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements.

To examine whether the motor inhibition of return (IOR) postulated by Taylor and Klein (1998, 2000) generalizes to manual guided movements or is restricted to saccadic responses, the following three experiments were conducted. The first experiment combined peripheral cues (which generate IOR) with four types of manual responses made to central targets (central arrow indicating the response location). The responses were made on a touch-screen and were the equivalent of either a detection keypress, a choice keypress, a detection-guided pointing movement, or a choice-guided pointing movement. No IOR was found for any of the responses. The second experiment replicated the main result under eye fixation control. In Experiment 3, peripheral cues and peripheral targets were used, and IOR was present in all responses. Overall, these finding suggest that motor-based IOR is restricted to the oculomotor system. Implications for motor-based IOR and attention-based IOR are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Intentionally-evoked modulations of smooth pursuit eye movements.

When observers pursue a moving target with their eyes, they use predictions of future target positions in order to keep the target within the fovea. It was suggested that these predictions of smooth pursuit (SP) eye movements are computed only from the visual feedback of the target characteristics. As a consequence, if the target vanishes unexpectedly, the eye movements do not stop immediately, but they overshoot the vanishing point. We compared the spatial and temporal features of such predictive eye movements in a task with or without intentional control over the target vanishing point. If the observers stopped the target with a button press, the overshoot of the eyes was reduced compared to a condition where the offset was computer generated. Accordingly, the eyes started to decelerate well before the target offset and lagged further behind the target when it disappeared. The involvement of intentionally-generated expectancies in eye movement control was also obvious in the spatial trajectories of the eyes, which showed a clear flexion in anticipation of the circular motion path we used. These findings are discussed together with neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the SP eye movements.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2002

Visual search is modulated by action intentions.

The influence of action intentions on visual selection processes was investigated in a visual search paradigm. A predefined target object with a certain orientation and color was presented among distractors, and subjects had to either look and point at the target or look at and grasp the target. Target selection processes prior to the first saccadic eye movement were modulated by the different action intentions. Specifically, fewer saccades to objects with the wrong orientation were made in the grasping condition than in the pointing condition, whereas the number of saccades to an object with the wrong color was the same in the two conditions. Saccadic latencies were similar under the different task conditions, so the results cannot be explained by a speed-accuracy trade-off. The results suggest that a specific action intention, such as grasping, can enhance visual processing of action-relevant features, such as orientation. Together the findings support the view that visual attention can be best understood as a selection-for-action mechanism.

Adult↗