Biomedical subjects

SeungYeoun Lee

Publications and source records attributed to SeungYeoun Lee.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Combining multiple microarrays in the presence of controlling variables.

MOTIVATION: Microarray technology enables the monitoring of expression levels for thousands of genes simultaneously. When the magnitude of the experiment increases, it becomes common to use the same type of microarrays from different laboratories or hospitals. Thus, it is important to analyze microarray data together to derive a combined conclusion after accounting for the differences. One of the main objectives of the microarray experiment is to identify differentially expressed genes among the different experimental groups. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) model has been commonly used to detect differentially expressed genes after accounting for the sources of variation commonly observed in the microarray experiment. RESULTS: We extended the usual ANOVA model to account for an additional variability resulting from many confounding variables such as the effect of different hospitals. The proposed model is a two-stage ANOVA model. The first stage is the adjustment for the effects of no interests. The second stage is the detection of differentially expressed genes among the experimental groups using the residuals obtained from the first stage. Based on these residuals, we propose a permutation test to detect the differentially expressed genes. The proposed model is illustrated using the data from 133 microarrays collected at three different hospitals. The proposed approach is more flexible to use, and it is easier to accommodate the individual covariates in this model than using the meta-analysis approach. AVAILABILITY: A set of programs written in R will be electronically sent upon request.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Diagnostic plots for detecting outlying slides in a cDNA microarray experiment.

Different sources of systematic and random error variations are often observed in cDNA microarray experiments. A simple scatter plot is commonly used to examine outlying slides that have unusual expression patterns or larger variability than other slides. These outlying slides tend to have large impacts on the subsequent analyses, such as identification of differentially expressed genes and clustering analysis. However, it is difficult to select outlying slides rigorously and consistently based on subjective human pattern recognition on their scatter plots. A graphical method and a rigorous diagnostic measure are proposed to detect outlying slides. The proposed graphical method is easy to implement and shown to be quite effective in detecting outlying slides in real microarray data sets. This diagnostic measure is also informative to compare variability among slides. Two cDNA microarray data sets are carefully examined to illustrate the proposed approach. A 3840-gene microarray experiment for neuronal differentiation of cortical stem cells and a 2076-gene microarray experiment for anticancer compound time-course expression of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Evaluation of normalization methods for microarray data.

BACKGROUND: Microarray technology allows the monitoring of expression levels for thousands of genes simultaneously. This novel technique helps us to understand gene regulation as well as gene by gene interactions more systematically. In the microarray experiment, however, many undesirable systematic variations are observed. Even in replicated experiment, some variations are commonly observed. Normalization is the process of removing some sources of variation which affect the measured gene expression levels. Although a number of normalization methods have been proposed, it has been difficult to decide which methods perform best. Normalization plays an important role in the earlier stage of microarray data analysis. The subsequent analysis results are highly dependent on normalization. RESULTS: In this paper, we use the variability among the replicated slides to compare performance of normalization methods. We also compare normalization methods with regard to bias and mean square error using simulated data. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that intensity-dependent normalization often performs better than global normalization methods, and that linear and nonlinear normalization methods perform similarly. These conclusions are based on analysis of 36 cDNA microarrays of 3,840 genes obtained in an experiment to search for changes in gene expression profiles during neuronal differentiation of cortical stem cells. Simulation studies confirm our findings.

Analysis of Variance↗