Biomedical subjects

Sergio Ruiz-Santana

Publications and source records attributed to Sergio Ruiz-Santana.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A bedside scoring system ("Candida score") for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a score for deciding early antifungal treatment when candidal infection is suspected in nonneutropenic critically ill patients. DESIGN: Analysis of data collected from the database of the EPCAN project, an ongoing prospective, cohort, observational, multicenter surveillance study of fungal infection and colonization in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. SETTING: Seventy-three medical-surgical ICUs of 70 teaching hospitals in Spain. PATIENTS: A total of 1,699 ICU patients aged 18 yrs and older admitted for at least 7 days between May 1998 and January 1999 were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Surveillance cultures of urine, tracheal, and gastric samples were obtained weekly. Patients were grouped as follows: neither colonized nor infected (n=719), unifocal or multifocal Candida colonization (n=883), and proven candidal infection (n=97). The odds ratio (OR) for each risk factor associated with colonization vs. proven candidal infection was estimated. A logistic regression model was performed to adjust for possible confounders. The "Candida score" was obtained according to the logit method. The discriminatory power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the logit model, surgery (OR=2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-5.06); multifocal colonization (OR=3.04, 95% CI, 1.45-6.39); total parenteral nutrition (OR=2.48, 95% CI, 1.16-5.31); and severe sepsis (OR=7.68, 95% CI, 4.14-14.22) were predictors of proven candidal infection. The "Candida score" for a cut-off value of 2.5 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 74%) was as follows: parenteral nutrition, +0.908; surgery, +0.997; multifocal colonization, +1.112; and severe sepsis, +2.038. Central venous catheters were not a significant risk factor for proven candidal infection (p=.292). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of nonneutropenic critically ill patients in whom Candida colonization was prospectively assessed, a "Candida score">2.5 accurately selected patients who would benefit from early antifungal treatment.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Benefits of minocycline and rifampin-impregnated central venous catheters. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of minocycline and rifampin-impregnated catheters compared to non-impregnated catheters in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Intensive care units of seven acute-care teaching hospitals in Spain. PATIENTS. Intensive care unit patients requiring triple-lumen central venous catheter for more than 3 days. INTERVENTIONS: At catheter insertion, 228 patients were randomized to minocycline and rifampin-impregnated catheters and 237 to non-impregnated catheters. Skin, catheter tip, subcutaneous segment, hub cultures, peripheral blood and infusate cultures were performed at catheter withdrawal. The rate of colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and catheter-related clinical infectious complications (purulence at the insertion site or CRBSI) were assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis (primary analysis), the episodes per 1000 catheter days of clinical infectious complications decreased from 8.6 to 5.7 (RR =0.67, 95% CI 0.31-1.44), CRBSI from 5.9 to 3.1 (RR =0.53, 95% CI 0.2-1.44) and tip colonization from 24 to 10.4 (RR =0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.73). Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters were associated with a significant decrease of coagulase-negative staphylococci colonization (RR =0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.45) and a significant increase of Candida spp. colonization (RR =5.84, 95% CI 1.31-26.1). CONCLUSIONS: The use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters was associated with a significantly lower rate of coagulase-negative staphylococci colonization and a significant increase in Candida spp. colonization, although a decrease in CRBSI, increase in 30-day survival or reduced length of stay was not observed.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2003

Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The hub connecting the catheter and the infusion equipment is a common portal of entry for bacteria causing catheter-related sepsis. We assessed the efficacy of a new hub model (Segur-Lock) that incorporates an antiseptic chamber filled with 3% iodinated alcohol in preventing endoluminal catheter contamination and catheter-related bloodstream infection arising at the hub. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study. SETTING: Seven medical and surgical adult intensive care units in Spain. PATIENTS: A total of 230 patients aged 18 yrs or older requiring the insertion of a nontunneled central venous catheter for >or=6 days from January 1, 1998, to April 30, 1999. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized at the time of catheter insertion to receive catheters with standard Luer-lock connector (control group, n = 114) or catheters with the new hub model (n = 116). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Skin, catheter tip, and hub cultures were performed at the time the catheter was withdrawn because therapy was terminated or due to suspicion of sepsis, in which case peripheral blood and infusate cultures were simultaneously taken. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 19 (8.3%) patients. Catheters were more often withdrawn because of suspicion of infection in the control group (43.8%) than in the new hub model group (30.1%, p <.035). The prevalence of culture-positive catheter hubs without associated bacteremia (colonization) was higher in the control group (14.4% vs. 4.3%, p <.001). Catheter-related bloodstream infection from the catheter hub also occurred more frequently in controls than in patients assigned to the new hub model (7% vs. 1.7%; p <.049; relative risk, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-19). CONCLUSIONS: This new antiseptic chamber-containing hub has proved to be effective in preventing endoluminal bacterial colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection from hub contamination in intensive care unit patients with central venous catheters inserted for >or=6 days.

Alcohols↗

PubMed2002

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications, the efficacy of diet administration, and the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients fed in the stomach or in the jejunum. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized multicenter study. SETTING: Intensive care units (ICUs) in 11 teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients who could receive early enteral nutrition more than 5 days. INTERVENTIONS: Enteral nutrition was started in the first 36 hrs after admission. One group was fed with a nasogastric tube (GEN group) and the other in the jejunum through a dual-lumen nasogastrojejunal tube (JEN group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gastrointestinal complications were previously defined. The efficacy of diet administration was calculated using the volume ratio (expressed as the ratio between administered and prescribed volumes). Nosocomial pneumonia was defined according the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definitions. One hundred ten patients were included (GEN: 51, JEN: 50). Both groups were comparable in age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score. There were no differences in feeding duration, ICU length of stay, or mortality (43% vs. 38%). The JEN group had lesser gastrointestinal complications (57% vs. 24%, p <.001), mainly because of a lesser incidence of increased gastric residuals (49% vs. 2%, p <.001). Volume ratio was similar in both groups. A post hoc analysis showed that the JEN group had a higher volume ratio at day 7 than the GEN group (68% vs. 82%, p <.03) in patients from ICUs with previous experience in jejunal feeding. Both groups had a similar incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (40% vs. 32%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal complications are less frequent in ICU patients fed in the jejunum. Nevertheless, it seems to be a necessary learning curve to achieve better results with a postpyloric access. Early enteral nutrition using a nasojejunal route seems not to be an efficacious measure to decrease nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Critical Illness↗