PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sebastiano Biondo

Publications and source records attributed to Sebastiano Biondo.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Polymorphisms within inflammatory genes and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation is a risk factor for colorectal cancer and polymorphisms in the inflammatory genes could modulate the levels of inflammation. We have investigated ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the following inflammation-related genes: TLR4 (Asp299Gly), CD14 (-260 T>C), MCP1 (-2518 A>G), IL12A (+7506 A>T, +8707 A>G, +9177 T>A, +9508 G>A), NOS2A (+524T>C), TNF (-857C>T), and PTGS1 (V444I) in 377 colorectal (CRC) cancer cases and 326 controls from Barcelona (Spain). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant association between the SNPs investigated and colorectal cancer risk. CONCLUSION: The lack of association may show that the inflammatory genes selected for this study are not involved in the carcinogenic process of colorectum. Alternatively, the negative results may derive from no particular biological effect of the analysed polymorphisms in relation to CRC. Otherwise, the eventual biological effect is so little to go undetected, unless analysing a much larger sample size.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

[Randomized clinical study of polydioxanone and nylon sutures for laparotomy clousure in high-risk patients].

INTRODUCTION: The complications of surgical wound closure in patients with risk factors significantly increases morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in abdominal wall closure in patients with risk factors with the same closure technique and slow-absorbable or non-absorbable sutures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter, comparative study of polydioxanone versus nylon sutures. Laparotomies performed for intestinal diseases and hepatobiliopancreatic procedures in patients with at least one risk factor were included. Exclusions criteria were eventrations, interventions for obesity, the need for reinforcement sutures, uncommon incisions, life expectancy of less than 1.5 years and deaths unrelated to the wound. Closure was performed with monoplane, extracutaneous, continuous, en bloc, loop sutures. Infection, evisceration, dehiscence, extrusion, sinus, eventration, intolerance, and pain were evaluated. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 10 and 30 days, 3 and 6 months, and at 1 and 1.5 years. RESULTS: A total of 770 patients were included (451 in the polydioxanone group and 319 in the nylon group). A total of 78.05% were midline incisions, with a mean length of 23.3 cm. Caliber 1 sutures were most frequently used (85.45%), and 1.7 sutures were used per patient. No complications occurred in 94.03% with no differences between groups (94.7% polydioxanone and 93.1% nylon). The results were similar throughout follow-up. The surgical infection rate was 10%. No differences were found in any of the follow-up assessments in any of the variables analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal wall closure should be performed with continuous slow-absorption sutures such as polydioxanone since this type of suture has a similar complication rate to reabsorbable sutures and presents greater biocompatibility.

Female↗
PubMed2006

[Surgery in complicated colorectal cancer].

Colorectal cancer continues to have a serious social impact. A large proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Approximately one-third of patients with colorectal cancer will undergo emergency surgery for a complicated tumor, with a high risk of mortality and poorer long-term prognosis. The most frequent complications are obstruction and perforation, while massive hemorrhage is rare. The curative potential of surgery, whether urgent or elective, depends on how radical the resection is, among other factors. In the literature on the management of urgent colorectal disease, there are few references to the oncological criteria for resection. Uncertainly about the optimal treatment has led to wide variability in the treatment of this entity. The present article aims to provide a critical appraisal of the controversies surrounding the role of surgery and its impact on complicated colorectal cancer.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus about the risk factors for anastomotic failure after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that may contribute in anastomotic dehiscence. METHODS: A total of 208 patients who underwent left colonic resection and primary anastomosis for distal colonic emergencies were studied. Preoperative and operative variables analyzed for each patient were gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, indication for surgery, etiology of the disease, presence and grade of peritonitis, preoperative creatinine, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and leukocyte count, need for preoperative and operative transfusion. The end point was the clinical evident incidence of anastomotic leak. Bivariate comparisons of those patients with or without anastomotic leak were unpaired, and all tests of significance were two-tailed. A multivariate analysis, in which presentation of anastomotic leak was the dependent outcome variable, was performed by forward stepwise logistic regression model. RESULTS: One hundred five patients (50.4 percent) had one or more complications. Anastomotic leak was diagnosed in 12 patients (5.7 percent). Seventeen patients (8.2 percent) needed a reoperation for complication. The overall mortality was 6.2 percent (13 patients). Obesity was significant as a predictor of anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a factor predicting anastomotic leak risk after resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided colonic emergencies.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although a significantly decreased long-term survival has been observed in patients undergoing surgery for complicated colorectal tumors compared with uncomplicated ones, the role of radical oncologic surgery on emergency colonic cancer is not defined clearly. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a curative emergency surgery in terms of tumor recurrence and cancer-related survival compared with elective colonic surgery. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 1998, all patients with colonic cancer deemed to have undergone a curative resection were considered for inclusion in this prospective study. Patients were classified into 2 groups: group 1, after emergency surgery for complicated colonic cancer, and group 2, patients undergoing elective surgery. The main end points were cancer-related survival and the probability of being free from recurrence at 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 266 patients included in the study, 59 patients (22.2%) were in group 1 and 207 patients (77.8%) were in group 2. Postoperative mortality was higher in group 1 (P=.0004). After patients were stratified by the tumor node metastasis system, differences between the groups with respect to overall survival of stage II tumors (P=.0728), the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0827), and cancer-related survival (P=.1071) of stage III cancers did not reach statistical significance. Differences were observed for the overall survival in stage III tumors (P=.0007), and for the probability of being free from recurrence (P=.0011) and cancer-related survival (P=.0029) in stage II cancers. When patients with elective stage II tumors presenting 1 or more negative prognostic factor were compared with emergency patients affected by a stage II colonic cancer, no differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Curative surgeries for complicated colonic cancer are acceptable in emergency conditions. Cancer-related survival and recurrence in patients with complicated colonic cancers may approach that of elective surgery if a surgical treatment with radical oncologic criteria is performed.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Results and prognostic factors in the Hartmann procedure].

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of one-stage procedures in emergency colonic surgery many years ago has relegated the use of the Hartmann procedure to the most seriously-ill patients, which has led to the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with this surgical technique. The aim of our study was to investigate our results using Hartmanns procedure and to evaluate several prognostic factors of postoperative mortality in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2000, 79 patients (34 men and 45 women) with a mean age of 71.5 years underwent Hartmanns operation. Almost all the series (91.1%) had comorbidities. In this group of patients, morbidity and mortality were analyzed retrospectively, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to study prognostic factors of postoperative mortality. RESULTS: The indications for surgery were acute peritonitis (77.2%), intestinal obstruction (18.9%), and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.7%). The most frequent etiology was acute diverticulitis (36 patients), followed by complicated colorectal carcinoma (18 patients). In 70.9% of the patients (56 patients) one or more postoperative complications was observed. Reoperation was performed in 15 patients (18.9%) and overall postoperative mortality was 45.5%. Renal failure (creatinine > or = 120 micromol/l) and high surgical ASA score (III or IV) reached statistical significance as predictive factors of mortality in these patients (p=.001 and p=.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: The patients who underwent Hartmanns procedure with high surgical ASA score and/or renal failure were at significantly higher risk of mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Fecal incontinence. Patient assessment and classical treatments].

Fecal incontinence is a very common disease but its exact prevalence is largely unknown. The condition gives rise to personal and social stigma with severe repercussions for the patient. It can be caused by a large number of physiopathologic disorders and consequently there is a wide variety of treatments. In this article we review the incidence and etiology of fecal incontinence, physical and instrumental examinations (with description of the components of the anorectal laboratory), traditional medical and surgical treatments and, lastly, the results of sphincteroplasties.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2004

[Survival and recurrence in the multidisciplinary approach of colorectal cancer].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent causes of death in the general population. Our aim was to analyze our experience in the multidisciplinary approach of colorectal carcinoma during a three year period. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between January 1996 and December 1998, we studied prospectively 807 patients with colorectal cancer. The epidemiology, treatment and outcome(recurrence and survival) were analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 3 years. RESULTS: There were 598 colon (65.5%) and 279 rectal (34.5%) tumors in all the series. Surgical treatment was elective in 84% and urgent in 16%, and was considered radical in 598 cases (74.1%). Chemotherapy or radiotherapy was administered in 49.6% and 18.3% patients, respectively. The overall 3-year survival was as follows: stage I 97.5%, stage II 90.6%, stage III 75.2%, and stage IV 12.6%. The 3-year free-disease survival was as follows: in colon cancer 97.8% for stage I, 87.3% for stage II, and 71.4% for stage III; and in rectal cancer 96.8% for stage I, 85.1% for stage II, and 75.4% for stage III. During the follow-up 124 patients (20.7%) developed recurrence: local (2.8%), systemic (15.9%) or both (2%). The three-year survival in operated patients with liver metastases was 61.9%. CONCLUSIONS: We have observed adequate survival and recurrence rates which are the result are of systematic protocols established by a multidisciplinary team.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Large bowel obstruction: predictive factors for postoperative mortality.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value for mortality of several factors in patients with colonic obstruction and to study the differences between proximal and distal obstruction. METHODS: Two-hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for colonic obstruction were studied. Patients with an obstructive lesion distal to the splenic flexure were assessed as having a distal colonic obstruction. Resection and primary anastomosis was the operation of choice in selected patients. Alternative procedures were Hartmann's procedure in high-risk patients, subtotal colectomy in cases of associated proximal colonic damage, and colostomy or intestinal bypass in the presence of irresectable lesions. Obstruction was considered proximal when the tumor was situated at the splenic flexure or proximally and a right or extended right colectomy was performed. A range of factors were investigated to estimate the probability of death: gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, nature of obstruction (benign vs. malign), location of the lesion (proximal vs. distal), associated proximal colonic damage and/or peritonitis, preoperative transfusion, preoperative renal failure, and laboratory data (hematocrit < or = 30 percent, hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dl, and leukocyte count >15,000/mm3). Univariate and multivariate forward steptwise logistic regression analysis was used to study the prognostic value of each significant variable in terms of mortality. RESULTS: One or more complications were detected in 109 patients (46.5 percent). Death occurred in 44 patients (18.8 percent). No differences were observed between proximal and distal obstruction. Age (>70 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV score, preoperative renal failure, and the presence of proximal colon damage with or without peritonitis were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in the univariate analysis. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of proximal colon damage, and preoperative renal failure were significant predictors of outcome in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Large bowel obstruction still has a high of mortality rate. An accurate preoperative evaluation of severity factors might allow stratification of patients in terms of their mortality risk and help in the decision-making process for treatment. Such an evaluation would also enable better comparison between studies performed by different authors. Principles and stratification similar to those of distal lesions should be considered in patients with proximal colonic obstruction.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon.

OBJECTIVE: Although diverticulitis is the most common cause of large bowel perforation, other disease may result in left colonic peritonitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the incidence, management, and outcome of patients with different causes of nondiverticular left colonic perforations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1992 to September 2000, 212 surgical patients underwent emergency operation for distal colonic peritonitis. Perforations were caused by diverticulitis in 133 patients (63%) and by a nondiverticular process in 79 (37%). Mortality and morbidity in patients with nondiverticular perforation of the distal large bowel its relationship with the general conditions, the grade and the cause of peritonitis were analysed. Four types of surgical procedures were used. Hartmann's procedure was performed in 40 patients (51%); intraoperative colonic lavage, resection, and primary anastomosis (ICL) in 27 patients (34%); colostomy in 7 (9%); and subtotal colectomy in 5 (6%). RESULTS: Perforated neoplasm, the most common cause of peritonitis, was observed in 30 patients, colonic ischemia in 20, iatrogenia in 13, and other causes in 16 patients. One or more complications were observed in 57 patients (72%); among causes of perforation, colonic ischemia was significantly associated with the longest hospital stay and highest mortality. Eighteen patients (23%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Left large bowel perforation by nondiverticular disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The prognosis of patients is determined by the development of septic shock and colonic ischemia, as underlying disease, may influence patient survival.

Adult↗