PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Serge Poiraudeau

Publications and source records attributed to Serge Poiraudeau.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index (MKI). DESIGN: Prospective study. A cohort of patients planned for surgery of the wrist and/or fingers was evaluated within 48 hours before surgery and at least 6 months after surgery. SETTING: Patients were in hospitalized or private care in France. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Forty-two patients (36 women; mean age, 57.5y; range, 22-80y) were included in the reliability study. Fifty patients (42 women; mean age, 54.18y; range, 19-77y) were included in the validity study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome measures included the MKI, the overall mobility score of the wrist and fingers, the finger mobility score, a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain in the hands and wrists, morning stiffness duration, total score of tenderness, total score of swelling, grip and pinch strength, the Hand Functional Index (HFI), and the Cochin rheumatoid hand disability scale. Reliability was studied with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Responsiveness was assessed by the paired t test, the effect size, and the standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was good with an ICC of.90, and the Bland and Altman analysis showed homogeneous distribution of the differences, with no systematic trend. The MKI correlated well with the other mobility measures (HFI, the finger mobility score measured with the finger goniometer), indicating a good convergent validity, and the expected divergent validity with the other outcome measures (grip and pinch strength, total score of swelling, total score of Ritchie Articular Index, Cochin scale, VAS of pain) was observed. The 50 patients in the validity study were evaluated twice, before and after surgery, at a mean interval +/- standard deviation of 7.16+/-2.10 months (range, 6-15mo). Thirty-six patients (72%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the results of surgery, 7 (14%) were not satisfied or dissatisfied, and 7 (14%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The SRM and effect size values of the MKI were -.19 and -.10, respectively. Individual changes in the score had the best correlation (r(s)=.51) with overall patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The MKI has excellent validity and reliability. Individual changes in the score are clinically relevant. This index can be used in clinical practice and in therapeutic trials; it needs further study concerning its use for hand surgery.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a modified Lequesne index in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability and the construct validity of a modified version of the Lequesne index. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) fulfilling the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology completed the Lequesne index twice at a 3-h interval. Impairment outcome measures and patients' perceived discomfort in walking and handicap were recorded. An item-by-item analysis was performed. Items having insufficient psychometric properties were excluded. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included. One question assessing pain (question IE) had a weak reliability (Kappa (kappa) = 0.39) and was excluded. The test-retest reliability of the modified questionnaire was excellent (ICC = 0.95). Expected convergent and divergent correlations were achieved except for visual analog scale pain (VAS P) and VAS handicap (VAS H) (0.46 and 0.40, respectively), and the "a priori" double stratification was confirmed by factor analysis, explaining 48.7% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The modified form of the Lequesne index has sufficient psychometric properties to be used to assess pain and function in knee OA in a French population.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

A pilot study on the recovery from paresis after lumbar disc herniation.

BACKGROUND: Although the existence of a motor defect in discogenic sciatica is a sign of severity, the literature does not provide evidence for an immediate requirement for surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the course of sciatica with discogenic paresis and to determine possible prognostic factors for recovery or improvement. STUDY DESIGN: This open prospective multicenter study included patients with discogenic sciatica with paresis that had been developing for less than 1 month and was rated < or =3 on a 5-grade scale. Pain, the strength of 11 muscles, return to work, and analgesic intake were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Recovery and improvement were defined by pain not exceeding 20 mm or < or =50% of the initial pain score and a score of either 5 (recovery) or 4 (improvement) for the weakest muscle at inclusion. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; 39 (58%) patients were treated surgically and 28 (42%) medically. Surgically treated patients differed from medically treated patients by a higher rate of extruded herniation, a higher number of paretic muscles (6.3 vs. 5; P = 0.051), and a longer course of sciatica (31.4 vs. 17.3 days; P = 0.034). At 6 months, 7 (10.4%) patients were lost to follow-up; 32 (53.3%) had improved, including 18 (30%) recovered, 33 (85%) back to work and having a professional activity, and 22 (39%) still taking analgesics. The only significant difference between recovered and not recovered patients was mean age at inclusion (43 vs. 51 years, P = 0.034). There were no significant differences between improved and not improved patients. Moreover, the outcome was not different in the two treatment groups: there were 17 (53%) improvements in surgically treated patients, including 8 (25%) recoveries, and 14 (56%) improvements in medically treated patients, including 8 (40%) recoveries. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed no difference between surgical or medical management for recovery or improvement in patients with discogenic paresis. These results need confirmation by a randomized study.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Beneficial effects of information leaflets before spinal steroid injection.

UNLABELLED: How beneficial is the provision of information leaflets to low back pain patients before steroid injection under fluoroscopy? OBJECTIVES: To compare the value of information leaflets with verbal information on steroid injection under fluoroscopy. METHODS: Alternate month design. One hundred and twenty-three low back pain patients hospitalized for steroid injection under fluoroscopy were enrolled in the trial. Fifty-two patients received both written standardized information and non-standardized verbal information (intervention group), seventy one patients received only non-standardized verbal information (control group). Anxiety assessed at baseline evaluation and just before the injection; satisfaction related to the information received assessed on discharge day; knowledge about steroid injection assessed 4 hours and 1 month after the injection. RESULTS: Patients had a high anxiety level at baseline evaluation. Written standardized information did not decrease significantly anxiety (P = 0.068) before the injection, had no effect on pain during the injection, but increased patients' knowledge about the adverse effects on the day of injection and 1 month later (P = 0.040 and P = 0.084 respectively), and improve satisfaction with information received about potential complications of the steroid injections (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Providing an information leaflet to low back pain patents undergoing steroid injection under fluoroscopy tends to reduce state anxiety, and increases patients' knowledge and satisfaction with information about the risks of the injection.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain.

OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. DESIGN: Reliability and validity study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred one patients (mean age, 49 y). INTERVENTION: French translations were obtained by using the "translation-backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impairment outcome measures (visual analog scale [VAS] pain, neck range of motion, morning stiffness, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Three functional disability scales (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPDS], Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPQ]) were recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Test-retest was excellent for the NPDS and NDI (ICC =.91,.93, respectively) and good for the NPQ (ICC =.84). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Expected convergent and divergent validity were observed only for the NPDS; 3 main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. CONCLUSION: The 3 translated scales are valid, but the NPDS seems to have the best construct validity.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the scale used affects levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of studies on exercise therapy and chronic low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Twenty trials previously analyzed in a systematic review were assessed by 2 readers using 16 different scales. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital in France. PARTICIPANTS: Chronic LBP patients. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For the scales allowing classification into high- and low-quality trials, a rating system with 4 levels of evidence was used to summarize conclusions drawn. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlations between the scores obtained with the different scales. Interrater reliability of the scales was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method, and the degree of agreement between the readers was calculated using the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Two of the 3 main results of the systematic review (conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with inactive treatments; strong evidence that exercise therapy is more effective than usual care by a general practitioner) were influenced by the scale used. The range of the Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the different scales was wide (range,.49-.94), the interreader reliability of the scales was heterogeneous, and the interreader agreement was often low (kappa<or=.60 for 7/10 tests). CONCLUSIONS: The use of summary scores to identify physical therapy trials of high quality is questionable. Different quality assessment scales should probably be used to assess pharmacologic interventions and physical therapies. Development and validation of quality scales specific to physical treatments are needed.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Modulation of proteoglycan production by cyclic tensile stretch in intervertebral disc cells through a post-translational mechanism.

Proteoglycan production is one of the major extracellular matrix components implicated in the dynamic process of intervertebral disc degeneration. Mechanical stress is an important modulator of the degeneration, but the underlying molecular mechanism at the proteoglycan level remains unclear. The aim of this work was to study the regulation of proteoglycan production by cyclic tensile stretch applied to intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus cells. Matrix metalloproteinases do not seem to be implicated in the regulation of proteoglycan production. By contrast, nitrite oxide production is induced by cyclic tensile stretch, in a time, intensity, and frequency dependant manner. Using a non-specific nitric oxide synthases inhibitor [NG-methyl-L-arginine (L-NMA)], we suppress totally the inhibition of proteoglycan production induced by cyclic tensile stretch suggesting the implication of nitric oxide synthases in the observed phenomenon. Introducing the transcriptional inhibitor 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole or a more specific inhibitor of nitric oxide synthases II [N-iminoethyl-L-lysine (L-NIL)] did not affect the decreased proteoglycan production, which suggests a post-translational regulation. In contrast, N-omega nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) a more specific inhibitor of NOS I and III abrogated the cyclic tensile stretch-dependant inhibition of proteoglycan production. These results suggest that cyclic tensile stretch regulates proteoglycan production through a post-translational mechanism involving nitrite oxide. This result could be of interest in the development of local therapeutic strategies aimed at controlling intervertebral disc degeneration.

Animals↗